]>

hch@lst.de

Oracle Corporation

United States of America chuck.lever@oracle.com

Opendrives.com

11 Selwyn Road Newton MA 02461 United States of America +1 617-510-0422 s.faibish@opendrives.com

Dell Technologies

176 South Street Hopkinton MA 01748 United States of America david.black@dell.com

Transport NFSv4 NFSv4 This document specifies how to use the Parallel Network File System (pNFS) Small Computer System Interface (SCSI) Layout Type to access storage devices using the Non-Volatile Memory Express (NVMe) protocol family.

Introduction NFSv4.1 (in ) includes a pNFS feature that allows reads and writes to be performed by other means than directing read and write operations to the server. Through use of this feature, the server, in the role of metadata server is responsible for managing file and directory metadata while separate means are provided for execution of reads and writes. These other means of performing file reads and writes are defined by individual mapping types which often have their own specifications. The pNFS Small Computer System Interface (SCSI) layout is a layout type that allows NFS clients to directly perform I/O to block storage devices while bypassing the Metadata Server (MDS). It is specified by using concepts from the SCSI protocol family for the data path to the storage devices. NVM Express (NVMe), or the Non-Volatile Memory Host Controller Interface Specification, is a set of specifications to talk to storage devices over a number of protocols such as PCI Express (PCIe), Fibre Channel (FC) and TCP/IP or Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) networking. NVMe is currently the by far dominant protocol used to access PCIe Solid State Disks (SSDs), and increasingly adopted for remote storage access where it replaces SCSI-based protocols such as iSCSI. This document defines how NVMe Namespaces using the NVM Command Set exported by NVMe Controllers implementing the NVMe Base specification are to be used as storage devices using the SCSI Layout Type. The definition is independent of the underlying transport used by the NVMe Controller and thus supports Controllers implementing a wide variety of transports, including PCI Express, RDMA, TCP and Fibre Channel. This document does not amend the existing SCSI layout document. Rather, it defines how NVMe Namespaces can be used within the SCSI Layout by establishing a mapping of the SCSI constructs used in the SCSI layout document to corresponding NVMe constructs.

Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

General Definitions The following definitions are provided for the purpose of providing an appropriate context for the reader.

Client

The "client" is the entity that accesses the NFS server's resources. The client may be an application that contains the logic to access the NFS server directly or be part of the operating system that provides remote file system services for a set of applications.

Metadata Server (MDS)

The Metadata Server (MDS) is the entity responsible for coordinating client access to a set of file systems and is identified by a server owner.

SCSI Layout mapping to NVMe The SCSI layout definition references only a few SCSI-specific concepts directly. This document provides a mapping from these SCSI concepts to NVM Express concepts that are used when using the pNFS SCSI layout with NVMe namespaces.

Volume Identification The pNFS SCSI layout uses the Device Identification Vital Product Data (VPD) page (page code 0x83) from to identify the devices used by a layout. Implementations that use NVMe namespaces as storage devices map NVMe namespace identifiers to a subset of the identifiers that the Device Identification VPD page supports for SCSI logical units. To be used as storage devices for the pNFS SCSI layout, NVMe namespaces MUST support either the IEEE Extended Unique Identifier (EUI64) or Namespace Globally Unique Identifier (NGUID) value reported in a Namespace Identification Descriptor, the I/O Command Set Independent Identify Namespace Data Structure, and the Identify Namespace Data Structure, NVM Command Set. If available, use of the NGUID value is preferred as it is the larger identifier. Note: The PS_DESIGNATOR_T10 and PS_DESIGNATOR_NAME have no equivalent in NVMe and cannot be used to identify NVMe storage devices. The pnfs_scsi_base_volume_info4 structure for an NVMe namespace SHALL be constructed as follows: The "sbv_code_set" field SHALL be set to PS_CODE_SET_BINARY. The "pnfs_scsi_designator_type" field SHALL be set to PS_DESIGNATOR_EUI64. The "sbv_designator" field SHALL contain either the NGUID or the EUI64 identifier for the namespace. If both NGUID and EUI64 identifiers are available, then the NGUID identifier SHOULD be used as it is the larger identifier. RFC 8154 specifies the "sbv_designator" field as an XDR variable length opaque<>. The length of that XDR opaque<> value (part of its XDR representation) indicates which NVMe identifier is present. That length MUST be 16 octets for an NVMe NGUID identifier and MUST be 8 octets for an NVMe EUI64 identifier. All other lengths MUST NOT be used with an NVMe namespace.

Client Fencing The SCSI layout uses Persistent Reservations (PRs) to provide client fencing. For this to be achieved, both the MDS and the Clients have to register a key with the storage device, and the MDS has to create a reservation on the storage device. The following sub-sections provide a full mapping of the required PERSISTENT RESERVE IN and PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT SCSI commands to NVMe commands which MUST be used when using NVMe namespaces as storage devices for the pNFS SCSI layout.

PRs - Key Registration On NVMe namespaces, reservation keys are registered using the Reservation Register command (refer to Section 7.3 of ) with the Reservation Register Action (RREGA) field set to 000b (i.e., Register Reservation Key) and supplying the reservation key in the New Reservation Key (NRKEY) field. Reservation keys are unregistered using the Reservation Register command with the Reservation Register Action (RREGA) field set to 001b (i.e., Unregister Reservation Key) and supplying the reservation key in the Current Reservation Key (CRKEY) field. One important difference between SCSI Persistent Reservations and NVMe Reservations is that NVMe reservation keys always apply to all controllers used by a host (as indicated by the NVMe Host Identifier). This behavior is analogous to setting the ALL_TG_PT bit when registering a SCSI Reservation key, and is always supported by NVMe Reservations, unlike the ALL_TG_PT for which SCSI support is inconsistent and cannot be relied upon. Registering a reservation key with a namespace creates an association between a host and a namespace. A host that is a registrant of a namespace may use any controller with which that host is associated (i.e., that has the same Host Identifier, refer to Section 5.27.1.25 of ) to access that namespace as a registrant.

PRs - MDS Registration and Reservation Before returning a PNFS_SCSI_VOLUME_BASE volume to the client, the MDS needs to prepare the volume for fencing using PRs. This is done by registering the reservation generated for the MDS with the device (see ) followed by a Reservation Acquire command (refer to Section 7.2 of ) with the Reservation Acquire Action (RACQA) field set to 000b (i.e., Acquire) and the Reservation Type (RTYPE) field set to 4h (i.e., Exclusive Access - Registrants Only Reservation).

Fencing Action In case of a non-responding client, the MDS fences the client by executing a Reservation Acquire command (refer to Section 7.2 of ), with the Reservation Acquire Action (RACQA) field set to 001b (i.e., Preempt) or 010b (i.e., Preempt and Abort), the Current Reservation Key (CRKEY) field set to the server's reservation key, the Preempt Reservation Key (PRKEY) field set to the reservation key associated with the non-responding client and the Reservation Type (RTYPE) field set to 010b (i.e., Exclusive Access - Registrants Only Reservation). The client can distinguish I/O errors due to fencing from other errors based on the Reservation Conflict NVMe status code.

Client Recovery after a Fence Action If an NVMe command issued by the client to the storage device returns a non-retryable error (refer to the DNR bit defined in Figure 92 in ), the client MUST commit all layouts that use the storage device through the MDS, return all outstanding layouts for the device, forget the device ID, and unregister the reservation key.

Volatile write caches For NVMe controllers a volatile write cache is enabled if bit 0 of the Volatile Write Cache (VWC) field in the Identify Controller Data Structure, I/O Command Set Independent (see Figure 275 in ) is set and the Volatile Write Cache Enable (WCE) bit (i.e., bit 00) in the Volatile Write Cache Feature (Feature Identifier 06h) (see Section 5.27.1.4 of ) is set. If a volatile write cache is enabled on an NVMe namespace used as a storage device for the pNFS SCSI layout, the pNFS server (MDS) MUST use the NVMe Flush command to flush the volatile write cache to stable storage before the LAYOUTCOMMIT operation returns by using the Flush command (see Section 7.1 of ). The NVMe Flush command is the equivalent to the SCSI SYNCHRONIZE CACHE commands.

Security Considerations NFSv4 clients access NFSv4 metadata servers using the NFSv4 protocol. The security considerations generally described in apply to a client's interactions with the metadata server. However, NFSv4 clients and servers access NVMe storage devices at a lower layer than NFSv4. NFSv4 and RPC security are not directly applicable to the I/Os to data servers using NVMe. Refer to Section Extents Are Permissions and Section Security Considerations of for the Security Considerations of direct block access from NFS clients. pNFS with an NVMe layout can be used with NVMe transports (e.g., NVMe over PCIe ) that provide essentially no additional security functionality. Or, pNFS may be used with storage protocols such as NVMe over TCP that can provide significant transport layer security. It is the responsibility of those administering and deploying pNFS with an NVMe layout to ensure that appropriate protection is deployed to that protocol. When using IP-based storage protocols such as NVMe over TCP, data confidentiality and integrity SHOULD be provided for traffic between pNFS clients and NVMe storage devices by using a secure communication protocol such as Transport Layer Security (TLS) . For NVMe over TCP, TLS SHOULD be used as described in to protect traffic between pNFS clients and NVMe namespaces used as storage devices. Physical security is a common means for protocols not based on IP. In environments where the security requirements for the storage protocol cannot be met, pNFS with an NVMe layout SHOULD NOT be deployed. When security is available for the data server storage protocol, it is generally at a different granularity and with a different notion of identity than NFSv4 (e.g., NFSv4 controls user access to files, and NVMe controls initiator access to volumes). As with pNFS with the block layout type , the pNFS client is responsible for enforcing appropriate correspondences between these security layers. In environments where the security requirements are such that client-side protection from access to storage outside of the layout is not sufficient, pNFS with a SCSI layout on a NVMe namespace SHOULD NOT be deployed. As with other block-oriented pNFS layout types, the metadata server is able to fence off a client's access to the data on an NVMe namespace used as a storage device. If a metadata server revokes a layout, the client's access MUST be terminated at the storage devices via fencing as specified in . The client has a subsequent opportunity to acquire a new layout.

IANA Considerations The document does not require any actions by IANA.

Parallel NFS (pNFS) extends Network File Sharing version 4 (NFSv4) to allow clients to directly access file data on the storage used by the NFSv4 server. This ability to bypass the server for data access can increase both performance and parallelism, but requires additional client functionality for data access, some of which is dependent on the class of storage used. The main pNFS operations document specifies storage-class-independent extensions to NFS; this document specifies the additional extensions (primarily data structures) for use of pNFS with block- and volume-based storage. [STANDARDS-TRACK] The Parallel Network File System (pNFS) allows a separation between the metadata (onto a metadata server) and data (onto a storage device) for a file. The Small Computer System Interface (SCSI) layout type is defined in this document as an extension to pNFS to allow the use of SCSI-based block storage devices. This document describes the Network File System (NFS) version 4 minor version 1, including features retained from the base protocol (NFS version 4 minor version 0, which is specified in RFC 7530) and protocol extensions made subsequently. The later minor version has no dependencies on NFS version 4 minor version 0, and is considered a separate protocol. This document obsoletes RFC 5661. It substantially revises the treatment of features relating to multi-server namespace, superseding the description of those features appearing in RFC 5661. INCITS Technical Committee T10 NVM Express, Inc. NVM Express, Inc. NVM Express, Inc. This document specifies version 1.3 of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol. TLS allows client/server applications to communicate over the Internet in a way that is designed to prevent eavesdropping, tampering, and message forgery. This document updates RFCs 5705 and 6066, and obsoletes RFCs 5077, 5246, and 6961. This document also specifies new requirements for TLS 1.2 implementations. In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings. NVM Express, Inc.

Acknowledgements Carsten Bormann ran the scripted conversion from the XML2RFC v2 format used by earlier drafts to the currently used markdown source format. David Noveck provided ample feedback to various drafts of this document.