<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!-- edited with XMLSPY v5 rel. 3 U (http://www.xmlspy.com)
     by Daniel M Kohn (private) -->
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
<!ENTITY rfc2119 PUBLIC "" "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml">
]>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="3"?>
<?rfc tocindent="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc comments="yes"?>
<?rfc inline="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-23"
     ipr="trust200902">
  <front>
    <title>PCEP Extension for Native IP Network</title>

    <author fullname="Aijun Wang" initials="A" surname="Wang">
      <organization>China Telecom</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Beiqijia Town, Changping District</street>

          <city>Beijing</city>

          <region>Beijing</region>

          <code>102209</code>

          <country>China</country>
        </postal>

        <email>wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Boris Khasanov" initials="B" surname="Khasanov">
      <organization abbrev="">Yandex LLC</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Ulitsa Lva Tolstogo 16</street>

          <street/>

          <city>Moscow</city>

          <region/>

          <code/>

          <country>Russia</country>
        </postal>

        <email>bhassanov@yahoo.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Sheng Fang" initials="S" surname="Fang">
      <organization abbrev="">Huawei Technologies</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Huawei Bld., No.156 Beiqing Rd.</street>

          <city>Beijing</city>

          <region/>

          <code/>

          <country>China</country>
        </postal>

        <phone/>

        <facsimile/>

        <email>fsheng@huawei.com</email>

        <uri/>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Ren Tan" initials="R" surname="Tan">
      <organization abbrev="">Huawei Technologies</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>Huawei Bld., No.156 Beiqing Rd.</street>

          <city>Beijing</city>

          <region/>

          <code/>

          <country>China</country>
        </postal>

        <phone/>

        <facsimile/>

        <email>tanren@huawei.com</email>

        <uri/>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Chun Zhu" initials="C" surname="Zhu">
      <organization>ZTE Corporation</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>50 Software Avenue, Yuhua District</street>

          <city>Nanjing</city>

          <region>Jiangsu</region>

          <code>210012</code>

          <country>China</country>
        </postal>

        <phone/>

        <facsimile/>

        <email>zhu.chun1@zte.com.cn</email>

        <uri/>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date day="12" month="June" year="2023"/>

    <area>RTG</area>

    <workgroup>PCE Working Group</workgroup>

    <keyword>CCDR, PCECC</keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document defines the Path Computation Element Communication
      Protocol (PCEP) extension for Central Control Dynamic Routing (CCDR)
      based application in Native IP network. It describes the key information
      that is transferred between Path Computation Element (PCE) and Path
      Computation Clients (PCC) to accomplish the End to End (E2E) traffic
      assurance in Native IP network under central control mode.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section anchor="intro" title="Introduction">
      <t>Generally, Multiprotocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering
      (MPLS-TE) requires the corresponding network devices support
      Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) or Resource ReSerVation Protocol
      (RSVP)/Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) technologies to assure the
      End-to-End (E2E) traffic performance. But in native IP network scenarios
      described in <xref target="RFC8735"/> , there will be no such signaling
      protocol to synchronize the action among different network devices. It
      is necessary to use the central control mode that described in <xref
      target="RFC8283"/> to correlate the forwarding behavior among different
      network devices. <xref target="RFC8821"/> describes the architecture and
      solution philosophy for the E2E traffic assurance in Native IP network
      via multi Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) session based solution. This
      document describes the corresponding Path Computation Element
      Communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions to transfer the key information
      about BGP peer info, peer prefix advertisement and the explicit peer
      route on on-path routers.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Conventions used in this document">
      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
      "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
      "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14
      <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when,
      they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Terminology">
      <t>This document uses the following terms defined in <xref
      target="RFC5440"/>: PCE, PCEP</t>

      <t>The following terms are defined in this document:</t>

      <t><list style="symbols">
          <t>CCDR: Central Control Dynamic Routing</t>

          <t>E2E: End to End</t>

          <t>BPI: BGP Peer Info</t>

          <t>EPR: Explicit Peer Route</t>

          <t>PPA: Peer Prefix Advertisement</t>

          <t>QoS: Quality of Service</t>
        </list></t>
    </section>

    <section title="Capability Advertisement">
      <section title="Open message">
        <t>During the PCEP Initialization Phase, PCEP Speakers (PCE or PCC)
        advertise their support of Native IP extensions.</t>

        <t>This document defines a new Path Setup Type (PST) <xref
        target="RFC8408"/> for Native-IP, as follows: <list style="symbols">
            <t>PST = TBD1: Path is a Native IP path as per <xref
            target="RFC8821"/>.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>A PCEP speaker MUST indicate its support of the function described
        in this document by sending a PATH-SETUP-TYPE-CAPABILITY TLV in the
        OPEN object with this new PST included in the PST list.</t>

        <t><xref target="RFC9050"/> defined the PCECC-CAPABILITY sub-TLV to
        exchange information about their PCECC capability. A new flag is
        defined in PCECC-CAPABILITY sub-TLV for Native IP:</t>

        <t>N (NATIVE-IP-TE-CAPABILITY - 1 bit - TBD2): If set to 1 by a PCEP
        speaker, it indicates that the PCEP speaker is capable for TE in
        Native IP network as specified in this document. The flag MUST be set
        by both the PCC and PCE in order to support this extension.</t>

        <t>If a PCEP speaker receives the PATH-SETUP-TYPE-CAPABILITY TLV with
        the newly defined path setup type, but without the N bit set in
        PCECC-CAPABILITY sub-TLV, it MUST:</t>

        <t><list style="symbols">
            <t>Send a PCErr message with Error-Type=10(Reception of an invalid
            object) and Error-Value TBD3(PCECC NATIVE-IP-TE-CAPABILITY bit is
            not set).</t>

            <t>Terminate the PCEP session</t>
          </list></t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="PCEP messages" toc="default">
      <t>PCECC Native IP TE solution utilizing the existing PCE LSP Initiate
      Request message(PCInitiate)<xref target="RFC8281"/>, and PCE Report
      message(PCRpt) <xref target="RFC8281"/> to accomplish the multi BGP
      sessions establishment, E2E TE path deployment, and route prefixes
      advertisement among different BGP sessions. A new PST for Native-IP is
      used to indicate the path setup based on TE in Native IP networks.</t>

      <t>The extended PCInitiate message described in <xref target="RFC9050"/>
      is used to download or cleanup central controller's instructions (CCIs).
      <xref target="RFC9050"/> specifies an object called CCI for the encoding
      of central controller's instructions. This document specifies a new CCI
      object-type for Native IP. The PCEP messages are extended in this
      document to handle the PCECC operations for Native IP. Three new PCEP
      Objects (BGP Peer Info (BPI) Object, Explicit Peer Route (EPR) Object
      and Peer Prefix Advertisement (PPA) Object) are defined in this
      document. Refer to<xref target="Obj-Def-Sec"> </xref> for detail object
      definitions.</t>

      <section anchor="SEC_PCInitiate" title="The PCInitiate message"
               toc="default">
        <t>The PCInitiate Message defined in <xref target="RFC8281"/> and
        extended in <xref target="RFC9050"/> is further extended to support
        Native-IP CCI.</t>

        <t>The format of the extended PCInitiate message is as follows:
        <figure title="">
            <artwork><![CDATA[
     <PCInitiate Message> ::= <Common Header>
                              <PCE-initiated-lsp-list>
  Where:
     <Common Header> is defined in [RFC5440]

     <PCE-initiated-lsp-list> ::= <PCE-initiated-lsp-request>
                                  [<PCE-initiated-lsp-list>]

     <PCE-initiated-lsp-request> ::=
                          (<PCE-initiated-lsp-instantiation>|
                           <PCE-initiated-lsp-deletion>|
                           <PCE-initiated-lsp-central-control>)

     <PCE-initiated-lsp-central-control> ::= <SRP>
                                             <LSP>
                                             (<cci-list>|
                                             (<BPI>|<EPR>|<PPA>))

     <cci-list> ::=  <CCI>
                     [<cci-list>]

  Where:
      <cci-list> is as per [RFC9050]
      <PCE-initiated-lsp-instantiation> and <PCE-initiated-lsp-deletion> are as per [RFC8281].
      The LSP and SRP objects are defined in [RFC8231].
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t>When PCInitiate message is used to create Native IP instructions,
        the SRP, LSP and CCI objects MUST be present. The error handling for
        missing SRP, LSP or CCI object is as per <xref target="RFC9050"/>.
        Further only one BPI, EPR, or PPA object MUST be present. The PLSP-ID
        within the LSP object should be set by PCC uniquely according to the
        Symbolic Path Name TLV that included in the CCI object. The Symbolic
        Path Name is used by the PCE/PCC to identify uniquely the E2E native
        IP TE path.</t>

        <t>If none of them are present, the receiving PCC MUST send a PCErr
        message with Error-type=6 (Mandatory Object missing) and
        Error-value=TBD4 (Native IP object missing). If there are more than
        one of BPI, EPR or PPA object are presented, the receiving PCC MUST
        send a PCErr message with Error-type=19(Invalid Operation) and
        Error-value=TBD5(Only one BPI, EPR or PPA object can be included in
        this message).</t>

        <t>To cleanup the existing Native IP instructions, the SRP object must
        set the R (remove) bit.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="SEC_PCRpt" title="The PCRpt message" toc="default">
        <t>The PCRpt message is used to acknowledge the Native-IP instructions
        received from the central controller (PCE).</t>

        <t>The format of the PCRpt message is as follows: <figure title="">
            <artwork><![CDATA[
      <PCRpt Message> ::= <Common Header>
                          <state-report-list>
   Where:

      <state-report-list> ::= <state-report>[<state-report-list>]

      <state-report> ::= (<lsp-state-report>|
                          <central-control-report>)

      <lsp-state-report> ::= [<SRP>]
                             <LSP>
                             <path>

      <central-control-report> ::= [<SRP>]
                                   <LSP>
                                   (<cci-list>|
                                   (<BPI>|<EPR>|<PPA>))
    Where:
      <path> is as per [RFC8231] and the LSP and SRP object are also defined in [RFC8231].
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t>The error handling for missing CCI object is as per <xref
        target="RFC9050"/>. Further only one BPI, EPR, or PPA object MUST be
        present.</t>

        <t>If none of them are present, the receiving PCE MUST send a PCErr
        message with Error-type=6 (Mandatory Object missing) and
        Error-value=TBD4 (Native IP object missing). If there are more than
        one of BPI, EPR or PPA object are presented, the receiving PCE MUST
        send a PCErr message with Error-type=19(Invalid Operation) and
        Error-value=TBD5(Only one BPI, EPR or PPA object can be included in
        this message).</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="PCECC Native IP TE Procedures">
      <t>The detail procedures for the TE in native IP environment are
      described in the following sections.</t>

      <section anchor="BGPSess" title="BGP Session Establishment Procedures">
        <t>The PCInitiate and PCRpt message pair is used to configure the
        parameters for a BGP peer session. This pair of PCEP messages is
        exchanged between a PCE and each BGP peer which needs to be
        configured. After the BGP peer session has been configured via this
        pair of PCEP messages, the BGP session establishes and operates in a
        normal fashion. The BGP peers can be configured for EBGP peers or IBGP
        peers. For IBGP connection topologies, the Route Reflector(RR) is
        required.</t>

        <t>The PCInitiate message should be sent to PCC which acts as BGP
        router and/or RR.</t>

        <t>The RR topology for a single AS is shown in Figure 1. The BGP
        routers R1, R3, and R7 are within a single AS. R1 and R7 are BGP RR
        clients, and R3 is a RR. The PCInitiate message should be sent only
        the BGP routers that need to be newly configured R1 (via M1 message),
        R3 (via M2 &amp; M3 message), and R7 (via M4 message).</t>

        <t>PCInitiate message creates an auto-configuration function for these
        BGP peers by providing the indicated Peer AS and the Local/Peer IP
        Address.</t>

        <t>When PCC receives the BPI and CCI object (with the R bit set to 0
        in SRP object) in PCInitiate message, the PCC should try to establish
        the BGP session with the indicated Peer AS and Local/Peer IP
        address.</t>

        <t>When PCC creates successfully the BGP session that is indicated by
        the associated information, it should report the result via the PCRpt
        messages, with BPI object and the corresponding SRP and CCI object
        included.</t>

        <t>When PCC receives this message with the R bit set to 1 in SRP
        object in PCInitiate message, the PCC should clear the BGP session
        that indicated by the BPI object.</t>

        <t>When PCC clears successfully the specified BGP session, it should
        report the result via the PCRpt message, with the BPI object included,
        and the corresponding SRP and CCI object.</t>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[                             +------------------+
                 +-----------+       PCE        +----------+
                 |           +--------^---------+          |
                 |                    |                    |
                             M2/M2-R & M3/M3-R
                 |                    |                    |
                 |               +----v--+                 |
                 +---------------+ R3(RR)+-----------------+
                 |               +-------+                 |
              M1/M1-R                                   M4/M4-R
                 |                                         |
                +v-+          +--+          +--+         +-v+
                |R1+----------+R5+----------+R6+---------+R7|
                ++-+          +--+          +--+         +-++
                 |                                         |
                 |            +--+          +--+           |
                 +------------+R2+----------+R4+-----------+
                              +--+          +--+
       Figure 1: BGP Session Establishment Procedures(R3 act as RR)
]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t/>

        <t>The message number, message peers, message type and message key
        parameters in the above figures are shown in below table:<figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[                  Table 1: Message Information
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| No.| Peers|    Type  |     Message Key Parameters           |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|M1  |PCE/R1|PCInitiate|CC-ID=X1(Symbolic Path Name=Class A)  |
|M1-R|      |PCRpt     |BPI Object(Peer AS,
                       |           Local_IP=R1_A,Peer_IP=R3_A)|
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|M2  |PCE/R3|PCInitiate|CC-ID=X2(Symbolic Path Name=Class A)  |
|M2-R|      |PCRpt     |BPI Object(Peer AS,
                       |           Local_IP=R3_A,Peer_IP=R1_A)|
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|M3  |PCE/R3|PCInitiate|CC-ID=X3(Symbolic Path Name=Class A)  |
|M3-R|      |PCRpt     |BPI Object(Peer AS,
                       |           Local_IP=R3_A,Peer_IP=R7_A)|
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|M4  |PCE/R7|PCInitiate|CC-ID=X4(Symbolic Path Name=Class A)  |
|M4-R|      |PCRpt     |BPI Object(Peer AS,
                       |           Local_IP=R7_A,Peer_IP=R3_A)|
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t>If the PCC cannot establish the BGP session that required by this
        message, it should report the error values via PCErr message with the
        newly defined error type:</t>

        <t>1) Error-type=TBD6 and Error-value=TBD7, Peer AS not match when the
        received Peer AS is not the same the local AS, or</t>

        <t>2) Error-type=TBD6 and Error-Value=TBD8, Peer IP can't be reached
        when there is no route to the Peer IP address), which is indicated
        in</t>

        <t>If the Local IP Address or Peer IP Address within BPI object is
        used in other existing BGP sessions, the PCC should report such error
        situation via PCErr message with:</t>

        <t>3) Err-type=TBD6 and Error-value=TBD9, Local IP is in use, or</t>

        <t>4) Err-type=TBD6 and Error-value=TBD10, Remote IP is in use.</t>

        <t>The detail Error-Types and Error-Values are defined in <xref
        target="NewErrorTypeAndValue"/></t>

        <t>If the established BGP session is broken after some time, the PCC
        should report such error via PCErr message with:</t>

        <t>5) Err-type=TBD6 and Error-value=TBD11, Existing BGP session is
        broken.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="BGPEx" title="Explicit Route Establish Procedures">
        <t>The explicit route establishment procedures can be used to install
        a route via PCE on the PCC, using PCInitiate and PCRpt message pair.
        Such explicit routes operate similar to static routes installed by
        network management protocols. The procedures of such explicit route
        addition and remove must be controlled by the PCE in an specific order
        so that the pathways are established without loops.</t>

        <t>The PCInitiate message should be sent to the on-path routers
        respectively. In the example, for explicit route from R1 to R7, the
        PCInitiate message should be sent to R1(via M1 message), R2(via M2
        message) and R4(via M3 message), as shown in Figure 2. For explicit
        route from R7 to R1, the PCInitiate message should be sent to R7(via
        M1 message), R4(via M2 message) and R2(via M3 message), as shown in
        Figure 3.</t>

        <t>When PCC receives the EPR and the CCI object (with the R bit set to
        0 in SRP object) in PCInitiate message, the PCC should install the
        explicit route to the peer.</t>

        <t>When PCC install successfully the explicit route to the peer, it
        should report the result via the PCRpt messages, with EPR object and
        the corresponding SRP and CCI object included.</t>

        <t>When PCC receives the EPR and the CCI object with the R bit set to
        1 in SRP object in PCInitiate message, the PCC should clear the
        explicit route to the peer that indicated by the EPR object.</t>

        <t>When PCC clear successfully the explicit route that indicated by
        this object, it should report the result via the PCRpt message, with
        the EPR object included, and the corresponding SRP and CCI object.</t>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[                          +------------------+
               +----------+       PCE        +
               |          +----^-----------^-+
               |               |           |
               |               |           |
               |               | +------+  |
               +-----------------+R3(RR)+--|-------------+
           M1/M1-R             | +------+  |             |
               |               |           |             |
              +v-+      +--+   |           |   +--+    +--+
              |R1+------+R5+---+-----------|---+R6+----+R7|
              ++-+      +--+   |           |   +--+    +-++
               |            M2/M2-R      M3/M3-R         |
               |               |           |             |
               |            +--v--+     +--v-+           |
               +------------+- R2 +-----+ R4 +-----------+
                            +--+--+     +--+-+
      Figure 2: Explicit Route Establish Procedures(From R1 to R7)
]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t/>

        <t>The message number, message peers, message type and message key
        parameters in the above figures are shown in below table:<figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[                    Table 2: Message Information
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| No.|Peers |   Type   |     Message Key Parameters                |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|M1  |PCE/R1|PCInitiate|CC-ID=X1(Symbolic Path Name=Class A)       |
|M1-R|      |PCRpt     |EPR Object(Peer Address=R7_A,Next Hop=R2_A)|
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|M2  |PCE/R2|PCInitiate|CC-ID=X2(Symbolic Path Name=Class A)       |
|M2-R|      |PCRpt     |EPR Object(Peer Address=R7_A,Next Hop=R4_A)|
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|M3  |PCE/R4|PCInitiate|CC-ID=X3(Symbolic Path Name=Class A)       |
|M3-R|      |PCRpt     |EPR Object(Peer Address=R7_A,Next Hop=R7_A)|
+------------------------------------------------------------------+

]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
                    +------------------+
                    +       PCE        +-----------+
                    +----^-----------^-+           |
                         |           |             |
                         |           |             |
                         | +------+  |             |
         +-----------------+R3(RR)+--|-------------+
         |               | +------+  |         M1/M1-R
         |               |           |             |
        +--+      +--+   |           |   +--+    +-v+
        |R1+------+R5+---+-----------|---+R6+----+R7|
        ++-+      +--+   |           |   +--+    +-++
         |            M3/M3-R      M2/M2-R         |
         |               |           |             |
         |            +--v--+     +--v-+           |
         +------------+- R2 +-----+ R4 +-----------+
                      +--+--+     +--+-+
 Figure 3: Explicit Route Establish Procedures(From R7 to R1)
]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t/>

        <t>The message number, message peers, message type and message key
        parameters in the above figures are shown in below table:</t>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[                    Table 3: Message Information
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|No. |Peers |   Type   |     Message Key Parameters                |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|M1  |PCE/R7|PCInitiate|CC-ID=X1(Symbolic Path Name=Class A)       |
|M1-R|      |PCRpt     |EPR Object(Peer Address=R1_A,Next Hop=R4_A)|
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|M2  |PCE/R4|PCInitiate|CC-ID=X2(Symbolic Path Name=Class A)       |
|M2-R|      |PCRpt     |EPR Object(Peer Address=R1_A,Next Hop=R2_A)|
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|M3  |PCE/R2|PCInitiate|CC-ID=X3(Symbolic Path Name=Class A)       |
|M3-R|      |PCRpt     |EPR Object(Peer Address=R1_A,Next Hop=R1_A)|
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>In order to avoid the transient loop during the deploy of explicit
        peer route, the EPR object should be sent to the PCCs in the reverse
        order of the E2E path. To remove the explicit peer route, the EPR
        object should be sent to the PCCs in the same order of E2E path.</t>

        <t>To accomplish ECMP effects, the PCE can send multiple EPR objects
        to the same node, with the same route priority and peer address value
        but different next hop addresses.</t>

        <t>The PCC should verify that the next hop address is reachable. Upon
        the error occurs, the PCC SHOULD send the corresponding error via
        PCErr message, with an error information:</t>

        <t>1) Error-type=TBD6, Error-value=TBD12, Explicit Peer Route
        Error.</t>

        <t>When the peer info is not the same as the peer info that indicated
        in BPI object in PCC for the same path that is identified by Symbolic
        Path Name TLV, an PCErr message should be reported, with an error
        information:</t>

        <t>2) Error-type=TBD6, Error-value=TBD17, EPR/BPI Peer Info
        Mismatch.</t>

        <t>When PCE receives the PCError message that indicates the BGP
        session to the peer address is broken(Err-type=TBD6 and
        Error-value=TBD11, Existing BGP session is broken), the PCE should
        clear the explicit peer route to the peer address.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="BGPPrefix" title="BGP Prefix Advertisement Procedures">
        <t>The detail procedures for BGP prefix advertisement are shown below,
        using PCInitiate and PCRpt message pair.</t>

        <t>The PCInitiate message should be sent to PCC that acts as BGP peer
        edge router only. In the example, it should be sent to R1(M1) or
        R7(M2) respectively.</t>

        <t>When PCC receives the PPA and the CCI object (with the R bit set to
        0 in SRP object) in PCInitiate message, the PCC should send the
        prefixes indicated in this object to the appointed BGP peer.</t>

        <t>When PCC sends successfully the prefixes to the appointed BGP peer,
        it should report the result via the PCRpt messages, with PPA object
        and the corresponding SRP and CCI object included.</t>

        <t>When PCC receives the PPA and the CCI object with the R bit set to
        1 in SRP object in PCInitiate message, the PCC should withdraw the
        prefixes advertisement to the peer that indicated by this object.</t>

        <t>When PCC withdraws successfully the prefixes that indicated by this
        object, it should report the result via the PCRpt message, with the
        PPA object included, and the corresponding SRP and CCI object.</t>

        <t><figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
                 +------------------+
      +----------+       PCE        +-----------+
      |          +------------------+           |
      |                  +--+                   |
      +------------------+R3+-------------------+
     M1&M1-R             +--+                M2&M2-R
      |                                         |
     +v-+          +--+          +--+         +-v+
     |R1+----------+R5+----------+R6+---------+R7|
     ++-+          +--+          +--+         +-++
 (BGP Router)                           (BGP Router)
      |                                         |
      |                                         |
      |            +--+          +--+           |
      +------------+R2+----------+R4+-----------+
   Figure 4: BGP Prefix Advertisement Procedures
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[                        Table 4: Message Information
  +-----------------------------------------------------------+
  |No. | Peers|    Type  |  Message Key Parameters            |
  +-----------------------------------------------------------+
  |M1  |PCE/R1|PCInitiate|CC-ID=X1(Symbolic Path Name=Class A)|
  |M1-R|      |PCRpt     |PPA Object(Peer IP=R7_A,Prefix=1_A) |
  +-----------------------------------------------------------+
  |M2  |PCE/R7|PCInitiate|CC-ID=X2(Symbolic Path Name=Class A)|
  |M2-R|      |PCRpt     |PPA Object(Peer IP=R1_A,Prefix=7_A) |
  +-----------------------------------------------------------+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t>The allowed AFI/SAFI for the IPv4 BGP session should be 1/1(IPv4
        prefix) and the allowed AFI/SAFI for the IPv6 BGP session should be
        2/1(IPv6 prefix). If mismatch occur, an error:</t>

        <t>1) Error-type=TBD6, Error-value=TBD18, BPI/PPR address family
        mismatch should be reported via PCErr message.</t>

        <t>When the peer info is not the same as the peer info that indicated
        in BPI object in PCC for the same path that is identified by Symbolic
        Path Name TLV, an error:</t>

        <t>2) Error-type=TBD6, Error-value=TBD19, PPA/BPI peer info mismatch
        should be reported via the PCErr message.</t>

        <t>When PCE receives the PCError message that indicates the BGP
        session to the peer address is broken(Err-type=TBD6 and
        Error-value=TBD11, Existing BGP session is broken), the PCE should
        clear the prefixes advertisement to the peer.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="Obj-Def-Sec" title="New PCEP Objects">
      <t>One new CCI Object and three new PCEP objects are defined in this
      document. All new PCEP objects are as per <xref target="RFC5440"/></t>

      <section anchor="CCI" title="CCI Object">
        <t>The Central Control Instructions (CCI) Object is used by the PCE to
        specify the forwarding instructions defined in <xref
        target="RFC9050"/>. This document defines another object-type for
        Native-IP.</t>

        <t>CCI Object-Type is TBD13 for Native-IP as below <figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                            CC-ID                              |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|          Reserved             |             Flags             |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                               |
//                        Optional TLV                         //
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

        Figure 5: CCI Object for Native IP]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t>The field CC-ID is as described in <xref target="RFC9050"/>.
        Following fields are defined for CCI Object-Type TBD13 <list
            style="hanging">
            <t hangText="Reserved:">is set to zero while sending, ignored on
            receipt.</t>

            <t hangText="Flags:">is used to carry any additional information
            pertaining to the CCI. Currently no flag bits are defined.</t>
          </list></t>

        <t>The Symbolic Path Name TLV <xref target="RFC8231"/> MUST be
        included in the CCI Object-Type TBD13 to identify the E2E TE path in
        Native IP environment and MUST be unique.</t>
      </section>

      <section anchor="BPI_Object" title="BGP Peer Info Object">
        <t>The BGP Peer Info object is used to specify the information about
        the peer with which the PCC should establish the BGP relationship.
        This object should only be included and sent to the head and end
        router of the E2E path in case there is no Route Reflection (RR)
        involved. If the RR is used between the head and end routers, then
        such information should be sent to head router, RR and end router
        respectively.</t>

        <t>By default, the Local/Peer IP address SHOULD be dedicated to the
        usage of native IP TE solution, and SHOULD NOT be used by other BGP
        sessions that established by manual or non PCE initiated
        configuration.</t>

        <t>BGP Peer Info Object-Class is TBD14</t>

        <t>BGP Peer Info Object-Type is 1 for IPv4 and 2 for IPv6</t>

        <t>The format of the BGP Peer Info object body for IPv4(Object-Type=1)
        is as follows:</t>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                      Peer AS Number                           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   ETTL        |              Reserved                       |T|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                    Local IP Address                           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                   Peer IP Address                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Tunnel Source IP Address                        |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Tunnel Destination IP Address                   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                  Additional TLVs                              |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     Figure 6: BGP Peer Info Object Body Format for IPv4  ]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t/>

        <t>The format of the BGP Peer Info object body for IPv6(Object-Type=2)
        is as follows:</t>

        <t><figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                      Peer AS Number                           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   ETTL        |              Reserved                       |T|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
+                                                               +
|               Local IP Address (16 bytes)                     |
+                                                               +
|                                                               |
+                                                               +
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
+                                                               +
|               Peer IP Address (16 bytes)                      |
+                                                               +
|                                                               |
+                                                               +
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
+                                                               +
|          Tunnel Source IP Address (16 bytes)                  |
+                                                               +
|                                                               |
+                                                               +
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
+                                                               +
|          Tunnel Destination IP Address (16 bytes)             |
+                                                               +
|                                                               |
+                                                               +
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                  Additional TLVs                              |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      Figure 7: BGP Peer Info Object Body Format for IPv6  ]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t>Peer AS Number: 4 Bytes, to indicate the AS number of Remote
        Peer.</t>

        <t>ETTL: 1 Byte, to indicate the multihop count for EBGP session. It
        should be 0 and ignored when Local AS and Peer AS is same.</t>

        <t>Reserved: is set to zero while sending, ignored on receipt.</t>

        <t>T bit: Indicates whether the traffic that associated with the
        prefixes advertised via this BGP session is transported via IPinIP
        tunnel (when T bit is set) or not (when T bit is clear).</t>

        <t>Local IP Address(4/16 Bytes): IP address of the local router, used
        to peer with other end router. When Object-Type is 1, length is 4
        bytes; when Object-Type is 2, length is 16 bytes.</t>

        <t>Peer IP Address(4/16 Bytes): IP address of the peer router, used to
        peer with the local router. When Object-Type is 1, length is 4 bytes;
        when Object-Type is 2, length is 16 bytes;</t>

        <t>Tunnel Source IP Address(4/16 Bytes): IP address of the tunnel
        source, should be owned by the local router. When Object-Type is 1,
        length is 4 bytes; when Object-Type is 2, length is 16 bytes. It
        should be different from the Local IP Address.</t>

        <t>Tunnel Destination IP Address(4/16 Bytes): IP address of the tunnel
        destination, should be owned by the peer router. When Object-Type is
        1, length is 4 bytes; when Object-Type is 2, length is 16 bytes. It
        should be different from the Peer IP Address.</t>

        <t>Additional TLVs: TLVs that associated with this object, can be used
        to convey other necessary information for dynamic BGP session
        establishment. Their definitions are out of the current document.</t>

        <t>When PCC receives BPI object, with Object-Type=1, it should try to
        establish BGP session with the peer in AFI/SAFI=1/1;</t>

        <t>when PCC receives BPI object with Object-Type=2, it should try to
        establish the BGP session with the peer in AFI/SAFI=2/1.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="Explicit Peer Route Object">
        <t>The Explicit Peer Route object is defined to specify the explicit
        peer route to the corresponding peer address on each device that is on
        the E2E assurance path. This Object should be sent to all the devices
        on the E2E assurance path that calculated by PCE.</t>

        <t>The path established by this object should have higher priority
        than other path calculated by dynamic IGP protocol, but should have
        lower priority than the static route configured by manual or NETCONF
        or by other means.</t>

        <t>Explicit Peer Route Object-Class is TBD15.</t>

        <t>Explicit Peer Route Object-Type is 1 for IPv4 and 2 for IPv6</t>

        <t>The format of Explicit Peer Route object body for
        IPv4(Object-Type=1) is as follows:</t>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|       Route Priority        |          Reserved               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Peer/Tunnel Destination Address                 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    Next Hop Address to the Peer/Tunnel Destination Address    |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                      Additional TLVs                          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    Figure 8: Explicit Peer Route Object Body Format for IPv4
]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t/>

        <t>The format of Explicit Peer Route object body for
        IPv6(Object-Type=2) is as follows:</t>

        <figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|       Route Priority        |           Reserved              |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
+                                                               +
|           Peer Address/Tunnel Destination Address             |
+                                                               +
|                                                               |
+                                                               +
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
+                                                               +
|     Next Hop Address to the Peer/Tunnel Destination Address   |
+                                                               +
|                                                               |
+                                                               +
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                  Additional TLVs                              |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    Figure 9: Explicit Peer Route Object Body Format for IPv6
]]></artwork>
        </figure>

        <t/>

        <t>Route Priority: 2 Bytes, The priority of this explicit route. The
        higher priority should be preferred by the device. This field is used
        to indicate the backup path at each hop.</t>

        <t>Reserved: is set to zero while sending, ignored on receipt.</t>

        <t>Peer/Tunnel Destination Address: To indicate the peer address(4/16
        Bytes). When T bit is set in the associated BPI object, use the tunnel
        destination address in BPI object; when T bit is clear, use the peer
        address in BPI object.</t>

        <t>Next Hop Address to the Peer/Tunnel Destination Address: To
        indicate the next hop address(4/16 Bytes) to the corresponding
        peer/tunnel destination address.</t>

        <t>Additional TLVs: TLVs that associated with this object, can be used
        to convey other necessary information for explicit peer path
        establishment. Their definitions are out of the current document.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="Peer Prefix Advertisement Object">
        <t>The Peer Prefix Advertisement object is defined to specify the IP
        prefixes that should be advertised to the corresponding peer. This
        object should only be included and sent to the head/end router of the
        E2E path.</t>

        <t>The prefixes information included in this object MUST only be
        advertised to the indicated peer, MUST NOT be advertised to other BGP
        peers.</t>

        <t>Peer Prefix Advertisement Object-Class is TBD16</t>

        <t>Peer Prefix Advertisement Object-Type is 1 for IPv4 and 2 for
        IPv6</t>

        <t>The format of the Peer Prefix Advertisement object body is as
        follows:</t>

        <t><figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                  Peer IPv4 Address                            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
//               IPv4 Prefix subobjects                         //
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                  Additional TLVs                              |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  Figure 10: Peer Prefix Advertisement Object Body Format for IPv4]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t><figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                  Peer IPv6 Address                            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                                                               |
//               IPv6 Prefix subobjects                         //
|                                                               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                  Additional TLVs                              |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   Figure 11: Peer Prefix Advertisement Object Body Format for IPv6]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t>Peer IPv4 Address: 4 Bytes. Identifies the peer IPv4 address that
        the associated prefixes will be sent to.</t>

        <t>IPv4 Prefix subojects: List of IPv4 Prefix subobjects defined in
        <xref target="RFC3209"/>, identify the prefixes that will be sent to
        the peer identified by Peer IPv4 Address.</t>

        <t>Peer IPv6 Address: 16 Bytes. Identifies the peer IPv6 address that
        the associated prefixes will be sent to.</t>

        <t>IPv6 Prefix subojects: List of IPv6 Prefix subobjects defined in
        <xref target="RFC3209"/>, identify the prefixes that will be sent to
        the peer identified by Peer IPv6 Address.</t>

        <t>Additional TLVs: TLVs that associated with this object, can be used
        to convey other necessary information for prefixes advertisement.
        Their definitions are out of the current document.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="NewErrorTypeAndValue"
             title="New Error-Types and Error-Values Defined">
      <t>A PCEP-ERROR object is used to report a PCEP error and is
      characterized by an Error-Type that specifies that type of error and an
      Error-value that provides additional information about the error. An
      additional Error-Type and several Error-values are defined to represent
      the errors related to the newly defined objects that are related to
      Native IP TE procedures.</t>

      <t><figure>
          <artwork><![CDATA[       +============+===============+=====================================+
       | Error-Type | Meaning       | Error-value                         |
       +============+===============+=====================================+
       | TBD6       | Native IP     |                                     |
       |            | TE failure    |                                     |
       +------------+---------------+-------------------------------------+
       |            |               | 0: Unassigned                       |
       +------------+---------------+-------------------------------------+
       |            |               |TBD7: Peer AS not match              |
       +------------+---------------+-------------------------------------+
       |            |               |TBD8:Peer IP can't be reached        |
       +------------+---------------+-------------------------------------+
       |            |               |TBD9:Local IP is in use              |
       +------------+---------------+-------------------------------------+
       |            |               |TBD10:Remote IP is in use            |
       +------------+---------------+-------------------------------------+
       |            |               |TBD11:Exist BGP session broken       |
       +------------+---------------+-------------------------------------+
       |            |               |TBD12:Explicit Peer Route Error      |
       +------------+---------------+-------------------------------------+
       |            |               |TBD17:EPR/BPI Peer Info mismatch     |
       +------------+---------------+-------------------------------------+
       |            |               |TBD18:BPI/PPA Address Family mismatch|
       +------------+---------------+-------------------------------------+
       |            |               |TBD19:PPA/BPI Peer Info mismatch     |
       +------------+---------------+-------------------------------------+

            Figure 12: Newly defined Error-Type and Error-Value
]]></artwork>
        </figure></t>
    </section>

    <section title="BGP Considerations">
      <t>This document defines the procedures and objects to create the BGP
      sessions and advertise the associated prefixes dynamically. Only the key
      information, for example peer IP addresses, peer AS number are exchanged
      via the PCEP protocol. Other parameters that are needed for the BGP
      session setup should be derived from their default values, as described
      in <xref target="BPI_Object"/>.</t>

      <t>When the PCE sends out the PCInitiate message with BPI object
      embedded to establish the BGP session between the PCC peers, it should
      wait enough time to get the BGP session successful establishment report
      from the underlay PCCs. if the PCE can't get such report after the
      duration, then it should declare the failure of BGP session setup and
      try the establishment procedure again, or report the failure to the
      operator.</t>

      <t>Upon receiving such key information, the BGP module on the PCC should
      try to accomplish the task appointed by the PCEP protocol and report the
      successful status to the PCEP modules after the session is setup.</t>

      <t>There is no influence on current implementation of BGP Finite State
      Machine(FSM). The PCEP cares only the success and failure status of BGP
      session, and acts upon such information accordingly.</t>

      <t>The error handling procedures related to incorrect BGP parameters are
      specified in <xref target="BGPSess"/>, <xref target="BGPEx"/>, and <xref
      target="BGPPrefix"/>.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Deployment Considerations">
      <t>The information transferred in this document is mainly used for the
      light weight BGP session setup, explicit route deployment and the prefix
      distribution. The planning, allocation and distribution of the peer
      addresses within IGP should be accomplished in advanced and they are out
      of the scope of this document.</t>

      <t><xref target="RFC8232"/> describes the state synchronization
      procedure between stateful PCE and PCC. The communication of PCE and PCC
      described in this document should also follow the same procedures, treat
      the three newly defined objects(BPI, EPR, PPA) associated with the same
      symbolic path name as the attribute of the same path in the LSP-DB.</t>

      <t>When PCE detects one or some of the PCCs are out of control, it
      should recompute and redeploy the traffic engineering path for native IP
      on the active PCCs. The PCE should assure the avoidance of possible
      transient loop in such node failure when it deploys the explicit peer
      route on the PCCs.</t>

      <t>In case of a PCE failure, a new PCE can gain control over the central
      controller instructions.</t>

      <t>As per the PCEP procedures in <xref target="RFC8281"/>, the State
      Timeout Interval timer is used to ensure that a PCE failure does not
      result in automatic and immediate disruption for the services.
      Similarly, as per <xref target="RFC9050"/>, the central controller
      instructions are not removed immediately upon PCE failure. Instead, they
      could be re-delegated to the new PCE before the expiration of this
      timer, or be cleaned up on the expiration of this timer. This allows for
      network clean up without manual intervention. The PCC MUST support the
      removal of CCI as one of the behaviors applied on expiration of the
      State Timeout Interval timer.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Implementation Status">
      <t>[Note to the RFC Editor - remove this section before publication, as
      well as remove the reference to RFC 7942.]</t>

      <t>This section records the status of known implementations of the
      protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this
      Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in [RFC7942]. The
      description of implementations in this section is intended to assist the
      IETF in its decision processes in progressing drafts to RFCs. Please
      note that the listing of any individual implementation here does not
      imply endorsement by the IETF. Furthermore, no effort has been spent to
      verify the information presented here that was supplied by IETF
      contributors. This is not intended as, and must not be construed to be,
      a catalog of available implementations or their features. Readers are
      advised to note that other implementations may exist.</t>

      <t>According to <xref target="RFC7942"/>, "this will allow reviewers and
      working groups to assign due consideration to documents that have the
      benefit of running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable
      experimentation and feedback that have made the implemented protocols
      more mature. It is up to the individual working groups to use this
      information as they see fit".</t>

      <section title="Proof of Concept based on ODL">
        <t>At the time of posting the -22 version of this document, there are
        no known implementations of this mechanism. A proof of concept for the
        overall design has been verified using another SBI protocol on the
        Open DayLight (ODL) controller.</t>
      </section>
      <section title="ZTE">
        <t>ZTE is preparing an implementation of this document as the time of posting the -22 version of this document.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Security Considerations">
      <t>The setup of BGP sessions, prefix advertisement, and explicit peer
      route establishment are all controlled by the PCE. See <xref
      target="RFC4271"/> and <xref target="RFC4272"/> for BGP security
      considerations. Security consideration part in <xref target="RFC5440"/>
      and <xref target="RFC8231"/> should be considered. To prevent a bogus
      PCE sending harmful messages to the network nodes, the network devices
      should authenticate the validity of the PCE and ensure a secure
      communication channel between them. Mechanisms described in <xref
      target="RFC8253"/> should be used.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="IANA Considerations">
      <section title="Path Setup Type Registry">
        <t><xref target="RFC8408"/> created a sub-registry within the "Path
        Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers" registry called "PCEP
        Path Setup Types". IANA is requested to allocate a new code point
        within this sub-registry, as follows:</t>

        <t><figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[Value             Description                       Reference
TBD1           Native IP TE Path                  This document
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>
      </section>

      <section title="PCECC-CAPABILITY sub-TLV's Flag field">
        <t><xref target="RFC9050"/> created a sub-registry within the "Path
        Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers" registry to manage the
        value of the PCECC-CAPABILITY sub-TLV's 32-bits Flag field. IANA is
        requested to allocate a new bit position within this registry, as
        follows:</t>

        <t><figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
Bit         Name                   Reference
TBD2        NATIVE IP              This document
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>
      </section>

      <section title="PCEP Object">
        <t>IANA is requested to allocate new codepoints in the "PCEP Objects" sub-registry as follows:</t>

        <t><figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[
Object-Class Value   Name                        Reference
44                   CCI Object                  This document
                     Object-Type
                       TBD13: Native IP

TBD14                BGP Peer Info               This document
                     Object-Type
                       1: IPv4 address
                       2: IPv6 address

TBD15                Explicit Peer Route         This document
                     Object-Type
                       1: IPv4 address
                       2: IPv6 address

TBD16                Peer Prefix Advertisement   This document
                     Object-Type
                       1: IPv4 address
                       2: IPv6 address
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>
      </section>

      <section title="PCEP-Error Object">
        <t>IANA is requested to allocate new error types and error values
        within the "PCEP-ERROR Object Error Types and Values" sub-registry of
        the PCEP Numbers registry for the following errors::</t>

        <t><figure>
            <artwork><![CDATA[Error-Type       Meaning                      Error-value                                                             Reference
6           Mandatory Object missing
                                      TBD4:Native IP object missing                                                This document

10          Reception of an invalid object
                                      TBD3:PCECC NATIVE-IP-TE-CAPABILITY bit is not set                            This document

19          Invalid Operation
                                      TBD5:Only one BPI,EPR or PPA object can be included in this message          This document

TBD6        Native IP TE failure                                                                                   This document
                                      TBD7:Peer AS not match
                                      TBD8:Peer IP can't be reached
                                      TBD9:Local IP is in use
                                      TBD10:Remote IP is in use
                                      TBD11:Exist BGP session broken
                                      TBD12:Explicit Peer Route Error
                                      TBD17:EPR/BPI Peer Info mismatch
                                      TBD18:BPI/PPA Address Family mismatch
                                      TBD19:PPA/BPI Peer Info mismatch
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Contributor">
      <t>Dhruv Dhody has contributed to this document.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Acknowledgement">
      <t>Thanks Mike Koldychev, Susan Hares, Siva Sivabalan, Adam Simpson for
      his valuable suggestions and comments.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3209"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4271"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5440"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8174"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8231"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8232"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8253"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8281"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8408"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.9050"?>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4272"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7942"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8283"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8735"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8821"?>
    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>
