]> Cloudflare

Amsterdam Netherlands jabley@cloudflare.com

Kirei AB

jakob@kirei.se

Independent

guillaumebailey@outlook.com

ICANN

paul.hoffman@icann.org

The root zone of the Domain Name System (DNS) is cryptographically signed using DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC). In order to obtain secure answers from the root zone of the DNS using DNSSEC, a client must configure a suitable trust anchor. This document describes the format and publication mechanisms IANA uses to distribute the DNSSEC trust anchors. This document obsoletes RFC 7958. About This Document Status information for this document may be found at . Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at .

Introduction The Domain Name System (DNS) is described in and . DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) are described in . In the DNSSEC protocol, Resource Record Sets (RRSets) are signed cryptographically. This means that a response to a query contains signatures that allow the integrity and authenticity of the RRSet to be verified. DNSSEC signatures are validated by following a chain of signatures to a "trust anchor". The reason for trusting a trust anchor is outside the DNSSEC protocol, but having one or more trust anchors is required for the DNSSEC protocol to work. The publication of trust anchors for the root zone of the DNS is an IANA function performed by ICANN, through its affiliate Public Technical Identifiers (PTI). A detailed description of corresponding key management practices can be found in . This document describes the formats and distribution methods of DNSSEC trust anchors that is used by IANA for the root zone of the DNS. Other organizations might have different formats and mechanisms for distributing DNSSEC trust anchors for the root zone; however, most operators and software vendors have chosen to rely on the IANA trust anchors. The formats and distribution methods described in this document are a complement to, not a substitute for, the automated DNSSEC trust anchor update protocol described in . That protocol allows for secure in-band succession of trust anchors when trust has already been established. This document describes one way to establish an initial trust anchor that can be used by RFC 5011. This document obsoletes .

Definitions The term "trust anchor" is used in many different contexts in the security community. Many of the common definitions conflict because they are specific to a specific system, such as just for DNSSEC or just for S/MIME messages. In cryptographic systems with hierarchical structure, a trust anchor is an authoritative entity for which trust is assumed and not derived. The format of the entity differs in different systems, but the basic idea, the decision to trust this entity is made outside of the system that relies on it, is common to all the common uses of the term "trust anchor". The root zone trust anchor formats published by IANA are defined in . defines a trust anchor as "A configured DNSKEY RR or DS RR hash of a DNSKEY RR". Note that the formats defined here do not match the definition of "trust anchor" from ; however, a system that wants to convert the trusted material from IANA into a Delegation Signer (DS) RR can do so. The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

Changes from RFC 7958 This version of the document includes the following changes:

• There is a significant technical change from erratum 5932 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5932>. This is in the seventh paragraph of .
• Added the optional public key element.
• Removed the certificates and certificate signing mechanisms.
• Removed the detached OpenPGP signature mechanism.
• The reference to the DNSSEC Practice Statement was updated.
• Say explicitly that the XML documents might have XML comments in them.
• Clarified the use of the detached CMS signature.
• Added an IANA Considerations section.
• Simplified the description of using the validFrom and validUntil attributes.
• There was a bit of editorial cleanup.

IANA DNSSEC Root Zone Trust Anchor Format and Semantics IANA publishes trust anchors for the root zone as an XML document that contains the hashes of the DNSKEY records and optionally the keys from the DNSKEY records. This format and the semantics associated are described in the rest of this section. Note that the XML document can have XML comments. For example, IANA might use these comments to add pointers to important information on the IANA web site. XML comments are only used as human-readable commentary, not extensions to the grammar. The XML document contains a set of hashes for the DNSKEY records that can be used to validate the root zone. The hashes are consistent with the defined presentation format of a DS resource. The XML document also can contain the keys from the DNSKEY records. The keys are consistent with the defined presentation format of a DNSKEY resource. Note that the hashes are mandatory in the syntax, but the keys are optional.

XML Syntax A RELAX NG Compact Schema for the documents used to publish trust anchors is:

XML Semantics The TrustAnchor element is the container for all of the trust anchors in the file. The id attribute in the TrustAnchor element is an opaque string that identifies the set of trust anchors. Its value has no particular semantics. Note that the id element in the TrustAnchor element is different than the id element in the KeyDigest element, described below. The source attribute in the TrustAnchor element gives information about where to obtain the TrustAnchor container. It is likely to be a URL and is advisory only. The Zone element in the TrustAnchor element states to which DNS zone this container applies. The root zone is indicated by a single period (.) character without any quotation marks. The TrustAnchor element contains one or more KeyDigest elements. Each KeyDigest element represents the digest of a past, current, or potential future DNSKEY record of the zone defined in the Zone element. The id attribute in the KeyDigest element is an opaque string that identifies the hash. Note that the id element in the KeyDigest element is different than the id element in the TrustAnchor element described above. The validFrom and validUntil attributes in the KeyDigest element specify the range of times that the KeyDigest element can be used as a trust anchor. Note that the validUntil attribute of the KeyDigest element is optional. If the relying party is using a trust anchor that has a KeyDigest element that does not have a validUntil attribute, it can change to a trust anchor with a KeyDigest element that does have a validUntil attribute, as long as that trust anchor's validUntil attribute is in the future and the DNSKEY elements of the KeyDigest are the same as the previous trust anchor. Relying parties SHOULD NOT use a KeyDigest outside of the time range given in the validFrom and validUntil attributes. The KeyTag element in the KeyDigest element contains the key tag for the DNSKEY record represented in this KeyDigest. The Algorithm element in the KeyDigest element contains the signing algorithm identifier for the DNSKEY record represented in this KeyDigest. The DigestType element in the KeyDigest element contains the digest algorithm identifier for the DNSKEY record represented in this KeyDigest. The Digest element in the KeyDigest element contains the hexadecimal representation of the hash for the DNSKEY record represented in this KeyDigest. The PublicKey element in the KeyDigest element contains the base64 representation of the public key represented in this KeyDigest. The PublicKey is optional and is new in this version of the specification. It can be useful when IANA has a trust anchor that has not yet been published in the DNS root.

Converting from XML to DS Records The display format for the DS record that is the equivalent of a KeyDigest element can be constructed by marshaling the KeyTag, Algorithm, DigestType, and Digest elements. For example, assume that the TrustAnchor element contains: . 19036 8 2 49AAC11D7B6F6446702E54A1607371607A1A41855200FD2CE1CDDE32F24E8FB5 AwEAAagAIKlVZrpC6Ia7gEzahOR+9W29euxhJhVVLOyQbSEW0O8gcCjF FVQUTf6v58fLjwBd0YI0EzrAcQqBGCzh/RStIoO8g0NfnfL2MTJRkxoX bfDaUeVPQuYEhg37NZWAJQ9VnMVDxP/VHL496M/QZxkjf5/Efucp2gaD X6RS6CXpoY68LsvPVjR0ZSwzz1apAzvN9dlzEheX7ICJBBtuA6G3LQpz W5hOA2hzCTMjJPJ8LbqF6dsV6DoBQzgul0sGIcGOYl7OyQdXfZ57relS Qageu+ipAdTTJ25AsRTAoub8ONGcLmqrAmRLKBP1dfwhYB4N7knNnulq QxA+Uk1ihz0= ]]> The DS record would be:

Converting from XML to DNSKEY Records The display format for the DNSKEY record that is the equivalent of a KeyDigest element can be constructed by marshaling the Algorithm and PublicKey elements with some constants. For example, assume that the TrustAnchor element is the same as in . The DNSKEY record would be: The published trust anchor does not provide values for DNSKEY protocol or flags. For the purpose of this mechanism, clients can assume valid trust anchors will be have the ZONE and SEP flag bits set to 1.

XML Example The following describes two fictitious trust anchors for the root zone. . 34291 5 1 c8cb3d7fe518835490af8029c23efbce6b6ef3e2 12345 5 1 a3cf809dbdbc835716ba22bdc370d2efa50f21c7 ]]>

Root Zone Trust Anchor Retrieval

Retrieving Trust Anchors with HTTPS and HTTP Trust anchors are available for retrieval using HTTPS and HTTP. In this section, all URLs are given using the "https:" scheme. If HTTPS cannot be used, replace the "https:" scheme with "http:". The URL for retrieving the set of hashes in the XML file described in is <https://data.iana.org/root-anchors/root-anchors.xml>.

Accepting DNSSEC Trust Anchors A validator operator can choose whether or not to accept the trust anchors described in this document using whatever policy they want. In order to help validator operators verify the content and origin of trust anchors they receive, IANA uses digital signatures that chain to an ICANN-controlled Certificate Authority (CA) over the trust anchor data. It is important to note that the ICANN CA is not a DNSSEC trust anchor. Instead, it is an optional mechanism for verifying the content and origin of the XML and certificate trust anchors. The content and origin of the XML file can be verified using a digital signature on the file. IANA provides a detached Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) signature that chains to the ICANN CA with the XML file.
This can be useful for validator operators who have received a copy of the ICANN CA's public key in a trusted out-of-band fashion. The URL for a detached CMS signature for the XML file is <https://data.iana.org/root-anchors/root-anchors.p7s>. Another method IANA uses to help validator operators verify the content and origin of trust anchors they receive is to use the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol for distributing the trust anchors. Currently, the CA used for data.iana.org is well known, that is, one that is a WebTrust-accredited CA. If a system retrieving the trust anchors trusts the CA that IANA uses for the "data.iana.org" web server, HTTPS SHOULD be used instead of HTTP in order to have assurance of data origin.

Changes in the Trust Model for Distribution IANA used to distribute the trust anchors as a self-signed PGP message and as a self-issued certificate signing request; this was described in . This document removes those methods because they relied on a trust model that mixed out-of-band trust of authentication keys with out-of-band trust of the DNSSEC root keys. Note, however, that cryptographic assurance for the contents of the trust anchor now comes from the web PKI or the IANA CA as described in . This cryptographic assurance is bolstered by informal comparisons made by users of the trust anchors, such as software vendors comparing the trust anchor files they are using.

Security Considerations This document describes how DNSSEC trust anchors for the root zone of the DNS are published. Many DNSSEC clients will only configure IANA-issued trust anchors for the DNS root to perform validation. As a consequence, reliable publication of trust anchors is important. This document aims to specify carefully the means by which such trust anchors are published, with the goal of making it easier for those trust anchors to be integrated into user environments.

IANA Considerations Each time IANA produces a new trust anchor, it MUST publish that trust anchor using the format described in this document. IANA MAY delay the publication of a new trust anchor for operational reasons, such as having a newly-created key in multiple facilities. When a trust anchor that was previously published is no longer suitable for use, IANA MUST update the trust anchor document accordingly by setting a validUntil date for that trust anchor. The validUntil attribute that is added MAY be a date in the past or in the future, depending on IANA's operational choices. More information about IANA's policies and procedures for how the cryptographic keys for the DNS root zone are managed (also known as "DNSSEC Practice Statements" or "DPSs") can be found at https://www.iana.org/dnssec/procedures.

References Normative References This RFC is the revised basic definition of The Domain Name System. It obsoletes RFC-882. This memo describes the domain style names and their used for host address look up and electronic mail forwarding. It discusses the clients and servers in the domain name system and the protocol used between them. This RFC is the revised specification of the protocol and format used in the implementation of the Domain Name System. It obsoletes RFC-883. This memo documents the details of the domain name client - server communication. The Domain Name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC) add data origin authentication and data integrity to the Domain Name System. This document introduces these extensions and describes their capabilities and limitations. This document also discusses the services that the DNS security extensions do and do not provide. Last, this document describes the interrelationships between the documents that collectively describe DNSSEC. [STANDARDS-TRACK] This document describes a means for automated, authenticated, and authorized updating of DNSSEC "trust anchors". The method provides protection against N-1 key compromises of N keys in the trust point key set. Based on the trust established by the presence of a current anchor, other anchors may be added at the same place in the hierarchy, and, ultimately, supplant the existing anchor(s). This mechanism will require changes to resolver management behavior (but not resolver resolution behavior), and the addition of a single flag bit to the DNSKEY record. [STANDARDS-TRACK] This document describes the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS). This syntax is used to digitally sign, digest, authenticate, or encrypt arbitrary message content. [STANDARDS-TRACK] The root zone of the Domain Name System (DNS) has been cryptographically signed using DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC). In order to obtain secure answers from the root zone of the DNS using DNSSEC, a client must configure a suitable trust anchor. This document describes the format and publication mechanisms IANA has used to distribute the DNSSEC trust anchors. This document describes the DNS Security Extensions (commonly called "DNSSEC") that are specified in RFCs 4033, 4034, and 4035, as well as a handful of others. One purpose is to introduce all of the RFCs in one place so that the reader can understand the many aspects of DNSSEC. This document does not update any of those RFCs. A second purpose is to state that using DNSSEC for origin authentication of DNS data is the best current practice. A third purpose is to provide a single reference for other documents that want to refer to DNSSEC. In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings. Informative References Root Zone KSK Operator Policy Management Authority

Historical Note The first KSK for use in the root zone of the DNS was generated at a key ceremony at the ICANN Key Management Facility (KMF) in Culpeper, Virginia, USA on 2010-06-16. This key entered production during a second key ceremony held at an ICANN KMF in El Segundo, California, USA on 2010-07-12. The resulting trust anchor was first published on 2010-07-15. The second KSK for use in the root zone of the DNS was generated at key ceremony #27 at the ICANN KMF in Culpeper, Virginia, USA on 2016-10-27. This key entered production during key ceremony #28 held at the ICANN KMF in El Segundo, California, USA on 2017-02-02. The resulting trust anchor was first published on 2018-11-11. More information about the key ceremonies, including full records of previous ceremonies and plans for future ceremonies, can be found at <https://www.iana.org/dnssec/ceremonies>.

Acknowledgemwents Many pioneers paved the way for the deployment of DNSSEC in the root zone of the DNS, and the authors hereby acknowledge their substantial collective contribution. RFC 7958 incorporated suggestions made by Alfred Hoenes and Russ Housley, whose contributions are appreciated.