<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc version 1.7.29 (Ruby 3.4.7) -->
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-hardaker-dnsop-dns-xfr-scheme-00" category="std" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF" tocInclude="true" sortRefs="true" symRefs="true" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.31.0 -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="DNS XFR URI Schemes">The DNS XFR URI Schemes</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-hardaker-dnsop-dns-xfr-scheme-00"/>
    <author fullname="Wes Hardaker">
      <organization>Google, Inc.</organization>
      <address>
        <email>ietf@hardakers.net</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2025" month="November" day="25"/>
    <area>Operations and Management</area>
    <workgroup>Domain Name System Operations</workgroup>
    <keyword>DNS</keyword>
    <keyword>DNSSEC</keyword>
    <keyword>zone transfer</keyword>
    <keyword>axfr</keyword>
    <keyword>ixfr</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <?line 63?>

<t>The DNS protocol provides an in-band mechanism for transferring the
contents of a zone from a server to a client.  This is most frequently
used when secondary servers are transferring the DNS zone content from
their configured primary server.</t>
      <t>This document defines a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) scheme for
referencing DNS servers from which DNS zone contents can be transferred.</t>
    </abstract>
    <note removeInRFC="true">
      <name>About This Document</name>
      <t>
        The latest revision of this draft can be found at <eref target="https://github.io/hardker/draft-hardaker-dnsop-dns-xfr-scheme/draft-hardaker-dnsop-dns-xfr-scheme.html"/>.
        Status information for this document may be found at <eref target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardaker-dnsop-dns-xfr-scheme/"/>.
      </t>
      <t>
        Discussion of this document takes place on the
        Domain Name System Operations Working Group mailing list (<eref target="mailto:dnsop@ietf.org"/>),
        which is archived at <eref target="https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/"/>.
        Subscribe at <eref target="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop/"/>.
      </t>
      <t>Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
        <eref target="https://github.com/https://github.com/hardaker/draft-hardaker-dnsop-dns-xfr-scheme"/>.</t>
    </note>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <?line 73?>

<section anchor="introduction">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t>The DNS protocol provides an in-band mechanism for transferring the
contents of a zone from a server to a client.  This is most frequently
used when secondary servers are transferring the DNS zone content from
their configured primary server.</t>
      <t>This document defines a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) <xref target="RFC3986"/> scheme for
referencing DNS servers from which DNS zone contents can be transferred.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="definitions">
      <name>Conventions and Definitions</name>
      <t>The key words "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL
NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>",
"<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they
appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
      <?line -18?>

</section>
    <section anchor="syntax">
      <name>Syntax of a DNS Transfer Protocol URI</name>
      <t>Current DNS transfer protocols exist in three fundamental forms:
Authoratative Transfers (AXFR) <xref target="RFC5936"/>, Incremental Zone Transfers
(IXFR) <xref target="RFC5936"/> and XFR over TLS (XoT) <xref target="RFC9103"/>.  This document
defines URI schemes for all three of these DNS transfer protocols.</t>
      <t>This document uses the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) of
<xref target="RFC5234"/>.</t>
      <artwork><![CDATA[
    xfr-URI = scheme ":" host [ ":" port ] "/" zone

    scheme = "axfr" / "ixfr" / "xot"

    zone = TBD
]]></artwork>
      <t>host and port are specified in <xref target="RFC3986"/>.</t>
      <t>The 'scheme' signifies which DNS zone transfer protocol should be used
(AXFR <xref target="RFC5936"/>, IXFR <xref target="RFC5936"/> or XoT <xref target="RFC9103"/>).  While these
two ABNF productions are defined in <xref target="RFC3986"/> as components of the
generic hierarchical URI, this does not imply that the "axfr", "ixfr"
and "xot" URI schemes are hierarchical URIs.  Developers <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> use
a generic hierarchical URI parser to parse a "axfr", "ixfr" or "xot" URI.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="semantics">
      <name>URI Scheme Semantics</name>
      <t>The "axfr", "ixfr" or "xot" URI schemes are used to refer to a DNS
server that offers zone transfer support.  These three protocols each
specify the details of how transfers are performed within their
respective specifications and are beyond the scope of this document.</t>
      <t>The required 'host' part of the xfr URI denotes the DNS server host.</t>
      <t>As specified in each transfer protocols specifications, the 'port'
part, if present, denotes the port on which the DNS server is awaiting
requests.  If absent for the axfr and ixfr transfer protocols, this
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be TCP port 53.  If absent for the xot transfer protocol, the
default port <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be TCP port 853.</t>
      <t>The 'zone' signifies the zone to be transferred and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be a fully
qualified domain name.  Note that 'zone' <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be "." to refer to the
DNS root zone.  When not referring to the root zone, the 'zone' <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
have a trailing "." (for example "zone.example.").</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>The "axfr", "ixfr" or "xot" URI schemes do not introduce new security
considerations beyond what is specified in their respective RFCs (AXFR
<xref target="RFC5936"/>, IXFR <xref target="RFC5936"/> or XoT <xref target="RFC9103"/>).  These schemes are
intended for use in documentation and configuration files that refer
to servers offering DNS zone transfers.  Documentation and
configuration files should carefully consider which protocol is most
suitable for use, and if possible the "xot" protocol should be
preferred if privacy or integrity of the zone contents are a concern.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>This section contains the registration information for the "axfr",
"ixfr" or "xot" URI schemes (in accordance with <xref target="RFC4395"/>).</t>
      <section anchor="axfr-uri-registration">
        <name>"axfr" URI Registration</name>
        <t>URI scheme name: axfr</t>
        <t>Status: permanent</t>
        <t>URI scheme syntax: See Section <xref target="syntax"/></t>
        <t>URI scheme semantics: See Section <xref target="semantics"/></t>
        <t>Encoding considerations: There are no encoding considerations beyond
those in <xref target="RFC3986"/>.</t>
        <t>Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name:</t>
        <t>The "axfr" URI scheme is intended to be used by applications with
   a need to identify a DNS server supporting authoritative transfer
   over DNS using the AXFR protocol for a zone.</t>
        <t>Interoperability considerations: N/A</t>
        <t>Security considerations: See Section <xref target="security"/></t>
        <t>Contact: Wes Hardaker <eref target="mailto:ietf@hardakers.net">ietf@hardakers.net</eref></t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="ixfr-uri-registration">
        <name>"ixfr" URI Registration</name>
        <t>URI scheme name: ixfr</t>
        <t>Status: permanent</t>
        <t>URI scheme syntax: See Section <xref target="syntax"/></t>
        <t>URI scheme semantics: See Section <xref target="semantics"/></t>
        <t>Encoding considerations: There are no encoding considerations beyond
those in <xref target="RFC3986"/>.</t>
        <t>Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name:</t>
        <t>The "ixfr" URI scheme is intended to be used by applications with
   a need to identify a DNS server supporting authoritative transfer
   over DNS using the IXFR protocol for a zone.</t>
        <t>Interoperability considerations: N/A</t>
        <t>Security considerations: See Section <xref target="security"/></t>
        <t>Contact: Wes Hardaker <eref target="mailto:ietf@hardakers.net">ietf@hardakers.net</eref></t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="xot-uri-registration">
        <name>"xot" URI Registration</name>
        <t>URI scheme name: xot</t>
        <t>Status: permanent</t>
        <t>URI scheme syntax: See Section <xref target="syntax"/></t>
        <t>URI scheme semantics: See Section <xref target="semantics"/></t>
        <t>Encoding considerations: There are no encoding considerations beyond
those in <xref target="RFC3986"/>.</t>
        <t>Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name:</t>
        <t>The "xot" URI scheme is intended to be used by applications with
   a need to identify a DNS server supporting authoritative transfer
   over DNS using the XoT protocol for a zone.</t>
        <t>Interoperability considerations: N/A</t>
        <t>Security considerations: See Section <xref target="security"/></t>
        <t>Contact: Wes Hardaker <eref target="mailto:ietf@hardakers.net">ietf@hardakers.net</eref></t>
      </section>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references anchor="sec-combined-references">
      <name>References</name>
      <references anchor="sec-normative-references">
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC3986">
          <front>
            <title>Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax</title>
            <author fullname="T. Berners-Lee" initials="T." surname="Berners-Lee"/>
            <author fullname="R. Fielding" initials="R." surname="Fielding"/>
            <author fullname="L. Masinter" initials="L." surname="Masinter"/>
            <date month="January" year="2005"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>A Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) is a compact sequence of characters that identifies an abstract or physical resource. This specification defines the generic URI syntax and a process for resolving URI references that might be in relative form, along with guidelines and security considerations for the use of URIs on the Internet. The URI syntax defines a grammar that is a superset of all valid URIs, allowing an implementation to parse the common components of a URI reference without knowing the scheme-specific requirements of every possible identifier. This specification does not define a generative grammar for URIs; that task is performed by the individual specifications of each URI scheme. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="66"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3986"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3986"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4395">
          <front>
            <title>Guidelines and Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes</title>
            <author fullname="T. Hansen" initials="T." surname="Hansen"/>
            <author fullname="T. Hardie" initials="T." surname="Hardie"/>
            <author fullname="L. Masinter" initials="L." surname="Masinter"/>
            <date month="February" year="2006"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document provides guidelines and recommendations for the definition of Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) schemes. It also updates the process and IANA registry for URI schemes. It obsoletes both RFC 2717 and RFC 2718. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4395"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4395"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5234">
          <front>
            <title>Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF</title>
            <author fullname="D. Crocker" initials="D." role="editor" surname="Crocker"/>
            <author fullname="P. Overell" initials="P." surname="Overell"/>
            <date month="January" year="2008"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Internet technical specifications often need to define a formal syntax. Over the years, a modified version of Backus-Naur Form (BNF), called Augmented BNF (ABNF), has been popular among many Internet specifications. The current specification documents ABNF. It balances compactness and simplicity with reasonable representational power. The differences between standard BNF and ABNF involve naming rules, repetition, alternatives, order-independence, and value ranges. This specification also supplies additional rule definitions and encoding for a core lexical analyzer of the type common to several Internet specifications. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="68"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5234"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5234"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5936">
          <front>
            <title>DNS Zone Transfer Protocol (AXFR)</title>
            <author fullname="E. Lewis" initials="E." surname="Lewis"/>
            <author fullname="A. Hoenes" initials="A." role="editor" surname="Hoenes"/>
            <date month="June" year="2010"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The standard means within the Domain Name System protocol for maintaining coherence among a zone's authoritative name servers consists of three mechanisms. Authoritative Transfer (AXFR) is one of the mechanisms and is defined in RFC 1034 and RFC 1035.</t>
              <t>The definition of AXFR has proven insufficient in detail, thereby forcing implementations intended to be compliant to make assumptions, impeding interoperability. Yet today we have a satisfactory set of implementations that do interoperate. This document is a new definition of AXFR -- new in the sense that it records an accurate definition of an interoperable AXFR mechanism. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5936"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5936"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8499">
          <front>
            <title>DNS Terminology</title>
            <author fullname="P. Hoffman" initials="P." surname="Hoffman"/>
            <author fullname="A. Sullivan" initials="A." surname="Sullivan"/>
            <author fullname="K. Fujiwara" initials="K." surname="Fujiwara"/>
            <date month="January" year="2019"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Domain Name System (DNS) is defined in literally dozens of different RFCs. The terminology used by implementers and developers of DNS protocols, and by operators of DNS systems, has sometimes changed in the decades since the DNS was first defined. This document gives current definitions for many of the terms used in the DNS in a single document.</t>
              <t>This document obsoletes RFC 7719 and updates RFC 2308.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8499"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8499"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9103">
          <front>
            <title>DNS Zone Transfer over TLS</title>
            <author fullname="W. Toorop" initials="W." surname="Toorop"/>
            <author fullname="S. Dickinson" initials="S." surname="Dickinson"/>
            <author fullname="S. Sahib" initials="S." surname="Sahib"/>
            <author fullname="P. Aras" initials="P." surname="Aras"/>
            <author fullname="A. Mankin" initials="A." surname="Mankin"/>
            <date month="August" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>DNS zone transfers are transmitted in cleartext, which gives attackers the opportunity to collect the content of a zone by eavesdropping on network connections. The DNS Transaction Signature (TSIG) mechanism is specified to restrict direct zone transfer to authorized clients only, but it does not add confidentiality. This document specifies the use of TLS, rather than cleartext, to prevent zone content collection via passive monitoring of zone transfers: XFR over TLS (XoT). Additionally, this specification updates RFC 1995 and RFC 5936 with respect to efficient use of TCP connections and RFC 7766 with respect to the recommended number of connections between a client and server for each transport.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9103"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9103"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2119">
          <front>
            <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
            <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner"/>
            <date month="March" year="1997"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8174">
          <front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba"/>
            <date month="May" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
      <references anchor="sec-informative-references">
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC7766">
          <front>
            <title>DNS Transport over TCP - Implementation Requirements</title>
            <author fullname="J. Dickinson" initials="J." surname="Dickinson"/>
            <author fullname="S. Dickinson" initials="S." surname="Dickinson"/>
            <author fullname="R. Bellis" initials="R." surname="Bellis"/>
            <author fullname="A. Mankin" initials="A." surname="Mankin"/>
            <author fullname="D. Wessels" initials="D." surname="Wessels"/>
            <date month="March" year="2016"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies the requirement for support of TCP as a transport protocol for DNS implementations and provides guidelines towards DNS-over-TCP performance on par with that of DNS-over-UDP. This document obsoletes RFC 5966 and therefore updates RFC 1035 and RFC 1123.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7766"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7766"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
    </references>
    <?line 246?>

<section numbered="false" anchor="acknowledgments">
      <name>Acknowledgments</name>
    </section>
    <section numbered="false" anchor="examples">
      <name>Examples</name>
      <t>The following are example XFR URIs specifying an 'axfr' URI for the
DNS root zone, an 'ixfr' URI for example.com, and a 'xot' URI for
zone.example on port 8853:</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>
          <t>axfr:b.root-servers.net/.</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t>ixfr:ns.example.com/example.com.</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t>xot:ns.zone.example:8853/zone.example.</t>
        </li>
      </ul>
    </section>
  </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source: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-->

</rfc>
