Transaction ID Mechanism for NETCONF

Transaction ID Mechanism for NETCONF Cisco Systems

jlindbla@cisco.com

General NETCONF Internet-Draft NETCONF clients and servers often need to have a synchronized view of the server's configuration data stores. The volume of configuration data in a server may be very large, while data store changes typically are small when observed at typical client resynchronization intervals. Rereading the entire data store and analyzing the response for changes is an inefficient mechanism for synchronization. This document specifies an extension to NETCONF that allows clients and servers to keep synchronized with a much smaller data exchange and without any need for servers to store information about the clients. Discussion Venues Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at .

Introduction When a NETCONF client connects with a NETCONF server, a frequently occurring use case is for the client to find out if the configuration has changed since it was last connected. Such changes could occur for example if another NETCONF client has made changes, or another system or operator made changes through other means than NETCONF. One way of detecting a change for a client would be to retrieve the entire configuration from the server, then compare the result with a previously stored copy at the client side. This approach is not popular with most NETCONF users, however, since it would often be very expensive in terms of communications and computation cost. Furthermore, even if the configuration is reported to be unchanged, that will not guarantee that the configuration remains unchanged when a client sends a subsequent change request, a few moments later. In order to simplify the task of tracking changes, a NETCONF server could implement a meta level checksum over the configuration over a datastore or YANG subtree, and offer clients a way to read and compare this checksum. If the checksum is unchanged, clients can avoid performing expensive operations. Such checksums are often referred to as a configuration id or transaction id (txid). Evidence of a transaction id feature being demanded by clients is that several server implementors have built proprietary and mutually incompatible mechanisms for obtaining a transaction id from a NETCONF server. RESTCONF, RFC 8040, defines a mechanism for detecting changes in configuration subtrees based on Entity-Tags (ETags) and Last-Modified txid values. In conjunction with this, RESTCONF provides a way to make configuration changes conditional on the server confiuguration being untouched by others. This mechanism leverages RFC 7232 "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Conditional Requests". This document defines similar functionality for NETCONF, RFC 6241, and ties this in with YANG-Push, RFC 8641.

Conventions and Definitions The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. This document uses the terminology defined in RFC6241, RFC7950, RFC8040, and RFC8641. In addition, this document defines the following terms:

Versioned node: A node in the instantiated YANG data tree for which the server maintains a transaction id (txid) value.

NETCONF Txid Extension This document describes a NETCONF extension which modifies the behavior of get-config, get-data, edit-config, edit-data, discard-changes, copy-config, delete-config and commit such that clients are able to conditionally retrieve and update the configuration in a NETCONF server. For servers implementing YANG-Push, an extension for conveying txid updates as part of subscription updates is also defined. Several low level mechanisms could be defined to fulfill the requirements for efficient client-server txid synchronization. This document defines two such mechanisms, the etag txid mechanism and the last-modified txid mechanism. Additional mechanisms could be added in future.

Use Cases The common use cases for such mecahnisms are briefly discussed here.

Initial configuration retrieval: When the client initially connects to a server, it may be interested to acquire a current view of (parts of) the server's configuration. In order to be able to efficiently detect changes later, it may also be interested to store meta level txid information for subtrees of the configuration.
Subsequent configuration retrieval: When a client needs to reread (parts of) the server's configuration, it may be interested to leverage the txid meta data it has stored by requesting the server to prune the response so that it does not repeat configuration data that the client is already aware of.
Configuration update with txid return: When a client issues a transaction towards a server, it may be interested to also learn the new txid meta data the server has stored for the updated parts of the configuration.
Configuration update with txid specification: When a client issues a transaction towards a server, it may be interested to also specify the new txid meta data that the server stores for the updated parts of the configuration.
Conditional configuration change: When a client issues a transaction towards a server, it may specify txid meta data for the transaction in order to allow the server to verify that the client is up to date with any changes in the parts of the configuration that it is concerned with. If the txid meta data in the server is different than the client expected, the server rejects the transaction with a specific error message.
Subscribe to configuration changes with txid return: When a client subscribes to configuration change updates through YANG-Push, it may be interested to also learn the the updated txid meta data for the changed data trees.

General Txid Principles All servers implementing a txid mechanism MUST maintain a txid meta data value for each configuration datastore supported by the server. Txid mechanism implementations MAY also maintain txid meta data values for nodes deeper in the YANG data tree. The nodes for which the server maintains txids are collectively referred to as the "versioned nodes". The server returning txid values for the versioned nodes MUST ensure the txid values are changed every time there has been a configuration change at or below the node associated with the txid value. This means any update of a config true node will result in a new txid value for all ancestor versioned node, up to and including the datastore root itself. This also means a server MUST update the txid value for any nodes that change as a result of a configuration change, regardless of source, even if the changed nodes are not explicitly part of the change payload. An example of this is dependent data under YANG RFC 7950 when- or choice-statements. The server MUST NOT change the txid value of a versioned node unless the node itself or a child node of that node has been changed. The server MUST NOT change any txid values due to changes in config false data.

Initial Configuration Retrieval When a NETCONF server receives a get-config or get-data request containing requests for txid values, it MUST return txid values for all versioned nodes below the point requested by the client in the reply. The exact encoding varies by mechanism, but all txid mechanisms would have a special "txid-request" txid value (e.g. "?") which is guaranteed to never be used as a normal txid value. Clients MAY use this special txid value associated with one or more nodes in the data tree to indicate to the server that they are interested in txid values below that point of the data tree.

Initial Configuration Retrieval. The server returns the requested configuration, annotated with txid values. The most recent change seems to have been an update to the R8 and R9 source-port. | | get-config | | acls (txid: ?) | | | | <------------------------------------------ | | data | | acls (txid: 5152) | | acl A1 (txid: 4711) | | aces (txid: 4711) | | ace R1 (txid: 4711) | | matches ipv4 protocol udp | | acl A2 (txid: 5152) | | aces (txid: 5152) | | ace R7 (txid: 4711) | | matches ipv4 dscp AF11 | | ace R8 (txid: 5152) | | matches udp source-port port 22 | | ace R9 (txid: 5152) | | matches tcp source-port port 22 | v v ]]> NOTE: In the call flow examples we are using a 4-digit, monotonously increasing integer as txid. This is convenient and enhances readability of the examples, but does not reflect a typical implementation. In general, the only operation defined on a pair of txid values is testing them for equality.

Subsequent Configuration Retrieval Clients MAY request the server to return txid values in the response by adding one or more txid values received previously in get-config or get-data requests. When a NETCONF server receives a get-config or get-data request containing a node with a client specified txid value, there are several different cases:

The node is not a versioned node, i.e. the server does not maintain a txid value for this node. In this case, the server MUST look up the closest ancestor that is a versioned node, and use the txid value of that node as the txid value of this node in the further handling below. The datastore root is always a versioned node.
The client specified txid value is different than the server's txid value for this node. In this case the server MUST return the contents as it would otherwise have done, adding the txid values of all child versioned nodes to the response. In case the client has specified txid values for some child nodes, then these cases MUST be re-evaluated for those child nodes.
The node is a versioned node, and the client specified txid value matches the server's txid value. In this case the server MUST return the node decorated with a special "txid-match" txid value (e.g. "=") to the matching node, pruning any value and child nodes. A server MUST NOT ever use the txid-match value (e.g. "=") as an actual txid value.

For list elements, pruning child nodes means that top-level key nodes MUST be included in the response, and other child nodes MUST NOT be included. For containers, child nodes MUST NOT be included.

Conditional Transactions Conditional transactions are useful when a client is interested to make a configuration change, being sure that relevant parts of the server configuration have not changed since the client last inspected it. By supplying the latest txid values known to the client in its change requests (edit-config etc.), it can request the server to reject the transaction in case any relevant changes have occurred at the server that the client is not yet aware of. This allows a client to reliably compute and send confiuguration changes to a server without either acquiring a global datastore lock for a potentially extended period of time, or risk that a change from another client disrupts the intent in the time window between a read (get-config etc.) and write (edit-config etc.) operation. Clients that are also interested to know the txid assigned to the modified versioned nodes in the model immediately in the response could set a flag in the rpc message to request the server to return the new txid with the ok message.

For all leaf objects that were changed, and all their ancestors, the txids are updated to the value returned in the ok message. | | get-config | | acls (txid: ?) | | | | <------------------------------------------ | | data (txid: 7688) | | acls (txid: 7688) | | acl A1 (txid: 7688) | | aces (txid: 7688) | | ace R1 (txid: 7688) | | matches ipv4 protocol tcp | | acl A2 (txid: 6614) | | aces (txid: 6614) | | ace R7 (txid: 4711) | | matches ipv4 dscp AF11 | | ace R8 (txid: 5152) | | matches udp source-port port 22 | | ace R9 (txid: 6614) | | matches tcp source-port port 830 | v v ]]> If the server rejects the transaction because the configuration txid value differs from the client's expectation, the server MUST return an rpc-error with the following values: Additionally, the error-info tag SHOULD contain an sx:structure containing relevant details about the mismatching txids.

Transactions toward the Candidate Datastore When working with the Candidate datastore, the txid validation happens at commit time, rather than at individual edit-config or edit-data operations. Clients add their txid attributes to the configuration payload the same way. In case a client specifies different txid values for the same element in successive edit-config or edit-data operations, the txid value specified last MUST be used by the server at commit time.

Conditional transaction towards the Candidate datastore successfully executed. As all the txid values specified by the client matched those on the server, the transaction was successfully executed. | | edit-config | | config (txid: 5152) | | acls (txid: 5152) | | acl A1 (txid: 4711) | | type ipv4 | | | | <------------------------------------------ | | ok | | | | ------------------------------------------> | | edit-config | | config | | acls | | acl A1 | | aces (txid: 4711) | | ace R1 (txid: 4711) | | matches ipv4 protocol tcp | | | | <------------------------------------------ | | ok | | | | ------------------------------------------> | | commit (request new txid in response) | | | | <------------------------------------------ | | ok (txid: 7688) | v v ]]>

Dependencies within Transactions YANG modules that contain when-statements referencing remote parts of the model will cause the txid to change even in parts of the data tree that were not modified directly. Let's say there is an energy-example.yang module that defines a mechanism for clients to request the server to measure the amount of energy that is consumed by a given access control rule. The energy-example module augments the access control module as follows: This means there is a system wide switch leaf metering-enabled in energy-example which disables all energy measurements in the system when set to false, and that there is a boolean leaf energy-tracing that controls whether energy measurement is happening for each acl rule individually. In this example, we have an initial configuration like this:

Transaction changing a single leaf. This leaf is the target of a when-statement, however, which means other leafs elsewhere may be indirectly modified by this change. Such indirect changes will also result in txid changes. | | edit-config (request new txid in response) | | config | | energy metering-enabled false | | | | <------------------------------------------ | | ok (txid: 9118) | v v ]]> After the transaction above, the new configuration state has the energy-tracing leafs removed.

Other NETCONF Operations

discard-changes: The discard-changes operation resets the candidate datastore to the contents of the running datastore. The server MUST ensure the txid values in the candidate datastore get the same txid values as in the running datastore when this operation runs.
copy-config: The copy-config operation can be used to copy contents between datastores. The server MUST ensure the txid values retain the same txid values as in the soruce datastore.
: If copy-config is used to copy from a file, URL or other source that is not a datastore, the server MUST ensure the txid values are changed for the versioned nodes that are changed or have child nodes changed by the operation.
delete-config: The server MUST ensure the datastore txid value is changed, unless it was already empty.
commit: At commit, with regards to the txid values, the server MUST treat the contents of the candidate datastore as if any txid value provided by the client when updating the candidate was provided in a single edit-config towards the running datastore. If the transaction is rejected due to txid value mismatch, an rpc-error as described in section Conditional Transactions MUST be sent.

YANG-Push Subscriptions A client issuing a YANG-Push establish-subscription or modify-subscription request towards a server that supports both YANG-Push RFC 8641 and a txid mechanism MAY request that the server provides updated txid values in YANG-Push subscription updates.

Txid Mechanisms This document defines two txid mechanisms:

The etag attribute txid mechanism
The last-modified attribute txid mechanism

Servers implementing this specification MUST support the etag attribute txid mechanism and MAY support the last-modified attribute txid mechanism. Section NETCONF Txid Extension describes the logic that governs all txid mechanisms. This section describes the mapping from the generic logic to specific mechanism and encoding. If a client uses more than one txid mechanism, such as both etag and last-modified in a particular message to a server, or patricular commit, the result is undefined.

The etag attribute txid mechanism The etag txid mechanism described in this section is centered around a meta data XML attribute called "etag". The etag attribute is defined in the namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:txid:1.0". The etag attribute is added to XML elements in the NETCONF payload in order to indicate the txid value for the YANG node represented by the element. NETCONF servers that support this extension MUST announce the capability "urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:txid:etag:1.0". The etag attribute values are opaque UTF-8 strings chosen freely, except that the etag string must not contain space, backslash or double quotes. The point of this restriction is to make it easy to reuse implementations that adhere to section 2.3.1 in RFC 7232. The probability SHOULD be made very low that an etag value that has been used historically by a server is used again by that server if the configuration is different. It is RECOMMENDED that the same etag txid values are used across all management interfaces (i.e. NETCONF, RESTCONF and any other the server might implement), if it implements more than one. The detailed rules for when to update the etag value are described in section General Txid Principles. These rules are chosen to be consistent with the ETag mechanism in RESTCONF, RFC 8040, specifically sections 3.4.1.2, 3.4.1.3 and 3.5.2.

The last-modified attribute txid mechanism The last-modified txid mechanism described in this section is centered around a meta data XML attribute called "last-modified". The last-modified attribute is defined in the namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:txid:1.0". The last-modified attribute is added to XML elements in the NETCONF payload in order to indicate the txid value for the YANG node represented by the element. NETCONF servers that support this extension MUST announce the capability "urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:txid:last-modified:1.0". The last-modified attribute values are yang:date-and-time values as defined in ietf-yang-types.yang, RFC 6991. "2022-04-01T12:34:56.123456Z" is an example of what this time stamp format looks like. It is RECOMMENDED that the time stamps provided by the server to closely match the real world clock. Servers MUST ensure the timestamps provided are monotonously increasing for as long as the server's operation is maintained. It is RECOMMENDED that server implementors choose the number of digits of precision used for the fractional second timestamps high enough so that there is no risk that multiple transactions on the server would get the same timestamp. It is RECOMMENDED that the same last-modified txid values are used across all management interfaces (i.e. NETCONF and any other the server might implement), except RESTCONF. RESTCONF, as defined in RFC 8040, is using a different format for the time stamps which is limited to one second resolution. Server implementors that support the Last-Modified txid mechanism over both RESTCONF and other management protocols are RECOMMENDED to use Last-Modified timestamps that match the point in time referenced over RESTCONF, with the fractional seconds part added. The detailed rules for when to update the last-modified value are described in section General Txid Principles. These rules are chosen to be consistent with the Last-Modified mechanism in RESTCONF, RFC 8040, specifically sections 3.4.1.1, 3.4.1.3 and 3.5.1.

Common features to both etag and last-modified txid mechanisms Clients MAY add etag or last-modified attributes to zero or more individual elements in the get-config or get-data filter, in which case they pertain to the subtree(s) rooted at the element(s) with the attributes. Clients MAY also add such attributes directly to the get-config or get-data tags (e.g. if there is no filter), in which case it pertains to the txid value of the datastore root. Clients might wish to send a txid value that is guaranteed to never match a server constructed txid. With both the etag and last-modified txid mechanisms, such a txid-request value is "?". Clients MAY add etag or last-modified attributes to the payload of edit-config or edit-data requests, in which case they indicate the client's txid value of that element. Clients MAY request servers that also implement YANG-Push to return configuration change subsription updates with etag or last-modified txid attributes. The client requests this service by adding a with-etag or with-last-modified flag with the value 'true' to the subscription request or yang-push configuration. The server MUST then return such txids on the YANG Patch edit tag and to the child elements of the value tag. The txid attribute on the edit tag reflects the txid associated with the changes encoded in this edit section, as well as parent nodes. Later edit sections in the same push-update or push-change-update may still supercede the txid value for some or all of the nodes in the current edit section. Servers returning txid values in get-config, edit-config, get-data, edit-data and commit operations MUST do so by adding etag and/or last-modified txid attributes to the data and ok tags. When servers prune output due to a matching txid value, the server MUST add a txid-match attribute to the pruned element, and MUST set the attribute value to "=", and MUST NOT send any element value. Servers returning a txid mismatch error MUST return an rpc-error as defined in section Conditional Transactions with an error-info tag containing a txid-value-mismatch-error-info structure. The txid attributes are valid on the following NETCONF tags, where xmlns:nc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0", xmlns:ncds="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf-nmda", xmlns:sn="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-subscribed-notifications", xmlns:yp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-patch" and xmlns:ypatch="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-patch": In client messages sent to a server:

/nc:rpc/nc:get-config
/nc:rpc/nc:get-config/nc:filter//*
/nc:rpc/ncds:get-data
/nc:rpc/ncds:get-data/ncds:subtree-filter//*
/nc:rpc/ncds:get-data/ncds:xpath-filter//*
/nc:rpc/nc:edit-config/nc:config
/nc:rpc/nc:edit-config/nc:config//*
/nc:rpc/ncds:edit-data/ncds:config
/nc:rpc/ncds:edit-data/ncds:config//*

In server messages sent to a client:

/nc:rpc-reply/nc:data
/nc:rpc-reply/nc:data//*
/nc:rpc-reply/ncds:data
/nc:rpc-reply/ncds:data//*
/nc:rpc-reply/nc:ok
/yp:push-update/yp:datastore-contents/ypatch:yang-patch/ ypatch:edit
/yp:push-update/yp:datastore-contents/ypatch:yang-patch/ ypatch:edit/ypatch:value//*
/yp:push-change-update/yp:datastore-contents/ypatch:yang-patch/ ypatch:edit
/yp:push-change-update/yp:datastore-contents/ypatch:yang-patch/ ypatch:edit/ypatch:value//*

Txid Mechanism Examples

Initial Configuration Response

With etag NOTE: In the etag examples below, we have chosen to use a txid value consisting of "nc" followed by a monotonously increasing integer. This is convenient for the reader trying to make sense of the examples, but is not an implementation requirement. An etag would often be implemented as a "random" string of characters, with no comes-before/after relation defined. To retrieve etag attributes across the entire NETCONF server configuration, a client might send:

]]>

The server's reply might then be: A1 R1 udp A2 R7 AF11 R8

admin

sakura

joe

]]> To retrieve etag attributes for a specific ACL using an xpath filter, a client might send: ]]> To retrieve etag attributes for "acls", but not for "nacm", a client might send: ]]> If the server considers "acls", "acl", "aces" and "acl" to be versioned nodes, the server's response to the request above might look like: A1 R1 udp A2 R7 AF11 R8

admin

sakura

joe

]]>

With last-modified To retrieve last-modified attributes for "acls", but not for "nacm", a client might send: ]]> If the server considers "acls", "acl", "aces" and "acl" to be versioned nodes, the server's response to the request above might look like: A1 R1 udp A2 R7 AF11 R8

admin

sakura

joe

]]>

Configuration Response Pruning A NETCONF client that already knows some txid values MAY request that the configuration retrieval request is pruned with respect to the client's prior knowledge. To retrieve only changes for "acls" that do not have the last known etag txid value, a client might send: A1 A2 ]]> Assuming the NETCONF server configuration is the same as in the previous rpc-reply example, the server's response to request above might look like: ]]> Or, if a configuration change has taken place under /acls since the client was last updated, the server's response may look like: A1 A2 R7 AF11 R8

830

]]> In case the client provides a txid value for a non-versioned node, the server needs to treat the node as having the same txid value as the closest ancestor that does have a txid value. A2 R7 ]]> If a txid value is specified for a leaf, and the txid value matches, the leaf value is pruned. A2 R7 ]]>

Configuration Change A client that wishes to update the ace R1 protocol to tcp might send:

test-then-set

true A1 tcp

]]> The server would update the protocol leaf in the running datastore, and return an rpc-reply as follows: ]]> A subsequent get-config request for "acls", with txid:etag="?" might then return: A1 R1 tcp A2 R7 AF11 R8

830

]]> In case the server at this point received a configuration change from another source, such as a CLI operator, removing ace R8 and R9 in acl A2, a subsequent get-config request for acls, with txid:etag="?" might then return: A1 R1 tcp A2 R7 AF11 ]]>

Conditional Configuration Change If a client wishes to delete acl A1 if and only if its configuration has not been altered since this client last synchronized its configuration with the server, at which point it received the etag "nc7688" for acl A1, regardless of any possible changes to other acls, it might send:

test-then-set

true A1

]]> If acl A1 now has the etag txid value "nc7688", as expected by the client, the transaction goes through, and the server responds something like: ]]> A subsequent get-config request for acls, with txid:etag="?" might then return: A2 R7 AF11 ]]> In case acl A1 did not have the expected etag txid value "nc7688", when the server processed this request, it rejects the transaction, and might send:

protocol

operation-failed

error

/acl:acls/acl:acl[acl:name="A1"]

cli6912

]]>

Using etags with Other NETCONF Operations The client MAY request that the new etag txid value is returned as an attribute on the ok response for a successful commit. The client requests this by adding with-etag to the commit operation. For example, a client might send: xmlns:ietf-netconf-txid= "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf-txid"

true

]]> Assuming the server accepted the transaction, it might respond: ]]>

YANG-Push A client MAY request that the updates for one or more YANG Push subscriptions are annotated with the txid values. The request might look like this: ds:running

/acl:acls

500

true

]]> In case a client wishes to modify a previous subscription request in order to no longer receive YANG Push subscription updates, the request might look like this: 1011 ds:running

false

]]> A server might send a subscription update like this: 2022-04-04T06:00:24.16Z 89

edit1

delete /acl:acls A1

]]>

YANG Modules

Base module for txid in NETCONF WG List: Author: Jan Lindblad "; description "NETCONF Transaction ID aware operations for NMDA. Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself for full legal notices. The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. "; revision 2022-04-01 { description "Initial revision"; reference "RFC XXXX: Xxxxxxxxx"; } typedef etag-t { type string { pattern ".* .*" { modifier invert-match; } pattern '.*".*' { modifier invert-match; } pattern ".*\\.*" { modifier invert-match; } } description "Unique Entity-tag txid value representing a specific transaction. Could be any string that does not contain spaces, double quotes or backslash. The txid values '?' and '=' have special meaning."; } typedef last-modified-t { type union { type yang:date-and-time; type enumeration { enum ? { description "Txid value used by clients that is guaranteed not to match any txid on the server."; } enum = { description "Txid value used by servers to indicate that contents has been pruned due to txid match between client and server."; } } } description "Last-modified txid value representing a specific transaction. The txid values '?' and '=' have special meaning."; } grouping txid-grouping { leaf with-etag { type boolean; description "Indicates whether the client requests the server to include a txid:etag txid attribute when the configuration has changed."; } leaf with-last-modified { type boolean; description "Indicates whether the client requests the server to include a txid:last-modified attribute when the configuration has changed."; } description "Grouping for txid mechanisms, to be augmented into rpcs that modify configuration data stores."; } augment /nc:edit-config/nc:input { uses txid-grouping; description "Injects the txid mechanisms into the edit-config operation"; } augment /nc:commit/nc:input { uses txid-grouping; description "Injects the txid mechanisms into the commit operation"; } augment /ncds:edit-data/ncds:input { uses txid-grouping; description "Injects the txid mechanisms into the edit-data operation"; } sx:structure txid-value-mismatch-error-info { container txid-value-mismatch-error-info { description "This error is returned by a NETCONF server when a client sends a configuration change request, with the additonal condition that the server aborts the transaction if the server's configuration has changed from what the client expects, and the configuration is found not to actually not match the client's expectation."; leaf mismatch-path { type instance-identifier; description "Indicates the YANG path to the element with a mismatching etag txid value."; } leaf mismatch-etag-value { type etag-t; description "Indicates server's txid value of the etag attribute for one mismatching element."; } leaf mismatch-last-modified-value { type last-modified-t; description "Indicates server's txid value of the last-modified attribute for one mismatching element."; } } } } ]]>

Additional support for txid in YANG-Push WG List: Author: Jan Lindblad "; description "NETCONF Transaction ID aware operations for YANG Push. Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself for full legal notices. The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. "; revision 2022-04-01 { description "Initial revision"; reference "RFC XXXX: Xxxxxxxxx"; } augment "/sn:establish-subscription/sn:input" { description "This augmentation adds additional subscription parameters that apply specifically to datastore updates to RPC input."; uses ietf-netconf-txid:txid-grouping; } augment "/sn:modify-subscription/sn:input" { description "This augmentation adds additional subscription parameters specific to datastore updates."; uses ietf-netconf-txid:txid-grouping; } augment "/sn:subscriptions/sn:subscription" { description "This augmentation adds additional subscription parameters specific to datastore updates."; uses ietf-netconf-txid:txid-grouping; } } ]]>

Security Considerations TODO Security

IANA Considerations This document registers the following capability identifier URN in the 'Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Capability URNs' registry: This document registers three XML namespace URNs in the 'IETF XML registry', following the format defined in RFC 3688. This document registers two module names in the 'YANG Module Names' registry, defined in RFC 6020. and

Changes

Major changes in -02 since -01

A last-modified txid mechanism has been added (back). This mechanism aligns well with the Last-Modified mechanism defined in RESTCONF RFC 8040, but is not a carbon copy.
YANG Push functionality has been added. This allows YANG Push users to receive txid updates as part of the configuration updates. This functionality comes in a separate YANG module, to allow implementors to cleanly keep all this functionality out.
Changed name of "versioned elements". They are now called "versioned nodes".
Clarified txid behavior for transactions toward the Candidate datastore, and some not so common situations, such as when a client specifies a txid for a non-versioned node, and when there are when-statement dependencies across subtrees.
Examples provided for the abstract mechanism level with simple message flow diagrams.
More examples on protocol level, and with ietf-interfaces as example target module replaced with ietf-access-control to reduce confusion.
Explicit list of XPaths to clearly state where etag or last-modified attributes may be added by clients and servers.
Document introduction restructured to remove duplication between sections and to allow multiple (etag and last-modified) txid mechanisms.
Moved the actual YANG module code into proper module files that are included in the source document. These modules can be compiled as proper modules without any extraction tools.

Major changes in -01 since -00

Updated the text on numerous points in order to answer questions that appeared on the mailing list.
Changed the document structure into a general transaction id part and one etag specific part.
Renamed entag attribute to etag, prefix to txid, namespace to urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf-txid.
Set capability string to urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:txid:1.0
Changed YANG module name, namespace and prefix to match names above.
Harmonized/slightly adjusted etag value space with RFC 7232 and RFC 8040.
Removed all text discussing etag values provided by the client (although this is still an interesting idea, if you ask the author)
Clarified the etag attribute mechanism, especially when it comes to matching against non-versioned elements, its cascading upwards in the tree and secondary effects from when- and choice-statements.
Added a mechanism for returning the server assigned etag value in get-config and get-data.
Added section describing how the NETCONF discard-changes, copy-config, delete-config and commit operations work with respect to etags.
Added IANA Considerations section.
Removed all comments about open questions.

Normative References Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings.

Acknowledgments The author wishes to thank Benoit Claise for making this work happen, and the following individuals, who all provided helpful comments: Per Andersson, Kent Watsen, Andy Bierman, Robert Wilton, Qiufang Ma.