]> Center for Democracy and Technology

mknodel@cdt.org

GENART gender This document extends the existing limit on nomcom representation by company in order to improve gender diversity by ensuring that not all voting members of the IETF Nominating Committee (nomcom) belong to the same gender. About This Document The latest revision of this draft can be found at . Status information for this document may be found at . Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at .

Introduction The literature supports the claims that lack of gender diversity in hiring teams reinforce under representation of gender minorities in leadership positions and that lack of gender diversity in leadership perpetuates gender discrimination .

Gender Representation in the IETF Nomcom The IETF considers influence and weaknesses in nomcom selection in . Likewise, gender diversity in IETF leadership should be considered a community strengthening exercise insofar as gender diversity has been shown to lead to more productivity, creativity and reinforces a culture of respect and value for all participants. If we consider the nomcom as a "team", it will itself benefit from having more gender diversity among its voting members. The nomcom itself conventionally asks candidates some form of the question, 'Describe your perspective on what diversity should mean for the IETF, and the degree to which existing IETF participation meets those expectations. What have you done in the past to encourage participation by those who might otherwise not have considered engaging with the IETF?' implying diversity is regarded in the IETF. To address gender representation in the IETF nomcom, at a minimum we can ensure that all voting members are not of the same gender. All attempts to ensure gender representation in the nomcom should include: a. increase participation in the community from women and non-binary individuals so that the eligible pool is more gender diverse. b. encourage eligible women and non-binary members of the community to accept selection to the nomcom. While the IETF does not routinely confirm the gender of volunteers, we have committed to improving gender diversity in the community by way of measuring it and identifying concrete steps to mitigate imbalance.

Suggested Remedy The “two-per-organisation limit” can easily be extended to ensure a nomcom consisting of no more than n-1 members from any one gender (where n is the number of available volunteer slots), requiring skips for the nth slot until a gender minority volunteer is chosen. This assumes that for any given pool therein contains at least one gender minority volunteer. If there does not exist one gender minority volunteer in a given year's pool, this rule is withdrawn and the community should be notified of this reason that all ten nomcom volunteers will have the same gender that year. This short remedy might update .

Privacy Considerations Serving on the nomcom is voluntary. Public disclosure of one's gender and pronouns in the IETF Datatracker should remain voluntary. Disclosure of one's gender during meeting registration for the purposes of tracking communty diversity should remain voluntary and non-public. The pronouns used for an eligible nomcom volunteer in conversation, mailing list discussion, recorded meeting videos and notes can be strong indicators of that volunteer's gender. However it is best practice to resolve any doubt by directly asking the volunteer whether they identify as a member of the dominant gender. As part of nomcom processes that change as a result of this document's recommended remedy, the gender of eligible nomcom volunteers must not be publicly documented, and wherein this information is used to determine the pool, it must be kept private.

Security Considerations There are no security considerations for this document.

IANA Considerations This document has no IANA actions.

Informative References The process by which the members of the IAB and IESG, some Trustees of the IETF Trust, and some Directors of the IETF Administration LLC (IETF LLC) are selected, confirmed, and recalled is specified in this document. This document is based on RFC 7437. Only those updates required to reflect the changes introduced by IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA) 2.0 have been included. Any other changes will be addressed in future documents. This document obsoletes RFC 7437 and RFC 8318. The IETF Nominating Committee (NomCom) appoints candidates to several IETF leadership committees. RFC 8713 provides criteria for NomCom membership that attempt to ensure NomCom volunteers are members of the loosely defined IETF community, by requiring in-person attendance in three of the past five in-person meetings. In 2020 and 2021, the IETF had six consecutive fully online plenary meetings that drove rapid advancement in remote meeting technologies and procedures, including an experiment that included remote attendance for NomCom eligibility. This document updates RFC 8713 by defining a new set of eligibility criteria from first principles, with consideration to the increased salience of remote attendance. This document obsoletes RFCs 8788 and 8989. Vervo

Acknowledgments Thanks to Martin Thompson and Suresh Krishnan for informed initial thoughts on bringing this idea to the community.