<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" category="std" consensus="true" docName="draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-21" ipr="trust200902" obsoletes="" updates="" submissionType="IETF" xml:lang="en" tocInclude="true" symRefs="true" sortRefs="true" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.9.0 -->
  <?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>
  <front>
    <title abbrev="SRv6 Mobile User-Plane">
			Segment Routing IPv6 for Mobile User Plane</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-21"/>
    <author fullname="Satoru Matsushima" initials="S." surname="Matsushima" role="editor">
      <organization abbrev="SoftBank">SoftBank</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>
          <city/>
          <region/>
          <code/>
          <country>Japan</country>
        </postal>
        <email>satoru.matsushima@g.softbank.co.jp</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Clarence Filsfils" initials="C." surname="Filsfils">
      <organization abbrev="Cisco Systems, Inc.">
				Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>
          <city/>
          <region/>
          <code/>
          <country>Belgium</country>
        </postal>
        <email>cf@cisco.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Miya Kohno" initials="M." surname="Kohno">
      <organization abbrev="Cisco Systems, Inc.">
		Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>
          <city/>
          <region/>
          <code/>
          <country>Japan</country>
        </postal>
        <email>mkohno@cisco.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Pablo Camarillo Garvia" initials="P." surname="Camarillo" role="editor">
      <organization abbrev="Cisco Systems, Inc.">
			Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>
          <city/>
          <region/>
          <code/>
          <country>Spain</country>
        </postal>
        <email>pcamaril@cisco.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Daniel Voyer" initials="D." surname="Voyer">
      <organization abbrev="Bell Canada">Bell Canada</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>
          <city/>
          <region/>
          <code/>
          <country>Canada</country>
        </postal>
        <email>daniel.voyer@bell.ca</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Charles E. Perkins" initials="C.E." surname="Perkins">
      <organization abbrev="Lupin Lodge">Lupin Lodge</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>20600 Aldercroft Heights Rd.</street>
          <city>Los Gatos</city>
          <code>95033</code>
          <region>CA</region>
          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>
        <email>charliep@computer.org</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2022"/>
    <workgroup>DMM Working Group</workgroup>
    <abstract>
      <t>
        This document specifies the applicability of SRv6 (Segment Routing IPv6)
        to the user-plane of mobile networks. The network programming nature
        of SRv6 accomplishes mobile user-plane functions in a simple manner.
        The statelessness of SRv6 and its ability to control both service
        layer path and underlying transport can be beneficial to the mobile
        user-plane, providing flexibility, end-to-end network slicing, and
        SLA control for various applications.
      </t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t> In mobile networks, mobility systems provide
        connectivity over a wireless link to stationary and non-stationary nodes.
        The user-plane establishes a tunnel between the mobile node and its anchor
        node over IP-based backhaul and core networks. </t>
      <t> This document specifies the applicability of SRv6 (Segment
        Routing IPv6) to mobile networks. </t>
      <t>Segment Routing <xref target="RFC8402" format="default"/> is a source routing architecture: a node steers a packet through an ordered list of instructions called "segments". A segment can represent any instruction, topological or service based.</t>
      <t>SRv6 applied to mobile networks enables a source-routing based
        mobile architecture, where operators can explicitly indicate a route
        for the packets to and from the mobile node.  The SRv6 Endpoint nodes
        serve as mobile user-plane anchors.</t>
    </section>
    <!-- End section "Introduction" -->

  <section numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Conventions and Terminology</name>
      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL",
	    "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
	    "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
	    <xref target="RFC2119" format="default"/>.
      </t>
      <section anchor="terms" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Terminology</name>
        <ul spacing="compact">
          <li>CNF: Cloud-native Network Function</li>
          <li>NFV: Network Function Virtualization </li>
          <li>PDU: Packet Data Unit</li>
          <li>PDU Session: Context of a UE connects to a mobile network.</li>
          <li>UE: User Equipment </li>
          <li>UPF: User Plane Function </li>
          <li>VNF: Virtual Network Function (including CNFs)</li>
        </ul>
        <t>The following terms used within this document are defined in
            <xref target="RFC8402" format="default"/>: Segment Routing, SR Domain, Segment ID (SID), SRv6, SRv6
            SID, Active Segment, SR Policy, Prefix SID, Adjacency SID and Binding SID.</t>
        <t> The following terms used within this document are defined in
            <xref target="RFC8754" format="default"/>: SRH, SR Source Node, Transit Node, SR Segment Endpoint
            Node and Reduced SRH.</t>
        <t>The following terms used within this document are defined in <xref target="RFC8986" format="default"/>: NH, SL, FIB, SA, DA, SRv6 SID behavior, SRv6 Segment Endpoint Behavior.</t>
      </section>
      <!-- End subsection "Terminology" -->

        <section anchor="conventions" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Conventions</name>
        <t>An SR Policy is resolved to a SID list. A SID list is represented as &lt;S1, S2, S3&gt; where S1 is the first SID to visit, S2 is the second SID to visit, and S3 is the last SID to visit along the SR path.</t>
        <t>(SA,DA) (S3, S2, S1; SL) represents an IPv6 packet with:</t>
        <ul spacing="compact">
          <li>Source Address is SA, Destination Address is DA, and next-header is SRH</li>
          <li>SRH with SID list &lt;S1, S2, S3&gt; with Segments Left = SL</li>
          <li>Note the difference between the &lt;&gt; and () symbols: &lt;S1, S2, S3&gt; represents a SID list where S1 is the first SID and S3 is the last SID to traverse. (S3, S2, S1; SL) represents the same SID list but encoded in the SRH format where the rightmost SID in the SRH is the first SID and the leftmost SID in the SRH is the last SID. When referring to an SR policy in a high-level use-case, it is simpler to use the &lt;S1, S2, S3&gt; notation. When referring to an illustration of the detailed packet behavior, the (S3, S2, S1; SL) notation is more convenient.</li>
          <li>The payload of the packet is omitted.</li>
        </ul>
        <t>SRH[n]: A shorter representation of Segment List[n], as defined in <xref target="RFC8754" format="default"/>. SRH[SL] can be different from the DA of the IPv6 header.</t>
        <ul spacing="compact">
          <li> gNB::1 is an IPv6 address (SID) assigned to the gNB.</li>
          <li> U1::1 is an IPv6 address (SID) assigned to UPF1.</li>
          <li> U2::1 is an IPv6 address (SID) assigned to UPF2.</li>
          <li> U2:: is the Locator of UPF2.</li>
        </ul>
      </section>
      <!-- End subsection  "Conventions" -->

        <section anchor="srv6-funcs" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Predefined SRv6 Endpoint Behaviors</name>
        <t>
	    The following SRv6 Endpoint Behaviors are defined in
	    <xref target="RFC8986" format="default"/>.
        </t>
        <ul spacing="compact">
          <li> End.DT4: Decapsulation and Specific IPv4 Table Lookup</li>
          <li> End.DT6: Decapsulation and Specific IPv6 Table Lookup</li>
          <li> End.DT46: Decapsulation and Specific IP Table Lookup</li>
          <li> End.DX4: Decapsulation and IPv4 Cross-Connect</li>
          <li> End.DX6: Decapsulation and IPv6 Cross-Connect</li>
          <li> End.DX2: Decapsulation and L2 Cross-Connect</li>
          <li> End.T: Endpoint with specific IPv6 Table Lookup</li>
        </ul>
        <t>
	    This document defines new SRv6 Segment Endpoint Behaviors in <xref target="srv6_functions" format="default"/>.</t>
      </section>
      <!-- End section "Predefined SRv6 Functions" -->

    </section>
    <!-- End section "Conventions and Terminology" -->

    <section anchor="motivations" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Motivation</name>
      <t> Mobile networks are becoming more challenging to operate.
	On one hand, traffic is constantly growing, and latency requirements
	are tighter; on the other-hand, there are new use-cases like
	distributed NFVi that are also challenging network operations.</t>
      <t> The current architecture of mobile networks does not take into account
	the underlying transport.  The user-plane is rigidly fragmented into
	radio access, core and service networks, connected by tunneling
	according to user-plane roles such as access and anchor nodes. These
	factors have made it difficult for the operator
	to optimize and operate the data-path.
      </t>
      <t> In the meantime,
	applications have shifted to use IPv6, and network operators
	have started adopting IPv6 as their IP transport.
        SRv6, the IPv6 dataplane instantiation of Segment Routing
	<xref target="RFC8402" format="default"/>, integrates both
	the application data-path and the underlying transport layer into
	a single protocol, allowing operators to optimize the network in a
	simplified manner and removing forwarding state from the network. It is also
  suitable for virtualized environments, like VNF/CNF to VNF/CNF networking. SRv6 has been deployed in dozens of networks <xref target="I-D.matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status" format="default"/>.</t>
      <t> SRv6 defines the network-programming concept <xref target="RFC8986" format="default"/>.
  Applied to mobility, SRv6 can provide the user-plane behaviors needed
  for mobility management.  SRv6 takes advantage of the underlying transport
  awareness and flexibility together with the ability to also include services to optimize the end-to-end mobile dataplane.</t>
      <t>The use-cases for SRv6 mobility are discussed in <xref target="I-D.camarilloelmalky-springdmm-srv6-mob-usecases" format="default"/>, and the architetural benefits are discussed in <xref target="I-D.kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch" />. </t>
    </section>
    <!-- End section "Motivation" -->

    <section anchor="scenarios" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>3GPP Reference Architecture</name>
      <t> This section presents a reference architecture and possible deployment
        scenarios.</t>
      <t> <xref target="fig_5g-ref-arch" format="default"/> shows a reference diagram from
        the 5G packet core architecture <xref target="TS.23501" format="default"/>.</t>
      <t> The user plane described in this document does not depend on any
	specific architecture.  The 5G packet core architecture as shown is
	based on the latest 3GPP standards at the time of writing this draft.</t>
      <figure anchor="fig_5g-ref-arch">
        <name>3GPP 5G Reference Architecture</name>
        <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
                                +-----+
                                | AMF |
                               /+-----+
                              /    | [N11]
                       [N2]  /  +-----+
                     +------/   | SMF |
                    /           +-----+
                   /              / \
                  /              /   \  [N4]
                 /              /     \                    ________
                /              /       \                  /        \
+--+      +-----+ [N3] +------+  [N9]  +------+  [N6]    /          \
|UE|------| gNB |------| UPF1 |--------| UPF2 |--------- \    DN    /
+--+      +-----+      +------+        +------+           \________/
            ]]></artwork>
      </figure>
      <ul spacing="compact">
        <li>UE: User Endpoint</li>
        <li>gNB: gNodeB with N3 interface towards packet core (and N2 for control plane)</li>
        <li>UPF1: UPF with Interfaces N3 and N9 (and N4 for control plane)</li>
        <li>UPF2: UPF with Interfaces N9 and N6 (and N4 for control plane)</li>
        <li>SMF: Session Management Function </li>
        <li>AMF: Access and Mobility Management Function </li>
        <li>DN: Data Network e.g. operator services, Internet access </li>
      </ul>
      <t> This reference diagram does not depict a UPF that is only connected
	to N9 interfaces, although the mechanisms defined in this document
	also work in such case.</t>
      <t> Each session from a UE gets assigned to a UPF. Sometimes multiple
        UPFs may be used, providing richer service functions.  A UE gets its
	IP address from the DHCP block of its UPF.
        The UPF advertises that IP address block toward the Internet,
	ensuring that return traffic is routed to the right UPF. </t>
    </section>
    <!-- End section "A 3GPP Reference Architecture" -->

    <section anchor="uplane-functions" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>User-plane modes</name>
      <t>This section introduces an SRv6 based mobile user-plane.</t>
      <t> In order to simplify the adoption of SRv6, we present two different
	"modes" that vary with respect to the use of SRv6.
	The first one is the "Traditional mode", which inherits the
	current 3GPP mobile architecture. In this mode 
	<xref target="TS.29281" format="default">GTP-U protocol</xref> is replaced by SRv6, however the N3, N9 and N6 interfaces are still point-to-point interfaces with no intermediate waypoints as in the current mobile network architecture.</t>
      <t> The second mode is the "Enhanced mode". 
      This is an evolution from the "Traditional mode". In this mode the N3, N9 or N6 interfaces have intermediate waypoints -SIDs- that are used for Traffic Engineering or VNF purposes transparent to 3GPP functionalities. This results in optimal end-to-end policies across the mobile network with transport and services awareness.</t>
      <t>In both, the Traditional and the Enhanced modes, we assume that the
      gNB as well as the UPFs are SR-aware (N3, N9 and -potentially- N6
       interfaces are SRv6).</t>
      <t>In addition to those two modes, we introduce two mechanisms for interworking with legacy
    access networks (those where the N3 interface is unmodified). In this document we
    introduce them as a variant to the Enhanced mode, however they are equally applicable to the Traditional mode.</t>
      <t>One of these mechanisms is designed to interwork with legacy gNBs
	using GTP/IPv4. The second mechanism is designed to interwork with
	legacy gNBs using GTP/IPv6.</t>
      <t> This document uses SRv6 Segment Endpoint Behaviors defined in
	<xref target="RFC8986" format="default"/> as well
	as new SRv6 Segment Endpoint Behaviors designed for the mobile user plane that are defined in this document in <xref target="srv6_functions" format="default"/>.
      </t>
      <t>Note that the modes discussed throughout this section (with the exception of <xref target="drop_in" format="default"/>) only have informational purpose to implementors as well as operators deploying this technology. Indeed, it is expected that the operator defines his own operational model that best suits their needs.
      </t>
      <section anchor="traditional_mode" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Traditional mode</name>
        <t> In the traditional mode, the existing mobile UPFs remain unchanged
	    with the sole exception of the use of SRv6 as the data
	    plane instead of GTP-U.  There is no impact to the rest of the
	    mobile system.</t>
        <t> In existing 3GPP mobile networks, a PDU Session is mapped 1-for-1
	    with a specific GTP tunnel (TEID). This 1-for-1 mapping is
	    mirrored here to replace GTP encapsulation with the SRv6
	    encapsulation, while not changing anything else. There will be a unique SRv6 SID
	    associated with each PDU Session, and the SID list only contains a single SID.</t>
        <t> The traditional mode minimizes the changes required to the mobile
	    system; hence it is a good starting point for forming a common ground.</t>
        <t> The gNB/UPF control-plane (N2/N4 interface) is unchanged, specifically
      a single IPv6 address is provided to the gNB. The same control plane signalling 
      is used, and the gNB/UPF decides to use SRv6 based on signaled GTP-U parameters per local policy. The only information from the GTP-U parameters used for the SRv6 policy is the TEID, QFI, and the IPv6 Destination Address.</t>
        <t> Our example topology is shown in <xref target="fig_traditional" format="default"/>.
	    The gNB and the UPFs are SR-aware.
	    In the descriptions of the uplink and downlink packet flow,
	    A is an IPv6 address of the UE, and Z is an IPv6 address reachable
	    within the Data Network DN.  A new SRv6 Endpoint Behavior, End.MAP, defined
	    in <xref target="end-map-function" format="default"/>, is used.</t>
        <figure anchor="fig_traditional">
          <name>Traditional mode - example topology</name>
          <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
                                                           ________
                  SRv6           SRv6                     /        \
+--+      +-----+ [N3] +------+  [N9]  +------+  [N6]    /          \
|UE|------| gNB |------| UPF1 |--------| UPF2 |--------- \    DN    /
+--+      +-----+      +------+        +------+           \________/
         SRv6 node     SRv6 node       SRv6 node
                ]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <section anchor="traditional_up" numbered="true" toc="default">
          <name>Packet flow - Uplink</name>
          <t> The uplink packet flow is as follows:</t>
          <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
UE_out  : (A,Z)
gNB_out : (gNB, U1::1) (A,Z)     -> H.Encaps.Red <U1::1>
UPF1_out: (gNB, U2::1) (A,Z)     -> End.MAP
UPF2_out: (A,Z)                  -> End.DT4 or End.DT6]]></artwork>
          <t> When the UE packet arrives at the gNB, the gNB performs a
	      H.Encaps.Red operation. Since there is only one SID,
	      there is no need to push an SRH. gNB only adds an outer IPv6
	      header with IPv6 DA U1::1. gNB obtains the SID
	      U1::1 from the existing control plane (N2 interface). U1::1 represents an anchoring
        SID specific for that session at UPF1.</t>
          <t> When the packet arrives at UPF1, the SID U1::1 is associated with the End.MAP SRv6 Endpoint Behavior. End.MAP replaces U1::1 by U2::1, that
	      belongs to the next UPF (U2).</t>
          <t> When the packet arrives at UPF2, the SID U2::1 corresponds to
	      an End.DT4/End.DT6/End.DT46 SRv6 Endpoint Behavior. UPF2 decapsulates the packet, performs a
	      lookup in a specific table associated with that mobile network and
	      forwards the packet toward the data network (DN).</t>
        </section>
        <!-- End section "Packet flow - Uplink" -->

          <section anchor="traditional_dn" numbered="true" toc="default">
          <name>Packet flow - Downlink</name>
          <t>The downlink packet flow is as follows:</t>
          <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
UPF2_in : (Z,A)
UPF2_out: (U2::, U1::2) (Z,A)    -> H.Encaps.Red <U1::2>
UPF1_out: (U2::, gNB::1) (Z,A)   -> End.MAP
gNB_out : (Z,A)                  -> End.DX4, End.DX6, End.DX2
            ]]></artwork>
          <t> When the packet arrives at the UPF2, the UPF2 maps that flow into
	      a PDU Session. This PDU Session is associated with the segment
	      endpoint &lt;U1::2&gt;.  UPF2 performs
	      a H.Encaps.Red operation, encapsulating the packet into
	      a new IPv6 header with no SRH since there is only one SID.</t>
          <t> Upon packet arrival on UPF1, the SID U1::2 is a local SID associated with the End.MAP 
	      SRv6 Endpoint Behavior. It maps the SID to the next anchoring
	      point and replaces U1::2 by gNB::1, that belongs to the next
	      hop.</t>
          <t> Upon packet arrival on gNB, the SID gNB::1 corresponds to an
	      End.DX4, End.DX6 or End.DX2 behavior (depending on the PDU Session Type). The gNB decapsulates the packet,
	      removing the IPv6 header and all its extensions headers, and
	      forwards the traffic toward the UE.</t>
        </section>
        <!-- End section "Packet flow - Downlink" -->
      </section>
      <!-- End section "Traditional mode" -->

      <section anchor="enhanced_mode" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Enhanced mode</name>
        <t> Enhanced mode improves scalability, provides traffic engineering capabilities, and allows service
	    programming <xref target="I-D.ietf-spring-sr-service-programming" format="default"/>,
	    thanks to the use of multiple SIDs in the SID list (instead of a direct connectivity in between UPFs with no intermediate waypoints as in Traditional Mode).</t>
        <t>Thus, the main difference is that the SR policy MAY 
          include SIDs for traffic engineering and service programming
           in addition to the anchoring SIDs at UPFs.</t>
        <t>Additionally in this mode the operator may choose to aggregate several devices under the same SID list (e.g., stationary residential meters connected to the same cell) to improve scalability.</t>
        <t>The gNB/UPF control-plane (N2/N4 interface) is unchanged, specifically
	    a single IPv6 address is provided to the gNB. A local policy instructs the gNB to use SRv6.</t>
        <t> The gNB MAY resolve the IP address received via the control plane into a SID list using a mechanism like PCEP, DNS-lookup, LISP control-plane or others. The resolution mechanism is out of the scope of this document.</t>
        <t> Note that the SIDs MAY use the arguments Args.Mob.Session if
        required by the UPFs.</t>
        <t> <xref target="fig_enhanced" format="default"/> shows an Enhanced mode topology.
	    The gNB and the UPF are SR-aware.
	    The Figure shows two service segments, S1 and C1.
	    S1 represents a VNF in the network, and C1 represents an intermediate router used for Traffic Engineering purposes to enforce a low-latency path in the network.
       Note that neither S1 nor C1 are required to have an N4 interface.</t>
        <figure anchor="fig_enhanced">
          <name>Enhanced mode - Example topology</name>
          <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
                                 +----+  SRv6               _______
                 SRv6          --| C1 |--[N3]              /       \
+--+    +-----+  [N3]         /  +----+  \  +------+ [N6] /         \
|UE|----| gNB |--       SRv6 /    SRv6    --| UPF1 |------\   DN    /
+--+    +-----+  \      [N3]/      TE       +------+       \_______/
       SRv6 node  \ +----+ /               SRv6 node
                   -| S1 |-
                    +----+
                   SRv6 node
                     VNF
                ]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <section anchor="enhanced_uplink" numbered="true" toc="default">
          <name>Packet flow - Uplink</name>
          <t>The uplink packet flow is as follows:</t>
          <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
UE_out  : (A,Z)
gNB_out : (gNB, S1)(U1::1, C1; SL=2)(A,Z)->H.Encaps.Red<S1,C1,U1::1>
S1_out  : (gNB, C1)(U1::1, C1; SL=1)(A,Z)
C1_out  : (gNB, U1::1)(A,Z)              ->End with PSP
UPF1_out: (A,Z)                          ->End.DT4,End.DT6,End.DT2U
            ]]></artwork>
          <t> UE sends its packet (A,Z) on a specific bearer to its gNB.
	      gNB's control plane associates that session from the UE(A) with
	      the IPv6 address B.  gNB's control plane does a
	      lookup on B to find the related SID list
	      &lt;S1, C1, U1::1&gt;. </t>
          <t> When gNB transmits the packet, it contains all the segments of
	      the SR policy. The SR policy includes segments for
	      traffic engineering (C1) and for service programming (S1). </t>
          <t> Nodes S1 and C1 perform their related Endpoint functionality
	      and forward the packet.</t>
          <t> When the packet arrives at UPF1, the active segment (U1::1) is
	      an End.DT4/End.DT6/End.DT2U which performs the decapsulation (removing the
	      IPv6 header with all its extension headers) and forwards toward
	      the data network.</t>
        </section>
        <!-- End section "Packet flow - Uplink" -->

        <section numbered="true" toc="default">
          <name>Packet flow - Downlink</name>
          <t>The downlink packet flow is as follows:</t>
          <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
UPF1_in : (Z,A)                             ->UPF1 maps the flow w/
                                              SID list <C1,S1, gNB>
UPF1_out: (U1::1, C1)(gNB::1, S1; SL=2)(Z,A)->H.Encaps.Red
C1_out  : (U1::1, S1)(gNB::1, S1; SL=1)(Z,A)
S1_out  : (U1::1, gNB::1)(Z,A)              ->End with PSP
gNB_out : (Z,A)                             ->End.DX4/End.DX6/End.DX2
            ]]></artwork>
          <t>When the packet arrives at the UPF1, the UPF1 maps that
	      particular flow into a UE PDU Session. This UE PDU Session is associated
	      with the policy &lt;C1, S1, gNB&gt;. The UPF1 performs a
	      H.Encaps.Red operation, encapsulating the packet into a
	      new IPv6 header with its corresponding SRH.</t>
          <t>The nodes C1 and S1 perform their related Endpoint processing.</t>
          <t>Once the packet arrives at the gNB, the IPv6 DA corresponds to
	      an End.DX4, End.DX6 or End.DX2 behavior at the gNB (depending on the underlying traffic).
	      The gNB decapsulates the packet, removing the IPv6 header,
	       and forwards the traffic
	      towards the UE. The SID gNB::1 is one example of a SID associated to this service.</t>
          <t>Note that there are several means to provide the UE session aggregation. The decision on which one to use is a local decision made by the operator. One option is to use the <xref target="arguments-for-mobility" format="default">Args.Mob.Session </xref>. Another option comprises the gNB performing an IP lookup on the inner packet by using the End.DT4, End.DT6, and End.DT2 behaviors.</t>
        </section>
        <!-- End section "Packet flow - Downlink" -->

        <section numbered="true" toc="default">
          <name>Scalability</name>
          <t>The Enhanced Mode improves since it allows the aggregation
        		of several UEs under the same SID list. For example, in the 
        		case of stationary residential meters that are connected 
        		to the same cell, all such devices can share the same SID list.
        		This improves scalability compared to Traditional Mode 
        		(unique SID per UE) and compared to GTP-U (dedicated TEID per UE).</t>
        </section>
      </section>
      <!-- End section "Enhanced Mode" -->

      <section anchor="enhanced_gtp" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Enhanced mode with unchanged gNB GTP behavior</name>
        <t> This section describes two mechanisms for interworking with legacy
	    gNBs that still use GTP: one for IPv4, and another for IPv6.</t>
        <t> In the interworking scenarios as illustrated in
	    <xref target="fig_interworking" format="default"/>, the gNB does not support SRv6.
	    The gNB supports GTP encapsulation over IPv4 or IPv6.  To achieve
	    interworking, an SR Gateway (SRGW) entity is added.  The SRGW
	    maps the GTP traffic into SRv6.</t>
        <t> The SRGW is not an anchor point and maintains very little state.
	    For this reason,
	    both IPv4 and IPv6 methods scale to millions of UEs.</t>
        <figure anchor="fig_interworking">
          <name>Example topology for interworking</name>
          <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
                                                          _______
                 IP GTP          SRv6                    /       \
+--+      +-----+ [N3] +------+  [N9]  +------+  [N6]   /         \
|UE|------| gNB |------| SRGW |--------| UPF  |---------\   DN    /
+--+      +-----+      +------+        +------+          \_______/
                      SR Gateway       SRv6 node
              ]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>Both of the mechanisms described in this section are applicable to either the Traditional Mode or the Enhanced Mode.</t>
        <section numbered="true" toc="default">
          <name>Interworking with IPv6 GTP</name>
          <t>In this interworking mode the gNB at the N3 interface uses GTP
	      over IPv6.</t>
          <t>Key points:
          </t>
          <ul spacing="compact">
            <li> The gNB is unchanged (control-plane or user-plane) and
		encapsulates into GTP (N3 interface is not modified).</li>
            <li> The 5G Control-Plane towards the gNB (N2 interface) is unmodified, though multiple UPF addresses need to be used - one IPv6 address (i.e. a BSID at the SRGW) is needed per &lt;SLA, PDU session type&gt;. The SRv6 SID is different depending on the required &lt;SLA, PDU session type&gt; combination.</li>
            <li> In the uplink, the SRGW removes GTP, finds the SID list related to the IPv6 DA,
	        and adds SRH with the SID list.</li>
            <li> There is no state for the downlink at the SRGW.</li>
            <li> There is simple state in the uplink at the SRGW; using
		Enhanced mode results in fewer SR policies on this node.
		An SR policy is shared across UEs as long as they belong to the same context (i.e., tenant). A set of many different policies (i.e., different SLAs) increases the amount of state required.</li>
            <li> When a packet from the UE leaves the gNB, it is SR-routed.
		This simplifies network slicing
		<xref target="I-D.ietf-lsr-flex-algo" format="default"/>.</li>
            <li> In the uplink, the SRv6 BSID steers traffic
		into an SR policy when it arrives at the SRGW.</li>
          </ul>
          <t> An example topology is shown in
	      <xref target="fig_interworking_ipv6" format="default"/>.</t>
          <t> S1 and C1 are two service segments.
	      S1 represents a VNF in the network, and C1 represents a router
	      configured for Traffic Engineering.</t>
          <figure anchor="fig_interworking_ipv6">
            <name>Enhanced mode with unchanged gNB IPv6/GTP behavior</name>
            <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
                               +----+
             IPv6/GTP         -| S1 |-                            ___
+--+  +-----+ [N3]           / +----+ \                          /
|UE|--| gNB |-         SRv6 /   SRv6   \ +----+   +------+ [N6] /
+--+  +-----+ \        [N9]/     VNF    -| C1 |---| UPF2 |------\  DN
        GTP    \ +------+ /              +----+   +------+       \___
                -| SRGW |-                SRv6      SRv6
                 +------+                  TE
                SR Gateway
                ]]></artwork>
          </figure>
          <section numbered="true" toc="default">
            <name>Packet flow - Uplink</name>
            <t>The uplink packet flow is as follows:</t>
            <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
UE_out  : (A,Z)
gNB_out : (gNB, B)(GTP: TEID T)(A,Z)       -> Interface N3 unmodified
                                              (IPv6/GTP)
SRGW_out: (SRGW, S1)(U2::T, C1; SL=2)(A,Z) -> B is an End.M.GTP6.D
                                              SID at the SRGW
S1_out  : (SRGW, C1)(U2::T, C1; SL=1)(A,Z)
C1_out  : (SRGW, U2::T)(A,Z)               -> End with PSP
UPF2_out: (A,Z)                            -> End.DT4 or End.DT6
              ]]></artwork>
            <t> The UE sends a packet destined to Z toward the gNB on a
	        specific bearer for that session. The gNB, which is unmodified,
	        encapsulates the packet into IPv6, UDP, and GTP headers.
	        The IPv6 DA B, and the GTP TEID T are the ones received in the
	        N2 interface.</t>
            <t> The IPv6 address that was signaled over the N2 interface for
	        that UE PDU Session, B, is now the IPv6 DA. B is an SRv6 Binding
	        SID at the SRGW.  Hence the packet is routed to the SRGW.</t>
            <t> When the packet arrives at the SRGW, the SRGW identifies
	        B as an End.M.GTP6.D Binding SID
		(see <xref target="End-M-GTP6-D" format="default"/>).  Hence, the SRGW removes
	        the IPv6, UDP, and GTP headers, and pushes an IPv6
	        header with its own SRH containing the SIDs bound to the
	        SR policy associated with this BindingSID.  There
	        at least one instance of the End.M.GTP6.D SID per PDU type.</t>
            <t> S1 and C1 perform their related Endpoint functionality
	        and forward the packet.</t>
            <t> When the packet arrives at UPF2, the active segment is (U2::T)
	        which is bound to End.DT4/6.  UPF2 then decapsulates
		(removing the outer IPv6 header with all its extension headers)
		and forwards the packet toward the data network.</t>
          </section>
          <!-- End section "Packet flow - Uplink" -->

          <section numbered="true" toc="default">
            <name>Packet flow - Downlink</name>
            <t>The downlink packet flow is as follows:</t>
            <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
UPF2_in : (Z,A)                           -> UPF2 maps the flow with
                                             <C1, S1, SRGW::TEID,gNB>
UPF2_out: (U2::1, C1)(gNB, SRGW::TEID, S1; SL=3)(Z,A) -> H.Encaps.Red
C1_out  : (U2::1, S1)(gNB, SRGW::TEID, S1; SL=2)(Z,A)
S1_out  : (U2::1, SRGW::TEID)(gNB, SRGW::TEID, S1, SL=1)(Z,A)
SRGW_out: (SRGW, gNB)(GTP: TEID=T)(Z,A)   -> SRGW/96 is End.M.GTP6.E
gNB_out : (Z,A)
              ]]></artwork>
            <t> When a packet destined to A arrives at the UPF2, the UPF2
		performs a lookup in the table associated to A and finds the
		SID list &lt;C1, S1, SRGW::TEID, gNB&gt;. The UPF2 performs
		an H.Encaps.Red operation, encapsulating the packet into
		a new IPv6 header with its corresponding SRH.</t>
            <t> C1 and S1 perform their related Endpoint processing.</t>
            <t> Once the packet arrives at the SRGW, the SRGW identifies the
		active SID as an End.M.GTP6.E function. The SRGW removes
		the IPv6 header and all its extensions headers. The SRGW
		generates new IPv6, UDP, and GTP headers. The new IPv6 DA
		is the gNB which is the last SID in the received SRH.
		The TEID in the generated GTP header is an argument of the
		received End.M.GTP6.E SID. The SRGW pushes the headers to
		the packet and forwards the packet toward the gNB.  There
		is one instance of the End.M.GTP6.E SID per PDU type.</t>
            <t> Once the packet arrives at the gNB, the packet is a regular
		IPv6/GTP packet. The gNB looks for the specific radio bearer
		for that TEID and forward it on the bearer. This gNB behavior
		is not modified from current and previous generations.</t>
          </section>
          <!-- End section "Packet flow - Downlink" -->

          <section numbered="true" toc="default">
            <name>Scalability</name>
            <t> For the downlink traffic, the SRGW is stateless. All the state
		is in the SRH pushed by the UPF2.  The UPF2 must have the UE
		states since it is the UE's session anchor point.</t>
            <t> For the uplink traffic, the state at the SRGW does not
		necessarily need to be unique per PDU Session; the SR policy
     can be shared among UEs.  This enables more
		scalable SRGW deployments compared to a
		solution holding millions of states, one or more per UE.</t>
          </section>
          <!-- End section "Scalability" -->
        </section>
        <!-- End section "Interworking with IPv6 GTP" -->

        <section numbered="true" toc="default">
          <name>Interworking with IPv4 GTP</name>
          <t> In this interworking mode the gNB uses GTP
		over IPv4 in the N3 interface</t>
          <t> Key points:
          </t>
          <ul spacing="compact">
            <li> The gNB is unchanged and encapsulates packets into GTP
		(the N3 interface is not modified).</li>
            <li>N2 signaling is not changed, though multiple UPF addresses need to be provided - one for each PDU Session Type.</li>
            <li> In the uplink, traffic is classified by SRGW's
		classification engine and steered into an SR policy.
		The SRGW may be implemented in a UPF or as a separate entity. How the classification engine rules are set up is outside the scope of this document, though one example is using BGP signaling from a Mobile User Plane Controller <xref target="I-D.mhkk-dmm-srv6mup-architecture" format="default"/>.</li> 
            <li> SRGW removes GTP, finds the SID list related to DA, and adds
		an SRH with the SID list.</li>
          </ul>
          <t> An example topology is shown in
		<xref target="fig_interworking_ipv4" format="default"/>. In this mode
		the gNB is an unmodified gNB using IPv4/GTP.
		The UPFs are SR-aware.  As before, the SRGW maps the
		IPv4/GTP traffic to SRv6.</t>
          <t> S1 and C1 are two service segment endpoints.
		S1 represents a VNF in the network, and C1 represents a router
		configured for Traffic Engineering.</t>
          <figure anchor="fig_interworking_ipv4">
            <name>Enhanced mode with unchanged gNB IPv4/GTP behavior</name>
            <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
                               +----+
             IPv4/GTP         -| S1 |-                            ___
+--+  +-----+ [N3]           / +----+ \                          /
|UE|--| gNB |-         SRv6 /   SRv6   \ +----+   +------+ [N6] /
+--+  +-----+ \        [N9]/     VNF    -| C1 |---| UPF2 |------\  DN
        GTP    \ +------+ /              +----+   +------+       \___
                -| UPF1 |-                SRv6      SRv6
                 +------+                  TE
                SR Gateway
                ]]></artwork>
          </figure>
          <section numbered="true" toc="default">
            <name>Packet flow - Uplink</name>
            <t>The uplink packet flow is as follows:</t>
            <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
gNB_out : (gNB, B)(GTP: TEID T)(A,Z)          -> Interface N3
                                                 unchanged IPv4/GTP
SRGW_out: (SRGW, S1)(U2::1, C1; SL=2)(A,Z)    -> H.M.GTP4.D function
S1_out  : (SRGW, C1)(U2::1, C1; SL=1)(A,Z)
C1_out  : (SRGW, U2::1) (A,Z)                 -> PSP
UPF2_out: (A,Z)                               -> End.DT4 or End.DT6
              ]]></artwork>
            <t> The UE sends a packet destined to Z toward the gNB on a
		specific bearer for that session. The gNB, which is unmodified,
		encapsulates the packet into a new IPv4, UDP, and GTP headers.
		The IPv4 DA, B, and the GTP TEID are the ones received at the
		N2 interface.</t>
            <t> When the packet arrives at the SRGW for UPF1, the SRGW has an
		classification engine rule for incoming traffic from the
		gNB, that steers the traffic into an SR policy by using the
    function H.M.GTP4.D. The SRGW removes the IPv4, UDP, and GTP
		headers and pushes an IPv6 header with its own SRH containing
		the SIDs related to the SR policy associated with this traffic.
		The SRGW forwards according to the new IPv6 DA.</t>
            <t> S1 and C1 perform their related Endpoint
		functionality and forward the packet.</t>
            <t> When the packet arrives at UPF2, the active segment is (U2::1)
		which is bound to End.DT4/6 which performs the decapsulation
		(removing the outer IPv6 header with all its extension headers)
		and forwards toward the data network.</t>
    <t>Note that the interworking mechanisms for IPv4/GTP and IPv6/GTP differs. This is due to the fact that in IPv6/GTP we can leverage the remote steering capabilities provided by the Segment Routing BSID. In IPv4 this construct is not available, and building a similar mechanism would require a significant address consumption.</t>
          </section>
          <!-- End section "Packet flow - Uplink" -->

          <section numbered="true" toc="default">
            <name>Packet flow - Downlink</name>
            <t>The downlink packet flow is as follows:</t>
            <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
UPF2_in : (Z,A)                            -> UPF2 maps flow with SID
                                            <C1, S1,GW::SA:DA:TEID>
UPF2_out: (U2::1, C1)(GW::SA:DA:TEID, S1; SL=2)(Z,A) ->H.Encaps.Red
C1_out  : (U2::1, S1)(GW::SA:DA:TEID, S1; SL=1)(Z,A)
S1_out  : (U2::1, GW::SA:DA:TEID)(Z,A)
SRGW_out: (GW, gNB)(GTP: TEID=T)(Z,A)       -> End.M.GTP4.E
gNB_out : (Z,A)
              ]]></artwork>
            <t>When a packet destined to A arrives at the UPF2, the UPF2
		performs a lookup in the table associated to A and finds the
		SID list &lt;C1, S1, SRGW::SA:DA:TEID&gt;. The UPF2 performs
		a H.Encaps.Red operation, encapsulating the packet into
		a new IPv6 header with its corresponding SRH.</t>
            <t>The nodes C1 and S1 perform their related Endpoint
		processing.</t>
            <t>Once the packet arrives at the SRGW, the SRGW identifies the
		active SID as an End.M.GTP4.E function. The SRGW removes
		the IPv6 header and all its extensions headers. The SRGW
		generates an IPv4, UDP, and GTP headers. The IPv4 SA and
		DA are received as SID arguments.
		The TEID in the generated GTP header is also the arguments
		of the received End.M.GTP4.E SID.  The SRGW pushes the headers
		to the packet and forwards the packet toward the gNB.</t>
            <t> When the packet arrives at the gNB, the packet is a regular
		IPv4/GTP packet. The gNB looks for the specific radio bearer
		for that TEID and forwards it on the bearer. This gNB behavior
		is not modified from current and previous generations.</t>
          </section>
          <!-- End section "Packet flow - Downlink" -->

          <section numbered="true" toc="default">
            <name>Scalability</name>
            <t>For the downlink traffic, the SRGW is stateless. All the
		state is in the SRH pushed by the UPF2. The UPF must have
		this UE-base state anyway (since it is its anchor point).</t>
            <t>For the uplink traffic, the state at the SRGW is dedicated on a
		per UE/session basis according to a classification engine.
		There is state for steering the different sessions in the form of an SR Policy. However, SR policies are shared
		among several UE/sessions.</t>
          </section>
          <!-- End section "Scalability" -->
        </section>
        <!-- End section "Interworking with IPv4 GTP" -->

      

        <section numbered="true" toc="default">
          <name>Extensions to the interworking mechanisms</name>
          <t>In this section we presented two mechanisms for interworking
	      with gNBs and UPFs that do not support SRv6. These mechanisms are used
	      to support GTP over IPv4 and IPv6.</t>
          <t>Even though we have presented these methods as an extension to
	      the "Enhanced mode", it is straightforward in its
	      applicability to the "Traditional mode".</t>
        </section>
        <!-- End section "Extensions .. interworking mechanisms" -->
      </section>
      <!-- End "Enhanced mode with unchanged gNB GTP ..." -->
      <section anchor="drop_in" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>SRv6 Drop-in Interworking</name>
        <t>In this section we introduce another mode useful for legacy gNB and UPFs that still operate with GTP-U.
            This mode provides an SRv6-enabled user plane in between
          two GTP-U tunnel endpoints.</t>
        <t>In this mode we employ two SRGWs that map GTP-U traffic to SRv6 and vice-versa.</t>
        <t>Unlike other interworking modes, in this mode both of the mobility overlay endpoints use GTP-U.
            Two SRGWs are deployed in either N3 or N9 interface to realize an intermediate SR policy.</t>
        <figure anchor="fig_drop_in">
          <name>Example topology for SRv6 Drop-in mode</name>
          <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[

                            +----+
                           -| S1 |-
+-----+                   / +----+ \
| gNB |-            SRv6 /   SRv6   \ +----+   +--------+    +-----+
+-----+  \              /     VNF    -| C1 |---| SRGW-B |----| UPF |
   GTP[N3]\ +--------+ /              +----+   +--------+    +-----+
           -| SRGW-A |-                SRv6   SR Gateway-B     GTP
            +--------+                  TE
           SR Gateway-A

                ]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>The packet flow of <xref target="fig_drop_in" format="default"/> is as
            follows:</t>
        <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
gNB_out : (gNB, U::1)(GTP: TEID T)(A,Z)
GW-A_out: (GW-A, S1)(U::1, SGB::TEID, C1; SL=3)(A,Z)->U::1 is an
                                                      End.M.GTP6.D.Di
                                                      SID at SRGW-A
S1_out  : (GW-A, C1)(U::1, SGB::TEID, C1; SL=2)(A,Z)
C1_out  : (GW-A, SGB::TEID)(U::1, SGB::TEID, C1; SL=1)(A,Z)
GW-B_out: (GW-B, U::1)(GTP: TEID T)(A,Z)            ->SGB::TEID is an
                                                      End.M.GTP6.E
                                                      SID at SRGW-B
UPF_out : (A,Z)
              ]]></artwork>
        <t>When a packet destined to Z is sent to the gNB, which is
          unmodified (control-plane and user-plane remain GTP-U), 
          gNB performs encapsulation into a new IP, UDP, and
          GTP headers.  The IPv6 DA, U::1, and the GTP TEID are the ones
          received at the N2 interface.</t>
        <t>The IPv6 address that was signaled over the N2 interface for that
          PDU Session, U::1, is now the IPv6 DA.  U::1 is an SRv6 Binding
          SID at SRGW-A.  Hence the packet is routed to the SRGW.</t>
        <t>When the packet arrives at SRGW-A, the SRGW identifies U::1 as an
          End.M.GTP6.D.Di Binding SID (see <xref target="End-M-GTP6-D-Di" format="default"/>).
          Hence, the SRGW removes the IPv6, UDP, and GTP headers, and pushes an
          IPv6 header with its own SRH containing the SIDs bound to the SR
          policy associated with this Binding SID. There is one instance of the
          End.M.GTP6.D.Di SID per PDU type.</t>
        <t>S1 and C1 perform their related Endpoint functionality and forward
          the packet.</t>
        <t>Once the packet arrives at SRGW-B, the SRGW identifies the active
          SID as an End.M.GTP6.E function. The SRGW removes the IPv6 header and
          all its extensions headers. The SRGW generates new IPv6, UDP, and GTP
          headers. The new IPv6 DA is U::1 which is the last SID in the
          received SRH. The TEID in the generated GTP header is an argument of
          the received End.M.GTP6.E SID. The SRGW pushes the headers to the
          packet and forwards the packet toward UPF.  There is one instance of
          the End.M.GTP6.E SID per PDU type.</t>
        <t>Once the packet arrives at UPF, the packet is a regular IPv6/GTP
          packet. The UPF looks for the specific rule for that TEID to forward
          the packet. This UPF behavior is not modified from current and
          previous generations.</t>
      </section>
      <!-- End section "SRv6 Drop-in Interworking" -->
    </section>
    <!-- End section "User-plane behaviors" -->

    <section anchor="srv6_functions" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>SRv6 Segment Endpoint Mobility Behaviors</name>
      <!-- Add text on functions used on UPF1, UPF2,... -->
      <section anchor="arguments-for-mobility" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Args.Mob.Session</name>
        <t>Args.Mob.Session provide per-session information for charging, buffering and
          lawful intercept (among others) required by some mobile nodes.
          The Args.Mob.Session argument format is used in combination with End.Map,
          End.DT4/End.DT6/End.DT46 and End.DX4/End.DX6/End.DX2 behaviors. Note that proposed format is applicable for
          5G networks, while similar formats could be used for legacy networks.
        </t>
        <figure>
          <name>Args.Mob.Session format</name>
          <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   QFI     |R|U|                PDU Session ID                 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|PDU Sess(cont')|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
          ]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <ul spacing="compact">
          <li> QFI: QoS Flow Identifier <xref target="TS.38415" format="default"/></li>
          <li> R: Reflective QoS Indication  <xref target="TS.23501" format="default"/>.
          This parameter indicates the activation of reflective QoS towards the UE for the transferred packet. Reflective QoS enables the UE to map UL User Plane traffic to QoS Flows without SMF provided QoS rules.</li>
          <li>U: Unused and for future use. MUST be 0 on transmission and
              ignored on receipt.</li>
          <li>PDU Session ID: Identifier of PDU Session. The GTP-U equivalent is TEID.</li>
        </ul>
        <t>Arg.Mob.Session is required in case that one SID aggregates
      multiple PDU Sessions. Since the SRv6 SID is likely NOT to be
      instantiated per PDU session, Args.Mob.Session helps the UPF to
      perform the behaviors which require per QFI and/or per PDU Session
      granularity.</t>
        <t>Note that the encoding of user-plane messages (e.g., Echo Request, Echo Reply, Error Indication and End Marker) is out of the scope of this draft. <xref target="I-D.murakami-dmm-user-plane-message-encoding" /> defines one possible encoding.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="end-map-function" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>End.MAP</name>
        <t>The "Endpoint behavior with SID mapping" behavior (End.MAP for
	    short) is used in several scenarios. Particularly in mobility,
      End.MAP is used by the intermediate UPFs.</t>
        <t>When node N receives a packet whose IPv6 DA is D and D is a local End.MAP SID, N does:</t>
        <artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
S01. If (IPv6 Hop Limit <= 1) {
S02.    Send an ICMP Time Exceeded message to the Source Address,
           Code 0 (Hop limit exceeded in transit),
           interrupt packet processing, and discard the packet.
S03. }
S04. Decrement IPv6 Hop Limit by 1
S05. Update the IPv6 DA with the new mapped SID
S06. Submit the packet to the egress IPv6 FIB lookup for
        transmission to the new destination
                    ]]></artwork>
        <t>Notes:
                The SIDs in the SRH are not modified.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="End-M-GTP6-D" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>End.M.GTP6.D</name>
        <t>The "Endpoint behavior with IPv6/GTP decapsulation into SR policy"
	    behavior (End.M.GTP6.D for short) is used in interworking scenario
	    for the uplink towards SRGW from the legacy gNB using IPv6/GTP.
	    Any SID instance of this behavior is associated with an SR Policy B
   and an IPv6 Source Address S.
        </t>
        <t>When the SR Gateway node N receives a packet destined to D and
	    D is a local End.M.GTP6.D SID, N does:</t>
        <artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
S01. When an SRH is processed {
S02.   If (Segments Left != 0) {
S03.      Send an ICMP Parameter Problem to the Source Address,
             Code 0 (Erroneous header field encountered),
             Pointer set to the Segments Left field,
             interrupt packet processing, and discard the packet.
S04.   }
S05.   Proceed to process the next header in the packet
S06. }
                ]]></artwork>
        <t>When processing the Upper-layer header of a packet matching a FIB entry locally instantiated as an End.M.GTP6.D SID, N does:</t>
        <artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
S01. If (Next Header (NH) == UDP & UDP_Dest_port == GTP) {
S02.    Copy the GTP TEID and QFI to buffer memory
S03.    Pop the IPv6, UDP, and GTP Headers
S04.    Push a new IPv6 header with its own SRH containing B
S05.    Set the outer IPv6 SA to S
S06.    Set the outer IPv6 DA to the first SID of B
S07.    Set the outer Payload Length, Traffic Class, Flow Label,
           Hop Limit, and Next-Header (NH) fields
S08.    Write in the SRH[0] the Args.Mob.Session based on
           the information of buffer memory
S09.    Submit the packet to the egress IPv6 FIB lookup and 
           transmission to the new destination
S10. } Else {
S11.    Process as per [RFC8986] Section 4.1.1
S12. }
                ]]></artwork>
        <t>Notes:
        S07. The NH is set based on the SID parameter. There is one
          instantiation of the End.M.GTP6.D SID per PDU Session Type,
          hence the NH is already known in advance. For the IPv4v6 PDU
          Session Type, in addition we inspect the first nibble of the
          PDU to know the NH value.</t>
        <t>The last segment (S3 in above example) SHOULD be
        followed by an Arg.Mob.Session argument space which is used to
        provide the session identifiers.</t>
      </section>
      <!-- End section "End.M.GTP6.D" -->
     <section anchor="End-M-GTP6-D-Di" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>End.M.GTP6.D.Di</name>
        <t>The "Endpoint behavior with IPv6/GTP decapsulation into SR policy for
        Drop-in Mode" behavior (End.M.GTP6.D.Di for short) is used in SRv6
        drop-in interworking scenario described in <xref target="drop_in" format="default"/>. The
        difference between End.M.GTP6.D as another variant of IPv6/GTP
        decapsulation function is that the original IPv6 DA of GTP packet is
        preserved as the last SID in SRH.</t>
        <t>Any SID instance of this behavior is associated with an SR Policy B and an IPv6 Source Address S.</t>
        <t>When the SR Gateway node N receives a packet destined to D and
        D is a local End.M.GTP6.D.Di SID, N does:</t>
        <artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
S01. When an SRH is processed {
S02.   If (Segments Left != 0) {
S03.      Send an ICMP Parameter Problem to the Source Address,
             Code 0 (Erroneous header field encountered),
             Pointer set to the Segments Left field,
             interrupt packet processing, and discard the packet.
S04.   }
S05.   Proceed to process the next header in the packet
S06. }
                ]]></artwork>
        <t>When processing the Upper-layer header of a packet matching a FIB entry locally instantiated as an End.M.GTP6.Di SID, N does:</t>
        <artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
S01. If (Next Header = UDP & UDP_Dest_port = GTP) {
S02.    Copy D to buffer memory
S03.    Pop the IPv6, UDP, and GTP Headers
S04.    Push a new IPv6 header with its own SRH containing B
S05.    Set the outer IPv6 SA to S
S06.    Set the outer IPv6 DA to the first SID of B
S07.    Set the outer Payload Length, Traffic Class, Flow Label,
           Hop Limit, and Next-Header fields
S08.    Preprend D to the SRH (as SRH[0]) and set SL accordingly
S09.    Submit the packet to the egress IPv6 FIB lookup and 
           transmission to the new destination
S10. } Else {
S11.    Process as per [RFC8986] Section 4.1.1
S12. }
                ]]></artwork>
        <t>Notes:
        S07. The NH is set based on the SID parameter. There is one
          instantiation of the End.M.GTP6.D SID per PDU Session Type,
          hence the NH is already known in advance. For the IPv4v6 PDU
          Session Type, in addition we inspect the first nibble of the
          PDU to know the NH value.</t>
        <t>S SHOULD be an End.M.GTP6.E SID instantiated
       at the SR gateway.</t>
      </section>
      <!-- End section "End.M.GTP6.D.Di" -->


      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>End.M.GTP6.E</name>
        <t>The "Endpoint behavior with encapsulation for IPv6/GTP tunnel"
        behavior (End.M.GTP6.E for short) is used among others in the interworking scenario
        for the downlink toward the legacy gNB using IPv6/GTP.</t>
        <t>The prefix of End.M.GTP6.E SID MUST be followed by the
        Arg.Mob.Session argument space which is used to provide the session
        identifiers.</t>
        <t>When the SR Gateway node N receives a packet destined to D, and
        D is a local End.M.GTP6.E SID, N does the following:</t>
        <artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
S01. When an SRH is processed {
S02.   If (Segments Left != 1) {
S03.      Send an ICMP Parameter Problem to the Source Address,
             Code 0 (Erroneous header field encountered),
             Pointer set to the Segments Left field,
             interrupt packet processing, and discard the packet.
S04.   }
S05.   Proceed to process the next header in the packet
S06. }
                ]]></artwork>
        <t>When processing the Upper-layer header of a packet matching a FIB entry locally instantiated as an End.M.GTP6.E SID, N does:</t>
        <artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
S01.    Copy SRH[0] and D to buffer memory
S02.    Pop the IPv6 header and all its extension headers
S03.    Push a new IPv6 header with a UDP/GTP Header
S04.    Set the outer IPv6 SA to S
S05.    Set the outer IPv6 DA from buffer memory
S06.    Set the outer Payload Length, Traffic Class, Flow Label,
           Hop Limit, and Next-Header fields
S07.    Set the GTP TEID (from buffer memory)
S08.    Submit the packet to the egress IPv6 FIB lookup and 
           transmission to the new destination
                ]]></artwork>
        <t>Notes:
        An End.M.GTP6.E SID MUST always be the penultimate SID.
        The TEID is extracted from the argument space of the current
        SID.</t>
        <t> The source address S SHOULD be an End.M.GTP6.D SID instantiated
        at an SR gateway.</t>
      </section>
      <!-- End section "End.M.GTP6.E" -->

      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>End.M.GTP4.E</name>
        <t>The "Endpoint behavior with encapsulation for IPv4/GTP tunnel"
	    behavior (End.M.GTP4.E for short) is used in the downlink when
	    doing interworking with legacy gNB using IPv4/GTP.</t>
        <t>When the SR Gateway node N receives a packet destined to S and S
	    is a local End.M.GTP4.E SID, N does:</t>
        <artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
S01. When an SRH is processed {
S02.   If (Segments Left != 0) {
S03.      Send an ICMP Parameter Problem to the Source Address,
             Code 0 (Erroneous header field encountered),
             Pointer set to the Segments Left field,
             interrupt packet processing, and discard the packet.
S04.   }
S05.   Proceed to process the next header in the packet
S06. }
                ]]></artwork>
        <t>When processing the Upper-layer header of a packet matching a FIB entry locally instantiated as an End.M.GTP4.E SID, N does:</t>
        <artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
S01.    Store the IPv6 DA and SA in buffer memory
S02.    Pop the IPv6 header and all its extension headers
S03.    Push a new IPv4 header with a UDP/GTP Header
S04.    Set the outer IPv4 SA and DA (from buffer memory)
S05.    Set the outer Total Length, DSCP, Time To Live, and
           Next-Header fields
S06.    Set the GTP TEID (from buffer memory)
S07.    Submit the packet to the egress IPv6 FIB lookup and 
           transmission to the new destination
                ]]></artwork>
        <t>Notes:

        The End.M.GTP4.E SID in S has the following format:</t>
        <figure>
          <name>End.M.GTP4.E SID Encoding</name>
          <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
0                                                         127
+-----------------------+-------+----------------+---------+
|  SRGW-IPv6-LOC-FUNC   |IPv4DA |Args.Mob.Session|0 Padded |
+-----------------------+-------+----------------+---------+
       128-a-b-c            a            b           c

          ]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>The IPv6 Source Address has the following format:</t>
        <figure>
          <name>IPv6 SA Encoding for End.M.GTP4.E</name>
          <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
0                                                         127
+----------------------+--------+--------------------------+
|  Source UPF Prefix   |IPv4 SA | any bit pattern(ignored) |
+----------------------+--------+--------------------------+
         128-a-b            a                  b

          ]]></artwork>
        </figure>
      </section>
      <!-- End section "End.M.GTP4.E" -->

      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>H.M.GTP4.D</name>
        <t>The "SR Policy Headend with tunnel decapsulation and map to an SRv6
        policy" behavior (H.M.GTP4.D for short) is used in the direction
        from legacy IPv4 user-plane to SRv6 user-plane network.</t>
        <t>When the SR Gateway node N receives a packet destined to a
        IW-IPv4-Prefix, N does:</t>
        <artwork align="left" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
S01. IF Payload == UDP/GTP THEN
S02.    Pop the outer IPv4 header and UDP/GTP headers
S03.    Copy IPv4 DA, TEID to form SID B
S04.    Copy IPv4 SA to form IPv6 SA B'
S05.    Encapsulate the packet into a new IPv6 header   ;;Ref1
S06.    Set the IPv6 DA = B
S07.    Forward along the shortest path to B
S08. ELSE
S09.    Drop the packet
          ]]></artwork>
        <t>Ref1: The NH value is identified by inspecting the first nibble
        of the inner payload.</t>
        <t>The SID B has the following format:</t>
        <figure>
          <name>H.M.GTP4.D SID Encoding</name>
          <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
0                                                         127
+-----------------------+-------+----------------+---------+
|Destination UPF Prefix |IPv4DA |Args.Mob.Session|0 Padded |
+-----------------------+-------+----------------+---------+
       128-a-b-c            a            b           c

          ]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t> The SID B MAY be an SRv6 Binding SID instantiated at the first
        UPF (U1) to bind an SR policy <xref target="I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy" format="default"/>.</t>
      </section>
      <!-- End section "T.M.Tmap" -->

      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>End.Limit: Rate Limiting behavior</name>
        <t> The mobile user-plane requires a rate-limit feature. For this
          purpose, we define a new behavior "End.Limit".
          The "End.Limit" behavior encodes in its arguments the
          rate limiting parameter that should be applied to this packet.
          Multiple flows of packets should have the same group identifier
           in the SID when those flows are in the same AMBR (Aggregate Maximum Bit Rate) group.
          The encoding format of the rate limit
	    segment SID is as follows:</t>
        <figure>
          <name>End.Limit: Rate limiting behavior argument format</name>
          <artwork align="center" name="" type="" alt=""><![CDATA[
+----------------------+----------+-----------+
| LOC+FUNC rate-limit  | group-id | limit-rate|
+----------------------+----------+-----------+
      128-i-j                i          j
              ]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t> If the limit-rate bits are set to zero, the node should
            not do rate limiting unless static configuration or
            control-plane sets the limit rate associated to the SID.</t>
      </section>
      <!-- End section "End.Limit: Rate Limiting function" -->
    </section>
    <!-- End section "" -->


    <section anchor="pdu_sessions" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>SRv6 supported 3GPP PDU session types</name>
      <t>The 3GPP <xref target="TS.23501" format="default"/> defines the following PDU session
		types:
      </t>
      <ul spacing="compact">
        <li>IPv4</li>
        <li>IPv6</li>
        <li>IPv4v6</li>
        <li>Ethernet</li>
        <li>Unstructured</li>
      </ul>
      <t> SRv6 supports the 3GPP PDU session types without any protocol
	    overhead by using the corresponding SRv6 behaviors (End.DX4,
	    End.DT4 for IPv4 PDU sessions; End.DX6, End.DT6, End.T for IPv6
	    PDU sessions; End.DT46 for IPv4v6 PDU sessions; End.DX2
	    for L2 and Unstructured PDU sessions).</t>
    </section>
    <!-- End section "SRv6 supported PDU session types" -->

    <section anchor="netslice" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Network Slicing Considerations</name>
      <t>A mobile network may be required to implement "network slices",
	    which logically separate network resources. User-plane behaviors
	    represented as SRv6 segments would be part of a slice.</t>
      <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy" format="default"/>
	    describes a solution to build basic network slices with SR.
	    Depending on the requirements, these slices can be further
	    refined by adopting the mechanisms from:
      </t>
      <ul spacing="compact">
        <li>IGP Flex-Algo
		<xref target="I-D.ietf-lsr-flex-algo" format="default"/></li>
        <li>Inter-Domain policies
	       <xref target="I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe" format="default"/></li>
      </ul>
      <t>Furthermore, these can be combined with ODN/AS (On Demand Nexthop/Automated Steering)
	    <xref target="I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy" format="default"/> for
	    automated slice provisioning and traffic steering.</t>
      <t>Further details on how these tools can be used to create
          end to end network slices are documented in
          <xref target="I-D.ali-spring-network-slicing-building-blocks" format="default"/>.</t>
    </section>
    <!-- End section "Network Slicing Considerations" -->

    <section anchor="c-plane" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Control Plane Considerations</name>
      <t>This document focuses on user-plane behavior and its
	    independence from the control plane. While the SRv6 mobile user-plane behaviors may be utilized in emerging architectures, such as <xref target="I-D.gundavelli-dmm-mfa" format="default"/>, <xref target="I-D.mhkk-dmm-srv6mup-architecture" format="default"/> for example, require control plane support for the user-plane, this document does not impose any change to the existent mobility control plane.</t>
      <t> <xref target="IANA" format="default"/> allocates SRv6
	    Segment Endpoint Behavior codepoints for the new behaviors defined in this
	    document.</t>
    </section>
    <!-- End section "Control Plane Considerations" -->

    <section numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>   The security considerations for Segment Routing are discussed in
           <xref target="RFC8402" format="default"/>.  More specifically for SRv6 the security considerations
           and the mechanisms for securing an SR domain are discussed in
           <xref target="RFC8754" format="default"/>.  Together, they describe the required security mechanisms
           that allow establishment of an SR domain of trust to operate
           SRv6-based services for internal traffic while preventing any
           external traffic from accessing or exploiting the SRv6-based
           services.</t>
      <t>The technology described in this document is applied to a mobile network that is within the SR Domain.</t>
      <t>This document introduces new SRv6 Endpoint Behaviors. Those behaviors do not need any special security consideration given that it is deployed within that SR Domain.</t>
    </section>
    <!-- End section "Security Considerations" -->

    <section anchor="IANA" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t> The following values have been allocated within the "SRv6 Endpoint Behaviors" <xref target="RFC8986" format="default"/>
	  sub-registry belonging to the top-level
	  "Segment Routing Parameters" registry:</t>
      <table anchor="endpoint_opcodes" align="center">
        <name>SRv6 Mobile User-plane Endpoint Behavior Types</name>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left">Value</th>
            <th align="center">Hex</th>
            <th align="center">Endpoint behavior</th>
            <th align="center">Reference</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">40</td>
            <td align="center">0x0028</td>
            <td align="center">End.MAP</td>
            <td align="center">[This.ID]</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">41</td>
            <td align="center">0x0029</td>
            <td align="center">End.Limit</td>
            <td align="center">[This.ID]</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">69</td>
            <td align="center">0x0045</td>
            <td align="center">End.M.GTP6.D</td>
            <td align="center">[This.ID]</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">70</td>
            <td align="center">0x0046</td>
            <td align="center">End.M.GTP6.Di</td>
            <td align="center">[This.ID]</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">71</td>
            <td align="center">0x0047</td>
            <td align="center">End.M.GTP6.E</td>
            <td align="center">[This.ID]</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">72</td>
            <td align="center">0x0048</td>
            <td align="center">End.M.GTP4.E</td>
            <td align="center">[This.ID]</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </section>
    <!-- End section "IANA Considerations" -->

    <section anchor="acknowledge" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Acknowledgements</name>
      <t>The authors would like to thank Daisuke Yokota, Bart Peirens,
	  Ryokichi Onishi, Kentaro Ebisawa, Peter Bosch, Darren Dukes,
	  Francois Clad, Sri Gundavelli, Sridhar Bhaskaran, Arashmid Akhavain,
    Ravi Shekhar, Aeneas Dodd-Noble, Carlos Jesus Bernardos, Dirk v. Hugo
     and Jeffrey Zhang for their useful comments of this work.</t>
    </section>
    <!-- End section "Acknowledgements" -->

    <section numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Contributors</name>
      <t>Kentaro Ebisawa
      Toyota Motor Corporation
      Japan</t>
      <t>Email: ebisawa@toyota-tokyo.tech</t>
      <t>Tetsuya Murakami
      Arrcus, Inc.
      United States of America</t>
      <t>Email: tetsuya.ietf@gmail.com</t>
    </section>
    <!-- End section "Contributors" -->

  </middle>
  <back>
    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references>
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8402.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8986.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8754.xml"/>
        <reference anchor="TS.23501">
          <front>
            <title>System Architecture for the 5G System</title>
            <author surname="3GPP" fullname="3GPP">
                </author>
            <date month="November" year="2017"/>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="3GPP TS 23.501" value="15.0.0"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
      <references>
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-ietf-spring-sr-service-programming.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-camarilloelmalky-springdmm-srv6-mob-usecases.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-ali-spring-network-slicing-building-blocks.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-mhkk-dmm-srv6mup-architecture.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-gundavelli-dmm-mfa.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bibxml3/draft-murakami-dmm-user-plane-message-encoding.xml"/>
        <reference anchor="TS.29281">
          <front>
            <title>General Packet Radio System (GPRS) Tunnelling Protocol User Plane (GTPv1-U)</title>
            <author surname="3GPP" fullname="3GPP">
                </author>
            <date month="December" year="2017"/>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="3GPP TS 29.281" value="15.1.0"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="TS.38415">
          <front>
            <title>Draft Specification for 5GS container (TS 38.415)</title>
            <author surname="3GPP" fullname="3GPP">
                </author>
            <date month="August" year="2017"/>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="3GPP R3-174510" value="0.0.0"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
    </references>
    <section anchor="Implementations" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Implementations</name>
      <t>This document introduces new SRv6 Endpoint Behaviors. These behaviors have an
	  open-source P4 implementation available in
	  <eref target="https://github.com/ebiken/p4srv6"/>.</t>
      <t>Additionally, a full implementation of this document is available in Linux Foundation FD.io VPP project since release 20.05. More information available here: 
    <eref target="https://docs.fd.io/vpp/20.05/d7/d3c/srv6_mobile_plugin_doc.html"/>.</t>
      <t>There are also experimental implementations in M-CORD NGIC and Open Air Interface (OAI).</t>
    </section>
    <!-- End section "Implementations" -->
  </back>
</rfc>
