<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc version 1.7.5 (Ruby 3.2.2) -->
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-06" category="std" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF" tocInclude="true" sortRefs="true" symRefs="true" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.19.2 -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="IPFIX IANA Fixes">Simple Fixes to the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) IANA Registry</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-06"/>
    <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair">
      <organization>Orange</organization>
      <address>
        <email>mohamed.boucadair@orange.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Benoit Claise">
      <organization>Huawei</organization>
      <address>
        <email>benoit.claise@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2024" month="February" day="06"/>
    <area>Operations and Management</area>
    <workgroup>OPSAWG</workgroup>
    <keyword>IPFIX</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <?line 61?>

<t>This document provides simple fixes to the IANA IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) registry. Specifically, this document provides updates to fix a shortcoming in the description of some Information Elements (IE), updates to ensure a consistent structure when calling an existing IANA registry, and updates to fix broken pointers, orphaned section references, etc. The updates are also meant to bring some consistency among the entries of the registry.</t>
    </abstract>
    <note removeInRFC="true">
      <name>Discussion Venues</name>
      <t>Discussion of this document takes place on the
    Operations and Management Area Working Group Working Group mailing list (opsawg@ietf.org),
    which is archived at <eref target="https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/"/>.</t>
      <t>Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
    <eref target="https://github.com/boucadair/simple-ipfix-fixes"/>.</t>
    </note>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <?line 66?>

<section anchor="introduction">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t>When OPSAWG was considering <xref target="I-D.ietf-opsawg-rfc7125-update"/> which updates <xref target="RFC7125"/>, the WG realized that some other parts of the IANA IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) registry <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/> were not up-to-date. Indeed, since its initial creation in 2007, some IPFIX Information Elements (IEs) are no longer adequately specified  (while they were at some point in time in the past). This document intends to update the IANA registry and bring some consistency among the entries of the registry.</t>
      <t>As discussed with IANA during the publication process of <xref target="RFC9487"/>, the "Additional Information" entry in <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/> should contain a link to an existing registry, when applicable, as opposed to having:</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>
          <t>A link to an existing registry in the "Description" entry.</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t>The registry detailed values repeated in the "Description" entry. This practice has the drawback that the description must be updated each time the registry is updated.</t>
        </li>
      </ul>
      <t>Therefore, this document lists a set of simple fixes to the IPFIX IANA registry <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/>. These fixes are classified as follows:</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>
          <t>Updates that fix a shortcoming in the description of an IE (<xref target="desc"/>).</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t>Updates that require adding a pointer to an existing IANA registry (<xref target="to-iana"/>).</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t>Updates that are meant to ensure a consistent structure when calling an existing IANA registry (<xref target="consistent"/>).</t>
        </li>
        <li>
          <t>Miscellaneous updates that fix broken pointers, orphaned section references, etc. (<xref target="misc"/>).</t>
        </li>
      </ul>
      <t>These updates are also meant to facilitate the automatic extraction of the values maintained in IANA registries (e.g., with a cron job), required by Collectors to be able to support new IPFIX IEs and, more importantly, adequately interpret new values in registries specified by those IPFIX IEs.</t>
      <t>Note that, as per <xref section="5" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7012"/>, <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/> is the normative reference for the IPFIX IEs that were defined in <xref target="RFC5102"/>. Therefore, the updates in this document do not update any part of <xref target="RFC7011"/>.</t>
      <t>Likewise, this document is not marked as formally updating <xref target="RFC5477"/>, <xref target="RFC5610"/>, <xref target="RFC5655"/>, <xref target="RFC6235"/>, <xref target="RFC6759"/>, <xref target="RFC7014"/>, <xref target="RFC7015"/>, <xref target="RFC7133"/>, <xref target="RFC7270"/>, <xref target="RFC8038"/>, and <xref target="RFC8158"/>.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="conventions-and-definitions">
      <name>Conventions and Definitions</name>
      <t>The key words "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL
NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>",
"<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they
appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
      <?line -18?>

<t>This document uses the IPFIX-specific terminology (Information Element, Template,
   Collector,  Data Record, Flow Record, Exporting Process,
   Collecting Process, etc.) defined in
   Section 2 of <xref target="RFC7011"/>. As in <xref target="RFC7011"/>, these IPFIX-specific terms
   have the first letter of a word capitalized.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="why-an-rfc-is-needed-for-these-updates">
      <name>Why An RFC is Needed for These Updates?</name>
      <t>Many of the edits in this document may be handled by the IPFIX Experts (informally called the IE-DOCTORS <xref target="RFC7013"/>). However, and given that many of the impacted IEs were created via the IETF stream, the following from <xref section="5.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7013"/> should be followed:</t>
      <ul empty="true">
        <li>
          <t>This process should not in any way be construed as allowing the IE-DOCTORS to overrule IETF consensus.  Specifically, Information Elements in the IANA IE registry that were added with IETF consensus require IETF consensus for revision or deprecation.</t>
        </li>
      </ul>
    </section>
    <section anchor="desc">
      <name>Update the Description</name>
      <section anchor="forwardingstatus">
        <name>forwardingStatus</name>
        <t>The current forwardingStatus entry in <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/> deviates from what is provided in <xref target="RFC7270"/>. In particular, the registered Abstract Data Type is unsigned8, while it must be unsigned32. The following update fixes that issue. The description is also updated to clarify the use of the reduced-size encoding as per <xref section="6.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7011"/>.</t>
        <section anchor="old">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
   - Description:  This Information Element describes the forwarding
                   status of the flow and any attached reasons.

                   The layout of the encoding is as follows:

                   MSB  -  0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7  -  LSB
                         +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
                         | Status|  Reason code or flags |
                         +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

                   See the Forwarding Status sub-registries at
                   [Forwarding-Status].

                   Examples:

                   value : 0x40 = 64
                   binary: 01000000
                   decode: 01        -> Forward
                             000000  -> No further information

                   value : 0x89 = 137
                   binary: 10001001
                   decode: 10        -> Drop
                             001001  -> Bad TTL

   - Additional Information: See "NetFlow Version 9 Flow-Record Format"
             [CCO-NF9FMT].

   - Abstract Data Type: unsigned8
]]></artwork>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
   - Description:  This Information Element describes the forwarding
                   status of the flow and any attached reasons.
                   IPFIX reduced-size encoding is used as required.

                   A structure is currently associated with the first
                   byte. Future versions may be defined to associate
                   meanings with the remaining bits.

                   The current version of the Information Element
                   should be exported as unsigned8.

                   The layout of the encoding is as follows:

                   MSB  -  0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7  -  LSB
                         +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
                         | Status|  Reason code or flags |
                         +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

                   Examples:

                   value : 0x40 = 64
                   binary: 01000000
                   decode: 01        -> Forward
                             000000  -> No further information

                   value : 0x89 = 137
                   binary: 10001001
                   decode: 10        -> Drop
                             001001  -> Bad TTL

   - Additional Information: See "NetFlow Version 9 Flow-Record Format"
             [CCO-NF9FMT]. See the Forwarding Status sub-registries
             at [Forwarding-Status].

   - Abstract Data Type: unsigned32
]]></artwork>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="to-iana">
      <name>Point to An Existing IANA Registry</name>
      <t>This document requests IANA to update the following entries by adding the indicated "Additional Information" to the <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/> registry:</t>
      <table>
        <name>Cite an IANA Registry under Additional Information</name>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left">IE</th>
            <th align="left">Additional Information</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">icmpTypeCodeIPv4</td>
            <td align="left">https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmp-parameters/icmp-parameters.xhtml</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">igmpType</td>
            <td align="left">https://www.iana.org/assignments/igmp-type-numbers/igmp-type-numbers.xhtml#igmp-type-numbers-1</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">icmpTypeCodeIPv6</td>
            <td align="left">https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters/icmpv6-parameters.xhtml</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">icmpTypeIPv4</td>
            <td align="left">https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmp-parameters/icmp-parameters.xhtml#icmp-parameters-types</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">icmpCodeIPv4</td>
            <td align="left">https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmp-parameters/icmp-parameters.xhtml#icmp-parameters-codes</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">icmpTypeIPv6</td>
            <td align="left">https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters/icmpv6-parameters.xhtml#icmpv6-parameters-2</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">icmpCodeIPv6</td>
            <td align="left">https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters/icmpv6-parameters.xhtml#icmpv6-parameters-3</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">privateEnterpriseNumber</td>
            <td align="left">https://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers/enterprise-numbers</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </section>
    <section anchor="consistent">
      <name>Consistent Citation of IANA Registries</name>
      <t>This document requests IANA to update <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/> for each of the IE entries listed in the following subsections.</t>
      <section anchor="mplstoplabeltype">
        <name>mplsTopLabelType</name>
        <section anchor="old-1">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This field identifies the control protocol that allocated the top-of-stack label. Values for this field are listed in the MPLS label type registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-mpls-label-type.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3031"/> for the MPLS label structure.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See the list of MPLS label types assigned by IANA at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/mpls-label-values].</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-1">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This field identifies the control protocol that allocated the top-of-stack label. Values for this field are listed in the MPLS label type registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the list of MPLS label types assigned by IANA at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-mpls-label-type].</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3031"/> for the MPLS label structure.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="classificationengineid">
        <name>classificationEngineId</name>
        <section anchor="old-2">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>A unique identifier for the engine that determined the Selector ID. Thus, the Classification Engine ID defines the context for the Selector ID. The Classification Engine can be considered a specific registry for application assignments.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>Values for this field are listed in the Classification Engine IDs registry. See https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#classification-engine-ids.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-2">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>A unique identifier for the engine that determined the Selector ID. Thus, the Classification Engine ID defines the context for the Selector ID. The Classification Engine can be considered a specific registry for application assignments.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>Values for this field are listed in the Classification Engine IDs registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#classification-engine-ids.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="flowendreason">
        <name>flowEndReason</name>
        <section anchor="old-3">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>The reason for Flow termination. Values are listed in the flowEndReason registry. See https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-flow-end-reason.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-3">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>The reason for Flow termination. Values are listed in the flowEndReason registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the Classification Engine IDs registry available at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-flow-end-reason].</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="natoriginatingaddressrealm">
        <name>natOriginatingAddressRealm</name>
        <section anchor="old-4">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>Indicates whether the session was created because traffic originated in the private or public address realm. postNATSourceIPv4Address, postNATDestinationIPv4Address, postNAPTSourceTransportPort, and postNAPTDestinationTransportPort are qualified with the address realm in perspective.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>Values are listed in the natOriginatingAddressRealm registry. See https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-nat-originating-address-realm.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3022"/> for the definition of NAT.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-4">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>Indicates whether the session was created because traffic originated in the private or public address realm. postNATSourceIPv4Address, postNATDestinationIPv4Address, postNAPTSourceTransportPort, and postNAPTDestinationTransportPort are qualified with the address realm in perspective.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>Values are listed in the natOriginatingAddressRealm registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned NAT originating address realm at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-nat-originating-address-realm]. See <xref target="RFC3022"/> for the definition of NAT.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="natevent">
        <name>natEvent</name>
        <section anchor="old-5">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element identifies a NAT event. This IE identifies the type of a NAT event. Examples of NAT events include, but are not limited to, NAT translation create, NAT translation delete, Threshold Reached, or Threshold Exceeded, etc. Values for this Information Element are listed in the "NAT Event Type" registry, see https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-nat-event-type.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3022"/> for the definition of NAT.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3234"/> for the definition of middleboxes.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC8158"/> for the definitions of values 4-16.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-5">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element identifies a NAT event. This IE identifies the type of a NAT event. Examples of NAT events include, but are not limited to, NAT translation create, NAT translation delete, Threshold Reached, or Threshold Exceeded, etc. Values for this Information Element are listed in the "NAT Event Type" registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned NAT Event Types at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-nat-event-type].</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3022"/> for the definition of NAT.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3234"/> for the definition of middleboxes.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC8158"/> for the definitions of values 4-16.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="firewallevent">
        <name>firewallEvent</name>
        <section anchor="old-6">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>Indicates a firewall event. Allowed values are listed in the firewallEvent registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-firewall-event.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-6">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>Indicates a firewall event. Allowed values are listed in the firewallEvent registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned firewall events at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-firewall-event].</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="biflowdirection">
        <name>biflowDirection</name>
        <section anchor="old-7">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>A description of the direction assignment method used to assign the Biflow Source and Destination. This Information Element <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be present in a Flow Data Record, or applied to all flows exported from an Exporting Process or Observation Domain using IPFIX Options. If this Information Element is not present in a Flow Record or associated with a Biflow via scope, it is assumed that the configuration of the direction assignment method is done out-of-band. Note that when using IPFIX Options to apply this Information Element to all flows within an Observation Domain or from an Exporting Process, the Option <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be sent reliably. If reliable transport is not available (i.e., when using UDP), this Information Element <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> appear in each Flow Record. Values are listed in the biflowDirection registry. See [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-biflow-direction].</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-7">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>A description of the direction assignment method used to assign the Biflow Source and Destination. This Information Element <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be present in a Flow Data Record, or applied to all flows exported from an Exporting Process or Observation Domain using IPFIX Options. If this Information Element is not present in a Flow Record or associated with a Biflow via scope, it is assumed that the configuration of the direction assignment method is done out-of-band. Note that when using IPFIX Options to apply this Information Element to all flows within an Observation Domain or from an Exporting Process, the Option <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be sent reliably. If reliable transport is not available (i.e., when using UDP), this Information Element <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> appear in each Flow Record. Values are listed in the biflowDirection registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned biflow direction values at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-biflow-direction].</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="observationpointtype">
        <name>observationPointType</name>
        <section anchor="old-8">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>Type of observation point. Values are listed in the observationPointType registry. See https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-observation-point-type.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-8">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>Type of observation point. Values are listed in the observationPointType registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned observation point type at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-observation-point-type].</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="anonymizationtechnique">
        <name>anonymizationTechnique</name>
        <section anchor="old-9">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>A description of the anonymization technique applied to a referenced Information Element within a referenced Template. Each technique may be applicable only to certain Information Elements and recommended only for certain Information Elements. Values are listed in the anonymizationTechnique registry. See https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-anonymization-technique.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-9">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>A description of the anonymization technique applied to a referenced Information Element within a referenced Template. Each technique may be applicable only to certain Information Elements and recommended only for certain Information Elements. Values are listed in the anonymizationTechnique registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned anonymization techniques at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-anonymization-technique].</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="nattype">
        <name>natType</name>
        <section anchor="old-10">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>Values are listed in the natType registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-nat-type.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3022"/> for the definition of NAT.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC1631"/> for the definition of NAT44.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC6144"/> for the definition of NAT64.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC6146"/> for the definition of NAT46.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC6296"/> for the definition of NAT66.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC0791"/> for the definition of IPv4.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC8200"/> for the definition of IPv6.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-10">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element identifies the NAT type applied to packets of the Flow.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>Values are listed in the natType registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned NAT types at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-nat-type].</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3022"/> for the definition of NAT.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC1631"/> for the definition of NAT44.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC6144"/> for the definition of NAT46.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC6146"/> for the definition of NAT64.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC6296"/> for the definition of NPTv6.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC0791"/> for the definition of IPv4.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC8200"/> for the definition of IPv6.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
          <ul empty="true">
            <li>
              <t>Note to IANA: This change also corrects errors in the pointers provided for NAT46/NAT64.</t>
            </li>
          </ul>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="selectoralgorithm">
        <name>selectorAlgorithm</name>
        <section anchor="old-11">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element identifies the packet selection methods (e.g., Filtering, Sampling) that are applied by the Selection Process. Most of these methods have parameters. Further Information Elements are needed to fully specify packet selection with these methods and all their parameters. The methods listed below are defined in <xref target="RFC5475"/>. For their parameters, Information Elements are defined in the information model document. The names of these Information Elements are listed for each method identifier. Further method identifiers may be added to the list below. It might be necessary to define new Information Elements to specify their parameters.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>The following packet selection methods identifiers are defined here: https://www.iana.org/assignments/psamp-parameters.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>There is a broad variety of possible parameters that could be used for Property match Filtering (5) but currently there are no agreed parameters specified.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-11">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element identifies the packet selection methods (e.g., Filtering, Sampling) that are applied by the Selection Process. Most of these methods have parameters. Further Information Elements are needed to fully specify packet selection with these methods and all their parameters. For the methods parameters, Information Elements are defined in the information model document. The names of these Information Elements are listed for each method identifier. Further method identifiers may be added to the list. It might be necessary to define new Information Elements to specify their parameters.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>There is a broad variety of possible parameters that could be used for Property match Filtering (5) but currently there are no agreed parameters specified.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned PSAMP parameters at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/psamp-parameters].</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="informationelementdatatype">
        <name>informationElementDataType</name>
        <section anchor="old-12">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>A description of the abstract data type of an IPFIX information element. These are taken from the abstract data types defined in section 3.1 of the IPFIX Information Model <xref target="RFC5102"/>; see that section for more information on the types described in the [informationElementDataType] subregistry. These types are registered in the IANA IPFIX Information Element Data Type subregistry. This subregistry is intended to assign numbers for type names, not to provide a mechanism for adding data types to the IPFIX Protocol, and as such requires a Standards Action <xref target="RFC8126"/> to modify.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-12">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>A description of the abstract data type of an IPFIX information element.These are taken from the abstract data types defined in Section 3.1 of the IPFIX Information Model <xref target="RFC5102"/>; see that section for more information on the types described in the [informationElementDataType] subregistry. These types are registered in the IANA IPFIX Information Element Data Type subregistry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>The [informationElementDataType] subregistry is intended to assign numbers for type names, not to provide a mechanism for adding data types to the IPFIX Protocol, and as such requires a Standards Action <xref target="RFC8126"/> to modify.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned emelement data types at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-information-element-data-types].</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="informationelementsemantics">
        <name>informationElementSemantics</name>
        <section anchor="old-13">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>A description of the semantics of an IPFIX Information Element. These are taken from the data type semantics defined in section 3.2 of the IPFIX Information Model <xref target="RFC5102"/>; see that section for more information on the types defined in the [IPFIX Information Element Semantics] subregistry. This field may take the values in the semantics registry; the special value 0x00 (default) is used to note that no semantics apply to the field; it cannot be manipulated by a Collecting Process or File Reader that does not understand it a priori. These semantics are registered in the IANA IPFIX Information Element Semantics subregistry. This subregistry is intended to assign numbers for semantics names, not to provide a mechanism for adding semantics to the IPFIX Protocol, and as such requires a Standards Action <xref target="RFC8126"/> to modify.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-13">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>A description of the semantics of an IPFIX Information Element. These are taken from the data type semantics defined in Section 3.2 of the IPFIX Information Model <xref target="RFC5102"/>; see that section for more information on the types defined in the [IPFIX Information Element Semantics] subregistry. This field may take the values in the [IPFIX Information Element Semantics] subregistry; the special value 0x00 (default) is used to note that no semantics apply to the field; it cannot be manipulated by a Collecting Process or File Reader that does not understand it a priori.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>The [IPFIX Information Element Semantics] subregistry is intended to assign numbers for semantics names, not to provide a mechanism for adding semantics to the IPFIX Protocol, and as such requires a Standards Action <xref target="RFC8126"/> to modify.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned semantics of an IPFIX Information Element at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-information-element-semantic].</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="informationelementunits">
        <name>informationElementUnits</name>
        <section anchor="old-14">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>A description of the units of an IPFIX Information Element. These correspond to the units implicitly defined in the Information Element definitions in section 5 of the IPFIX Information Model <xref target="RFC5102"/>; see that section for more information on the types described in the informationElementsUnits subregistry. This field may take the values in Table 3 below; the special value 0x00 (none) is used to note that the field is unitless. These types are registered in the [IANA IPFIX Information Element Units] subregistry.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-14">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>A description of the units of an IPFIX Information Element. These correspond to the units implicitly defined in the Information Element definitions in Section 5 of the IPFIX Information Model <xref target="RFC5102"/>; see that section for more information on the types described in the informationElementsUnits subregistry. These types can take the values in the [IANA IPFIX Information Element Units] subregistry. The special value 0x00 (none) is used to note that the field is unitless.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned units of an IPFIX Information Element at [IANA IPFIX Information Element Units].</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="portrangestart">
        <name>portRangeStart</name>
        <section anchor="old-15">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>The port number identifying the start of a range of ports. A value of zero indicates that the range start is not specified, ie the range is defined in some other way.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>Additional information on defined TCP port numbers can be found at https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-15">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>The port number identifying the start of a range of ports. A value of zero indicates that the range start is not specified, i.e., the range is defined in some other way.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>Additional information on defined TCP port numbers can be found at https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="portrangeend">
        <name>portRangeEnd</name>
        <section anchor="old-16">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>The port number identifying the end of a range of ports. A value of zero indicates that the range end is not specified, ie the range is defined in some other way. Additional information on defined TCP port numbers can be found at https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-16">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>The port number identifying the end of a range of ports. A value of zero indicates that the range end is not specified, i.e., the range is defined in some other way.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>Additional information on defined TCP port numbers can be found at https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="ingressinterfacetype">
        <name>ingressInterfaceType</name>
        <section anchor="old-17">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>The type of interface where packets of this Flow are being received. The value matches the value of managed object 'ifType' as defined in https://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaiftype-mib.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>https://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaiftype-mib</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-17">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>The type of interface where packets of this Flow are being received. The value matches the value of managed object 'ifType'.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned ingress interface types at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaiftype-mib].</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="egressinterfacetype">
        <name>egressInterfaceType</name>
        <section anchor="old-18">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>The type of interface where packets of this Flow are being sent. The value matches the value of managed object 'ifType' as defined in https://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaiftype-mib.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>https://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaiftype-mib</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-18">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>The type of interface where packets of this Flow are being sent. The value matches the value of managed object 'ifType'.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned egress interface types at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaiftype-mib].</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="valuedistributionmethod">
        <name>valueDistributionMethod</name>
        <section anchor="old-19">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>A description of the method used to distribute the counters from Contributing Flows into the Aggregated Flow records described by an associated scope, generally a Template. The method is deemed to apply to all the non-key Information Elements in the referenced scope for which value distribution is a valid operation; if the originalFlowsInitiated and/or originalFlowsCompleted Information Elements appear in the Template, they are not subject to this distribution method, as they each infer their own distribution method. The valueDistributionMethod registry is intended to list a complete set of possible value distribution methods.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-value-distribution-method.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-19">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>A description of the method used to distribute the counters from Contributing Flows into the Aggregated Flow records described by an associated scope, generally a Template. The method is deemed to apply to all the non-key Information Elements in the referenced scope for which value distribution is a valid operation; if the originalFlowsInitiated and/or originalFlowsCompleted Information Elements appear in the Template, they are not subject to this distribution method, as they each infer their own distribution method. The valueDistributionMethod registry is intended to list a complete set of possible value distribution methods.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned value distribution methods at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-value-distribution-method].</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="flowselectoralgorithm">
        <name>flowSelectorAlgorithm</name>
        <section anchor="old-20">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element identifies the Intermediate Flow Selection Process technique (e.g., Filtering, Sampling) that is applied by the Intermediate Flow Selection Process. Most of these techniques have parameters. Its configuration parameter(s) <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be clearly specified. Further Information Elements are needed to fully specify packet selection with these methods and all their parameters. Further method identifiers may be added to the flowSelectorAlgorithm registry. It might be necessary to define new Information Elements to specify their parameters.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>Please note that the purpose of the flow selection techniques described in this document is the improvement of measurement functions as defined in the Scope (Section 1).</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>The Intermediate Flow Selection Process Techniques identifiers are defined at https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-flowselectoralgorithm.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-20">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element identifies the Intermediate Flow Selection Process technique (e.g., Filtering, Sampling) that is applied by the Intermediate Flow Selection Process. Most of these techniques have parameters. Its configuration parameter(s) <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be clearly specified. Further Information Elements are needed to fully specify packet selection with these methods and all their parameters. Further method identifiers may be added to the flowSelectorAlgorithm registry. It might be necessary to define new Information Elements to specify their parameters.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned flow selector algorithms at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-flowselectoralgorithm].</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="datalinkframetype">
        <name>dataLinkFrameType</name>
        <section anchor="old-21">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element specifies the type of the selected data link frame. Data link types are defined in the dataLinkFrameType registry. See https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-data-link-frame-type.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>Further values may be assigned by IANA. Note that the assigned values are bits so that multiple observations can be OR'd together. The data link layer is defined in [ISO/IEC.7498-1:1994].</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>(IEEE802.3)(IEEE802.11)(ISO/IEC.7498-1:1994)</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-21">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element specifies the type of the selected data link frame. Data link types are defined in the dataLinkFrameType registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>Further values may be assigned by IANA. Note that the assigned values are bits so that multiple observations can be OR'd together.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned data link frame types at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-data-link-frame-type].</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>More information about the data link layer can be found in (IEEE802.3)(IEEE802.11)(ISO/IEC.7498-1:1994).</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="mibcapturetimesemantics">
        <name>mibCaptureTimeSemantics</name>
        <section anchor="old-22">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>Indicates when in the lifetime of the Flow the MIB value was retrieved from the MIB for a mibObjectIdentifier. This is used to indicate if the value exported was collected from the MIB closer to Flow creation or Flow export time and refers to the Timestamp fields included in the same Data Record.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>This field <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used when exporting a mibObjectValue that specifies counters or statistics. If the MIB value was sampled by SNMP prior to the IPFIX Metering Process or Exporting Process retrieving the value (i.e., the data is already stale) and it is important to know the exact sampling time, then an additional observationTime* element should be paired with the OID using IPFIX Structured Data <xref target="RFC6313"/>. Similarly, if different MIB capture times apply to different mibObjectValue elements within the Data Record, then individual mibCaptureTimeSemantics Information Elements should be paired with each OID using IPFIX Structured Data.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>Values are listed in the mibCaptureTimeSemantics registry. See https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-mib-capture-time-semantics.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-22">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>Indicates when in the lifetime of the Flow the MIB value was retrieved from the MIB for a mibObjectIdentifier. This is used to indicate if the value exported was collected from the MIB closer to Flow creation or Flow export time and refers to the Timestamp fields included in the same Data Record.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>This field <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used when exporting a mibObjectValue that specifies counters or statistics. If the MIB value was sampled by SNMP prior to the IPFIX Metering Process or Exporting Process retrieving the value (i.e., the data is already stale) and it is important to know the exact sampling time, then an additional observationTime* element should be paired with the OID using IPFIX Structured Data <xref target="RFC6313"/>. Similarly, if different MIB capture times apply to different mibObjectValue elements within the Data Record, then individual mibCaptureTimeSemantics Information Elements should be paired with each OID using IPFIX Structured Data.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>Values are listed in the mibCaptureTimeSemantics registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned values for the MIB capture time semantics at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-mib-capture-time-semantics].</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="natquotaexceededevent">
        <name>natQuotaExceededEvent</name>
        <section anchor="old-23">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element identifies the type of a NAT Quota Exceeded event. Values for this Information Element are listed in the "NAT Quota Exceeded Event Type" registry, see https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-nat-quota-exceeded-event.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC0791"/> for the definition of the IPv4 source address field.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3022"/> for the definition of NAT.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3234"/> for the definition of middleboxes.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-23">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element identifies the type of a NAT Quota Exceeded event. Values for this Information Element are listed in the "NAT Quota Exceeded Event Type" registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned events for exceeded NAT quota at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-nat-quota-exceeded-event].</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC0791"/> for the definition of the IPv4 source address field.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3022"/> for the definition of NAT.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3234"/> for the definition of middleboxes.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="natthresholdevent">
        <name>natThresholdEvent</name>
        <section anchor="old-24">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element identifies a type of a NAT Threshold event. Values for this Information Element are listed in the "NAT Threshold Event Type" registry, see https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-nat-threshold-event.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC0791"/> for the definition of the IPv4 source address field.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3022"/> for the definition of NAT.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3234"/> for the definition of middleboxes.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-24">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element identifies a type of a NAT Threshold event. Values for this Information Element are listed in the "NAT Threshold Event Type" registry.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>See the assigned values for the NAT Threshold events at [https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-nat-threshold-event].</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC0791"/> for the definition of the IPv4 source address field.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3022"/> for the definition of NAT.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See <xref target="RFC3234"/> for the definition of middleboxes.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="misc">
      <name>Misc</name>
      <t>This document requests IANA to update the description of the following entries in <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/>.</t>
      <section anchor="collectiontimemilliseconds">
        <name>collectionTimeMilliseconds</name>
        <section anchor="old-25">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>The absolute timestamp at which the data within the scope containing this Information Element was received by a Collecting Process. This Information Element <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be bound to its containing IPFIX Message via IPFIX Options and the messageScope Information Element, as defined below.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-25">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>The absolute timestamp at which the data within the scope containing this Information Element was received by a Collecting Process. This Information Element <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be bound to its containing IPFIX Message via IPFIX Options and the messageScope Information Element.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="messagemd5checksum">
        <name>messageMD5Checksum</name>
        <section anchor="old-26">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>The MD5 checksum of the IPFIX Message containing this record. This Information Element <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be bound to its containing IPFIX Message via an options record and the messageScope Information Element, as defined below, and <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> appear only once in a given IPFIX Message. To calculate the value of this Information Element, first buffer the containing IPFIX Message, setting the value of this Information Element to all zeroes. Then calculate the MD5 checksum of the resulting buffer as defined in <xref target="RFC1321"/>, place the resulting value in this Information Element, and export the buffered message.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element is intended as a simple checksum only; therefore collision resistance and algorithm agility are not required, and MD5 is an appropriate message digest. This Information Element has a fixed length of 16 octets.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-26">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>The MD5 checksum of the IPFIX Message containing this record. This Information Element <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be bound to its containing IPFIX Message via an options record and the messageScope Information Element, and <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> appear only once in a given IPFIX Message. To calculate the value of this Information Element, first buffer the containing IPFIX Message, setting the value of this Information Element to all zeroes. Then calculate the MD5 checksum of the resulting buffer as defined in <xref target="RFC1321"/>, place the resulting value in this Information Element, and export the buffered message.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element is intended as a simple checksum only; therefore collision resistance and algorithm agility are not required, and MD5 is an appropriate message digest. This Information Element has a fixed length of 16 octets.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="anonymizationflags">
        <name>anonymizationFlags</name>
        <section anchor="old-27">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
+--------+----------+-----------------------------------------------+
| bit(s) | name     | description                                   |
| (LSB = |          |                                               |
| 0)     |          |                                               |
+--------+----------+-----------------------------------------------+
| 0-1    | SC       | Stability Class: see the Stability Class      |
|        |          | table below, and section Section 5.1.         |
| 2      | PmA      | Perimeter Anonymization: when set (1),        |
|        |          | source- Information Elements as described in  |
|        |          | [RFC5103] are interpreted as external         |
|        |          | addresses, and destination- Information       |
|        |          | Elements as described in [RFC5103] are        |
|        |          | interpreted as internal addresses, for the    |
|        |          | purposes of associating                       |
|        |          | anonymizationTechnique to Information         |
|        |          | Elements only; see Section 7.2.2 for details. |
|        |          | This bit MUST NOT be set when associated with |
|        |          | a non-endpoint (i.e., source- or              |
|        |          | destination-) Information Element.  SHOULD be |
|        |          | consistent within a record (i.e., if a        |
|        |          | source- Information Element has this flag     |
|        |          | set, the corresponding destination- element   |
|        |          | SHOULD have this flag set, and vice-versa.)   |
+--------+----------+-----------------------------------------------+
]]></artwork>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-27">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
+--------+----------+-----------------------------------------------+
| bit(s) | name     | description                                   |
| (LSB = |          |                                               |
| 0)     |          |                                               |
+--------+----------+-----------------------------------------------+
| 0-1    | SC       | Stability Class: see the Stability Class      |
|        |          | table below, and Section 5.1 of [RFC6235].    |
| 2      | PmA      | Perimeter Anonymization: when set (1),        |
|        |          | source- Information Elements as described in  |
|        |          | [RFC5103] are interpreted as external         |
|        |          | addresses, and destination- Information       |
|        |          | Elements as described in [RFC5103] are        |
|        |          | interpreted as internal addresses, for the    |
|        |          | purposes of associating                       |
|        |          | anonymizationTechnique to Information         |
|        |          | Elements only; see Section 7.2.2 of [RFC6235] |
|        |          | for details.                                  |
|        |          | This bit MUST NOT be set when associated with |
|        |          | a non-endpoint (i.e., source- or              |
|        |          | destination-) Information Element.  SHOULD be |
|        |          | consistent within a record (i.e., if a        |
|        |          | source- Information Element has this flag     |
|        |          | set, the corresponding destination- element   |
|        |          | SHOULD have this flag set, and vice-versa.)   |
+--------+----------+-----------------------------------------------+
]]></artwork>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="informationelementdescription">
        <name>informationElementDescription</name>
        <section anchor="old-28">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>A UTF-8 <xref target="RFC3629"/> encoded Unicode string containing a human-readable description of an Information Element. The content of the informationElementDescription <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be annotated with one or more language tags <xref target="RFC4646"/>, encoded in-line <xref target="RFC2482"/> within the UTF-8 string, in order to specify the language in which the description is written. Description text in multiple languages <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> tag each section with its own language tag; in this case, the description information in each language <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> have equivalent meaning. In the absence of any language tag, the "i-default" <xref target="RFC2277"/> language <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be assumed.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See the Security Considerations section for notes on string handling for Information Element type records.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-28">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>A UTF-8 <xref target="RFC3629"/> encoded Unicode string containing a human-readable description of an Information Element. The content of the informationElementDescription <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be annotated with one or more language tags <xref target="RFC4646"/>, encoded in-line <xref target="RFC2482"/> within the UTF-8 string, in order to specify the language in which the description is written. Description text in multiple languages <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> tag each section with its own language tag; in this case, the description information in each language <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> have equivalent meaning. In the absence of any language tag, the "i-default" <xref target="RFC2277"/> language <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be assumed.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See the Security Considerations Section of <xref target="RFC5610"/> for notes on string handling for Information Element type records.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="distinctcountofdestinationipaddress">
        <name>distinctCountOfDestinationIPAddress</name>
        <section anchor="old-29">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>The count of distinct destination IP address values for Original Flows contributing to this Aggregated Flow, without regard to IP version. This Information Element is preferred to the version-specific counters below, unless it is important to separate the counts by version.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-29">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>The count of distinct destination IP address values for Original Flows contributing to this Aggregated Flow, without regard to IP version. This Information Element is preferred to the version-specific counters, unless it is important to separate the counts by version.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="externaladdressrealm">
        <name>externalAddressRealm</name>
        <section anchor="old-30">
          <name>OLD</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element represents the external address realm where the packet is originated from or destined to. The detailed definition is in the internal address realm as specified above.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
        <section anchor="new-30">
          <name>NEW</name>
          <dl>
            <dt>Description:</dt>
            <dd>
              <t>This Information Element represents the external address realm where the packet is originated from or destined to.</t>
            </dd>
            <dt/>
            <dd>
              <t>See the internalAddressRealm IE for the detailed definition.</t>
            </dd>
          </dl>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>This document does not add new security considerations to those
already discussed for IPFIX in <xref section="8" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7012"/>.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>Sections 4 to 7 include actions for IANA. These actions are not repeated here.</t>
      <t>This document also requests IANA to update the reference clause of the "IPFIX Information Elements" registry <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/> with the reference to this document.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references anchor="sec-normative-references">
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <reference anchor="IANA-IPFIX" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml">
          <front>
            <title>IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7012">
          <front>
            <title>Information Model for IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)</title>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Claise"/>
            <author fullname="B. Trammell" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Trammell"/>
            <date month="September" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines the data types and management policy for the information model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol. This information model is maintained as the IANA "IPFIX Information Elements" registry, the initial contents of which were defined by RFC 5102. This information model is used by the IPFIX protocol for encoding measured traffic information and information related to the traffic Observation Point, the traffic Metering Process, and the Exporting Process. Although this model was developed for the IPFIX protocol, it is defined in an open way that allows it to be easily used in other protocols, interfaces, and applications. This document obsoletes RFC 5102.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7012"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7012"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7011">
          <front>
            <title>Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information</title>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Claise"/>
            <author fullname="B. Trammell" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Trammell"/>
            <author fullname="P. Aitken" initials="P." surname="Aitken"/>
            <date month="September" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol, which serves as a means for transmitting Traffic Flow information over the network. In order to transmit Traffic Flow information from an Exporting Process to a Collecting Process, a common representation of flow data and a standard means of communicating them are required. This document describes how the IPFIX Data and Template Records are carried over a number of transport protocols from an IPFIX Exporting Process to an IPFIX Collecting Process. This document obsoletes RFC 5101.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="77"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7011"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7011"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2119">
          <front>
            <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
            <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner"/>
            <date month="March" year="1997"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8174">
          <front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba"/>
            <date month="May" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7013">
          <front>
            <title>Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements</title>
            <author fullname="B. Trammell" initials="B." surname="Trammell"/>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." surname="Claise"/>
            <date month="September" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document provides guidelines for how to write definitions of new Information Elements for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol. It provides instructions on using the proper conventions for Information Elements to be registered in the IANA IPFIX Information Element registry, and provides guidelines for expert reviewers to evaluate new registrations.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="184"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7013"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7013"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
      <references anchor="sec-informative-references">
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC5103">
          <front>
            <title>Bidirectional Flow Export Using IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)</title>
            <author fullname="B. Trammell" initials="B." surname="Trammell"/>
            <author fullname="E. Boschi" initials="E." surname="Boschi"/>
            <date month="January" year="2008"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes an efficient method for exporting bidirectional flow (Biflow) information using the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol, representing each Biflow using a single Flow Record. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5103"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5103"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC6235">
          <front>
            <title>IP Flow Anonymization Support</title>
            <author fullname="E. Boschi" initials="E." surname="Boschi"/>
            <author fullname="B. Trammell" initials="B." surname="Trammell"/>
            <date month="May" year="2011"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes anonymization techniques for IP flow data and the export of anonymized data using the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol. It categorizes common anonymization schemes and defines the parameters needed to describe them. It provides guidelines for the implementation of anonymized data export and storage over IPFIX, and describes an information model and Options- based method for anonymization metadata export within the IPFIX protocol or storage in IPFIX Files. This document defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6235"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6235"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="CCO-NF9FMT" target="https://www.cisco.com/en/US/technologies/tk648/tk362/technologies_white_paper09186a00800a3db9.html">
          <front>
            <title>NetFlow Version 9 Flow-Record Format</title>
            <author>
              <organization>Cisco</organization>
            </author>
            <date year="2011" month="May"/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC_Errata_1738" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=1738">
          <front>
            <title>RFC Errata 1738</title>
            <author>
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date>n.d.</date>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC_Errata_1739" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=1739">
          <front>
            <title>RFC Errata 1739</title>
            <author>
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date>n.d.</date>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="Forwarding-Status" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml#forwarding-status">
          <front>
            <title>Forwarding Status (Value 89)</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-opsawg-rfc7125-update">
          <front>
            <title>An Update to the tcpControlBits IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Element</title>
            <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair" initials="M." surname="Boucadair">
              <organization>Orange</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="29" month="November" year="2023"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>   RFC 7125 revised the tcpControlBits IP Flow Information Export
   (IPFIX) Information Element that was originally defined in RFC 5102
   to reflect changes to the TCP header control bits since RFC 793.
   However, that update is still problematic for interoperability
   because some flag values have subsequently been deprecated.

   This document removes stale information from the IPFIX registry and
   avoids future conflicts with the authoritative TCP Header Flags
   registry.

   This document obsoletes RFC 7125.

              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc7125-update-07"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7125">
          <front>
            <title>Revision of the tcpControlBits IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Element</title>
            <author fullname="B. Trammell" initials="B." surname="Trammell"/>
            <author fullname="P. Aitken" initials="P." surname="Aitken"/>
            <date month="February" year="2014"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document revises the tcpControlBits IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Element as originally defined in RFC 5102 to reflect changes to the TCP Flags header field since RFC 793.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7125"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7125"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9487">
          <front>
            <title>Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)</title>
            <author fullname="T. Graf" initials="T." surname="Graf"/>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." surname="Claise"/>
            <author fullname="P. Francois" initials="P." surname="Francois"/>
            <date month="November" year="2023"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document introduces new IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements (IEs) to identify a set of information related to Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) such as data contained in a Segment Routing Header (SRH), the SRv6 control plane, and the SRv6 Endpoint behavior that traffic is being forwarded with.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9487"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9487"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5102">
          <front>
            <title>Information Model for IP Flow Information Export</title>
            <author fullname="J. Quittek" initials="J." surname="Quittek"/>
            <author fullname="S. Bryant" initials="S." surname="Bryant"/>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." surname="Claise"/>
            <author fullname="P. Aitken" initials="P." surname="Aitken"/>
            <author fullname="J. Meyer" initials="J." surname="Meyer"/>
            <date month="January" year="2008"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This memo defines an information model for the IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) protocol. It is used by the IPFIX protocol for encoding measured traffic information and information related to the traffic Observation Point, the traffic Metering Process, and the Exporting Process. Although developed for the IPFIX protocol, the model is defined in an open way that easily allows using it in other protocols, interfaces, and applications. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5102"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5102"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5477">
          <front>
            <title>Information Model for Packet Sampling Exports</title>
            <author fullname="T. Dietz" initials="T." surname="Dietz"/>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." surname="Claise"/>
            <author fullname="P. Aitken" initials="P." surname="Aitken"/>
            <author fullname="F. Dressler" initials="F." surname="Dressler"/>
            <author fullname="G. Carle" initials="G." surname="Carle"/>
            <date month="March" year="2009"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This memo defines an information model for the Packet SAMPling (PSAMP) protocol. It is used by the PSAMP protocol for encoding sampled packet data and information related to the Sampling process. As the PSAMP protocol is based on the IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) protocol, this information model is an extension to the IPFIX information model. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5477"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5477"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5610">
          <front>
            <title>Exporting Type Information for IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements</title>
            <author fullname="E. Boschi" initials="E." surname="Boschi"/>
            <author fullname="B. Trammell" initials="B." surname="Trammell"/>
            <author fullname="L. Mark" initials="L." surname="Mark"/>
            <author fullname="T. Zseby" initials="T." surname="Zseby"/>
            <date month="July" year="2009"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes an extension to the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol, which is used to represent and transmit data from IP flow measurement devices for collection, storage, and analysis, to allow the encoding of IPFIX Information Model properties within an IPFIX Message stream. This enables the export of extended type information for enterprise-specific Information Elements and the storage of such information within IPFIX Files, facilitating interoperability and reusability among a wide variety of applications and tools. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5610"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5610"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5655">
          <front>
            <title>Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) File Format</title>
            <author fullname="B. Trammell" initials="B." surname="Trammell"/>
            <author fullname="E. Boschi" initials="E." surname="Boschi"/>
            <author fullname="L. Mark" initials="L." surname="Mark"/>
            <author fullname="T. Zseby" initials="T." surname="Zseby"/>
            <author fullname="A. Wagner" initials="A." surname="Wagner"/>
            <date month="October" year="2009"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes a file format for the storage of flow data based upon the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol. It proposes a set of requirements for flat-file, binary flow data file formats, then specifies the IPFIX File format to meet these requirements based upon IPFIX Messages. This IPFIX File format is designed to facilitate interoperability and reusability among a wide variety of flow storage, processing, and analysis tools. [STANDARDS TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5655"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5655"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC6759">
          <front>
            <title>Cisco Systems Export of Application Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)</title>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." surname="Claise"/>
            <author fullname="P. Aitken" initials="P." surname="Aitken"/>
            <author fullname="N. Ben-Dvora" initials="N." surname="Ben-Dvora"/>
            <date month="November" year="2012"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies a Cisco Systems extension to the IPFIX information model specified in RFC 5102 to export application information. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6759"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6759"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7014">
          <front>
            <title>Flow Selection Techniques</title>
            <author fullname="S. D'Antonio" initials="S." surname="D'Antonio"/>
            <author fullname="T. Zseby" initials="T." surname="Zseby"/>
            <author fullname="C. Henke" initials="C." surname="Henke"/>
            <author fullname="L. Peluso" initials="L." surname="Peluso"/>
            <date month="September" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Intermediate Flow Selection Process is the process of selecting a subset of Flows from all observed Flows. The Intermediate Flow Selection Process may be located at an IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Exporter or Collector, or within an IPFIX Mediator. It reduces the effort of post-processing Flow data and transferring Flow Records. This document describes motivations for using the Intermediate Flow Selection process and presents Intermediate Flow Selection techniques. It provides an information model for configuring Intermediate Flow Selection Process techniques and discusses what information about an Intermediate Flow Selection Process should be exported.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7014"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7014"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7015">
          <front>
            <title>Flow Aggregation for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol</title>
            <author fullname="B. Trammell" initials="B." surname="Trammell"/>
            <author fullname="A. Wagner" initials="A." surname="Wagner"/>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." surname="Claise"/>
            <date month="September" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document provides a common implementation-independent basis for the interoperable application of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol to the handling of Aggregated Flows, which are IPFIX Flows representing packets from multiple Original Flows sharing some set of common properties. It does this through a detailed terminology and a descriptive Intermediate Aggregation Process architecture, including a specification of methods for Original Flow counting and counter distribution across intervals.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7015"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7015"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7133">
          <front>
            <title>Information Elements for Data Link Layer Traffic Measurement</title>
            <author fullname="S. Kashima" initials="S." surname="Kashima"/>
            <author fullname="A. Kobayashi" initials="A." role="editor" surname="Kobayashi"/>
            <author fullname="P. Aitken" initials="P." surname="Aitken"/>
            <date month="May" year="2014"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes Information Elements related to the data link layer. They are used by the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol for encoding measured data link layer traffic information.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7133"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7133"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7270">
          <front>
            <title>Cisco-Specific Information Elements Reused in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)</title>
            <author fullname="A. Yourtchenko" initials="A." surname="Yourtchenko"/>
            <author fullname="P. Aitken" initials="P." surname="Aitken"/>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." surname="Claise"/>
            <date month="June" year="2014"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes some additional IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements in the range of 1-127, which is the range compatible with field types used by NetFlow version 9 in RFC 3954, as specified in the IPFIX Information Model in RFC 7012.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7270"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7270"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8038">
          <front>
            <title>Exporting MIB Variables Using the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol</title>
            <author fullname="P. Aitken" initials="P." role="editor" surname="Aitken"/>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." surname="Claise"/>
            <author fullname="S. B S" initials="S. B" surname="S"/>
            <author fullname="C. McDowall" initials="C." surname="McDowall"/>
            <author fullname="J. Schoenwaelder" initials="J." surname="Schoenwaelder"/>
            <date month="May" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies a way to complement IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Data Records with Management Information Base (MIB) objects, avoiding the need to define new IPFIX Information Elements for existing MIB objects that are already fully specified.</t>
              <t>Two IPFIX Options Templates, as well as a method for creating IPFIX Options Templates that are used to export the extra data required to fully describe Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) MIB objects in IPFIX, are specified herein.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8038"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8038"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8158">
          <front>
            <title>IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements for Logging NAT Events</title>
            <author fullname="S. Sivakumar" initials="S." surname="Sivakumar"/>
            <author fullname="R. Penno" initials="R." surname="Penno"/>
            <date month="December" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Network operators require NAT devices to log events like creation and deletion of translations and information about the resources that the NAT device is managing. In many cases, the logs are essential to identify an attacker or a host that was used to launch malicious attacks and for various other purposes of accounting. Since there is no standard way of logging this information, different NAT devices use proprietary formats; hence, it is difficult to expect consistent behavior. This lack of standardization makes it difficult to write the Collector applications that would receive this data and process it to present useful information. This document describes the formats for logging NAT events.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8158"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8158"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC3031">
          <front>
            <title>Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture</title>
            <author fullname="E. Rosen" initials="E." surname="Rosen"/>
            <author fullname="A. Viswanathan" initials="A." surname="Viswanathan"/>
            <author fullname="R. Callon" initials="R." surname="Callon"/>
            <date month="January" year="2001"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies the architecture for Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS). [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3031"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3031"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC3022">
          <front>
            <title>Traditional IP Network Address Translator (Traditional NAT)</title>
            <author fullname="P. Srisuresh" initials="P." surname="Srisuresh"/>
            <author fullname="K. Egevang" initials="K." surname="Egevang"/>
            <date month="January" year="2001"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The NAT operation described in this document extends address translation introduced in RFC 1631 and includes a new type of network address and TCP/UDP port translation. In addition, this document corrects the Checksum adjustment algorithm published in RFC 1631 and attempts to discuss NAT operation and limitations in detail. This memo provides information for the Internet community.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3022"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3022"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC3234">
          <front>
            <title>Middleboxes: Taxonomy and Issues</title>
            <author fullname="B. Carpenter" initials="B." surname="Carpenter"/>
            <author fullname="S. Brim" initials="S." surname="Brim"/>
            <date month="February" year="2002"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document is intended as part of an IETF discussion about "middleboxes" - defined as any intermediary box performing functions apart from normal, standard functions of an IP router on the data path between a source host and destination host. This document establishes a catalogue or taxonomy of middleboxes, cites previous and current IETF work concerning middleboxes, and attempts to identify some preliminary conclusions. It does not, however, claim to be definitive. This memo provides information for the Internet community.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3234"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3234"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC1631">
          <front>
            <title>The IP Network Address Translator (NAT)</title>
            <author fullname="K. Egevang" initials="K." surname="Egevang"/>
            <author fullname="P. Francis" initials="P." surname="Francis"/>
            <date month="May" year="1994"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This memo proposes another short-term solution, address reuse, that complements CIDR or even makes it unnecessary. The address reuse solution is to place Network Address Translators (NAT) at the borders of stub domains. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1631"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC1631"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC6144">
          <front>
            <title>Framework for IPv4/IPv6 Translation</title>
            <author fullname="F. Baker" initials="F." surname="Baker"/>
            <author fullname="X. Li" initials="X." surname="Li"/>
            <author fullname="C. Bao" initials="C." surname="Bao"/>
            <author fullname="K. Yin" initials="K." surname="Yin"/>
            <date month="April" year="2011"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This note describes a framework for IPv4/IPv6 translation. This is in the context of replacing Network Address Translation - Protocol Translation (NAT-PT), which was deprecated by RFC 4966, and to enable networks to have IPv4 and IPv6 coexist in a somewhat rational manner while transitioning to an IPv6 network. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6144"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6144"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC6146">
          <front>
            <title>Stateful NAT64: Network Address and Protocol Translation from IPv6 Clients to IPv4 Servers</title>
            <author fullname="M. Bagnulo" initials="M." surname="Bagnulo"/>
            <author fullname="P. Matthews" initials="P." surname="Matthews"/>
            <author fullname="I. van Beijnum" initials="I." surname="van Beijnum"/>
            <date month="April" year="2011"/>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6146"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6146"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC6296">
          <front>
            <title>IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Prefix Translation</title>
            <author fullname="M. Wasserman" initials="M." surname="Wasserman"/>
            <author fullname="F. Baker" initials="F." surname="Baker"/>
            <date month="June" year="2011"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes a stateless, transport-agnostic IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Prefix Translation (NPTv6) function that provides the address-independence benefit associated with IPv4-to-IPv4 NAT (NAPT44) and provides a 1:1 relationship between addresses in the "inside" and "outside" prefixes, preserving end-to-end reachability at the network layer. This document defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6296"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6296"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC0791">
          <front>
            <title>Internet Protocol</title>
            <author fullname="J. Postel" initials="J." surname="Postel"/>
            <date month="September" year="1981"/>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="5"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="791"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC0791"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8200">
          <front>
            <title>Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification</title>
            <author fullname="S. Deering" initials="S." surname="Deering"/>
            <author fullname="R. Hinden" initials="R." surname="Hinden"/>
            <date month="July" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies version 6 of the Internet Protocol (IPv6). It obsoletes RFC 2460.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="86"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8200"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8200"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5475">
          <front>
            <title>Sampling and Filtering Techniques for IP Packet Selection</title>
            <author fullname="T. Zseby" initials="T." surname="Zseby"/>
            <author fullname="M. Molina" initials="M." surname="Molina"/>
            <author fullname="N. Duffield" initials="N." surname="Duffield"/>
            <author fullname="S. Niccolini" initials="S." surname="Niccolini"/>
            <author fullname="F. Raspall" initials="F." surname="Raspall"/>
            <date month="March" year="2009"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes Sampling and Filtering techniques for IP packet selection. It provides a categorization of schemes and defines what parameters are needed to describe the most common selection schemes. Furthermore, it shows how techniques can be combined to build more elaborate packet Selectors. The document provides the basis for the definition of information models for configuring selection techniques in Metering Processes and for reporting the technique in use to a Collector. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5475"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5475"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8126">
          <front>
            <title>Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs</title>
            <author fullname="M. Cotton" initials="M." surname="Cotton"/>
            <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba"/>
            <author fullname="T. Narten" initials="T." surname="Narten"/>
            <date month="June" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Many protocols make use of points of extensibility that use constants to identify various protocol parameters. To ensure that the values in these fields do not have conflicting uses and to promote interoperability, their allocations are often coordinated by a central record keeper. For IETF protocols, that role is filled by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA).</t>
              <t>To make assignments in a given registry prudently, guidance describing the conditions under which new values should be assigned, as well as when and how modifications to existing values can be made, is needed. This document defines a framework for the documentation of these guidelines by specification authors, in order to assure that the provided guidance for the IANA Considerations is clear and addresses the various issues that are likely in the operation of a registry.</t>
              <t>This is the third edition of this document; it obsoletes RFC 5226.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="26"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8126"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8126"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC6313">
          <front>
            <title>Export of Structured Data in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)</title>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." surname="Claise"/>
            <author fullname="G. Dhandapani" initials="G." surname="Dhandapani"/>
            <author fullname="P. Aitken" initials="P." surname="Aitken"/>
            <author fullname="S. Yates" initials="S." surname="Yates"/>
            <date month="July" year="2011"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies an extension to the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol specification in RFC 5101 and the IPFIX information model specified in RFC 5102 to support hierarchical structured data and lists (sequences) of Information Elements in data records. This extension allows definition of complex data structures such as variable-length lists and specification of hierarchical containment relationships between Templates. Finally, the semantics are provided in order to express the relationship among multiple list elements in a structured data record. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6313"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6313"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC1321">
          <front>
            <title>The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm</title>
            <author fullname="R. Rivest" initials="R." surname="Rivest"/>
            <date month="April" year="1992"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes the MD5 message-digest algorithm. The algorithm takes as input a message of arbitrary length and produces as output a 128-bit "fingerprint" or "message digest" of the input. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1321"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC1321"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC3629">
          <front>
            <title>UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646</title>
            <author fullname="F. Yergeau" initials="F." surname="Yergeau"/>
            <date month="November" year="2003"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>ISO/IEC 10646-1 defines a large character set called the Universal Character Set (UCS) which encompasses most of the world's writing systems. The originally proposed encodings of the UCS, however, were not compatible with many current applications and protocols, and this has led to the development of UTF-8, the object of this memo. UTF-8 has the characteristic of preserving the full US-ASCII range, providing compatibility with file systems, parsers and other software that rely on US-ASCII values but are transparent to other values. This memo obsoletes and replaces RFC 2279.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="63"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3629"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC3629"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC4646">
          <front>
            <title>Tags for Identifying Languages</title>
            <author fullname="A. Phillips" initials="A." surname="Phillips"/>
            <author fullname="M. Davis" initials="M." surname="Davis"/>
            <date month="September" year="2006"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes the structure, content, construction, and semantics of language tags for use in cases where it is desirable to indicate the language used in an information object. It also describes how to register values for use in language tags and the creation of user-defined extensions for private interchange. This document, in combination with RFC 4647, replaces RFC 3066, which replaced RFC 1766. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4646"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC4646"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2482">
          <front>
            <title>Language Tagging in Unicode Plain Text</title>
            <author fullname="K. Whistler" initials="K." surname="Whistler"/>
            <author fullname="G. Adams" initials="G." surname="Adams"/>
            <date month="January" year="1999"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document proposed a mechanism for language tagging in plain text. This memo provides information for the Internet community.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2482"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2482"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2277">
          <front>
            <title>IETF Policy on Character Sets and Languages</title>
            <author fullname="H. Alvestrand" initials="H." surname="Alvestrand"/>
            <date month="January" year="1998"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document is the current policies being applied by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) towards the standardization efforts in the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) in order to help Internet protocols fulfill these requirements. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="18"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2277"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2277"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
    </references>
    <?line 815?>

<section numbered="false" anchor="acknowledgments">
      <name>Acknowledgments</name>
      <t>Many thanks to Paul Aitken for the review and many suggestions that enhanced this specification. Special thanks to Andrew Feren for sharing data about scans of IPFIX data he collected.</t>
      <t>Thomas Graf tagged an issue with the forwardingStatus Information Element and for the Shepherd review.</t>
      <t>Thanks to Eric Vyncke for the review and comments.</t>
      <t>Thanks to Qin Wu for the opsdir review and Behcet Sarikay for the genart review.</t>
    </section>
  </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source: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-->

</rfc>
