<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="3"?>
<?rfc tocindent="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc comments="yes"?>
<?rfc inline="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-15"
     ipr="trust200902">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="Advertising SR Policies using BGP-LS">Advertisement of
    Segment Routing Policies using BGP Link-State</title>

    <author fullname="Stefano Previdi" initials="S." surname="Previdi">
      <organization>Individual</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>

          <city/>

          <code/>

          <country/>
        </postal>

        <email>stefano@previdi.net</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Ketan Talaulikar" initials="K." role="editor"
            surname="Talaulikar">
      <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>

          <city/>

          <code/>

          <country>India</country>
        </postal>

        <email>ketant.ietf@gmail.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Jie Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong">
      <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Huawei Campus, No. 156 Beiqing Rd.</street>

          <city>Beijing</city>

          <code>100095</code>

          <country>China</country>
        </postal>

        <email>jie.dong@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Hannes Gredler" initials="H." surname="Gredler">
      <organization>RtBrick Inc.</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street/>

          <city/>

          <region/>

          <code/>

          <country/>
        </postal>

        <email>hannes@rtbrick.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Jeff Tantsura" initials="J." surname="Tantsura">
      <organization>Nvidia</organization>

      <address>
        <email>jefftant.ietf@gmail.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date year=""/>

    <area>Routing</area>

    <workgroup>Inter-Domain Routing</workgroup>

    <keyword>BGP</keyword>

    <keyword>BGP-LS</keyword>

    <keyword>Segment Routing</keyword>

    <keyword>SR</keyword>

    <keyword>SR Policy</keyword>

    <keyword>SR-MPLS</keyword>

    <keyword>SRv6</keyword>

    <keyword>Traffic Engineering</keyword>

    <keyword>BGP SR Policy</keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document describes a mechanism to collect the Segment Routing
      Policy information that is locally available in a node and advertise it
      into BGP Link-State (BGP-LS) updates. Such information can be used by
      external components for path computation, re-optimization, service
      placement, network visualization, etc.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section anchor="Introduction" title="Introduction">
      <t>SR Policy architecture details are specified in <xref
      target="RFC9256"/>. An SR Policy comprises one or more candidate paths
      of which at a given time one and only one may be active (i.e., installed
      in forwarding and usable for steering of traffic). Each candidate path
      in turn may have one or more SID-List of which one or more SID-List may
      be active. When multiple SID-Lists are active then traffic is load
      balanced over them. This document covers the advertisement of state
      information at the individual SR Policy candidate path level.</t>

      <t>SR Policies are generally instantiated at the head-end and are based
      on either local configuration or controller-based programming of the
      node using various APIs and protocols (e.g., PCEP or BGP).</t>

      <t>In many network environments, the configuration, and state of each SR
      Policy that is available in the network is required by controllers. Such
      controllers, that are aware of both topology and SR Policy state
      information, allow the network operator to optimize several functions
      and operations in their networks.</t>

      <t>One example of a controller is the stateful Path Computation Element
      (PCE) <xref target="RFC8231"/>, which could provide benefits in path
      optimization. While some extensions are proposed in the Path Computation
      Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for the Path Computation Clients
      (PCCs) to report the LSP states to the PCE, this mechanism may not be
      applicable in a management-based PCE architecture as specified in
      section 5.5 of <xref target="RFC4655"/>. As illustrated in the figure
      below, the PCC is not an LSR in the routing domain, thus the head-end
      nodes of the SR Policies may not implement the PCEP protocol. In this
      case, a general mechanism to collect the SR Policy states from the
      ingress LERs is needed. This document proposes an SR Policy state
      collection mechanism complementary to the mechanism defined in <xref
      target="RFC8231"/>.<figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[                                 -----------
                                |   -----   |
            Service             |  | TED |<-+----------->
            Request             |   -----   |  TED synchronization
               |                |     |     |  mechanism (e.g.,
               v                |     |     |  routing protocol)
         ------------- Request/ |     v     |
        |             | Response|   -----   |
        |     NMS     |<--------+> | PCE |  |
        |             |         |   -----   |
         -------------           -----------
       Service |
       Request |
               v
          ----------  Signaling   ----------
         | Head-End | Protocol   | Adjacent |
         |  Node    |<---------->|   Node   |
          ----------              ----------

               Figure 1  Management-Based PCE Usage
]]></artwork>
        </figure></t>

      <t>In networks with composite PCE nodes as specified in section 5.1 of
      <xref target="RFC4655"/>, PCE is implemented on several routers in the
      network, and the PCCs in the network can use the mechanism described in
      <xref target="RFC8231"/> to report the SR Policy information to the PCE
      nodes. An external component may also need to collect the SR Policy
      information from all the PCEs in the network to obtain a global view of
      the state of all SR Policy paths in the network.</t>

      <t>In multi-area or multi-AS scenarios, each area or AS can have a child
      PCE to collect the SR Policies in its domain, in addition, a parent PCE
      needs to collect SR Policy information from multiple child PCEs to
      obtain a global view of SR Policy paths inside and across the domains
      involved.</t>

      <t>In another network scenario, a centralized controller is used for
      service placement. Obtaining the SR Policy state information is quite
      important for making appropriate service placement decisions with the
      purpose of both meeting the application's requirements and utilizing
      network resources efficiently.</t>

      <t>The Network Management System (NMS) may need to provide global
      visibility of the SR Policies in the network as part of the network
      visualization function.</t>

      <t>BGP has been extended to distribute link-state and traffic
      engineering information to external components <xref target="RFC9552"/>.
      Using the same protocol to collect SR Policy and state information is
      desirable for these external components since this avoids introducing
      multiple protocols for network topology information collection. This
      document describes a mechanism to distribute SR Policy information (both
      SR-MPLS, and SRv6 <xref target="RFC8402"/>) to external components using
      BGP-LS and covers both explicit and dynamic candidate paths. The
      advertisements of composite candidate path is outside the scope of this
      document.</t>

      <t>The BGP-LS Producer <xref target="RFC9552"/> that is originating the
      advertisement of SR Policy information can be either:<list
          style="symbols">
          <t>a SR Policy headend node, or</t>

          <t>a PCE which is receiving the SR Policy information from its PCCs
          (i.e., SR Policy headend nodes) via PCEP</t>
        </list></t>

      <t>This extensions specified in this document complement the BGP SR
      Policy SAFI <xref target="I-D.ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi"/> and <xref
      target="I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext"/> that are used to advertise
      SR Policies from controllers to the headend routers using BGP by
      enabling the reporting of the operational state of those SR Policies
      back from the headend to the controllers.</t>

      <t>While this document focuses on SR Policies, <xref
      target="I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-te-path"/> introduces further extension to
      support other TE Paths such as MPLS-TE LSPs.</t>

      <t>The encodings specified in this document (specifically in <xref
      target="SRPOLICYCP"/> and <xref target="SRPOLICYTLVS"/>) make use of
      flags that convey various types of information of the SR Policy. The
      document uses the term "set" to indicate that the value of a flag bit is
      1 and the term "clear" when the value is 0.</t>

      <section title="Requirements Language">
        <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
        "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
        "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
        14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only
        when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="TEINFOINBGP"
             title="Carrying SR Policy Information in BGP">
      <t>The "Link-State NLRI" defined in <xref target="RFC9552"/> is extended
      to carry the SR Policy information. New TLVs carried in the BGP
      Link-State Attribute defined in <xref target="RFC9552"/> are also
      defined to carry the attributes of an SR Policy in the subsequent
      sections.</t>

      <t>The format of "Link-State NLRI" is defined in <xref
      target="RFC9552"/> as follows:<figure>
          <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|            NLRI Type          |     Total NLRI Length         |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
//                  Link-State NLRI (variable)                 //
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

               Figure 2  BGP-LS NLRI Format

]]></artwork>
        </figure></t>

      <t>An additional "NLRI Type" known as SR Policy Candidate Path NLRI
      (value 5) is defined for the advertisement of SR Policy Information.</t>

      <t>This SR Policy Candidate Path NLRI is used to report the state
      details of individual SR Policy Candidate paths along with their
      underlying segment lists.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="TEPOLICYNLRI" title="SR Policy Candidate Path NLRI Type">
      <t>This document defines SR Policy Candidate Path NLRI Type with its
      format as shown in the following figure:</t>

      <t><figure>
          <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|  Protocol-ID  |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                        Identifier                             |
|                        (64 bits)                              | 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
//        Local Node Descriptor TLV (for the Headend)          //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
//           SR Policy Candidate Path Descriptor TLV           //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

          Figure 3  SR Policy Candidate Path NLRI Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
        </figure><list style="symbols">
          <t>Protocol-ID field specifies the component that owns the SR Policy
          state in the advertising node. An additional Protocol-ID "Segment
          Routing" (value 9) is introduced by this document that MUST be used
          for advertisement of SR Policies.</t>

          <t>"Identifier" is an 8 octet value as defined in section 5.2 of
          <xref target="RFC9552"/>.</t>

          <t>"Local Node Descriptor" (TLV 256) <xref target="RFC9552"/> is
          used as specified further in this section.</t>

          <t>The SR Policy Candidate Path Descriptor TLV is specified in <xref
          target="SRPOLICYCP"/>.</t>
        </list></t>

      <t>The Local Node Descriptor TLV carries information that only
      identifies the headend node of the SR Policy irrespective of whether the
      BGP-LS Producer is a headend or a PCE node.</t>

      <t>The Local Node Descriptor TLV MUST include at least one of the
      following Node Descriptor TLVs:<list style="symbols">
          <t>IPv4 Router-ID of Local Node (TLV 1028) <xref target="RFC9552"/>,
          which identifies the headend node of the SR Policy as specified in
          section 2.1 of <xref target="RFC9256"/>.</t>

          <t>IPv6 Router-ID of Local Node (TLV 1029) <xref target="RFC9552"/>,
          which identifies the headend node of the SR Policy as specified in
          section 2.1 of <xref target="RFC9256"/>.</t>
        </list></t>

      <t>The following sub-sections describe the encoding of sub-TLVs within
      the Local Node Descriptor TLV depending on which node is the BGP-LS
      Producer.</t>

      <section title="SR Policy Headend as BGP-LS Producer">
        <t>The Local Node Descriptor TLV MUST include the following Node
        Descriptor TLVs when the headend node is the BGP-LS Producer:<list
            style="symbols">
            <t>BGP Router-ID (TLV 516) <xref target="RFC9086"/>, which
            contains a valid BGP Identifier of the headend node of the SR
            Policy.</t>

            <t>Autonomous System Number (TLV 512) <xref target="RFC9552"/>,
            which contains the ASN (or AS Confederation Identifier (ASN) <xref
            target="RFC5065"/>, if confederations are used) of the headend
            node of the SR Policy.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>The Local Node Descriptor TLV MAY include the following Node
        Descriptor TLVs when the headend node is the BGP-LS Producer:<list
            style="symbols">
            <t>BGP Confederation Member (TLV 517) <xref target="RFC9086"/>,
            which contains the ASN of the confederation member (i.e. Member-AS
            Number), if BGP confederations are used, the headend node of the
            SR Policy.</t>

            <t>Other Node Descriptors as defined in <xref target="RFC9552"/>
            to identify the headend node of the SR Policy. The determination
            of whether the IGP Router-ID sub-TLV (TLV 515) contains a 4-octet
            OSPF Router-ID or a 6-octet ISO System-ID is to be done based on
            the length of that sub-TLV since the Protocol-ID in the NLRI is
            always going to be "Segment Routing".</t>
          </list></t>
      </section>

      <section title="PCE as BGP-LS Producer">
        <t>The PCE node MUST NOT include its identifiers in the Node
        Descriptor TLV in the NLRI as the Node Descriptor TLV MUST only carry
        the identifiers of the SR Policy headend.</t>

        <t>The Local Node Descriptor TLV MAY include the following Node
        Descriptor TLVs when the PCE node is the BGP-LS Producer and it has
        this information about the headend (e.g., as part of its topology
        database):<list style="symbols">
            <t>BGP Router-ID (TLV 516) <xref target="RFC9086"/>, which
            contains a valid BGP Identifier of the headend node of the SR
            Policy.</t>

            <t>Autonomous System Number (TLV 512) <xref target="RFC9552"/>,
            which contains the ASN (or AS Confederation Identifier (ASN) <xref
            target="RFC5065"/>, if confederations are used) of the headend
            node of the SR Policy.</t>

            <t>BGP Confederation Member (TLV 517) <xref target="RFC9086"/>,
            which contains the ASN of the confederation member (i.e. Member-AS
            Number), if BGP confederations are used, the headend node of the
            SR Policy.</t>

            <t>Other Node Descriptors as defined in <xref target="RFC9552"/>
            to identify the headend node of the SR Policy. The determination
            of whether the IGP Router-ID sub-TLV (TLV 515) contains a 4-octet
            OSPF Router-ID or a 6-octet ISO System-ID is to be done based on
            the length of that sub-TLV since the Protocol-ID in the NLRI is
            always going to be "Segment Routing".</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>When a Path Computation Element (PCE) node is functioning as the
        BGP-LS Producer on behalf of one or more headends, it MAY include its
        own BGP Router-ID (TLV 516), Autonomous System Number (TLV 512), or
        BGP Confederation Member (TLV 517) in the BGP-LS Attribute.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="SRPOLICYCP" title="SR Policy Candidate Path Descriptor">
      <t>The SR Policy Candidate Path Descriptor TLV identifies a Segment
      Routing Policy candidate path as defined in <xref target="RFC9256"/>. It
      is a mandatory TLV for SR Policy Candidate Path NLRI type. The TLV has
      the following format: <figure>
          <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|             Type              |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Protocol-origin|    Flags      |            RESERVED           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                     Endpoint (4 or 16 octets)                //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                     Policy Color (4 octets)                   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Originator AS Number (4 octets)                 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|              Originator Address (4 or 16 octets)             //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                    Discriminator (4 octets)                   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

      Figure 4  SR Policy Candidate Path Descriptor Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
        </figure><list style="symbols">
          <t>Type: 554</t>

          <t>Length: variable (valid values are 24, 36 or 48 octets)</t>

          <t>Protocol-Origin: 1-octet field which identifies the protocol or
          component which is responsible for the instantiation of this path as
          specified in section 2.3 of <xref target="RFC9256"/>. The
          protocol-origin codepoints to be used are listed in <xref
          target="PROTOCOLORIGINS"/>.</t>

          <t>Flags: 1-octet field with following bit positions defined. Other
          bits MUST be cleared by the originator and MUST be ignored by a
          receiver.<figure>
              <artwork><![CDATA[    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |E|O|           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Where:
]]></artwork>
            </figure><list style="symbols">
              <t>E-Flag: Indicates the encoding of endpoint as IPv6 address
              when set and IPv4 address when clear</t>

              <t>O-Flag: Indicates the encoding of originator address as IPv6
              address when set and IPv4 address when clear</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>Reserved: 2 octets which MUST be set to 0 by the originator and
          MUST be ignored by a receiver.</t>

          <t>Endpoint: 4 or 16 octets (as indicated by the flags) containing
          the address of the endpoint of the SR Policy as specified in section
          2.1 of <xref target="RFC9256"/>.</t>

          <t>Color: 4 octets that indicate the color of the SR Policy as
          specified in section 2.1 of <xref target="RFC9256"/>.</t>

          <t>Originator ASN: 4 octets to carry the 4-byte encoding of the ASN
          of the originator. Refer to section 2.4 of <xref target="RFC9256"/>
          for details.</t>

          <t>Originator Address: 4 or 16 octets (as indicated by the flags) to
          carry the address of the originator. Refer to section 2.4 of <xref
          target="RFC9256"/> for details.</t>

          <t>Discriminator: 4 octets to carry the discriminator of the path.
          Refer to section 2.5 of <xref target="RFC9256"/> for details.</t>
        </list></t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="SRPOLICYTLVS" title="SR Policy State TLVs">
      <t>This section defines the various TLVs which enable the headend to
      report the state at the SR Policy candidate path level. These TLVs (and
      their sub-TLVs) are carried in the optional non-transitive BGP-LS
      Attribute defined in <xref target="RFC9552"/> associated with the SR
      Policy Candidate Path NLRI type.</t>

      <t>The detailed procedures for the advertisement are described in <xref
      target="Procedures"/>.</t>

      <section anchor="CPBSID" title="SR Binding SID TLV">
        <t>The SR Binding SID (BSID) is an optional TLV that is used to report
        the BSID and its attributes for the SR Policy candidate path. The TLV
        MAY also optionally contain the Specified BSID value for reporting as
        described in section 6.2.3 of <xref target="RFC9256"/>. Only a single
        instance of this TLV is advertised for a given candidate path. If
        multiple instances are present, then the first one is considered valid
        and the rest are ignored.</t>

        <t>The TLV has the following format:<figure align="center">
            <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|              Type             |             Length            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|           BSID Flags          |            RESERVED           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                   Binding SID (4 or 16 octets)               //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Specified Binding SID (4 or 16 octets)         //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

      Figure 5  SR Binding SID TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>Type: 1201</t>

            <t>Length: variable (valid values are 12 or 36 octets)</t>

            <t>BSID Flags: 2-octet field that indicates attribute and status
            of the Binding SID (BSID) associated with this candidate path. The
            following bit positions are defined and the semantics are
            described in detail in section 6.2 of <xref target="RFC9256"/>.
            Other bits MUST be cleared by the originator and MUST be ignored
            by a receiver.<figure>
                <artwork><![CDATA[    0                   1           
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |D|B|U|L|F|                     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Where:
]]></artwork>
              </figure><list style="symbols">
                <t>D-Flag: Indicates the dataplane for the BSIDs and if they
                are 16 octet SRv6 SID (when set) or are 4 octet SR/MPLS label
                value (when clear).</t>

                <t>B-Flag: Indicates the allocation of the value in the BSID
                field when set and indicates that BSID is not allocated when
                clear.</t>

                <t>U-Flag: Indicates the specified BSID value is unavailable
                when set. When clear it indicates that this candidate path is
                using the specified BSID. This flag is ignored when there is
                no specified BSID.</t>

                <t>L-Flag: Indicates the BSID value is from the Segment
                Routing Local Block (SRLB) of the headend node when set and is
                from the local dynamic label pool when clear.</t>

                <t>F-Flag: Indicates the BSID value is one allocated from
                dynamic label pool due to fallback (e.g. when specified BSID
                is unavailable) when set and indicates that there has been no
                fallback for BSID allocation when clear.</t>
              </list></t>

            <t>RESERVED: 2 octets. MUST be set to 0 by the originator and MUST
            be ignored by a receiver.</t>

            <t>Binding SID: It indicates the operational or allocated BSID
            value based on the status flags.</t>

            <t>Specified BSID: It is used to report the explicitly specified
            BSID value regardless of whether it is successfully allocated or
            not. The field is set to value 0 when BSID has not been
            specified.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>The BSID fields above depend on the dataplane (SRv6 or MPLS)
        indicated by the D-Flag. If D-Flag set (SRv6 dataplane), then the
        length of the BSID fields is 16 octets. If the D-Flag is clear (MPLS
        dataplane), then the length of the BSID fields is 4 octets. When
        carrying the MPLS Label, as shown in the figure below, the TC, S, and
        TTL (total of 12 bits) are RESERVED and MUST be set to 0 by the
        originator and MUST be ignored by a receiver.</t>

        <t><figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
   0                   1                   2                   3
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |          Label                        | TC  |S|       TTL     |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

      Figure 6  SR Binding SID Label Format
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t>In the case of an SRv6, the SR Binding SID sub-TLV does not have
        the ability to signal the SRv6 Endpoint Behavior <xref
        target="RFC8986"/> or the structure of the SID. Therefore, the SR
        Binding SID sub-TLV SHOULD NOT be used for the advertisement of an
        SRv6 Binding SID. Instead, the SRv6 Binding SID TLV defined in <xref
        target="CPBSIDSRV6"/> SHOULD be used for signaling of an SRv6 Binding
        SID. The use of the SR Binding SID sub-TLV for advertisement of the
        SRv6 Binding SID has been deprecated, and is documented here only for
        backward compatibility with implementations that followed early
        versions of this specification.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="CPBSIDSRV6" title="SRv6 Binding SID TLV">
        <t>The SRv6 Binding SID (BSID) is an optional TLV that is used to
        report the SRv6 BSID and its attributes for the SR Policy candidate
        path. The TLV MAY also optionally contain the Specified SRv6 BSID
        value for reporting as described in section 6.2.3 of <xref
        target="RFC9256"/>. Multiple instances of this TLV may be used to
        report each of the SRv6 BSIDs associated with the candidate path.</t>

        <t>The TLV has the following format:<figure align="center">
            <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|              Type             |             Length            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|           BSID Flags          |            RESERVED           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                    Binding SID (16 octets)                   //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                Specified Binding SID (16 octets)             //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
//   Sub-TLVs (variable)                                       //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

            Figure 7  SRv6 Binding SID TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>Type: 1212</t>

            <t>Length: variable</t>

            <t>BSID Flags: 2-octet field that indicates attribute and status
            of the Binding SID (BSID) associated with this candidate path. The
            following bit positions are defined and the semantics are
            described in detail in section 6.2 of <xref target="RFC9256"/>.
            Other bits MUST be cleared by the originator and MUST be ignored
            by a receiver.<figure>
                <artwork><![CDATA[    0                   1           
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |B|U|F|                         |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Where:
]]></artwork>
              </figure><list style="symbols">
                <t>B-Flag: Indicates the allocation of the value in the BSID
                field when set and indicates that BSID is not allocated when
                clear.</t>

                <t>U-Flag: Indicates the specified BSID value is unavailable
                when set. When clear it indicates that this candidate path is
                using the specified BSID. This flag is ignored when there is
                no specified BSID.</t>

                <t>F-Flag: Indicates the BSID value is one allocated
                dynamically due to fallback (e.g. when specified BSID is
                unavailable) when set and indicates that there has been no
                fallback for BSID allocation when clear.</t>
              </list></t>

            <t>RESERVED: 2 octets. MUST be set to 0 by the originator and MUST
            be ignored by a receiver.</t>

            <t>Binding SID: It indicates the operational or allocated BSID
            value based on the status flags.</t>

            <t>Specified BSID: It is used to report the explicitly specified
            BSID value regardless of whether it is successfully allocated or
            not. The field is set to value 0 when BSID has not been
            specified.</t>

            <t>Sub-TLVs: variable and contains any other optional attributes
            associated with the SRv6 BSID.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>The SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLV (1250) and the SRv6 SID Structure
        TLV (1252) MAY optionally be used as sub-TLVs of the SRv6 Binding SID
        TLV to indicate the SRv6 Endpoint behavior and SID structure for the
        Binding SID value in the TLV. <xref target="RFC9514"/> defines SRv6
        Endpoint Behavior TLV And SRv6 SID Structure TLV.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="CPSTATE" title="SR Candidate Path State TLV">
        <t>The SR Candidate Path State TLV provides the operational status and
        attributes of the SR Policy at the candidate path level. Only a single
        instance of this TLV is advertised for a given candidate path. If
        multiple instances are present, then the first one is considered valid
        and the rest are ignored.</t>

        <t>The TLV has the following format:<figure align="center">
            <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|              Type             |             Length            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   Priority    |   RESERVED    |              Flags            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                      Preference (4 octets)                    |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

         Figure 8  SR Candidate Path State TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>Type: 1202</t>

            <t>Length: 8 octets</t>

            <t>Priority: 1-octet value which indicates the priority of the
            candidate path. Refer Section 2.12 of <xref
            target="RFC9256"/>.</t>

            <t>RESERVED: 1 octet. MUST be set to 0 by the originator and MUST
            be ignored by a receiver.</t>

            <t>Flags: 2-octet field that indicates attribute and status of the
            candidate path. The following bit positions are defined and the
            semantics are described in section 5 of <xref target="RFC9256"/>
            unless stated otherwise for individual flags. Other bits MUST be
            cleared by the originator and MUST be ignored by a
            receiver.<figure>
                <artwork><![CDATA[    0                   1           
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |S|A|B|E|V|O|D|C|I|T|U|         |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Where:
]]></artwork>
              </figure><list style="symbols">
                <t>S-Flag: Indicates the candidate path is in an
                administrative shut state when set and not in administrative
                shut state when clear.</t>

                <t>A-Flag: Indicates the candidate path is the active path
                (i.e. one provisioned in the forwarding plane as specified in
                section 2.9 of <xref target="RFC9256"/>) for the SR Policy
                when set and not the active path when clear.</t>

                <t>B-Flag: Indicates the candidate path is the backup path
                (i.e. one identified for path protection of the active path as
                specified in section 9.3 of <xref target="RFC9256"/>) for the
                SR Policy when set and not the backup path when clear.</t>

                <t>E-Flag: Indicates that the candidate path has been
                evaluated for validity (e.g. headend may evaluate candidate
                paths based on their preferences) when set and has not been
                evaluated for validity when clear.</t>

                <t>V-Flag: Indicates the candidate path has at least one valid
                SID-List when set and indicates no valid SID-List is available
                or evaluated when clear. When the E-Flag is clear (i.e. the
                candidate path has not been evaluated), then this flag MUST be
                set to 0 by the originator and ignored by the receiver.</t>

                <t>O-Flag: Indicates the candidate path was instantiated by
                the headend due to an on-demand nexthop trigger based on a
                local template when set and that the candidate path has not
                been instantiated due to on-demand nexthop trigger when clear.
                Refer to section 8.5 of <xref target="RFC9256"/> for
                details.</t>

                <t>D-Flag: Indicates the candidate path was delegated for
                computation to a PCE/controller when set and indicates that
                the candidate path has not been delegated for computation when
                clear.</t>

                <t>C-Flag: Indicates the candidate path was provisioned by a
                PCE/controller when set and indicates that the candidate path
                was not provisioned by a PCE/controller when clear.</t>

                <t>I-Flag: Indicates the candidate path is to perform the
                "drop upon invalid" behavior when no other valid candidate
                path is available for this SR Policy when the flag is set.
                Refer to section 8.2 of <xref target="RFC9256"/> for details.
                When clear, it indicates that the candidate path is not
                enabled for the "drop upon invalid" behavior.</t>

                <t>T-Flag: Indicates the candidate path has been marked as
                eligible for use as a transit policy on the headend when set
                and not eligible for use as a transit policy when clear.
                Transit policy is a policy whose BSID can be used in the
                segment list of another SR Policy. Refer to section 8.3 of
                <xref target="RFC9256"/> for steering into a transit policy
                using its BSID.</t>

                <t>U-Flag: Indicates that this candidate path is reported as
                active and is dropping traffic as a result of the "drop upon
                invalid" behavior being activated for the SR Policy when set.
                When clear, it indicates that the candidate path is not
                dropping traffic as a result of the "drop upon invalid"
                behavior. Refer to section 8.2 of <xref target="RFC9256"/> for
                details.</t>
              </list></t>

            <t>Preference: 4-octet value which indicates the preference of the
            candidate path. Refer to section 2.7 of <xref target="RFC9256"/>
            for details.</t>
          </list></t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="POLNAME" title="SR Policy Name TLV">
        <t>The SR Policy Name TLV is an optional TLV that is used to carry the
        symbolic name associated with the SR Policy. Only a single instance of
        this TLV is advertised for a given candidate path. If multiple
        instances are present, then the first one is considered valid and the
        rest are ignored.</t>

        <t>The TLV has the following format:<figure align="center">
            <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |              Length           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                   SR Policy Name (variable)                  //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  

          Figure 9  SR Policy Name TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>Type: 1213</t>

            <t>Length: variable</t>

            <t>SR Policy Name: Symbolic name for the SR Policy without a NULL
            terminator as specified in section 2.1 of <xref
            target="RFC9256"/>. It is RECOMMENDED that the size of the
            symbolic name be limited to 255 bytes. Implementations MAY choose
            to truncate long names to 255 bytes when signaling via BGP-LS.</t>
          </list></t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="CPNAME" title="SR Candidate Path Name TLV">
        <t>The SR Candidate Path Name TLV is an optional TLV that is used to
        carry the symbolic name associated with the candidate path. Only a
        single instance of this TLV is advertised for a given candidate path.
        If multiple instances are present, then the first one is considered
        valid and the rest are ignored.</t>

        <t>The TLV has the following format:<figure align="center">
            <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |              Length           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                Candidate Path Name (variable)                //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  

          Figure 10  SR Candidate Path Name TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>Type: 1203</t>

            <t>Length: variable</t>

            <t>Candidate Path Name: Symbolic name for the SR Policy candidate
            path without a NULL terminator as specified in section 2.6 of
            <xref target="RFC9256"/>. It is RECOMMENDED that the size of the
            symbolic name be limited to 255 bytes. Implementations MAY choose
            to truncate long names to 255 bytes when signaling via BGP-LS.</t>
          </list></t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="CPCONSTRAINTS"
               title="SR Candidate Path Constraints TLV">
        <t>The SR Candidate Path Constraints TLV is an optional TLV that is
        used to report the constraints associated with the candidate path. The
        constraints are generally applied to a dynamic candidate path which is
        computed either by the headend or may be delegated to a controller.
        The constraints may also be applied to an explicit path where the
        computation entity is expected to validate that the path satisfies the
        specified constraints and if not the path is to be invalidated (e.g.,
        due to topology changes). Only a single instance of this TLV is
        advertised for a given candidate path. If multiple instances are
        present, then the first one is considered valid and the rest are
        ignored.</t>

        <t>The TLV has the following format:<figure align="center">
            <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |              Length           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|              Flags            |          RESERVED1            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|             MTID              |   Algorithm   |   RESERVED2   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   sub-TLVs (variable)                                        //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

       Figure 11  SR Candidate Path Constraints TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>Type: 1204</t>

            <t>Length: variable</t>

            <t>Flags: 2-octet field that indicates the constraints that are
            being applied to the candidate path. The following bit positions
            are defined and the other bits MUST be cleared by the originator
            and MUST be ignored by a receiver.<figure>
                <artwork><![CDATA[    0                   1           
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |D|P|U|A|T|S|F|H|               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Where:
]]></artwork>
              </figure><list style="symbols">
                <t>D-Flag: Indicates that the candidate path uses SRv6
                dataplane when set and SR/MPLS dataplane when clear</t>

                <t>P-Flag: Indicates that the candidate path prefers the use
                of only protected SIDs when set and indicates that the
                candidate path does not prefer the use of only protected SIDs
                when clear. This flag is mutually exclusive with the U-Flag
                (i.e., both these flags cannot be set at the same time).</t>

                <t>U-Flag: Indicates that the candidate path prefers the use
                of only unprotected SIDs when set and indicates that the
                candidate path does not prefer the use of only unprotected
                SIDs when clear. This flag is mutually exclusive with the
                P-Flag (i.e., both these flags cannot be set at the same
                time).</t>

                <t>A-Flag: Indicates that the candidate path uses only the
                SIDs belonging to the specified SR Algorithm when set and
                indicates that the candidate path does not use only the SIDs
                belonging to the specified SR Algorithm when clear.</t>

                <t>T-Flag: Indicates that the candidate path uses only the
                SIDs belonging to the specified topology when set and
                indicates that the candidate path does not use only the SIDs
                belonging to the specified topology when clear.</t>

                <t>S-Flag: Indicates that the use of protected (P-Flag) or
                unprotected (U-Flag) SIDs becomes a strict constraint instead
                of a preference when set and indicates that there is no strict
                constraint (and only a preference) when clear.</t>

                <t>F-Flag: Indicates that the candidate path is fixed once
                computed and not modified except on operator intervention and
                indicates that the candidate path may be modified as part of
                recomputation when clear.</t>

                <t>H-Flag: Indicates that the candidate path uses only
                adjacency SIDs and traverses hop-by-hop over the links
                corresponding to those adjacency SIDs when set and indicates
                that the candidate path is not restricted to using only
                hop-by-hop adjacency SIDs when clear.</t>
              </list></t>

            <t>RESERVED1: 2 octets. MUST be set to 0 by the originator and
            MUST be ignored by a receiver.</t>

            <t>MTID: Indicates the multi-topology identifier of the IGP
            topology that is preferred to be used when the path is set up.
            When the T-flag is set then the path is strictly using the
            specified topology SIDs only.</t>

            <t>Algorithm: Indicates the algorithm that is preferred to be used
            when the path is set up. When the A-flag is set then the path is
            strictly using the specified algorithm SIDs only. The algorithm
            values are from IGP Algorithm Types registry under the IANA
            Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) Parameters.</t>

            <t>RESERVED2: 1 octet. MUST be set to 0 by the originator and MUST
            be ignored by a receiver.</t>

            <t>sub-TLVs: one or more optional sub-TLVs MAY be included in this
            TLV to describe other constraints. These sub-TLVs are: SR Affinity
            Constraint, SR SRLG Constraint, SR Bandwidth Constraint, SR
            Disjoint Group Constraint, SR Bidirectional Group Constraint, and
            SR Metric Constraint.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>These constraint sub-TLVs are defined below.</t>

        <section anchor="CPAFFINITY" title="SR Affinity Constraint Sub-TLV">
          <t>The SR Affinity Constraint sub-TLV is an optional sub-TLV of the
          SR Candidate Path Constraints TLV that is used to carry the affinity
          constraints <xref target="RFC2702"/> associated with the candidate
          path. The affinity is expressed in terms of Extended Admin Group
          (EAG) as defined in <xref target="RFC7308"/>. Only a single instance
          of this sub-TLV is advertised for a given candidate path. If
          multiple instances are present, then the first one is considered
          valid and the rest are ignored.</t>

          <t>The sub-TLV has the following format:<figure align="center">
              <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |              Length           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Excl-Any-Size | Incl-Any-Size | Incl-All-Size |    RESERVED   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|             Exclude-Any EAG (optional, variable)             //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  
|             Include-Any EAG (optional, variable)             //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  
|             Include-All EAG (optional, variable)             //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  

       Figure 12  SR Affinity Constraints Sub-TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
            </figure></t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>Type: 1208</t>

              <t>Length: variable, dependent on the size of the Extended Admin
              Group. MUST be a non-zero multiple of 4 octets.</t>

              <t>Exclude-Any-Size: one octet to indicate the size of
              Exclude-Any EAG bitmask size in multiples of 4 octets. (e.g.
              value 0 indicates the Exclude-Any EAG field is skipped, value 1
              indicates that 4 octets of Exclude-Any EAG is included)</t>

              <t>Include-Any-Size: one octet to indicate the size of
              Include-Any EAG bitmask size in multiples of 4 octets. (e.g.
              value 0 indicates the Include-Any EAG field is skipped, value 1
              indicates that 4 octets of Include-Any EAG is included)</t>

              <t>Include-All-Size: one octet to indicate the size of
              Include-All EAG bitmask size in multiples of 4 octets. (e.g.
              value 0 indicates the Include-All EAG field is skipped, value 1
              indicates that 4 octets of Include-All EAG is included)</t>

              <t>RESERVED: 1 octet. MUST be set to 0 by the originator and
              MUST be ignored by a receiver.</t>

              <t>Exclude-Any EAG: the bitmask used to represent the affinities
              that have been excluded from the path.</t>

              <t>Include-Any EAG: the bitmask used to represent the affinities
              that have been included in the path.</t>

              <t>Include-All EAG: the bitmask used to represent all the
              affinities that have been included in the path.</t>
            </list></t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="CPSRLG" title="SR SRLG Constraint Sub-TLV">
          <t>The SR SRLG Constraint sub-TLV is an optional sub-TLV of the SR
          Candidate Path Constraints TLV that is used to carry the Shared Risk
          Link Group (SRLG) values <xref target="RFC4202"/> that have been
          excluded from the candidate path. Only a single instance of this
          sub-TLV is advertised for a given candidate path. If multiple
          instances are present, then the first one is considered valid and
          the rest are ignored.</t>

          <t>The sub-TLV has the following format:<figure align="center">
              <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |              Length           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|         SRLG Values (variable, multiples of 4 octets)        //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  

       Figure 13  SR SRLG Constraints Sub-TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
            </figure></t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>Type: 1209</t>

              <t>Length: variable, dependent on the number of SRLGs encoded.
              MUST be a non-zero multiple of 4 octets.</t>

              <t>SRLG Values: One or more SRLG values. Each SRLG value is of 4
              octets.</t>
            </list></t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="CPBW" title="SR Bandwidth Constraint Sub-TLV">
          <t>The SR Bandwidth Constraint sub-TLV is an optional sub-TLV of the
          SR Candidate Path Constraints TLV that is used to indicate the
          bandwidth that has been requested for the candidate path. Only a
          single instance of this sub-TLV is advertised for a given candidate
          path. If multiple instances are present, then the first one is
          considered valid and the rest are ignored.</t>

          <t>The sub-TLV has the following format:<figure align="center">
              <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |              Length           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                          Bandwidth                            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  

       Figure 14  SR Bandwidth Constraints Sub-TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
            </figure></t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>Type: 1210</t>

              <t>Length: 4 octets</t>

              <t>Bandwidth: 4 octets which specify the desired bandwidth in
              unit of bytes per second in IEEE floating point format <xref
              target="IEEE754"/>.</t>
            </list></t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="CPDISJOINT"
                 title="SR Disjoint Group Constraint Sub-TLV">
          <t>The SR Disjoint Group Constraint sub-TLV is an optional sub-TLV
          of the SR Candidate Path Constraints TLV that is used to carry the
          disjointness constraint associated with the candidate path. The
          disjointness between two SR Policy Candidate Paths is expressed by
          associating them with the same disjoint group identifier and then
          specifying the type of disjointness required between their paths.
          The types disjointness are described in section 3 of <xref
          target="RFC8800"/> where the level of disjointness increases in the
          order: link, node, SRLG, Node + SRLG. The computation is expected to
          achieve the highest level of disjointness requested and when that is
          not possible then fallback to a lesser level progressively based on
          the levels indicated. Only a single instance of this sub-TLV is
          advertised for a given candidate path. If multiple instances are
          present, then the first one is considered valid and the rest are
          ignored.</t>

          <t>The sub-TLV has the following format:<figure align="center">
              <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |              Length           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Request-Flags |  Status-Flags |            RESERVED           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|         Disjoint Group Identifier (variable)                 //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  

       Figure 15  SR Disjoint Group Constraints Sub-TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
            </figure></t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>Type: 1211</t>

              <t>Length: Variable. Minimum of 8 octets.</t>

              <t>Request Flags: one octet to indicate the level of
              disjointness requested as specified in the form of flags. The
              following flags are defined and the other bits MUST be cleared
              by the originator and MUST be ignored by a receiver.<figure>
                  <artwork><![CDATA[
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |S|N|L|F|I|     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Where:
]]></artwork>
                </figure><list style="symbols">
                  <t>S-Flag: Indicates that SRLG disjointness is requested
                  when set and indicates that SRLG disjointness is not
                  requested when clear.</t>

                  <t>N-Flag: Indicates that node disjointness is requested
                  when set and indicates that node disjointness is not
                  requested when clear.</t>

                  <t>L-Flag: Indicates that link disjointness is requested
                  when set and indicates that the link disjointness is not
                  requested when clear.</t>

                  <t>F-Flag: Indicates that the computation may fallback to a
                  lower level of disjointness amongst the ones requested when
                  all cannot be achieved when set and indicates that fallback
                  to a lower level of disjointness is not allowed when
                  clear.</t>

                  <t>I-Flag: Indicates that the computation may fallback to
                  the default best path (e.g. IGP path) in case of none of the
                  desired disjointness can be achieved when set and indicates
                  that fallback to the default best path is not allowed when
                  clear.</t>
                </list></t>

              <t>Status Flags: one octet to indicate the level of disjointness
              that has been achieved by the computation as specified in the
              form of flags. The following flags are defined and the other
              bits MUST be cleared by the originator and MUST be ignored by a
              receiver.<figure>
                  <artwork><![CDATA[
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |S|N|L|F|I|X|   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Where:
]]></artwork>
                </figure><list style="symbols">
                  <t>S-Flag: Indicates that SRLG disjointness is achieved when
                  set and indicates that SRLG disjointness is not achieved
                  when clear.</t>

                  <t>N-Flag: Indicates that node disjointness is achieved when
                  set and indicates that node disjointness was not achieved
                  when clear.</t>

                  <t>L-Flag: Indicates that link disjointness is achieved when
                  set and indicates that link disjointness was not achieved
                  when clear.</t>

                  <t>F-Flag: Indicates that the computation has fallen back to
                  a lower level of disjointness than requested when set and
                  indicates that there has been no fallback to a lower level
                  of disjointness when clear.</t>

                  <t>I-Flag: Indicates that the computation has fallen back to
                  the best path (e.g. IGP path) and disjointness has not been
                  achieved when set and indicates that there has been no
                  fallback to best path when clear.</t>

                  <t>X-Flag : Indicates that the disjointness constraint could
                  not be achieved and hence path has been invalidated when set
                  and indicates that the path has not been invalidated due to
                  unmet disjointness constraints when clear.</t>
                </list></t>

              <t>RESERVED: 2 octets. MUST be set to 0 by the originator and
              MUST be ignored by a receiver.</t>

              <t>Disjoint Group Identifier: 4-octet value that is the group
              identifier for a set of disjoint paths. Alternatively, this
              field MAY contain the entire PCEP Association Object as
              specified in section 6.1 of <xref target="RFC8697"/> (including
              its optional TLVs) when PCEP is used for the signaling the SR
              Policy candidate path and where the BGP-LS Producer is unable to
              determine the group identifier that can be accommodated in a
              4-octet value (since PCEP supports multiple methods of encoding
              an association identifier). Note that the parsing of the PCEP
              object is expected to be performed only by the BGP-LS Consumer
              (hence, outside the scope of this document) and not by any BGP
              Speaker as specified in <xref target="RFC9552"/>. If the PCEP
              object size is such that the update for a single SR Policy
              Candidate Path NLRI would exceed the supported BGP message size
              by the implementation, then the PCEP Association Object MUST NOT
              be encoded and this sub-TLV skipped along with an error log.
              Refer section 5.3 of <xref target="RFC9552"/> for discussion on
              implications of encoding large sets of information into
              BGP-LS.</t>
            </list></t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="CPBIDIR"
                 title="SR Bidirectional Group Constraint Sub-TLV">
          <t>The SR Bidirectional Group Constraint sub-TLV is an optional
          sub-TLV of the SR Candidate Path Constraints TLV that is used to
          carry the bidirectional constraint associated with the candidate
          path. The bidirectional relationship between two SR Policy Candidate
          Paths is expressed by associating them with the same bidirectional
          group identifier and then specifying the type of bidirectional
          routing required between their paths. Only a single instance of this
          sub-TLV is advertised for a given candidate path. If multiple
          instances are present, then the first one is considered valid and
          the rest are ignored.</t>

          <t>The sub-TLV has the following format:<figure align="center">
              <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |              Length           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|              Flags            |            RESERVED           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|            Bidirectional Group Identifier (variable)         //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  

   Figure 16  SR Bidirectional Group Constraints Sub-TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
            </figure></t>

          <t><list style="symbols">
              <t>Type: 1214</t>

              <t>Length: Variable. Minimum of 8 octets.</t>

              <t>Flags: two octets to indicate the bidirectional path setup
              information as specified in the form of flags. The following
              flags are defined and the other bits MUST be cleared by the
              originator and MUST be ignored by a receiver.<figure>
                  <artwork><![CDATA[    0                   1           
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |R|C|                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Where:
]]></artwork>
                </figure><list style="symbols">
                  <t>R-Flag: Indicates that this candidate path of the SR
                  Policy forms the reverse path when the R-Flag is set. If the
                  R-Flag is clear, this candidate path forms the forward
                  path.</t>

                  <t>C-Flag: Indicates that the bidirectional path is
                  co-routed when set and indicates that the bidirectional path
                  is not co-routed when clear.</t>
                </list></t>

              <t>RESERVED: 2 octets. MUST be set to 0 by the originator and
              MUST be ignored by a receiver.</t>

              <t>Bidirectional Group Identifier: 4-octet value that is the
              group identifier for a set of bidirectional paths.
              Alternatively, this field MAY contain the entire PCEP
              Association Object as specified in section 6.1 of <xref
              target="RFC8697"/> (including its optional TLVs) when PCEP is
              used for the signaling the SR Policy candidate path and where
              the BGP-LS Producer is unable to determine the group identifier
              that can be accommodated in a 4-octet value (since PCEP supports
              multiple methods of encoding an association identifier). Note
              that the parsing of the PCEP object is expected to be performed
              only by the BGP-LS Consumer (hence, outside the scope of this
              document) and not by any BGP Speaker as specified in <xref
              target="RFC9552"/>. If the PCEP object size is such that the
              update for a single SR Policy Candidate Path NLRI would exceed
              the supported BGP message size by the implementation, then the
              PCEP Association Object MUST NOT be encoded and this sub-TLV
              skipped along with an error log. Refer section 5.3 of <xref
              target="RFC9552"/> for discussion on implications of encoding
              large sets of information into BGP-LS.</t>
            </list></t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="CPMETRIC" title="SR Metric Constraint Sub-TLV">
          <t>The SR Metric Constraint sub-TLV is an optional sub-TLV of the SR
          Candidate Path Constraints TLV that is used to report the
          optimization metric of the candidate path. For a dynamic path
          computation, it is used to report the optimization metric used along
          with its parameters. For an explicit path, this sub-TLV MAY be used
          to report the metric margin or bound to be used for validation
          (i.e., the path is invalidated if the metric is beyond specified
          values). Multiple instances of this sub-TLV may be used to report
          different metric type uses.</t>

          <t>The sub-TLV has the following format: <figure align="center">
              <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|              Type             |             Length            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|  Metric Type  |      Flags    |          RESERVED             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                         Metric Margin                         |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                         Metric Bound                          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

       Figure 17  SR Metric Constraints Sub-TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
            </figure><list style="symbols">
              <t>Type: 1215</t>

              <t>Length: 12 octets</t>

              <t>Metric Type: 1-octet field which identifies the type of the
              metric being used. The Table 1 below lists the metric types
              introduced by this document along with reference for each. Where
              the references are for IS-IS and OSPF specifications, those
              metric types are defined for a link while in the SR Policy
              context those relate to the candidate path or the segment list.
              The metric type code points that may be used in this sub-TLV are
              also listed in <xref target="METRICTYPE"/> of this document.
              Note that the metric type in this field is not taken from the
              "IGP Metric Type" registry from IANA "IGP Parameters" and is a
              separate registry that includes IGP Metric Types as well as
              metric types specific to SR Policy path computation. Additional
              metric types may be introduced by future documents. This
              document does not make any assumption of a smaller metric value
              being better than a higher metric value; that is something
              dependent on the semantics of the specific metric type. The
              document uses the words "best" and "worst" to abstract this
              aspect when referring to metric margins and bounds.<list
                  style="symbols">
                  <t>Type 0: IGP: In IS-IS, this is known as the default
                  metric and specified in section 3 of <xref
                  target="RFC5305"/>. This is known as metric in both OSPFv2
                  <xref target="RFC2328"/> and OSPFv3 <xref
                  target="RFC5340"/>. </t>

                  <t>Type 1: Min Unidirectional Delay: This is specified in
                  section 4.2 of <xref target="RFC8570"/> for IS-IS and in
                  section 4.2 of <xref target="RFC7471"/> for
                  OSPFv2/OSPFv3.</t>

                  <t>Type 2: TE: This is specified in section 3.7 of <xref
                  target="RFC5305"/> as the TE default metric for IS-IS, in
                  section 2.5.5 of <xref target="RFC3630"/> for OSPFv2, and in
                  section 4 of <xref target="RFC5329"/> for OSPFv3.</t>

                  <t>Type 3: Hop Count: This is specified in section 7.8 of
                  <xref target="RFC5440"/>.</t>

                  <t>Type 4: SID List Length: This is specified in section 4.5
                  of <xref target="RFC8664"/>.</t>

                  <t>Type 5: Bandwidth: This is specified in section 4 of
                  <xref target="I-D.ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con"/>.</t>

                  <t>Type 6: Average Unidirectional Delay: This is specified
                  in section 4.1 of <xref target="RFC8570"/> for IS-IS and in
                  section 4.1 of <xref target="RFC7471"/> for
                  OSPFv2/OSPFv3.</t>

                  <t>Type 7: Unidirectional Delay Variation: This is specified
                  in section 4.3 of <xref target="RFC8570"/> for IS-IS and in
                  section 4.3 of <xref target="RFC7471"/> for
                  OSPFv2/OSPFv3.</t>

                  <t>Type 8: Loss: This is specified in section 4.4 of <xref
                  target="RFC8570"/> for IS-IS and in section 4.4 of <xref
                  target="RFC7471"/> for OSPFv2/OSPFv3.</t>

                  <t>Types 128 to 255 (both inclusive): User Defined: This is
                  specified for IS-IS and OSPF in section 2 of <xref
                  target="I-D.ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con"/>.</t>
                </list></t>

              <t>Flags: 1-octet field that indicates the validity of the
              metric fields and their semantics. The following bit positions
              are defined and the other bits MUST be cleared by the originator
              and MUST be ignored by a receiver.<figure>
                  <artwork><![CDATA[
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |O|M|A|B|       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Where:
]]></artwork>
                </figure><list style="symbols">
                  <t>O-Flag: Indicates that this is the optimization metric
                  being reported for a dynamic candidate path when set and
                  indicates that the metric is not the optimization metric
                  when clear. This bit MUST NOT be set in more than one
                  instance of this TLV for a given candidate path
                  advertisement.</t>

                  <t>M-Flag: Indicates that the metric margin allowed is
                  specified when set and indicates that metric margin allowed
                  is not specified when clear.</t>

                  <t>A-Flag: Indicates that the metric margin is specified as
                  an absolute value when set and is expressed as a percentage
                  of the minimum metric when clear.</t>

                  <t>B-Flag: Indicates that the metric bound allowed for the
                  path is specified when set and indicates that metric bound
                  is not specified when clear.</t>
                </list></t>

              <t>RESERVED: 2 octets. MUST be set to 0 by the originator and
              MUST be ignored by a receiver.</t>

              <t>Metric Margin: 4-octet value which indicates the metric
              margin when the M-flag is set. The metric margin is specified,
              depending on the A-flag, as either an absolute value or as a
              percentage of the best computed path metric based on the
              specified constraints for path calculation. The metric margin
              allows for the metric value of the computed path to vary
              (depending on the semantics of the specific metric type) from
              the best metric value possible to optimize for other factors
              (that are not specified as constraints) such as bandwidth
              availability, minimal SID stack depth, and maximizing of ECMP
              for the SR path computed.</t>

              <t>Metric Bound: 4-octet value which indicates the worst metric
              value (depending on the semantics of the specific metric type)
              that is allowed when the B-flag is set. If the computed path
              metric crosses the specified bound value then the path is
              considered invalid.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>The absolute metric margin and the metric bound values are
          encoded as specified for each metric type. For metric types that are
          smaller than 4 octets in size, the most significant bits are filled
          with zeros. The percentage metric margin is encoded as an unsigned
          integer percentage value.</t>
        </section>
      </section>

      <section anchor="SEGMENTLIST" title="SR Segment List TLV">
        <t>The SR Segment List TLV is used to report a single SID-List of a
        candidate path. Multiple instances of this TLV may be used to report
        multiple SID-Lists of a candidate path.</t>

        <t>The TLV has the following format: <figure align="center">
            <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|              Type             |             Length            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|              Flags            |           RESERVED            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|             MTID              |   Algorithm   |    RESERVED   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                        Weight (4 octets)                      |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   sub-TLVs (variable)                                        //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

       Figure 18  SR Segment List TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
          </figure><list style="symbols">
            <t>Type: 1205</t>

            <t>Length: variable</t>

            <t>Flags: 2-octet field that indicates attribute and status of the
            SID-List.The following bit positions are defined and the semantics
            are described in detail in <xref target="RFC9256"/>. Other bits
            MUST be cleared by the originator and MUST be ignored by a
            receiver.<figure>
                <artwork><![CDATA[    0                   1           
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |D|E|C|V|R|F|A|T|M|             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Where:
]]></artwork>
              </figure><list style="symbols">
                <t>D-Flag: Indicates the SID-List is comprised of SRv6 SIDs
                when set and indicates it is comprised of SR/MPLS labels when
                clear.</t>

                <t>E-Flag: Indicates that SID-List is associated with an
                explicit candidate path when set and with a dynamic candidate
                path when clear. All segment lists of a given candidate path
                MUST be either explicit or dynamic and in case of
                inconsistency, the receiver MAY consider them all to be
                dynamic.</t>

                <t>C-Flag: Indicates that SID-List has been computed for a
                dynamic path when set. It is always reported as set for
                explicit paths. When clear, it indicates that the SID-List has
                not been computed for a dynamic path.</t>

                <t>V-Flag: Indicates the SID-List has passed verification or
                its verification was not required when set and failed
                verification when clear.</t>

                <t>R-Flag: Indicates that the first Segment has been resolved
                when set and failed resolution when clear.</t>

                <t>F-Flag: Indicates that the computation for the dynamic path
                failed when set and succeeded (or not required in case of
                explicit path) when clear.</t>

                <t>A-Flag: Indicates that all the SIDs in the SID-List belong
                to the specified algorithm when set and indicates that not all
                the SIDs belong to the specified algorithm when clear.</t>

                <t>T-Flag: Indicates that all the SIDs in the SID-List belong
                to the specified topology (identified by the multi-topology
                ID) when set and indicates that not all the SIDs belong to the
                specified topology when clear.</t>

                <t>M-Flag: Indicates that the SID-list has been removed from
                the forwarding plane due to fault detection by a monitoring
                mechanism (e.g. BFD) when set and indicates no fault detected
                or monitoring is not being done when clear.</t>
              </list></t>

            <t>RESERVED: 2 octets. MUST be set to 0 by the originator and MUST
            be ignored by a receiver.</t>

            <t>MTID: 2 octets that indicates the multi-topology identifier of
            the IGP topology that is to be used when the T-flag is set.</t>

            <t>Algorithm: 1 octet that indicates the algorithm of the SIDs
            used in the SID-List when the A-flag is set. The algorithm values
            are from IGP Algorithm Types registry under the IANA Interior
            Gateway Protocol (IGP) Parameters.</t>

            <t>RESERVED: 1 octet. MUST be set to 0 by the originator and MUST
            be ignored by a receiver.</t>

            <t>Weight: 4-octet field that indicates the weight associated with
            the SID-List for weighted load-balancing. Refer to section 2.2 and
            2.11 of <xref target="RFC9256"/>.</t>

            <t>Sub-TLVs: variable and contains the ordered set of Segments and
            any other optional attributes associated with the specific
            SID-List.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>The SR Segment sub-TLV (defined in <xref target="SEGMENTTLV"/>)
        MUST be included as an ordered set of sub-TLVs within the SR Segment
        List TLV when the SID-List is not empty. A SID-List may be empty in
        certain situations (e.g. for a dynamic path) where the headend has not
        yet performed the computation and hence not derived the segments
        required for the path. In such cases where the SID-LIST is empty, the
        SR Segment List TLV SHOULD NOT include any SR Segment sub-TLVs.</t>

        <section anchor="SEGMENTTLV" title="SR Segment Sub-TLV">
          <t>The SR Segment sub-TLV describes a single segment in a SID-List.
          One or more instances of this sub-TLV in an ordered manner
          constitute a SID-List for an SR Policy candidate path. It is a
          sub-TLV of the SR Segment List TLV and it has the following format:
          <figure align="center">
              <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|              Type             |             Length            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Segment Type  |    RESERVED   |             Flags             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                   SID (4 or 16 octets)                       //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
//               Segment Descriptor (variable)                 //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
//   Sub-TLVs (variable)                                       //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

            Figure 19  SR Segment Sub-TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
            </figure><list style="symbols">
              <t>Type: 1206</t>

              <t>Length: variable</t>

              <t>Segment Type: 1 octet which indicates the type of segment.
              Initial values are specified by this document (see <xref
              target="SEGMENTDESC"/> for details). Additional segment types
              are possible, but out of scope for this document.</t>

              <t>RESERVED: 1 octet. MUST be set to 0 by the originator and
              MUST be ignored by a receiver.</t>

              <t>Flags: 2-octet field that indicates attribute and status of
              the Segment and its SID. The following bit positions are defined
              and the semantics are described in section 5 of <xref
              target="RFC9256"/>. Other bits MUST be cleared by the originator
              and MUST be ignored by a receiver.<figure>
                  <artwork><![CDATA[    0                   1           
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |S|E|V|R|A|                     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Where:
]]></artwork>
                </figure><list style="symbols">
                  <t>S-Flag: Indicates the presence of SID value in the SID
                  field when set and that no value is indicated when
                  clear.</t>

                  <t>E-Flag: Indicates the SID value is explicitly provisioned
                  value (locally on headend or via controller/PCE) when set
                  and is a dynamically resolved value by headend when
                  clear</t>

                  <t>V-Flag: Indicates the SID has passed verification or did
                  not require verification when set. When V-Flag is clear, it
                  indicates the SID has failed verification.</t>

                  <t>R-Flag: Indicates the SID has been resolved or did not
                  require resolution (e.g. because it is not the first SID)
                  when set. When R-Flag is clear, it indicates the SID has
                  failed resolution.</t>

                  <t>A-Flag: Indicates that the Algorithm indicated in the
                  Segment descriptor is valid when set. When clear, it
                  indicates that the headend is unable to determine the
                  algorithm of the SID.</t>
                </list></t>

              <t>SID: 4 octets carrying the MPLS Label or 16 octets carrying
              the SRv6 SID based on the Segment Type. When carrying the MPLS
              Label, as shown in the figure below, the TC, S, and TTL (total
              of 12 bits) are RESERVED and MUST be set to 0 by the originator
              and MUST be ignored by a receiver.<figure>
                  <artwork><![CDATA[
   0                   1                   2                   3
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |          Label                        | TC  |S|       TTL     |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

]]></artwork>
                </figure></t>

              <t>Segment Descriptor: variable size Segment descriptor based on
              the type of segment (refer to <xref target="SEGMENTDESC"/> for
              details)</t>

              <t>Sub-Sub-TLVs: variable and contains any other optional
              attributes associated with the specific segment.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>The SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLV (1250) and the SRv6 SID Structure
          TLV (1252) defined in <xref target="RFC9514"/> are used as
          sub-sub-TLVs of the SR Segment sub-TLV. These two sub-sub-TLVs are
          used to optionally indicate the SRv6 Endpoint behavior and SID
          structure when advertising the SRv6 specific segment types.</t>

          <section anchor="SEGMENTDESC" title="Segment Descriptors">
            <t>Section 4 of <xref target="RFC9256"/> defines multiple types of
            segments and their description. This section defines the encoding
            of the Segment Descriptors for each of those Segment types to be
            used in the Segment sub-TLV described previously in <xref
            target="SEGMENTTLV"/>.</t>

            <t>The following types are currently defined and their mapping to
            the respective segment types defined in <xref target="RFC9256"/>:
            <figure align="center">
                <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[+------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| Type |   Segment Description                                       |
+------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|   1  | (Type A) SR-MPLS Label                                      |
|   2  | (Type B) SRv6 SID as IPv6 address                           |
|   3  | (Type C) SR-MPLS Prefix SID as IPv4 Node Address            |
|   4  | (Type D) SR-MPLS Prefix SID as IPv6 Node Global Address     |
|   5  | (Type E) SR-MPLS Adjacency SID as IPv4 Node Address & Local |
|      | Interface ID                                                |
|   6  | (Type F) SR-MPLS Adjacency SID as IPv4 Local & Remote       |
|      | Interface Addresses                                         |
|   7  | (Type G) SR-MPLS Adjacency SID as pair of IPv6 Global       |
|      | Address & Interface ID for Local & Remote nodes             |
|   8  | (Type H) SR-MPLS Adjacency SID as pair of IPv6 Global       |
|      | Addresses for the Local & Remote Interface                  |
|   9  | (Type I) SRv6 END SID as IPv6 Node Global Address           |
|  10  | (Type J) SRv6 END.X SID as pair of IPv6 Global Address &    |
|      | Interface ID for Local & Remote nodes                       |
|  11  | (Type K) SRv6 END.X SID as pair of IPv6 Global Addresses    |
|      | for the Local & Remote Interface                            |
+------+-------------------------------------------------------------+

                  Table 1  SR Segment Types

]]></artwork>
              </figure></t>

            <section anchor="TYPE1" title="Type 1: SR-MPLS Label (Type A)">
              <t>The Segment is SR-MPLS type and is specified simply as the
              label. The format of its Segment Descriptor is as
              follows:<figure align="center">
                  <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   Algorithm   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

      Figure 20  Type 1 Segment Descriptor

Where:
]]></artwork>
                </figure></t>

              <t><list style="symbols">
                  <t>Algorithm: 1-octet value that indicates the algorithm
                  used for picking the SID. This is valid only when the A-flag
                  has been set in the Segment TLV. The algorithm values are
                  from IGP Algorithm Types registry under the IANA Interior
                  Gateway Protocol (IGP) Parameters.</t>
                </list></t>
            </section>

            <section anchor="TYPE2" title="Type 2: SRv6 SID (Type B)">
              <t>The Segment is SRv6 type and is specified simply as the SRv6
              SID address. The format of its Segment Descriptor is as
              follows:<figure align="center">
                  <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   Algorithm   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

      Figure 21  Type 2 Segment Descriptor

Where:
]]></artwork>
                </figure></t>

              <t><list style="symbols">
                  <t>Algorithm: 1-octet value that indicates the algorithm
                  used for picking the SID. This is valid only when the A-flag
                  has been set in the Segment TLV. The algorithm values are
                  from IGP Algorithm Types registry under the IANA Interior
                  Gateway Protocol (IGP) Parameters.</t>
                </list></t>
            </section>

            <section anchor="TYPE3"
                     title="Type 3: SR-MPLS Prefix SID for IPv4 (Type C)">
              <t>The Segment is SR-MPLS Prefix SID type and is specified as an
              IPv4 node address. The format of its Segment Descriptor is as
              follows:<figure align="center">
                  <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   Algorithm   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                 IPv4 Node Address (4 octets)                  |      
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

      Figure 22  Type 3 Segment Descriptor

Where:
]]></artwork>
                </figure></t>

              <t><list style="symbols">
                  <t>Algorithm: 1-octet value that indicates the algorithm
                  used for picking the SID. The algorithm values are from IGP
                  Algorithm Types registry under the IANA Interior Gateway
                  Protocol (IGP) Parameters.</t>

                  <t>IPv4 Node Address: 4-octet value which carries the IPv4
                  address associated with the node</t>
                </list></t>
            </section>

            <section anchor="TYPE4"
                     title="Type 4: SR-MPLS Prefix SID for IPv6 (Type D)">
              <t>The Segment is SR-MPLS Prefix SID type and is specified as an
              IPv6 global address. The format of its Segment Descriptor is as
              follows:<figure align="center">
                  <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   Algorithm   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
|          IPv6 Node Global Address (16 octets)                 |
|                                                               |
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

      Figure 23  Type 4 Segment Descriptor

Where:
]]></artwork>
                </figure></t>

              <t><list style="symbols">
                  <t>Algorithm: 1-octet value that indicates the algorithm
                  used for picking the SID. The algorithm values are from IGP
                  Algorithm Types registry under the IANA Interior Gateway
                  Protocol (IGP) Parameters.</t>

                  <t>IPv6 Node Global Address: 16-octet value which carries
                  the IPv6 global address associated with the node</t>
                </list></t>
            </section>

            <section anchor="TYPE5"
                     title="Type 5: SR-MPLS Adjacency SID for IPv4 with an Interface ID (Type E)">
              <t>The Segment is SR-MPLS Adjacency SID type and is specified as
              an IPv4 node address along with the local interface ID on that
              node. The format of its Segment Descriptor is as follows:<figure
                  align="center">
                  <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                 IPv4 Node Address (4 octets)                  |      
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                Local Interface ID (4 octets)                  |      
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

      Figure 24  Type 5 Segment Descriptor

Where:
]]></artwork>
                </figure></t>

              <t><list style="symbols">
                  <t>IPv4 Node Address: 4-octet value which carries the IPv4
                  address associated with the node</t>

                  <t>Local Interface ID: 4-octet value which carries the local
                  interface ID of the node identified by the Node Address</t>
                </list></t>
            </section>

            <section anchor="TYPE6"
                     title="Type 6: SR-MPLS Adjacency SID for IPv4 with an Interface Address (Type F)">
              <t>The Segment is SR-MPLS Adjacency SID type and is specified as
              a pair of IPv4 local and remote addresses. The format of its
              Segment Descriptor is as follows:<figure align="center">
                  <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                IPv4 Local Address (4 octets)                  |      
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               IPv4 Remote Address (4 octets)                  |      
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

      Figure 25  Type 6 Segment Descriptor

Where:
]]></artwork>
                </figure></t>

              <t><list style="symbols">
                  <t>IPv4 Local Address: 4-octet value which carries the local
                  IPv4 address associated with the node's interface</t>

                  <t>IPv4 Remote Address: 4-octet value which carries the
                  remote IPv4 address associated with interface on the node's
                  neighbor. This is optional and MAY be set to 0 when not used
                  (e.g. when identifying point-to-point links).</t>
                </list></t>
            </section>

            <section anchor="TYPE7"
                     title="Type 7: SR-MPLS Adjacency SID for IPv6 with an interface ID (Type G)">
              <t>The Segment is SR-MPLS Adjacency SID type and is specified as
              a pair of IPv6 global address and interface ID for local and
              remote nodes. The format of its Segment Descriptor is as
              follows:<figure align="center">
                  <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
|          IPv6 Local Node Global Address (16 octets)           |
|                                                               |
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|          Local Node Interface ID (4 octets)                   |      
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
|          IPv6 Remote Node Global Address (16 octets)          |
|                                                               |
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|          Remote Node Interface ID (4 octets)                  |      
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

      Figure 26  Type 7 Segment Descriptor

Where:
]]></artwork>
                </figure></t>

              <t><list style="symbols">
                  <t>IPv6 Local Node Global Address: 16-octet value which
                  carries the IPv6 global address associated with the local
                  node</t>

                  <t>Local Node Interface ID : 4-octet value which carries the
                  interface ID of the local node identified by the Local Node
                  Address</t>

                  <t>IPv6 Remote Node Global Address: 16-octet value which
                  carries the IPv6 global address associated with the remote
                  node. This is optional and MAY be set to 0 when not used
                  (e.g. when identifying point-to-point links).</t>

                  <t>Remote Node Interface ID: 4-octet value which carries the
                  interface ID of the remote node identified by the Remote
                  Node Address. This is optional and MAY be set to 0 when not
                  used (e.g. when identifying point-to-point links).</t>
                </list></t>
            </section>

            <section anchor="TYPE8"
                     title="Type 8: SR-MPLS Adjacency SID for IPv6 with an Interface Address (Type H)">
              <t>The Segment is SR-MPLS Adjacency SID type and is specified as
              a pair of IPv6 Global addresses for local and remote interface
              addresses. The format of its Segment Descriptor is as
              follows:<figure align="center">
                  <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
|        Global IPv6 Local Interface Address (16 octets)        |
|                                                               |
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
|        Global IPv6 Remote Interface Address (16 octets)       |
|                                                               |
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

      Figure 27  Type 8 Segment Descriptor

Where:
]]></artwork>
                </figure></t>

              <t><list style="symbols">
                  <t>IPv6 Local Address: 16-octet value which carries the
                  local IPv6 address associated with the node's interface</t>

                  <t>IPv6 Remote Address: 16-octet value which carries the
                  remote IPv6 address associated with the interface on the
                  node's neighbor</t>
                </list></t>
            </section>

            <section anchor="TYPE9"
                     title="Type 9: SRv6 END SID as IPv6 Node Address (Type I)">
              <t>The Segment is SRv6 END SID type and is specified as an IPv6
              global address. The format of its Segment Descriptor is as
              follows:<figure align="center">
                  <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   Algorithm   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
|          IPv6 Node Global Address (16 octets)                 |
|                                                               |
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

      Figure 28  Type 9 Segment Descriptor

Where:
]]></artwork>
                </figure></t>

              <t><list style="symbols">
                  <t>Algorithm: 1-octet value that indicates the algorithm
                  used for picking the SID. The algorithm values are from IGP
                  Algorithm Types registry under the IANA Interior Gateway
                  Protocol (IGP) Parameters.</t>

                  <t>IPv6 Node Global Address: 16-octet value which carries
                  the IPv6 global address associated with the node</t>
                </list></t>
            </section>

            <section anchor="TYPE10"
                     title="Type 10: SRv6 END.X SID as an Interface ID (Type J)">
              <t>The Segment is SRv6 END.X SID type and is specified as a pair
              of IPv6 global address and interface ID for local and remote
              nodes. The format of its Segment Descriptor is as
              follows:<figure align="center">
                  <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
|          IPv6 Local Node Global Address (16 octets)           |
|                                                               |
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|          Local Node Interface ID (4 octets)                   |      
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
|          IPv6 Remote Node Global Address (16 octets)          |
|                                                               |
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|          Remote Node Interface ID (4 octets)                  |      
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

      Figure 29  Type 10 Segment Descriptor

Where:
]]></artwork>
                </figure></t>

              <t><list style="symbols">
                  <t>IPv6 Local Node Global Address: 16-octet value which
                  carries the IPv6 global address associated with the local
                  node</t>

                  <t>Local Node Interface ID: 4-octet value which carries the
                  interface ID of the local node identified by the Local Node
                  Address</t>

                  <t>IPv6 Remote Node Global Address: 16-octet value which
                  carries the IPv6 global address associated with the remote
                  node. This is optional and MAY be set to 0 when not used
                  (e.g. when identifying point-to-point links).</t>

                  <t>Remote Node Interface ID: 4-octet value which carries the
                  interface ID of the remote node identified by the Remote
                  Node Address. This is optional and MAY be set to 0 when not
                  used (e.g. when identifying point-to-point links).</t>
                </list></t>
            </section>

            <section anchor="TYPE11"
                     title="Type 11: SRv6 END.X SID as an Interface Address (Type K)">
              <t>The Segment is SRv6 END.X SID type and is specified as a pair
              of IPv6 Global addresses for local and remote interface
              addresses. The format of its Segment Descriptor is as
              follows:<figure align="center">
                  <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
|        Global IPv6 Local Interface Address (16 octets)        |
|                                                               |
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
|        Global IPv6 Remote Interface Address (16 octets)       |
|                                                               |
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

      Figure 30  Type 11 Segment Descriptor

Where:
]]></artwork>
                </figure></t>

              <t><list style="symbols">
                  <t>IPv6 Local Address: 16-octet value which carries the
                  local IPv6 address associated with the node's interface</t>

                  <t>IPv6 Remote Address: 16-octet value which carries the
                  remote IPv6 address associated with the interface on the
                  node's neighbor</t>
                </list></t>
            </section>
          </section>
        </section>

        <section anchor="SLMETRIC" title="SR Segment List Metric Sub-TLV">
          <t>The SR Segment List Metric sub-TLV reports the computed metric of
          the specific SID-List. It is used to report the type of metric and
          its computed value by the computation entity (i.e., either the
          headend or the controller when the path is delegated) when
          available. More than one instance of this sub-TLV may be present in
          SR Segment List to report metric values of different metric types.
          The metric margin and bound may be optionally reported using this
          sub-TLV when this information is not being reported using the SR
          Metric Constraint sub-TLV (refer to <xref target="CPMETRIC"/>) at
          the SR candidate path level.</t>

          <t>It is a sub-TLV of the SR Segment List TLV and has the following
          format: <figure align="center">
              <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|              Type             |             Length            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|  Metric Type  |      Flags    |          RESERVED             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                         Metric Margin                         |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                         Metric Bound                          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                         Metric Value                          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

       Figure 31  SR Segment List Metric Sub-TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
            </figure><list style="symbols">
              <t>Type: 1207</t>

              <t>Length: 16 octets</t>

              <t>Metric Type: 1-octet field which identifies the type of
              metric. The semantics are the same as the Metric Type field in
              the SR Metric Constraints sub-TLV in <xref target="CPMETRIC"/>
              of this document.</t>

              <t>Flags: 1-octet field that indicates the validity of the
              metric fields and their semantics. The following bit positions
              are defined and the other bits MUST be cleared by the originator
              and MUST be ignored by a receiver.<figure>
                  <artwork><![CDATA[
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |M|A|B|V|       |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Where:]]></artwork>
                </figure><list style="symbols">
                  <t>M-Flag: Indicates that the metric margin allowed for this
                  path computation is specified when set and indicates that
                  metric margin allowed is not specified when clear.</t>

                  <t>A-Flag: Indicates that the metric margin is specified as
                  an absolute value when set and is expressed as a percentage
                  of the minimum metric when clear.</t>

                  <t>B-Flag: Indicates that the metric bound allowed for the
                  path is specified when set and indicates that metric bound
                  is not specified when clear.</t>

                  <t>V-Flag: Indicates that the metric value computed is being
                  reported when set and indicates that the computed metric
                  value is not being reported when clear.</t>
                </list></t>

              <t>RESERVED: 2 octets. MUST be set to 0 by the originator and
              MUST be ignored by a receiver.</t>

              <t>Metric Margin: 4-octet value which indicates the metric
              margin value when the M-flag is set. The metric margin is
              specified, depending on the A-flag, as either an absolute value
              or as a percentage of the best computed path metric based on the
              specified constraints for path calculation. The metric margin
              allows for the metric value of the computed path to vary
              (depending on the semantics of the specific metric type) from
              the best metric value possible to optimize for other factors
              (that are not specified as constraints) such as bandwidth
              availability, minimal SID stack depth, and maximizing of ECMP
              for the SR path computed.</t>

              <t>Metric Bound: 4-octet value which indicates the worst metric
              value (depending on the semantics of the specific metric type)
              that is allowed when the B-flag is set. If the computed path
              metric crosses the specified bound value then the path is
              considered invalid.</t>

              <t>Metric Value: 4-octet value which indicates the metric of the
              computed path when the V-flag is set. This value is available
              and reported when the computation is successful and a valid path
              is available.</t>
            </list></t>

          <t>The absolute metric margin, metric bound, and metric values are
          encoded as specified for each metric type. For metric types that are
          smaller than 4 octets in size, the most significant bits are filled
          with zeros. The percentage metric margin is encoded as an unsigned
          integer percentage value.</t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="SLBW" title="SR Segment List Bandwidth Sub-TLV">
          <t>The SR Segment List Bandwidth sub-TLV is an optional sub-TLV used
          to report the bandwidth allocated to the specific SID-List by the
          path computation entity. Only a single instance of this sub-TLV is
          advertised for a given Segment List. If multiple instances are
          present, then the first one is considered valid and the rest are
          ignored.</t>

          <t>It is a sub-TLV of the SR Segment List TLV and has the following
          format: <figure align="center">
              <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|              Type             |             Length            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                          Bandwidth                            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  

       Figure 32  SR Segment List Bandwidth Sub-TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
            </figure><list style="symbols">
              <t>Type: 1216</t>

              <t>Length: 4 octets</t>

              <t>Bandwidth: 4 octets which specify the allocated bandwidth in
              unit of bytes per second in IEEE floating point format <xref
              target="IEEE754"/>.</t>
            </list></t>
        </section>

        <section anchor="SLID" title="SR Segment List Identifier Sub-TLV">
          <t>The SR Segment List Identifier sub-TLV is an optional sub-TLV
          used to report an identifier associated with the specific SID-List.
          Only a single instance of this sub-TLV is advertised for a given
          Segment List. If multiple instances are present, then the first one
          is considered valid and the rest are ignored.</t>

          <t>It is a sub-TLV of the SR Segment List TLV and has the following
          format: <figure align="center">
              <artwork align="left"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|              Type             |             Length            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                 Segment List Identifier                       |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+  

       Figure 33  SR Segment List Identifier Sub-TLV Format

Where:
]]></artwork>
            </figure><list style="symbols">
              <t>Type: 1217</t>

              <t>Length: 4 octets</t>

              <t>Segment List Identifier: 4 octets which carry a 32-bit
              unsigned non-zero integer that serves as the identifier
              associated with the segment list. A value of 0 indicates that
              there is no identifier associated with the Segment List. The
              scope of this identifier is the SR Policy Candidate path.</t>
            </list></t>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="Procedures" title="Procedures">
      <t>The BGP-LS advertisements for the SR Policy Candidate Path NLRI type
      are generally originated by the headend node for the SR Policies that
      are instantiated on its local node (i.e., the headend is the BGP-LS
      Producer). The BGP-LS Producer may also be a node (e.g., a PCE) that is
      advertising on behalf of the headend.</t>

      <t>For the reporting of SR Policy Candidate Paths, the NLRI descriptor
      TLV as specified in <xref target="SRPOLICYCP"/> is used. An SR Policy
      candidate path may be instantiated on the headend node via a local
      configuration, PCEP, or BGP SR Policy signaling and this is indicated
      via the SR Protocol Origin. When a PCE node is the BGP-LS Producer, it
      uses the "in PCEP" variants of the SR Protocol Origin (where available)
      so as to distinguish them from advertisements by headend nodes. The SR
      Policy Candidate Path's state and attributes are encoded in the BGP-LS
      Attribute field as SR Policy State TLVs and sub-TLVs as described in
      <xref target="SRPOLICYTLVS"/>. The SR Candidate Path State TLV as
      defined in <xref target="CPSTATE"/> is included to report the state of
      the candidate path. The SR BSID TLV as defined in <xref
      target="CPBSID"/> or <xref target="CPBSIDSRV6"/> is included to report
      the BSID of the candidate path when one is either specified or allocated
      by the headend. The constraints and the optimization metric for the SR
      Policy Candidate Path are reported using the SR Candidate Path
      Constraints TLV and its sub-TLVs as described in <xref
      target="CPCONSTRAINTS"/>. The SR Segment List TLV is included for each
      of the SID-List(s) associated with the candidate path. Each SR Segment
      List TLV in turn includes SR Segment sub-TLV(s) to report the segment(s)
      and their status. The SR Segment List Metric sub-TLV is used to report
      the metric values at an individual SID List level.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="Manageability" title="Manageability Considerations">
      <t>The Existing BGP operational and management procedures apply to this
      document. No new procedures are defined in this document. The
      considerations as specified in <xref target="RFC9552"/> apply to this
      document.</t>

      <t>In general, the SR Policy head-end nodes are responsible for the
      advertisement of SR Policy state information.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="IANA" title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>This section describes the code point allocation by IANA for this
      document.</t>

      <section anchor="NLRITYPES" title="BGP-LS NLRI-Types">
        <t>IANA maintains a registry called "BGP-LS NLRI-Types" in the "Border
        Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Parameters" registry group.</t>

        <t>The following table lists the code points that have been allocated
        by IANA:</t>

        <t><figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[ +------+-------------------------------+---------------+
 | Type | NLRI Type                     |   Reference   |
 +------+-------------------------------+---------------+
 |  5   | SR Policy Candidate Path NLRI | this document |
 +------+-------------------------------+---------------+

            Table 2  NLRI Type Codepoint
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="PROTOCOLIDS" title="BGP-LS Protocol-IDs">
        <t>IANA maintains a registry called "BGP-LS Protocol-IDs" in the
        "Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Parameters" registry
        group.</t>

        <t>The following Protocol-ID codepoints have been allocated by
        IANA:</t>

        <t><figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[ +-------------+----------------------------------+---------------+
 | Protocol-ID | NLRI information source protocol |   Reference   |
 +-------------+----------------------------------+---------------+
 |     9       |       Segment Routing            | this document |
 +-------------+----------------------------------+---------------+

                  Table 3  Protocol ID Codepoint
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="BGPLSTLVS" title="BGP-LS TLVs">
        <t>IANA maintains a registry called "BGP-LS NLRI and Attribute TLVs"
        in the "Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Parameters"
        registry group.</t>

        <t>The following table lists the TLV code points that have been
        allocated by IANA:</t>

        <t><figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[+-------+----------------------------------------+---------------+
| Code  |             Description                | Value defined |
| Point |                                        |       in      |
+-------+----------------------------------------+---------------+
|   554 |   SR Policy Candidate Path Descriptor  | this document |
|  1201 |   SR Binding SID                       | this document |
|  1202 |   SR Candidate Path State              | this document |
|  1203 |   SR Candidate Path Name               | this document |
|  1204 |   SR Candidate Path Constraints        | this document |
|  1205 |   SR Segment List                      | this document |
|  1206 |   SR Segment                           | this document |
|  1207 |   SR Segment List Metric               | this document |
|  1208 |   SR Affinity Constraint               | this document |
|  1209 |   SR SRLG Constraint                   | this document |
|  1210 |   SR Bandwidth Constraint              | this document |
|  1211 |   SR Disjoint Group Constraint         | this document |
|  1212 |   SRv6 Binding SID                     | this document |
|  1213 |   SR Policy Name                       | this document |
|  1214 |   SR Bidirectional Group Constraint    | this document |
|  1215 |   SR Metric Constraint                 | this document |
|  1216 |   SR Segment List Bandwidth            | this document |
|  1217 |   SR Segment List Identifier           | this document |
+-------+----------------------------------------+---------------+

        Table 4  NLRI and Attribute TLVs Codepoint
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="PROTOCOLORIGINS" title="SR Policy Protocol Origin">
        <t>Note to IANA (RFC editor to remove this before publication): The
        new registry creation request below is also present in the
        draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp. IANA is requested to process
        the registry creation via the first of these two documents to reach
        publication stage and the authors of the other document would update
        the IANA considerations suitably. The initial allocations in this
        document are a super-set of the initial allocations in
        draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp.</t>

        <t>This document requests IANA to maintain a new registry under
        "Segment Routing" registry group with the allocation policy of "Expert
        Review" <xref target="RFC8126"/> using the guidelines for Designated
        Experts as specified in <xref target="RFC9256"/>. The new registry is
        called "SR Policy Protocol Origin" and should have the reference to
        this document. This registry contains the codepoints allocated to the
        "Protocol Origin" field defined in <xref target="SRPOLICYCP"/>.</t>

        <t>The registry contains the following codepoints, with initial
        values, to be assigned by IANA with the reference set to this
        document:<figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[+---------+--------------------------------------+---------------+
|  Code   |                                      |               |
|  Point  |  Protocol Origin                     |   Reference   |
+---------+--------------------------------------+---------------+
|   0     | Reserved (not to be used)            | this document |
|   1     | PCEP                                 | this document |
|   2     | BGP SR Policy                        | this document |
|   3     | Configuration (CLI, YANG model via   | this document |
|         | NETCONF, etc.)                       |               |
|   4-9   | Unassigned                           | this document |
|   10    | PCEP (In PCEP or when                | this document |
|         | BGP-LS Producer is PCE)              |               |
|  11-19  | Unassigned                           | this document |
|   20    | BGP SR Policy (In PCEP or when       | this document |
|         | BGP-LS Producer is PCE)              |               |
|  21-29  | Unassigned                           | this document |
|   30    | Configuration (CLI, YANG model via   | this document |
|         | NETCONF, etc.) (In PCEP or when      |               |
|         | BGP-LS Producer is PCE)              |               |
|  31-250 | Unassigned                           | this document |
| 251-255 | Private Use (not to be assigned by   | this document |
|         | IANA)                                |               |
+---------+--------------------------------------+---------------+

        Table 5  SR Policy Protocol Origin Codepoint
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="SEGDESC" title="BGP-LS SR Segment Descriptors">
        <t>This document requests IANA to create a registry called "SR Segment
        Descriptor Types" under the "Border Gateway Protocol - Link State
        (BGP-LS) Parameters" registry group with the allocation policy of
        "Expert Review" <xref target="RFC8126"/> using the guidelines for
        Designated Experts as specified in <xref target="RFC9552"/>. There is
        also an additional guideline to the Designated Experts to maintain the
        alignment between the allocations in this registry with those in the
        "Segment Types" registry under the "Segment Routing" registry group.
        This requires that an allocation in the Segment Routing "Segment
        Types" registry is required before allocation can be done in the
        BGP-LS "SR Segment Descriptor Types" registry for a new segment type.
        However, this does not mandate that the specification of a new Segment
        Routing Segment Type also requires the specification of its equivalent
        SR Segment Descriptor Type in BGP-LS; that can be done as and when
        required while maintaining alignment.</t>

        <t>This registry contains the codepoints allocated to the "Segment
        Type" field defined in <xref target="SEGMENTTLV"/> and described in
        <xref target="SEGMENTDESC"/>. The registry contains the following
        codepoints, with initial values, to be assigned by IANA with the
        reference set to this document:<figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[+---------+---------------------------------------+---------------+
|  Code  |   Segment Description                  |  Reference    |
|  Point |                                        |               |
+--------+----------------------------------------+---------------+
|    0   | Reserved (not to be used)              | this document |
|    1   | (Type A) SR-MPLS Label                 | this document |
|    2   | (Type B) SRv6 SID as IPv6 address      | this document |
|    3   | (Type C) SR-MPLS Prefix SID as         | this document |
|        | IPv4 Node Address                      |               |
|    4   | (Type D) SR-MPLS Prefix SID as         | this document |
|        | IPv6 Node Global Address               |               |
|    5   | (Type E) SR-MPLS Adjacency SID as      | this document |
|        | IPv4 Node Address & Local Interface ID |               |
|    6   | (Type F) SR-MPLS Adjacency SID as      | this document |
|        | IPv4 Local & Remote Interface Addresses|               |
|    7   | (Type G) SR-MPLS Adjacency SID as pair | this document |
|        | of IPv6 Global Address & Interface ID  |               |
|        | for Local & Remote nodes               |               |
|    8   | (Type H) SR-MPLS Adjacency SID as pair | this document |
|        | of IPv6 Global Addresses for the       |               |
|        | Local & Remote Interface               |               |
|    9   | (Type I) SRv6 END SID as IPv6 Node     | this document |
|        | Global Address
|   10   | (Type J) SRv6 END.X SID as pair of     | this document |
|        | IPv6 Global Address & Interface ID for |               |
|        | Local & Remote nodes                   |               |
|   11   | (Type K) SRv6 END.X SID as pair of     | this document |
|        | IPv6 Global Addresses for the          |               |
|        | Local & Remote Interface               |               |
| 12-255 | Unassigned                             | this document |
+--------+----------------------------------------+---------------+

            Table 6  SR Segment Descriptor Types Codepoint
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="METRICTYPE" title="BGP-LS SR Policy Metric Type">
        <t>This document requests IANA to create a registry called "BGP-LS SR
        Policy Metric Type" under the "Border Gateway Protocol - Link State
        (BGP-LS) Parameters" registry group with the allocation policy of
        "Expert Review" <xref target="RFC8126"/> using the guidelines for
        Designated Experts as specified in <xref target="RFC9552"/>. This
        registry contains the codepoints allocated to the "metric type" field
        defined in <xref target="SLMETRIC"/>. The registry contains the
        following codepoints, with initial values, to be assigned by IANA with
        the reference set to this document:<figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[+---------+--------------------------------+---------------------+
|  Code   |                                |                     |
|  Point  |     Metric Type                |  Reference          |
+---------+--------------------------------+---------------------+
|    0    | IGP                            | this document       |
|    1    | Min Unidirectional Delay       | this document       |
|    2    | TE                             | this document       |
|    3    | Hop Count                      | this document       |
|    4    | SID List Length                | this document       |
|    5    | Bandwidth                      | this document       |
|    6    | Avg Unidirectional Delay       | this document       |
|    7    | Unidirectional Delay Variation | this document       |
|    8    | Loss                           | this document       |
|  9-127  | Unassigned                     | this document       |
| 128-255 | User Defined                   | this document       |
+---------+--------------------------------+---------------------+

            Table 7  SR Policy Metric Type Codepoint
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="Security" title="Security Considerations">
      <t>Procedures and protocol extensions defined in this document do not
      affect the base BGP security model. See <xref target="RFC6952"/> for
      details. The security considerations of the base BGP-LS specification as
      described in <xref target="RFC9552"/> also apply.</t>

      <t>The BGP-LS SR Policy extensions specified in this document enable
      traffic engineering and service programming use-cases within an SR
      domain as described in <xref target="RFC9256"/>. SR operates within a
      trusted SR domain <xref target="RFC8402"/> and its security
      considerations also apply to BGP sessions when carrying SR Policy
      information. The SR Policies advertised to controllers and other
      applications via BGP-LS are expected to be used entirely within this
      trusted SR domain, i.e., within a single AS or between multiple
      ASes/domains within a single provider network. Therefore, precaution is
      necessary to ensure that the SR Policy information advertised via BGP
      sessions is limited to nodes and/or controllers/applications in a secure
      manner within this trusted SR domain. The general guidance for BGP-LS
      with respect to isolation of BGP-LS sessions from BGP sessions for other
      address-families (refer security considerations of <xref
      target="RFC9552"/>) may be used to ensure that the SR Policy information
      is not advertised by accident or error to an EBGP peering session
      outside the SR domain.</t>

      <t>Additionally, it may be considered that the export of SR Policy
      information, as described in this document, constitutes a risk to
      confidentiality of mission-critical or commercially sensitive
      information about the network (more specifically endpoint/node
      addresses, SR SIDs, and the SR Policies deployed). BGP peerings are not
      automatic and require configuration. Thus, it is the responsibility of
      the network operator to ensure that only trusted nodes (that include
      both routers and controller applications) within the SR domain are
      configured to receive such information.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="Contributors" title="Contributors">
      <t>The following people have substantially contributed to the editing of
      this document:</t>

      <t><figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[Clarence Filsfils
Cisco Systems
Email: cfilsfil@cisco.com

]]></artwork>
        </figure><figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[Mach (Guoyi) Chen
Huawei Technologies
Email: mach.chen@huawei.com

]]></artwork>
        </figure></t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="Acknowledgements" title="Acknowledgements">
      <t>The authors would like to thank Dhruv Dhody, Mohammed Abdul Aziz
      Khalid, Lou Berger, Acee Lindem, Siva Sivabalan, Arjun Sreekantiah,
      Dhanendra Jain, Francois Clad, Zafar Ali, Stephane Litkowski, Aravind
      Babu Mahendra Babu, Geetanjalli Bhalla, Ahmed Bashandy, Mike Koldychev,
      Samuel Sidor, Alex Tokar, Rajesh Melarcode Venkatesswaran, Lin
      Changwang, Liu Yao, Joel Halpern, and Ned Smith for their review and
      valuable comments. The authors would also like to thank Susan Hares for
      her shepherd review of the document and helpful comments to improve this
      document. The authors would like to thank John Scudder for his AD review
      and helpful suggestions to improve this document.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.2328'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.3630'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.5329'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.5340'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.7471'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.5440'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.9552'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.8402'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.8174'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.I-D.ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.8126'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.5305'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.8570'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.8697'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.8664'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.9256'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.9086'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.9514'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.8986'?>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.4655'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.I-D.ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-te-path'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.2702'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.4202'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.7308'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.6952'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.8231'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.5065'?>

      <?rfc include='reference.RFC.8800'?>

      <reference anchor="IEEE754">
        <front>
          <title>IEEE Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic</title>

          <author>
            <organization>Institute of Electrical and Electronics
            Engineers</organization>
          </author>

          <date day="22" month="July" year="2019"/>
        </front>

        <seriesInfo name="IEEE" value="754-2019"/>

        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.1109/ieeestd.2019.8766229"/>

        <format target="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8766220"
                type="HTML"/>
      </reference>
    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>
