]> IIT-CNR/Registro.it

Via Moruzzi,1 Pisa IT 56124 mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it http://www.iit.cnr.it

IIT-CNR/Registro.it

Via Moruzzi,1 Pisa IT 56124 maurizio.martinelli@iit.cnr.it http://www.iit.cnr.it

Applications and Real-Time Registration Protocols Extensions RDAP Reverse search The Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) does not include query capabilities for finding the list of domains related to a set of entities matching a given search pattern. In the RDAP context, an entity can be associated with any defined object class. Moreover, other relationships between object classes exist and might be used for providing a reverse search capability. Therefore, a reverse search can be applied to other use cases than the classic domain-entity scenario. This document describes an RDAP extension that allow servers to provide a reverse search feature based on the relationship defined in RDAP between an object class for search and any related object class. The reverse search based on the domain-entity relationship is treated as a particular case.

Reverse Whois is a service provided by many web applications that allows users to find domain names owned by an individual or a company starting from the owner's details, such as name and email. Even if it has been considered useful for some legal purposes (e.g. uncovering trademark infringements, detecting cybercrimes), its availability as a standardized Whois capability has been objected to for two main reasons, which now don't seem to conflict with an RDAP implementation. The first objection concerns the potential risks of privacy violation. However, the domain name community is considering a new generation of Registration Directory Services , which provide access to sensitive data under some permissible purposes and in accordance with appropriate policies for requestor accreditation, authentication and authorization. RDAP's reliance on HTTP means that it can make use of common HTTP-based approaches to authentication and authorization, making it more useful than Whois in the context of such directory services. Since RDAP consequently permits a reverse search implementation complying with privacy protection principles, this objection is not well-founded. The other objection to the implementation of a reverse search capability has been connected with its impact on server processing. However, the core RDAP specifications already define search queries, with similar processing requirements, so the distinction on which this objection is based is not clear. Reverse searches, such as finding the list of domain names associated with contacts or nameservers, may be useful to registrars as well. Usually, registries adopt out-of-band solutions to provide results to registrars asking for reverse searches on their domains. Possible reasons for such requests are: the loss of synchronization between the registrar database and the registry database; the need for such data to perform bulk EPP updates (e.g. changing the contacts of a set of domains, etc.). Currently, RDAP does not provide any means for a client to search for the collection of domains associated with an entity . A query (lookup or search) on domains can return the array of entities related to a domain with different roles (registrant, registrar, administrative, technical, reseller, etc.), but the reverse operation is not allowed. Only reverse searches to find the collection of domains related to a nameserver (ldhName or ip) can be requested. Since an entity can be in relationship with any RDAP object , the availability of a reverse search as largely intended can be common to all the object classes allowed for search. Through a further step of generalization, the meaning of reverse search in the RDAP context can be extended to include any query for retrieving all the objects in relationship with another matching a given search pattern. The protocol described in this specification aims to extend the RDAP query capabilities to enable reverse search based on the relationships defined in RDAP between an object class for search and a related object class. The reverse search based on the domain-entity relationship is treated as a particular case of such a generic query model.

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

A generic reverse search path is described by the syntax: {searchable-resource-type}/reverse_search_0/{related-resource-type}?<search-condition> The path segments are defined as in the following: searchable-resource-type: it MUST be one of the resource types for search defined in Section 3.2 of (i.e. "domains", "nameservers" and "entities") or a resource type extension; related-resource-type: it MUST be one of the resource types for lookup defined in Section 3.1 of (i.e. "domain", "nameserver", "entity", "ip" and "autnum") or a resource type extension; search-condition: a sequence of "property=search pattern" predicates separated by the ampersand character ('&', US-ASCII value 0x0026). Each "property" represents a JSON object property of the RDAP object class corresponding to "related-resource-type". Objects are only included in the search results if they satisfy all included predicates. This includes predicates that are for the same property: it is necessary in such a case for the related object to match against each of those predicates. Based on their policy, servers MAY restrict the usage of predicates to make a valid search condition, by returning a 400 (Bad Request) response when a problematic request is received. While related-resource-type is defined as having one of a number of different values, the only searches defined in this document are for a related-resource-type of "entity". Searches for the other resource types specified in and resource type extensions may be defined by future documents. Partial string matching in search patterns is allowed as defined in section 4.1 of .

Reverse search responses use the formats defined in section 8 of , which correspond to the searchable resource types defined in .

Since in RDAP, an entity can be associated with any other object class, the most common kind of reverse search is one based on an entity's details. Such reverse searches arise from the query model by setting the related resource type to "entity". By selecting a specific searchable resource type, the resulting reverse search aims at retrieving all the objects (e.g. all the domains) that are related to any entity object matching the search conditions. This section defines the following reverse search properties servers SHOULD support regardless of the searchable resource type being selected: role $..entities[*].roles Section 10.2.4 of handle $..entities[*].handle Section 5.1 of fn $..entities[*].vcardArray[1][?(@[0]=='fn')][3] Section 6.2.1 of email $..entities[*].vcardArray[1][?(@[0]=='email')][3] Section 6.4.2 of The mapping between the reverse search property and the corresponding RDAP response property is done through the use of a JSONPath expression . The presence of a predicate on the reverse search property "role" means that the RDAP response property "roles" must contain at least the specified role. The last two properties are related to jCard elements , but the field references are to vCard , since jCard is the JSON format for vCard. Examples of reverse search paths based on the domain-entity relationship are presented in .

Documents that deprecate or restructure RDAP responses such that one or more of the properties listed above becomes invalid MUST either note that the relevant reverse search is no longer available (in the case of deprecation) or describe how to continue supporting the relevant search by way of some new RDAP property (in the case of restructuring). A server that includes additional fields in its objects in accordance with the extensibility provisions of section 6 of MAY support the use of those fields in search conditions, in the same way as for the search conditions defined in this section. Support for such fields in the reverse search context MUST be documented in the extension specification.

Servers complying with this specification MUST include the value "reverse_search_0" in the rdapConformance property of the help response . The information needed to register this value in the "RDAP Extensions" registry is described in .

To limit the impact of processing the search predicates, servers are RECOMMENDED to make use of indexes and similar functionality in their underlying data store. In addition, risks with respect to performance degradation or result set generation can be mitigated by adopting practices used for standard searches, e.g. restricting the search functionality, limiting the rate of search requests according to the user's authorization, truncating and paging the results, and returning partial responses.

NOTE: Please remove this section and the reference to RFC 7942 prior to publication as an RFC. This section records the status of known implementations of the protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in . The description of implementations in this section is intended to assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing drafts to RFCs. Please note that the listing of any individual implementation here does not imply endorsement by the IETF. Furthermore, no effort has been spent to verify the information presented here that was supplied by IETF contributors. This is not intended as, and must not be construed to be, a catalog of available implementations or their features. Readers are advised to note that other implementations may exist. According to RFC 7942, "this will allow reviewers and working groups to assign due consideration to documents that have the benefit of running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable experimentation and feedback that have made the implemented protocols more mature. It is up to the individual working groups to use this information as they see fit".

Responsible Organization: Institute of Informatics and Telematics of National Research Council (IIT-CNR)/Registro.it Location: https://rdap.pubtest.nic.it/ Description: This implementation includes support for RDAP queries using data from the public test environment of .it ccTLD. Reverse search is allowed to authenticated users. Registrar users are allowed to perform reverse searches on their own domains and contacts. This is achieved by adding an implicit predicate to the search condition. Level of Maturity: This is an "alpha" test implementation. Coverage: This implementation includes all of the features described in this specification. Contact Information: Mario Loffredo, mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it

Responsible Organization: Institute of Informatics and Telematics of National Research Council (IIT-CNR)/Registro.it Location: https://web-rdap.pubtest.nic.it/ Description: This is a Javascript web-based RDAP client. RDAP responses are retrieved from RDAP servers by the browser, parsed into an HTML representation, and displayed in a format improving the user experience. Reverse search is allowed to authenticated users. Level of Maturity: This is an "alpha" test implementation. Coverage: This implementation includes all of the features described in this specification. Contact Information: Francesco Donini, francesco.donini@iit.cnr.it

IANA is requested to register the following value in the RDAP Extensions Registry: Extension identifier: reverse_search_0 Registry operator: Any Published specification: This document. Contact: IETF <iesg@ietf.org> Intended usage: This extension describes reverse search query patterns for RDAP.

The search functionality defined in this document may affect the privacy of entities in the registry (and elsewhere) in various ways: see for a general treatment of privacy in protocol specifications. Registry operators should be aware of the tradeoffs that result from implementation of this functionality. Many jurisdictions have laws or regulations that restrict the use of "Personal Data", per the definition in . Given that, registry operators should ascertain whether the regulatory environment in which they operate permits implementation of the functionality defined in this document. In general, given the sensitivity of this functionality,it SHOULD be accessible to authorized users only, and for specific use cases only. Since reverse search requests and responses could contain Personally Identifiable Information (PII), reverse search functionality SHOULD be available over HTTPS only. Providing reverse search in RDAP carries the following threats as described in : Correlation Disclosure Misuse of information Therefore, RDAP providers are REQUIRED to mitigate the risk of those threats by implementing appropriate measures supported by security services (see ).

Security services required to provide controlled access to the operations specified in this document are described in . A non-exhaustive list of access control paradigms an RDAP provider can implement is presented in . The specification of the relationship within the reverse search path allows the RDAP servers to implement different authorization policies on a per-relationship basis.

The authors would like to acknowledge the following individuals for their contributions to this document: Francesco Donini, Scott Hollenbeck, Francisco Arias, Gustavo Lozano, Eduardo Alvarez, Ulrich Wisser and James Gould. Tom Harrison and Jasdip Singh provided relevant feedback and constant support to the implementation of this proposal. Their contributions have been greatly appreciated.

&RFC2119; &RFC3912; &RFC5730; &RFC6350; &RFC6973; &RFC7095; &RFC7480; &RFC7481; &RFC7942; &RFC8174; &RFC9082; &RFC9083; OpenID Foundation &I-D.ietf-jsonpath-base; &I-D.ietf-regext-rdap-openid; Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers

Access control can be implemented according to different paradigms introducing increasingly stringent rules. The paradigms reported here in the following leverage the capabilities either supported natively or provided as extensions by the OpenID Connect : Role-Based Access Control: access rights are granted depending on roles. Generally, this is done by grouping users into fixed categories and assigning static grants to each category. A more dynamic approach can be implemented by using the OpenID Connect "scope" claim; Purpose-Based Access Control: access rules are based on the notion of purpose, being the intended use of some data by a user. It can be implemented by tagging a request with the usage purpose and making the RDAP server check the compliance between the given purpose and the control rules applied to the data to be returned. The purpose can be stated within an out-of-band process by setting the OpenID Connect RDAP-specific "purpose" claim as defined in ; Attribute-Based Access Control: rules to manage access rights are evaluated and applied according to specific attributes describing the context within which data are requested. It can be implemented by setting within an out-of-band process additional OpenID Connect claims describing the request context and making the RDAP server check the compliance between the given context and the control rules applied to the data to be returned; Time-Based Access Control: data access is allowed for a limited time only. It can be implemented by assigning the users with temporary credentials linked to access grants whose scope is limited.

Initial working group version ported from draft-loffredo-regext-rdap-reverse-search-04 Updated "Privacy Considerations" section. Revised the text. Refactored the query model. Keepalive refresh. Reorganized "Abstract". Corrected "Conventions Used in This Document" section. Added "RDAP Conformance" section. Changed "IANA Considerations" section. Added references to RFC7095 and RFC8174. Other minor edits. Updated "Privacy Considerations", "Security Considerations" and "Acknowledgements" sections. Added some normative and informative references. Added . Updated normative references. Changed "Implementation Status" section. Updated informative references. Extended the query model to represent a reverse search based on any relationship between the RDAP object classes. Changed the path segment "role" into a query parameter. Updated "Reverse Searches Based on Entity Details" section to consider the use of JSContact format instead of jCard. Added references to JSContact documents. Updated the document based on Tom Harrison and James Gould feedback: Updated section "RDAP Path Segment Specification": Clarified how servers must evaluate a reverse search including predicates that are for the same property. Specified the error response servers must return when receiving a wrong reverse search request according to their policy. Clarified that searchs for the related-resource-type values other than "entity" may be defined in future documents. Reviewed text in section "Reverse Searches Based on Entity Details" about reverse searches based on custom response extensions. Removed references to JSContact documents in section "Reverse Searches Based on Entity Details". Moved the mapping between jCard properties used in the RDAP response and JSContact counterparts to draft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact. Added section "RDAP Response Specification". Changed the text to present reverse search as a single extension with multiple features. Changed the definition of searchable-resource-type and related-resource-type to consider also the resource type extensions. Replaced "reverse" with "reverse_search_0" in the generic reverse search path. Updated accordingly. Removed the phrase "but with a special focus on its privacy implications" from both the "Abstract" and the "Introduction". Moved the mapping between jCard properties used in the RDAP response and JSContact counterparts to draft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact. Reviewed the text of "Privacy Considerations" section. Text cleaning.