<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
<!ENTITY nbsp "&#160;">
<!ENTITY zwsp "&#8203;">
<!ENTITY nbhy "&#8209;">
<!ENTITY wj "&#8288;">
]>
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" category="info" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-ietf-detnet-ip-oam-11" obsoletes="" updates="" submissionType="IETF" xml:lang="en" tocInclude="true" tocDepth="3" symRefs="true" sortRefs="true" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.6.0 -->
  <?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>

<front>
    <title abbrev="OAM for DetNet over IP">Operations, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) for Deterministic Networks (DetNet) with IP Data Plane</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-detnet-ip-oam-11"/>
    <author initials="G." surname="Mirsky" fullname="Greg Mirsky">
      <organization>Ericsson</organization>
      <address>
        <email>gregimirsky@gmail.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Mach(Guoyi) Chen" initials="M." surname="Chen">
      <organization>Huawei</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>
          <city/>
          <code/>
          <country/>
        </postal>
        <email>mach.chen@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="D" surname="Black" fullname="David Black">
      <organization>Dell EMC</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>176 South Street</street>
          <city>Hopkinton, MA</city>
          <code>01748</code>
          <country>United States of America</country>
        </postal>
        <email>david.black@dell.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2024"/>
    
    <area>Routing</area>
    <workgroup>DetNet  Working Group</workgroup>
    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>
    <keyword>DetNet</keyword>
    <keyword>OAM</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <t>
	   This document discusses the use of existing IP Operations,
   Administration, and Maintenance protocols and mechanisms in
   Deterministic Networking networks that use the IP data plane.
      </t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section anchor="intro" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t>
   <xref target="RFC8655" format="default"/> introduces and explains Deterministic Networks (DetNet)
   architecture.
      </t>
      <t>
Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) protocols are used
   to detect and localize defects in the network as well as to monitor network
   performance.  Some OAM functions (e.g., failure detection), work in
   the network proactively, while others (e.g., defect localization) are
   usually performed on-demand.  These tasks are achieved by a combination
   of active and hybrid OAM methods, as defined in <xref target="RFC7799"/>.
      </t>
      <t>
   <xref target="I-D.ietf-detnet-oam-framework" format="default"/> lists the OAM functional requirements
   for DetNet, and defines the principles for OAM use within DetNet
   networks utilizing the IP data plane. The functional requirements
   can be compared against current OAM tools to identify gaps and
   potential enhancements required to enable proactive and on-demand
   path monitoring and service validation.
      </t>
      <t>
         This document discusses the use of existing IP OAM protocols and mechanisms in
   DetNet networks that use the IP data plane.
   </t>
    </section>
    <section numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Conventions used in this document</name>
      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Terminology</name>
        <t>
The term "DetNet OAM" used in this document interchangeably with longer version
"set of OAM protocols, methods and tools for Deterministic Networks".
</t>
        <t>DetNet    Deterministic Networks</t>
        <t>DiffServ   Differentiated Services</t>
        <t>OAM:      Operations, Administration, and Maintenance</t>
        <t>PREF      Packet Replication and Elimination Function</t>
        <t>POF        Packet Ordering Function</t>
        <t>RDI         Remote Defect Indication</t>
        <t>ICMP      Internet Control Message Protocol</t>
        <t>ACH       Associated Channel Header</t>
        <t>Underlay Network or Underlay Layer: The network that provides
   connectivity between DetNet nodes.  MPLS networks providing LSP
   connectivity between DetNet nodes are an example of the underlay
   layer.</t>
        <t>DetNet Node - a node that is an actor in the DetNet domain.  DetNet
   domain edge nodes and nodes that perform PREF within the domain are
   examples of a DetNet node.</t>
      </section>
      <!--
      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Keywords</name>
        <t>
   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
   NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED",
   "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
   described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119" format="default"/> <xref target="RFC8174" format="default"/> 
   when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
        </t>
      </section>
      -->
    </section>
    <section anchor="oam-data-plane" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Active OAM for DetNet Networks with the IP Data Plane</name>
      <t>
OAM protocols and mechanisms act within the data plane of the particular networking layer.
Thus, it is critical that the data plane encapsulation supports OAM mechanisms and enables them to be
   configured so that DetNet OAM packets follow the same path
   (unidirectional or bidirectional) through the network and receive
   the same forwarding treatment in the DetNet forwarding sub-layer
   as the DetNet flow being monitored.
</t>
      <t>
The DetNet data plane encapsulation in a transport network with IP encapsulations specified
in Section 6 of <xref target="RFC8939" format="default"/>.
For the IP underlay network, DetNet flows are identified
by the ordered match to the provisioned information set that, among other elements, includes the IP protocol, source port number,
destination port number. Active IP OAM
protocols like Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) <xref target="RFC5880" format="default"/> or
Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP) <xref target="RFC8762" format="default"/>,
use UDP transport and the well-known UDP port numbers as the destination port. 
For BFD, the UDP destination port is specific to the BFD variant,
e.g., Multihop BFD uses port 4784 <xref target="RFC5883"/>.
</t>
<t>
Thus a DetNet node must be
able to associate an IP DetNet flow with the particular test session to ensure that test packets experience the
same treatment as the DetNet flow packets. For example, in a network where path selection and DetNet functionality
   are based on 3-tuples (destination and source IP addresses
   in combination with DSCP value) that association can be achieved
   by having the OAM traffic use the same 3-tuple as the monitored
   IP DetNet flow.
In such a scenario, an IP OAM session between the same pair of IP nodes would share the network treatment
with the monitored IP DetNet flow regardless of whether ICMP, BFD, or STAMP protocol is used.
</t>
<t>
Most of on-demand failure detection and localization in IP networks is being done by using the Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP)
Echo Request, Echo Reply and the set of defined error messages,
e.g., Destination Unreachable, with the more detailed information provided through code points.
<xref target="RFC0792"/> and <xref target="RFC4443"/> define the ICMP for IPv4 and IPv6 networks, respectively.
Because ICMP is another IP protocol like, for example,
UDP, a DetNet node must able to associate an ICMP
packet generated by the specified IP DetNet node and addressed to the another IP DetnNet node
with an IP DetNet flow between this pair of endpoints.
</t>
      <section anchor="native-ip-section" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Mapping Active OAM and IP DetNet flows</name>
        <t>
IP OAM protocols are used to detect failures (e.g., BFD <xref target="RFC5880"/>)
and performance degradation (e.g., STAMP <xref target="RFC8762"/>) that affect an IP DetNet flow.
When the UDP destination port number used by the OAM protocol is assigned by IANA, then judicious selection of the UDP
   source port may be able to achieve co-routedness of OAM with the
   monitored IP DetNet flow in multipath environments, e.g., Link
   Aggregation Group or Equal Cost Multipath, via use of a UDP
   source port value that results in the OAM traffic and the monitored
   IP DetNet flow hashing to the same path based on the packet header
   hashes used for path selection.
(That also applies to encapsulation techniques described in <xref target="ip-udp-section"/> and <xref target="detnet-udp-section"/>.)
To ensure the accuracy of OAM results in detecting failures and
monitoring the performance of IP DetNet, it is essential that test packets not only traverse the same path as the monitored IP DetNet flow
but also receive the same treatment by the nodes, e.g., shaping, filtering, policing, and availability of the pre-allocated resources,
as experienced by the IP DetNet packet. That correlation between the particular IP OAM session and the monitored IP DetNet flow
can be achieved by using DetNet provisioning information (e.g., <xref target="I-D.ietf-detnet-yang"/>). Each IP OAM protocol session
is presented as a DetNet Application with related service and forwarding sub-layers. The forwarding sub-layer of the IP OAM session
is identical to the forwarding sub-layer of the monitored IP DetNet flow, except for information
in the grouping ip-header, defined in  <xref target="I-D.ietf-detnet-yang"/>.
<!--

-->
</t>
      </section>
      
      <section anchor="ip-udp-section" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Active OAM Using IP-in-UDP Encapsulation</name>
        <t>
As described above, active IP OAM is realized through several protocols. Some protocols use UDP transport,
while ICMP is a network-layer protocol. The amount of operational work mapping IP OAM protocols
to the monitored DetNet flow can be reduced by using an IP/UDP tunnel to carry IP test packets (<xref target="RFC2003"/>).
Then, to ensure that OAM packets traverse the same set of nodes and links, the IP/UDP tunnel
must be mapped to the monitored DetNet flow. Note that the DetNet domain for the test packet
is seen as a single IP link in such a case. As a result, transit DetNet IP nodes cannot be traced
using the usual traceroute procedure, and a modification of the traceroute may be required.
      </t>
        </section>
        
      <section anchor="detnet-udp-section" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Active OAM Using DetNet-in-UDP Encapsulation</name>
        <t>
Active OAM in IP DetNet can be realized using DetNet-in-UDP encapsulation.
Using DetNet-in-UDP tunnel between IP DetNet nodes   ensures that active OAM test packets follow the same path through
   the network as the monitored IP DetNet flow packets and receive
   the same forwarding treatment in the DetNet forwarding sub-layer
   (see Section 4.1.2 of <xref target="RFC8655"/>) as the IP DetNet flow
   being monitored.
</t>
<t>
<xref target="I-D.ietf-detnet-mpls-over-ip-preof"/> describes how DetNet with MPLS over UDP/IP data plane <xref target="RFC9025"/> can be used
to support Packet Replication, Elimination, and Ordering Functions to potentially lower packet loss, improve the probability of on-time packet delivery
and ensure in-order packet delivery in IP DetNet's service sub-layer. To ensure that an active OAM test packet follows the path of the monitored
DetNet flow in the DetNet service sub-layer the encapsulation shown in <xref target="ip-detnet-udp-oam"/> is used.
</t>
        <figure anchor="ip-detnet-udp-oam">
          <name>DetNet Associated Channel Header Format</name>
          <artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[    
      +---------------------------------+
      |                                 |
      |         DetNet App-Flow         |
      |       (original IP) Packet      |
      |                                 |
      +---------------------------------+ <--\
      |            DetNet ACH           |    |
      +---------------------------------+    +--> PREOF capable
      |       Service-ID (S-Label)      |    |    DetNet IP data
      +---------------------------------+    |    plane encapsulation
      |            UDP Header           |    |
      +---------------------------------+    |
      |            IP Header            |    |
      +---------------------------------+ <--/
      |            Data-Link            |
      +---------------------------------+
      |             Physical            |
      +---------------------------------+

]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>
                where DetNet ACH is the DetNet Associated Channel Header defined in <xref target="I-D.ietf-detnet-mpls-oam"/>.
        </t>

      </section>
      
      <section anchor="over-gre-section" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Active OAM Using GRE-in-UDP Encapsulation</name>
        <t>
<xref target="RFC8086" format="default"/> has defined the method of encapsulating GRE (Generic Routing Encapsulation) headers
in UDP. GRE-in-UDP encapsulation can be used for IP DetNet OAM as it eases the task of mapping an OAM test session
to a particular IP DetNet flow that is identified by N-tuple. Matching a GRE-in-UDP tunnel to the monitored IP DetNet flow
enables the use of Y.1731/G.8013 <xref target="ITU-T.1731" format="default"/> as a comprehensive toolset of OAM. The Protocol Type field
in GRE header must be set to 0x8902 assigned by IANA to IEEE 802.1ag Connectivity Fault Management (CFM) Protocol / ITU-T Recommendation Y.1731.
Y.1731/G.8013 supports necessary for IP DetNet OAM functions, i.e., continuity check, one-way packet loss and packet delay measurement.
</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <!--
<section anchor="hybrid-oam" title="Use of Hybrid OAM in DetNet">
<t>Hybrid OAM methods are used in performance monitoring and defined in <xref target="RFC7799"/> as:
<list>
<t>Hybrid Methods are Methods of Measurement that use a combination of
   Active Methods and Passive Methods.</t>
   </list>
   A hybrid measurement method may produce metrics as close to passive,
   but it still alters something in a data packet even if that is the value of a 
   designated field in the packet encapsulation. One example of such a hybrid measurement method
   is the Alternate Marking method (AMM) described in <xref target="RFC8321"/>. One of the advantages
   of the use of AMM in a DetNet domain with the IP data plane is that the marking is applied to a data flow,
   thus ensuring that measured metrics are directly applicable to the DetNet flow.
   </t>
</section>
-->

<section anchor="ip-over-tsn-sec" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Active OAM for DetNet IP Interworking with OAM of non-IP DetNet domains</name>
      <t>
A domain in which IP data plane provides DetNet service could be used
in conjunction with a TSN and a DetNet domain with MPLS data plane to deliver end-to-end service.
In such scenarios, the ability to detect defects and monitor performance using OAM is essential.
<xref target="I-D.ietf-detnet-mpls-oam" format="default"/> identified two OAM interworking models - peering and tunneling.
Interworking between DetNet domains with IP and MPLS data planes analyzed in Section 6.2 of <xref target="I-D.ietf-detnet-mpls-oam" format="default"/>.
Also, requirements and recommendations for OAM interworking between a DetNet domain with MPLS data plane and OAM of a TSN
equally apply to a DetNet domain with an IP data plane.
</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>
  This document does not have any requests for IANA allocation. This section can be deleted before the publication of the draft.
      </t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>
   This document describes the applicability of the existing Fault Management and
   Performance Monitoring IP OAM protocols.
   It does not raise any security concerns or issues in addition to ones common to networking or
   already documented in <xref target="RFC0792"/>, <xref target="RFC4443"/>, <xref target="RFC5880"/>,
   and <xref target="RFC8762"/> for the referenced DetNet and OAM protocols.
      </t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="ack" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Acknowledgment</name>
      <t>
TBA
      </t>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <!-- References split into informative and normative -->

    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references>
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <!--
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml"/>
        -->
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.0792.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4443.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8086.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8655.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-oam.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8939.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9025.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2003.xml"/>
          <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-ietf-detnet-yang.xml"/>
        <!--
    <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6310"?>
    <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7023"?>
   <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-detnet-ip-over-mpls"?>
   <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-detnet-ip-over-tsn"?>
   -->
    </references>
      <references>
        <name>Informational References</name>
        <reference anchor="ITU-T.1731">
          <front>
            <title>Operations, administration and maintenance (OAM) functions and mechanisms for Ethernet-based networks</title>
            <author>
              <organization>ITU-T</organization>
            </author>
            <date month="August" year="2015"/>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="ITU-T" value="G.8013/Y.1731"/>
        </reference>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7799.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8762.xml"/>
        <!-- <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8321"?> -->
    <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5880.xml"/>
    <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5883.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-ietf-detnet-oam-framework.xml"/>
       <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-ip-preof.xml"/>
      </references>
    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>
