<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc version 1.7.4 (Ruby 3.2.2) -->
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-07" category="std" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF" tocInclude="true" sortRefs="true" symRefs="true" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.19.0 -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="New TCP and IPv6 EH IPFIX IEs">Extended TCP Options and IPv6 Extension Headers IPFIX Information Elements</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-07"/>
    <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair">
      <organization>Orange</organization>
      <address>
        <email>mohamed.boucadair@orange.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Benoit Claise">
      <organization>Huawei</organization>
      <address>
        <email>benoit.claise@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2024" month="January" day="16"/>
    <area>Operations and Management</area>
    <workgroup>OPSAWG</workgroup>
    <keyword>IPFIX</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <?line 60?>

<t>This document specifies new IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements (IEs) to solve some issues with existing ipv6ExtensionHeaders and tcpOptions IPFIX IEs, especially the ability to export any observed IPv6 extension headers or TCP options.</t>
    </abstract>
    <note removeInRFC="true">
      <name>Discussion Venues</name>
      <t>Discussion of this document takes place on the
    Operations and Management Area Working Group Working Group mailing list (opsawg@ietf.org),
    which is archived at <eref target="https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/"/>.</t>
      <t>Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
    <eref target="https://github.com/boucadair/ipfix-tcpoptions-and-v6eh"/>.</t>
    </note>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <?line 64?>

<section anchor="introduction">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t>This document specifies new IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) <xref target="RFC7011"/> Information Elements (IEs) to solve a set of issues encountered with the specifications of ipv6ExtensionHeaders (to export IPv6 extension headers) and tcpOptions (to export TCP options) IEs <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/>. More details about these issues are provided in the following sub-sections.</t>
      <section anchor="sec-eh-issues">
        <name>Issues with ipv6ExtensionHeaders Information Element</name>
        <t>The specification of ipv6ExtensionHeaders IPFIX IE does not:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>
            <t>Cover the full extension headers' range (<xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/>).</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Specify the procedure to follow when all bits are exhausted.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Specify a means to export the order and the number of occurences of a given extension header.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Specify how to automatically update the IANA IPFIX registry (<xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/>) when a new value is assigned in <xref target="IANA-EH"/>. Only a frozen set of extension headers can be exported using the ipv6ExtensionHeaders IE.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Specify whether the exported values match the full enclosed values or only up to a limit imposed by hardware or software (e.g., <xref section="1.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8883"/>).</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Specify how to report the length of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Optimize the encoding.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Explain the reasoning for reporting values which do not correspond to extension headers (e.g., "Unknown Layer 4 header" or "Payload compression header").</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
        <t><xref target="sec-eh"/> addresses these issues.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-tcp-issues">
        <name>Issues with tcpOptions Information Element</name>
        <t>The specification of tcpOptions IPFIX IE does not:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>
            <t>Describe how any observed TCP option in a Flow can be exported using IPFIX. Only TCP options having a kind =&lt; 63 can be exported in a tcpOptions IPFIX IE.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Allow reporting the observed Experimental Identifiers (ExIDs) that are carried in shared TCP options (kind=253 or 254) <xref target="RFC6994"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Optimize the encoding.</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
        <t><xref target="sec-tcp"/> addresses these issues.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="conventions-and-definitions">
      <name>Conventions and Definitions</name>
      <t>The key words "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL
NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>",
"<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they
appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
      <?line -18?>

<t>This document uses the IPFIX-specific terminology (Information Element, Template Record,
   Flow, etc.) defined in
   <xref section="2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7011"/>. As in <xref target="RFC7011"/>, these IPFIX-specific terms
   have the first letter of a word capitalized.</t>
      <t>Also, the document uses the terms defined in <xref target="RFC8200"/> and <xref target="RFC9293"/>.</t>
      <t>In addition, the document makes use of the following term:</t>
      <dl>
        <dt>Extension header chain:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>Refers to the chain of extension headers that are present in an IPv6 packet.</t>
        </dd>
        <dt/>
        <dd>
          <t>This term should not be confused with the IPv6 header chain, which includes
the IPv6 header, zero or more IPv6 extension headers,
and zero or a single Upper-Layer Header.</t>
        </dd>
      </dl>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-eh">
      <name>Information Elements for IPv6 Extension Headers</name>
      <t>The definition of the ipv6ExtensionHeaders IE is updated in <xref section="4.1" sectionFormat="of" target="I-D.ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes"/> to address some of the issues listed in <xref target="sec-eh-issues"/>. Because some of these limitations cannot be addressed by simple updates to ipv6ExtensionHeaders, this section specifies a set of new IEs to address all the ipv6ExtensionHeaders IE limitations. Refer also to <xref section="4.1.1" sectionFormat="of" target="I-D.ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes"/> for more details.</t>
      <section anchor="sec-v6full">
        <name>ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD1</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>IPv6 extension headers observed in packets of this Flow. The
information is encoded in a set of bit fields.  For each IPv6
extension header, there is a bit in this set. The bit is set to 1 if
any observed packet of this Flow contains the corresponding IPv6
extension header.  Otherwise, if no observed packet of this Flow
contains the respective IPv6 extension header, the value of the
corresponding bit is 0.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The IPv6 extension header associated with each bit is provided in
[NEW_IPFIX_IPv6EH_SUBREGISTRY]. Bit 0 corresponds to the least-significant bit
in the ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE while bit 255 corresponds to the most-significant bit of the IE.
In doing so, few octets will be needed to encode common IPv6 extension headers when observed in a Flow.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The "No Next Header" (59) value is used if there is no upper-layer header in an IPv6 packet.
Even if the value is not considered as an extension header as such, the corresponding
bit is set in the ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE whenever that value is encountered in the Flow.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>Several extension header chains may be observed in a Flow. These extension headers
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be aggregated in one single ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull Information Element or
be exported in separate ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IEs, one for each extension header chain.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>This Information Element <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be exported if ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount Information Element is also present.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>unsigned256</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>flags</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See the assigned bits to each IPv6 extension header type in [NEW_IPFIX_IPv6EH_SUBREGISTRY].</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="IANA-EH"/> for assigned extension header types.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/> for the general definition of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
        <ul empty="true">
          <li>
            <t>Note to the RFC Editor: Please replace [NEW_IPFIX_IPv6EH_SUBREGISTRY] with the link to the "ipv6ExtensionHeaders Bits" registry created by <xref target="I-D.ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes"/>.</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-v6count">
        <name>ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD2</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>As per <xref section="4.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/>, IPv6 nodes must accept and attempt to process extension headers in
occurring any number of times in the same packet. This Information Element echoes the
order of extension headers and number of consecutive occurrences of the same extension header type in a Flow.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>If several extension header chains are observed in a Flow, each header
chain <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be exported in a separate ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount IE.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The same extension header type may appear several times in an ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount Information Element.
For example, if an IPv6 packet of a Flow includes a Hop-by-Hop Options header, a Destination Options header, a Fragment header,
and Destination Options header, the ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount Information Element will report two counts of the Destination Options header: the occurrences
that are observed before the Fragment header and the occurrences right after the Fragment header.</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
        <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
MSB                                                                 LSB
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 ...
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|  EH Type#1    |   Count       |...|  EH Type#n      |   Count       |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        <dl>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>unsigned64</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See the assigned IPv6 extension header types in <xref target="IANA-EH"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC8200"/> for the general definition of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-v6limit">
        <name>ipv6ExtensionHeadersLimit Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>ipv6ExtensionHeadersLimit</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD3</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>When set to "false", this Information Element indicates that the exported extension
headers information (e.g., ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull or ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount) does
not match the full enclosed extension headers, but only up to a
limit that is typically set by hardware or software.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>When set to "true", this Information Element indicates that the exported extension
header information matches the full enclosed extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>boolean</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>default</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/> for the general definition of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC8883"/> for an example of IPv6 packet processing due to limits on extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-v6aggr">
        <name>ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD4</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>In theory, there are no limits on the number of IPv6 extension headers that may
be present in a packet other than the path MTU. However, it was regularly
reported that IPv6 packets with extension headers are often dropped in the Internet.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>As discussed in <xref section="1.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8883"/>, some hardware devices implement
a parsing buffer of a fixed size to process packets, including all the headers.
When the aggregate length of headers of an IPv6 packet exceeds that size, the packet will be discarded or deferred to a slow path.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength IE is used to report, in octets, the length of
an extension header chain observed in a Flow.  The length is the sum of the length of all extension headers of the chain. Exporting such information may help identifying root causes of performance degradation, including packet drops.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>If several extension header chains are observed in a Flow, each header
chain length <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be exported in a separate ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength IE.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>unsigned32</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>identifier</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Units:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>octets</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/> for the general definition of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC9098"/> for an overview of operational implications of IPv6 packets with extension headerss.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-tcp">
      <name>Information Elements for TCP Options</name>
      <t>The definition of the tcpOptions IE is updated in <xref target="I-D.ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes"/> to address some of the issues listed in <xref target="sec-tcp-issues"/>. Because some of these limitations cannot be addressed by simple updates to tcpOptions, this section specifies a set of new IEs to address all the tcpOptions IE limitations.</t>
      <section anchor="sec-tcpfull">
        <name>tcpOptionsFull Information Element</name>
        <t>This section specifies a new IE to cover the full TCP options range.</t>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>tcpOptionsFull</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD5</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TCP options in packets of this Flow.  The information is encoded
    in a set of bit fields.  For each TCP option, there is a bit in
    this set.  The bit is set to 1 if any observed packet of this Flow
    contains the corresponding TCP option.  Otherwise, if no observed
    packet of this Flow contains the respective TCP option, the value
    of the corresponding bit is 0.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>Options are mapped to bits according to their option numbers.
TCP option kind 0 corresponds to the least-significant bit
in the tcpOptionsFull IE while kind 255 corresponds to the most-significant bit of the IE. This approach allows
an observer to export any observed TCP option even if it does support
that option and without requiring updating a mapping table.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>unsigned256</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>flags</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See the assigned TCP option kinds at <xref target="IANA-TCP"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC9293"/> for the general definition of TCP options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-ex">
        <name>tcpSharedOptionExID16 Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>tcpSharedOptionExID16</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD6</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>Any observed 2-byte Experiments IDs (ExIDs) in a shared
    TCP option (Kind=253 or 254)  in a Flow.  The information is encoded in a set of
    16-bit fields.  Each 16-bit field carries an observed 2-byte ExID in a
    shared option.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>octetArray</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>identifier</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See assigned ExIDs at <xref target="IANA-TCP-EXIDs"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC9293"/> for the general definition of TCP options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC6994"/> for the shared use of experimental TCP Options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-ex32">
        <name>tcpSharedOptionExID32 Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>tcpSharedOptionExID32</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD7</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>Any observed  4-byte Experiments IDs (ExIDs) in a shared
TCP option (Kind=253 or 254)  in a Flow.  The information is encoded in a set of
32-bit fields. Each 32-bit field carries an observed 4-byte ExID in a
shared option.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>octetArray</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>identifier</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See assigned ExIDs at <xref target="IANA-TCP-EXIDs"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC9293"/> for the general definition of TCP options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC6994"/> for the shared use of experimental TCP Options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="operational-considerations">
      <name>Operational Considerations</name>
      <section anchor="op-eh">
        <name>IPv6 Extension Headers</name>
        <t>The value of ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull and ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount IEs should be encoded in fewer octets as per the guidelines in <xref section="6.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7011"/>.</t>
        <t>If an implementation determines that it includes an extension header that it does not support, then the exact observed code of that extension header will be echoed in the ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount IE (<xref target="sec-v6count"/>). How an implementation disambiguates between unknown upper-layer protocols vs. extension headers is not IPFIX-specific. Readers may refer, for example, to <xref section="2.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8883"/> for a behavior of an intermediate nodes that encounters an unknown Next Header type. It is out of the scope of this document to discuss those considerations.</t>
        <t>The ipv6ExtensionHeadersLimit IE (<xref target="sec-v6limit"/>) may or may not be present when the ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength IE (<xref target="sec-v6aggr"/>) is also present as these IEs are targeting distinct properties of extension headers handling.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="op-tcp">
        <name>TCP Options</name>
        <t>The value of tcpOptionsFull IE should be encoded in fewer octets as per the guidelines in <xref section="6.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7011"/>.</t>
        <t>If a TCP Flow contains packets with a mix of 2-byte and 4-byte Experiment IDs, the same Template Record is used with both tcpSharedOptionExID16 and tcpSharedOptionExID32 IEs.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-examples">
      <name>Examples</name>
      <t>This section provides few examples to illustrate the use of some IEs defined in the document.</t>
      <section anchor="ipv6-extension-headers">
        <name>IPv6 Extension Headers</name>
        <t><xref target="ex-eh1"/> provides an example of reported values in an ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE for an IPv6 Flow in which only
the     IPv6 Destination Options header is observed. One octet is sufficient to report these observed options. Concretely, the ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE will be set to 1.</t>
        <figure anchor="ex-eh1">
          <name>A First Example of Extension Headers</name>
          <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
MSB                                                        LSB
                     1                   2     ...25
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 ... 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|   |0|0|0|0|0|1|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-++-++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t><xref target="ex-eh2"/> provides another example of reported values in an ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE for an IPv6 Flow in which
the     IPv6 Hop-by-Hop Options, Routing, and Destination Options headers are observed. One octet is sufficient to report these observed options. Concretely, the ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE will be set to 35.</t>
        <figure anchor="ex-eh2">
          <name>A Second Example of Extension Headers</name>
          <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
MSB                                                        LSB
                     1                   2     ...25
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 ... 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|   |1|0|0|0|1|1|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
      </section>
      <section anchor="tcp-options">
        <name>TCP Options</name>
        <t>Given TCP kind allocation practices and the option mapping defined in <xref target="sec-tcpfull"/>, fewer octers are likely to be used for
Flows with common TCP options.</t>
        <t><xref target="ex-tcp1"/> shows an example of reported values in a tcpOptionsFull IE for a TCP Flow in which End of Option List, Maximum Segment Size, and Window Scale options are observed. One octet is sufficient to report these observed options. Concretely, the tcpOptionsFull IE will be set to 13.</t>
        <figure anchor="ex-tcp1">
          <name>First Example of TCP Options</name>
          <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
MSB                                                        LSB
                     1                   2     ...25
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 ... 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|   |0|0|1|1|0|1|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>Let us consider a TCP Flow in which shared options with ExIDs 0x0348 (HOST_ID) <xref target="RFC7974"/>, 0x454E     (TCP-ENO) <xref target="RFC8547"/>, and 0xE2D4C3D9  (Shared Memory communications over RMDA protocol)       <xref target="RFC7609"/> are observed. As shown in <xref target="ex-tcp2"/>, two TCP shared IEs will be used to report these observed ExIDs:</t>
        <ol spacing="normal" type="1"><li>
            <t>The tcpSharedOptionExID16 IE set to 55067982 (i.e., 0x348454E) to report observed 2-byte ExIDs:  HOST_ID and TCP-ENO ExIDs.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>The tcpSharedOptionExID32 IE set to 3805594585 (i.e., 0xE2D4C3D9) to report the only observed 4-byte ExID.</t>
          </li>
        </ol>
        <figure anchor="ex-tcp2">
          <name>Example of TCP Shared IEs</name>
          <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
tcpSharedOptionExID16 IE:

MSB                                                          LSB
                     1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|              0x0348           |             0x454E            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

tcpSharedOptionExID32 IE:

MSB                                                          LSB
                     1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                           0xE2D4C3D9                          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>IPFIX security considerations are discussed in <xref section="11" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7011"/>. This document does not add new security considerations for exporting IEs other than those already discussed in <xref section="8" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7012"/>.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <section anchor="new-ipfix-information-elements">
        <name>New IPFIX Information Elements</name>
        <t>This document requests IANA to add the following new IPFIX IEs to the "IPFIX Information Elements" registry under the "IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities" registry group <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/>:</t>
        <table>
          <name>New IPFIX Information Elements</name>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th align="left">Value</th>
              <th align="left">Name</th>
              <th align="left">Reference</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD1</td>
              <td align="left">ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-v6full"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD2</td>
              <td align="left">ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-v6count"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD3</td>
              <td align="left">ipv6ExtensionHeadersLimit</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-v6limit"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD4</td>
              <td align="left">ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-v6aggr"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD5</td>
              <td align="left">tcpOptionsFull</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-tcpfull"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD6</td>
              <td align="left">tcpSharedOptionExID16</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-ex"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD7</td>
              <td align="left">tcpSharedOptionExID32</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-ex32"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </section>
      <section anchor="new-ipfix-information-element-data-type">
        <name>New IPFIX Information Element Data Type</name>
        <t>This document requests IANA to add the following new abstract data type to the "IPFIX Information Element Data Types" registry under the "IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities" registry group <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/>:</t>
        <table>
          <name>New IPFIX Information Element Data Type</name>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th align="left">Value</th>
              <th align="left">Description</th>
              <th align="left">Reference</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD8</td>
              <td align="left">unsigned256</td>
              <td align="left">This-Document</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <t>The type "unsigned256" represents a non-negative integer value in the
range of '0' to '2^256 - 1'.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references anchor="sec-normative-references">
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <reference anchor="IANA-IPFIX" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml">
          <front>
            <title>IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="IANA-EH" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-parameters/ipv6-parameters.xhtml#ipv6-parameters-1">
          <front>
            <title>Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Parameters, IPv6 Extension Header Types</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="IANA-TCP" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/tcp-parameters/tcp-parameters.xhtml#tcp-parameters-1">
          <front>
            <title>Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Parameters, TCP Option Kind Numbers</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="IANA-TCP-EXIDs" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/tcp-parameters/tcp-parameters.xhtml#tcp-exids">
          <front>
            <title>Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Parameters, TCP Experimental Option Experiment Identifiers (TCP ExIDs)</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7011">
          <front>
            <title>Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information</title>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Claise"/>
            <author fullname="B. Trammell" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Trammell"/>
            <author fullname="P. Aitken" initials="P." surname="Aitken"/>
            <date month="September" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol, which serves as a means for transmitting Traffic Flow information over the network. In order to transmit Traffic Flow information from an Exporting Process to a Collecting Process, a common representation of flow data and a standard means of communicating them are required. This document describes how the IPFIX Data and Template Records are carried over a number of transport protocols from an IPFIX Exporting Process to an IPFIX Collecting Process. This document obsoletes RFC 5101.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="77"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7011"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7011"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8200">
          <front>
            <title>Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification</title>
            <author fullname="S. Deering" initials="S." surname="Deering"/>
            <author fullname="R. Hinden" initials="R." surname="Hinden"/>
            <date month="July" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies version 6 of the Internet Protocol (IPv6). It obsoletes RFC 2460.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="86"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8200"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8200"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC6994">
          <front>
            <title>Shared Use of Experimental TCP Options</title>
            <author fullname="J. Touch" initials="J." surname="Touch"/>
            <date month="August" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes how the experimental TCP option codepoints can concurrently support multiple TCP extensions, even within the same connection, using a new IANA TCP experiment identifier. This approach is robust to experiments that are not registered and to those that do not use this sharing mechanism. It is recommended for all new TCP options that use these codepoints.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6994"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6994"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2119">
          <front>
            <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
            <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner"/>
            <date month="March" year="1997"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8174">
          <front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba"/>
            <date month="May" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9293">
          <front>
            <title>Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)</title>
            <author fullname="W. Eddy" initials="W." role="editor" surname="Eddy"/>
            <date month="August" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). TCP is an important transport-layer protocol in the Internet protocol stack, and it has continuously evolved over decades of use and growth of the Internet. Over this time, a number of changes have been made to TCP as it was specified in RFC 793, though these have only been documented in a piecemeal fashion. This document collects and brings those changes together with the protocol specification from RFC 793. This document obsoletes RFC 793, as well as RFCs 879, 2873, 6093, 6429, 6528, and 6691 that updated parts of RFC 793. It updates RFCs 1011 and 1122, and it should be considered as a replacement for the portions of those documents dealing with TCP requirements. It also updates RFC 5961 by adding a small clarification in reset handling while in the SYN-RECEIVED state. The TCP header control bits from RFC 793 have also been updated based on RFC 3168.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="7"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9293"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9293"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7012">
          <front>
            <title>Information Model for IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)</title>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Claise"/>
            <author fullname="B. Trammell" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Trammell"/>
            <date month="September" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines the data types and management policy for the information model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol. This information model is maintained as the IANA "IPFIX Information Elements" registry, the initial contents of which were defined by RFC 5102. This information model is used by the IPFIX protocol for encoding measured traffic information and information related to the traffic Observation Point, the traffic Metering Process, and the Exporting Process. Although this model was developed for the IPFIX protocol, it is defined in an open way that allows it to be easily used in other protocols, interfaces, and applications. This document obsoletes RFC 5102.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7012"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7012"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
      <references anchor="sec-informative-references">
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC8883">
          <front>
            <title>ICMPv6 Errors for Discarding Packets Due to Processing Limits</title>
            <author fullname="T. Herbert" initials="T." surname="Herbert"/>
            <date month="September" year="2020"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Network nodes may discard packets if they are unable to process protocol headers of packets due to processing constraints or limits. When such packets are dropped, the sender receives no indication, so it cannot take action to address the cause of discarded packets. This specification defines several new ICMPv6 errors that can be sent by a node that discards packets because it is unable to process the protocol headers. A node that receives such an ICMPv6 error may use the information to diagnose packet loss and may modify what it sends in future packets to avoid subsequent packet discards.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8883"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8883"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes">
          <front>
            <title>Simple Fixes to the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) IANA Registry</title>
            <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair" initials="M." surname="Boucadair">
              <organization>Orange</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Benoît Claise" initials="B." surname="Claise">
              <organization>Huawei</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="15" month="January" year="2024"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>   This document provides simple fixes to the IANA IP Flow Information
   Export (IPFIX) registry.  Specifically, this document provides
   updates to fix a shortcoming in the description of some Information
   Elements (IE), updates to ensure a consistent structure when calling
   an existing IANA registry, and updates to fix broken pointers, orphan
   section references, etc.  The updates are also meant to bringing some
   consistency among the entries of the registry.

              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-04"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9098">
          <front>
            <title>Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers</title>
            <author fullname="F. Gont" initials="F." surname="Gont"/>
            <author fullname="N. Hilliard" initials="N." surname="Hilliard"/>
            <author fullname="G. Doering" initials="G." surname="Doering"/>
            <author fullname="W. Kumari" initials="W." surname="Kumari"/>
            <author fullname="G. Huston" initials="G." surname="Huston"/>
            <author fullname="W. Liu" initials="W." surname="Liu"/>
            <date month="September" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document summarizes the operational implications of IPv6 extension headers specified in the IPv6 protocol specification (RFC 8200) and attempts to analyze reasons why packets with IPv6 extension headers are often dropped in the public Internet.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9098"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9098"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7974">
          <front>
            <title>An Experimental TCP Option for Host Identification</title>
            <author fullname="B. Williams" initials="B." surname="Williams"/>
            <author fullname="M. Boucadair" initials="M." surname="Boucadair"/>
            <author fullname="D. Wing" initials="D." surname="Wing"/>
            <date month="October" year="2016"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Recent RFCs have discussed issues with host identification in IP address-sharing systems, such as address/prefix-sharing devices and application-layer proxies. Potential solutions for revealing a host identifier in shared address deployments have also been discussed. This memo describes the design, deployment, and privacy considerations for one such solution in operational use on the Internet today that uses a TCP option to transmit a host identifier.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7974"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7974"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8547">
          <front>
            <title>TCP-ENO: Encryption Negotiation Option</title>
            <author fullname="A. Bittau" initials="A." surname="Bittau"/>
            <author fullname="D. Giffin" initials="D." surname="Giffin"/>
            <author fullname="M. Handley" initials="M." surname="Handley"/>
            <author fullname="D. Mazieres" initials="D." surname="Mazieres"/>
            <author fullname="E. Smith" initials="E." surname="Smith"/>
            <date month="May" year="2019"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Despite growing adoption of TLS, a significant fraction of TCP traffic on the Internet remains unencrypted. The persistence of unencrypted traffic can be attributed to at least two factors. First, some legacy protocols lack a signaling mechanism (such as a STARTTLS command) by which to convey support for encryption, thus making incremental deployment impossible. Second, legacy applications themselves cannot always be upgraded and therefore require a way to implement encryption transparently entirely within the transport layer. The TCP Encryption Negotiation Option (TCP-ENO) addresses both of these problems through a new TCP option kind providing out-of-band, fully backward-compatible negotiation of encryption.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8547"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8547"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7609">
          <front>
            <title>IBM's Shared Memory Communications over RDMA (SMC-R) Protocol</title>
            <author fullname="M. Fox" initials="M." surname="Fox"/>
            <author fullname="C. Kassimis" initials="C." surname="Kassimis"/>
            <author fullname="J. Stevens" initials="J." surname="Stevens"/>
            <date month="August" year="2015"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes IBM's Shared Memory Communications over RDMA (SMC-R) protocol. This protocol provides Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) communications to TCP endpoints in a manner that is transparent to socket applications. It further provides for dynamic discovery of partner RDMA capabilities and dynamic setup of RDMA connections, as well as transparent high availability and load balancing when redundant RDMA network paths are available. It maintains many of the traditional TCP/IP qualities of service such as filtering that enterprise users demand, as well as TCP socket semantics such as urgent data.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7609"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7609"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
    </references>
    <?line 516?>

<section numbered="false" anchor="acknowledgments">
      <name>Acknowledgments</name>
      <t>Thanks to Paul Aitken and Eric Vyncke for the review and comments.</t>
      <t>Thanks to Wesley Eddy for the tsvart review, Yingzhen Qu for the opsdir review,
and Dirk Von Hugo for intdir review.</t>
    </section>
  </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source: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-->

</rfc>
