<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc2629 version 1.6.4 (Ruby 2.6.6) -->
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-richardson-emu-eap-onboarding-01" category="std" consensus="true" tocInclude="true" sortRefs="true" symRefs="true" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.13.1 -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="EAP-onboarding">EAP defaults for devices that need to onboard</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-richardson-emu-eap-onboarding-01"/>
    <author initials="A." surname="Dekok" fullname="Alan DeKok">
      <organization>FreeRADIUS</organization>
      <address>
        <email>aland@freeradius.org</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="M." surname="Richardson" fullname="Michael Richardson">
      <organization>Sandelman Software Works</organization>
      <address>
        <email>mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2022" month="July" day="24"/>
    <area>Internet</area>
    <workgroup>anima Working Group</workgroup>
    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <t>This document describes a method by which an unconfigured device can
use EAP to join a network on which further device onboarding, network
attestation or other remediation can be done.
While RFC 5216 supports EAP-TLS without a client certificate, that document defines no method by which unauthenticated EAP-TLS can be used.
This draft addresses that issue.
First, by defining the @eap.arpa domain, and second by showing how it
can be used to provide quarantined network access for onboarding unauthenticated devices.</t>
    </abstract>
    <note removeInRFC="true">
      <name>About This Document</name>
      <t>
        Status information for this document may be found at <eref target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-emu-eap-onboarding/"/>.
      </t>
      <t>
        Discussion of this document takes place on the
        anima Working Group mailing list (<eref target="mailto:anima@ietf.org"/>),
        which is archived at <eref target="https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/"/>.
      </t>
      <t>Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
        <eref target="https://github.com/mcr/eap-onboarding.git"/>.</t>
    </note>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section anchor="introduction">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t>There are a multitude of situations where a network device needs to join a new (wireless) network but where the device does not yet have the right credentials for that network.  As the device does not have credentials, it cannot access networks which typically require authentication.  However, since the device does not have network access, it cannot download a new configuration which contains updated credentials.</t>
      <t>The process by which a device acquires these credentials has become known as onboarding
<xref target="I-D.irtf-t2trg-secure-bootstrapping"/>.
There are many onboarding protocols, including <xref target="RFC8995"/>, <xref target="RFC9140"/>, <xref target="dpp"/>, CSA MATTER, and OPC UA Part 21.
Some of these protocols use WiFi Public frames, or provide for provisioning as part of EAP, such as <xref target="RFC7170"/>.
Other systems require pre-existing IP connectivity in order to configure credentials for a device, which causes a circular dependancy.</t>
      <t>This document defines a method where devices can use unauthenticated EAP in order to obtain network access, albeit in a captive portal <xref target="RFC8952"/>.
Once the device is in a captive portal, it has access to the full suite of Internet Protocol (IP) technologies, and can proceed with onboarding.
We believe that the method defined here is clearer, safer, and easier to implement and deploy than alternatives.
This method also allows for multiple onboarding technologies to co-exist, and for the technologies to evolve without requiring invasive upgrades to layer-2 infrastructure.</t>
      <t>The method detailed in this document uses the unauthenticated client mode of EAP-TLS.
While <xref target="RFC5216"/> defines EAP-TLS without a client certificate, that document defines no method by which unauthenticated EAP-TLS can be used.</t>
      <t>This draft addresses that issue.
First, by defining the @eap.arpa domain, and second by showing how it can be used to provid network access for onboarding unauthenticated devices.</t>
      <t>Note that this specification does not specify the exact method used for onboarding devices.
There are many possibilities, with some methods yet to be defined. Not all of them are enumerated here!</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="terminology">
      <name>Terminology</name>
      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED",
"MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they
appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="protocol-details">
      <name>Protocol Details</name>
      <t>The onboarding is divided into the following phases:</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Discovery - the supplicant determines that a network can do onboarding,</li>
        <li>Authentication - the supplicant connects to the network as an unauthenticated device,</li>
        <li>Authorization - the network provides limited connectivity to the device,</li>
        <li>Onboarding - the device uses standard IP protocols to perform onboarding,</li>
        <li>Full network access - the device has provisioned credentials, and can proceed with normal network access.</li>
      </ul>
      <section anchor="discovery">
        <name>Discovery</name>
        <t>The network should use 802.11u to signal that it can potentially perform onboarding, by using 802.11u and indicating that it supports the realm "eap.arpa".
When a supplicant which requires onboarding sees this realm, it knows that the network may be suitable for onboarding.</t>
        <t>Note that not all such networks are suitable for onboarding.
There may be multiple such networks available, and only one (or none) may be willing to onboard this particular device.
Further, the device does not necessarily trust any such network.</t>
        <t>There are situations where there may be many hundreds of networks which offer onboarding, and a supplicant device may need to try all of them until it finds a network to which it can successfully onboard.
An example of such a situation is in a large (dozens to hundreds of floors) apartment building in a downtown core, where radio signals may leak from adjacent units, other floors, and even across the street from adjacent buildings.
This document does not address this issue, but anticipates future work in 802.11u involving some filtering mechanism involving Bloom Filters.</t>
        <t>Supplicants MUST limit their actions in the onboarding network to the action of onboarding.
If this process cannot be completed, the device MUST disconnect from the onboarding network, and try again, usually by selecting a different network.
As soon as the device has been onboarded, the device MUST disconnect from the onboarding network, and use the provided configuration to authenticate and connect to a fully-capable network.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="authentication">
        <name>Authentication</name>
        <t>The supplicant presents itself as an unauthenticated peer, which is allowed by EAP-TLS <xref target="RFC5216"/> Section 2.1.1.
TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 <xref target="RFC9190"/> may be used, but TLS 1.3 or higher is RECOMMENDED.</t>
        <t>The supplicant uses an identity of onboarding@eap.arpa, and provides no TLS client certificate.  The use of the "eap.arpa" domain signals to the network that the device wishes to use unauthenticated EAP-TLS.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="authorization">
        <name>Authorization</name>
        <t>Upon receipt of a supplicant without any authentication, the AAA server returns instructions to the authenticator to place the new client into a quarantined network.
The exact method is network-dependent, but it is usually done with a dedicated VLAN which has limited network access.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="characteristics-of-quarantine-network">
        <name>Characteristics of Quarantine Network</name>
        <t>The quarantine network SHOULD be segregated at layer-two (ethernet), and should not permit ethernet frames to any destination other than a small set of specified routers.</t>
        <t>For some onboarding protocols such as <xref target="RFC8995"/>, only IPv6 Link-Local frames are needed.
Such a network MUST provide a Join Proxy as specified in <xref section="4" sectionFormat="comma" target="RFC8995"/>.</t>
        <t>For other onboarding protocols more capabilities may be needed, in particular there need for a DHCPv4 server may be critical for the device to believe it has connected correctly.
This is particularly the case where a normal "smartphone" or laptop system will onboard via a captive portal.</t>
        <t>Once on the quarantine network, device uses other protocols <xref target="RFC6876"/> to perform the onboarding action.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="captive-portal">
      <name>Captive Portal</name>
      <t>While we can impose no requirements on the rest of the network, captive portals <xref target="RFC8952"/> have been used for almost two decades.
The administration and operation of captive portals is typically within the authority of administrators who are responsible for network access.
As such, we can define additional behavior on, and requirements for, captive portals, so long as those changes materially benefit the network access administrator.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="privacy-considerations">
      <name>Privacy Considerations</name>
      <t>Devices should take care to hide all identifying information from the onboarding network.
Any identifying information MUST be sent encrypted via a method such as TLS.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>Devices using an onboarding network MUST assume that the network is untrusted.
All network traffic SHOULD be encrypted in order to prevent attackers from both eavesdropping, and from modifying any provisioning information.</t>
      <t>Similarly onboarding networks MUST assume that devices are untrusted, and could be malicious.
Networks MUST make provisions to prevent Denial of Service (DoS) attacks, such as when many devices attempt to connect at the same time.
Networks MUST limit network access to onboarding protocols only.
Networks SHOULD also limit the bandwidth used by any device which is being onboarded.
The configuration information is likely to be small (megabytes at most), and it is reasonable to require a second or two for this process to take place.</t>
      <t>Any device which cannot be onboarded within approximately 30 seconds SHOULD be disconnected.
Such a delay signals either a malicious device / network, or a misconfigured device / network.
If onboarding cannot be finished within a short timer, the device should choose another network.</t>
      <section anchor="use-of-eaparpa">
        <name>Use of eap.arpa</name>
        <t>Supplicants MUST use the "eap.arpa" domain only for onboarding and related activities.
Supplicant MUST use unauthenticated EAP-TLS.</t>
        <t>Networks which support onboarding via the "eap.arpa" domain MUST require that supplicants use unauthenticated EAP-TLS.
The use of EAP types MUST result in rejection, and a denial of all network access.</t>
        <t>The "eap.arpa" domain MUST NOT be used in any other context, such as in an NAI <xref target="RFC7542"/>, etc. in any other protocol.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>The special-use domain "eap.arpa" should be registered in the .arpa registry (<eref target="https://www.iana.org/domains/arpa">https://www.iana.org/domains/arpa</eref>).  No A, AAAA, or PTR records are requested.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="acknowledgements">
      <name>Acknowledgements</name>
      <t>TBD.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="changelog">
      <name>Changelog</name>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references>
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <reference anchor="BCP14" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174">
          <front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol  specifications.  This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the  defined special meanings.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5216" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5216">
          <front>
            <title>The EAP-TLS Authentication Protocol</title>
            <author fullname="D. Simon" initials="D." surname="Simon">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="B. Aboba" initials="B." surname="Aboba">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="R. Hurst" initials="R." surname="Hurst">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="March" year="2008"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP), defined in RFC 3748, provides support for multiple authentication methods.  Transport Layer Security (TLS) provides for mutual authentication, integrity-protected ciphersuite negotiation, and key exchange between two endpoints.  This document defines EAP-TLS, which includes support for certificate-based mutual authentication and key derivation.</t>
              <t>This document obsoletes RFC 2716.  A summary of the changes between this document and RFC 2716 is available in Appendix A.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5216"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5216"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9190" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9190">
          <front>
            <title>EAP-TLS 1.3: Using the Extensible Authentication Protocol with TLS 1.3</title>
            <author fullname="J. Preuß Mattsson" initials="J." surname="Preuß Mattsson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="M. Sethi" initials="M." surname="Sethi">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="February" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP), defined in RFC 3748, provides a standard mechanism for support of multiple authentication methods. This document specifies the use of EAP-TLS with TLS 1.3 while remaining backwards compatible with existing implementations of EAP-TLS. TLS 1.3 provides significantly improved security and privacy, and reduced latency when compared to earlier versions of TLS. EAP-TLS with TLS 1.3 (EAP-TLS 1.3) further improves security and privacy by always providing forward secrecy, never disclosing the peer identity, and by mandating use of revocation checking when compared to EAP-TLS with earlier versions of TLS. This document also provides guidance on authentication, authorization, and resumption for EAP-TLS in general (regardless of the underlying TLS version used). This document updates RFC 5216.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9190"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9190"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2119" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119">
          <front>
            <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
            <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="March" year="1997"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification.  These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents.  This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8174" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174">
          <front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol  specifications.  This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the  defined special meanings.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
      <references>
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC6876" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6876">
          <front>
            <title>A Posture Transport Protocol over TLS (PT-TLS)</title>
            <author fullname="P. Sangster" initials="P." surname="Sangster">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="N. Cam-Winget" initials="N." surname="Cam-Winget">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Salowey" initials="J." surname="Salowey">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="February" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies PT-TLS, a TLS-based Posture Transport (PT) protocol.  The PT-TLS protocol carries the Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA) message exchange under the protection of a Transport Layer Security (TLS) secured tunnel.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6876"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6876"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7030" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7030">
          <front>
            <title>Enrollment over Secure Transport</title>
            <author fullname="M. Pritikin" initials="M." role="editor" surname="Pritikin">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="P. Yee" initials="P." role="editor" surname="Yee">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="D. Harkins" initials="D." role="editor" surname="Harkins">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="October" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document profiles certificate enrollment for clients using Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) messages over a secure transport.  This profile, called Enrollment over Secure Transport (EST), describes a simple, yet functional, certificate management protocol targeting Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) clients that need to acquire client certificates and associated Certification Authority (CA) certificates.  It also supports client-generated public/private key pairs as well as key pairs generated by the CA.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7030"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7030"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7170" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7170">
          <front>
            <title>Tunnel Extensible Authentication Protocol (TEAP) Version 1</title>
            <author fullname="H. Zhou" initials="H." surname="Zhou">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="N. Cam-Winget" initials="N." surname="Cam-Winget">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Salowey" initials="J." surname="Salowey">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="S. Hanna" initials="S." surname="Hanna">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2014"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines the Tunnel Extensible Authentication Protocol (TEAP) version 1.  TEAP is a tunnel-based EAP method that enables secure communication between a peer and a server by using the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol to establish a mutually authenticated tunnel.  Within the tunnel, TLV objects are used to convey authentication-related data between the EAP peer and the EAP server.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7170"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7170"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7542" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7542">
          <front>
            <title>The Network Access Identifier</title>
            <author fullname="A. DeKok" initials="A." surname="DeKok">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2015"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In order to provide inter-domain authentication services, it is necessary to have a standardized method that domains can use to identify each other's users.  This document defines the syntax for the Network Access Identifier (NAI), the user identifier submitted by the client prior to accessing resources.  This document is a revised version of RFC 4282.  It addresses issues with international character sets and makes a number of other corrections to RFC 4282.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7542"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7542"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8952" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8952">
          <front>
            <title>Captive Portal Architecture</title>
            <author fullname="K. Larose" initials="K." surname="Larose">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="D. Dolson" initials="D." surname="Dolson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="H. Liu" initials="H." surname="Liu">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="November" year="2020"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes a captive portal architecture. Network provisioning protocols such as DHCP or Router Advertisements (RAs), an optional signaling protocol, and an HTTP API are used to provide the solution.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8952"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8952"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8995" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8995">
          <front>
            <title>Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)</title>
            <author fullname="M. Pritikin" initials="M." surname="Pritikin">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="M. Richardson" initials="M." surname="Richardson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="T. Eckert" initials="T." surname="Eckert">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="M. Behringer" initials="M." surname="Behringer">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="K. Watsen" initials="K." surname="Watsen">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies automated bootstrapping of an Autonomic Control Plane.  To do this, a Secure Key Infrastructure is bootstrapped.  This is done using manufacturer-installed X.509 certificates, in combination with a manufacturer's authorizing service, both online and offline.  We call this process the Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI) protocol. Bootstrapping a new device can occur when using a routable address and a cloud service, only link-local connectivity, or limited/disconnected networks. Support for deployment models with less stringent security requirements is included. Bootstrapping is complete when the cryptographic identity of the new key infrastructure is successfully deployed to the device.  The established secure connection can be used to deploy a locally issued certificate to the device as well.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8995"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8995"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9140" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9140">
          <front>
            <title>Nimble Out-of-Band Authentication for EAP (EAP-NOOB)</title>
            <author fullname="T. Aura" initials="T." surname="Aura">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="M. Sethi" initials="M." surname="Sethi">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="A. Peltonen" initials="A." surname="Peltonen">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="December" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) provides support for multiple authentication methods. This document defines the EAP-NOOB authentication method for nimble out-of-band (OOB) authentication and key derivation. The EAP method is intended for bootstrapping all kinds of Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices that have no preconfigured authentication credentials. The method makes use of a user-assisted, one-directional, out-of-band (OOB) message between the peer device and authentication server to authenticate the in-band key exchange. The device must have a nonnetwork input or output interface, such as a display, microphone, speaker, or blinking light, that can send or receive dynamically generated messages of tens of bytes in length.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9140"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9140"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="I-D.irtf-t2trg-secure-bootstrapping" target="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-irtf-t2trg-secure-bootstrapping-02.txt">
          <front>
            <title>Terminology and processes for initial security setup of IoT devices</title>
            <author fullname="Mohit Sethi">
              <organization>Aalto University</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Behcet Sarikaya">
              <organization>Denpel Informatique</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Dan Garcia-Carrillo">
              <organization>University of Oviedo</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="25" month="April" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>   This document provides an overview of terms that are commonly used
   when discussing the initial security setup of Internet of Things
   (IoT) devices.  This document also presents a brief but illustrative
   survey of protocols and standards available for initial security
   setup of IoT devices.  For each protocol, we identify the terminology
   used, the entities involved, the initial assumptions, the processes
   necessary for completetion, and the knowledge imparted to the IoT
   devices after the setup is complete.

              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-irtf-t2trg-secure-bootstrapping-02"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="dpp" target="https://www.wi-fi.org/downloads-registered-guest/Device_Provisioning_Protocol_Draft_Technical_Specification_Package_v0_0_23_0.zip/31255">
          <front>
            <title>Device Provisioning Protocol Specification</title>
            <author>
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date>n.d.</date>
          </front>
          <format type="pdf" target="https://github.com/kcdtv/wpa3/blob/master/Device_Provisioning_Protocol_Specification_v1.0.pdf"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
    </references>
  </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source:
H4sIAKsM3mIAA8Va3XLbuBW+51Ogzo3TWvJP7E3i6XRWayeNW8f2xk53euWB
SEjCmiS4BChFm8m79Fn6ZP3OAcAfSd7ptDPt7kUoEgTO73e+c+jRaJQ47XJ1
Lt5N7kSmZrLJnRUzU+PHUqfKCreQTpRKZcIZYcqpkXWWyOm0Vkt+axTu6XKe
ZCYtZYHdslrO3KjW6QJPrClHqmhGSla9xaOj4ySxTpbZo8xNiZdc3ahEVzVf
WXdydPT26CSRtZLn4qp0qi6VS1bzcyFLXUjxk6mfsI/4c22aKnladYtGl3R8
kkp3LqzLkqTS5wL/vRCpLEVjlZB1LddiX8+EzHOxVvalgMoLaRdioWqVCCib
ntMDXFpTu1rN7Dlv0RoJ5gjP14V/TD8T2biFqc+TZCR0iZuTsbhUT+YJC71t
JjmEuFR/5Vumhj7va6U+TS6vPt/jjiqkzqEjVmXfz/Cklplu7Bgr2z0/jsWn
1rbtxh/plsqHj/iAe+yl8gLn3puZW8GkbD3bHVek9R+0crPvbVw6TmWSlKYu
pNNLdY6lP1zcHZ+ei0/vL94cvz7FDVydnRx/d+4v3x6/PYLaupz1X8KD7968
jmteH706ipfHr9vLs9OTcPnm7Vl3+fas3fqU116NLse6drORO3H1fGRV2tRq
NDXGWVfLqkI40LKsqugfONHH9t4lx7K4q81SW21KChv8gI9NLu4rleqZRrTg
yR6/5zXwewhRZbNzsXCusueHh3PtFs10nJri8CnN3PJwVclXh9PcTA8LaRF/
h/6wx/5hj/Gwx8Fhj8vj8dEY23thZT1XiNi9eNRqtRqv9GimyfeHmVmVuZGZ
HdVqrukklY3mjbLut0/kXHh8UOmixLGbEtzJ9EnO1ePy6PHo8eTV49H4V10d
vjo+OTvbS5KlKhv24pxyLCQefoYQpV/fU9RwcGIV24aD6XCY7GM8ShC+o5GQ
U/JVip8PC20FIKMpVOmQVzat9RSII0WhkEOZmK7FaoFgFpS1ZWrKmZ7D4VnA
JsrmhLKZsAvZ+LPRJV4GAKwQ3MCq8PasqR2yOr7VSXUQ1ybSORiSTUJAYHh9
rQqVaX+TgGOqIG2pxslPC50riktB4S9sU1WACMto+HB9L1awg2kcZElzTbql
qnbe5urAA2pP7ZkuoXRptrRuSsISLOIXs3b7IAs0z8bBiORjIbOsVtZGzNbW
NhD2va6tO6Bd+SgKfWwqvoeDxrKuJESBO8sDGDkTyChTsgh2YVa0Fv8ITVja
nkmmrijUMiV+aWQtIWCJ29HuMkXZ8DWkM/WWMqG8jH1QFDrLcpUkLwjDa5M1
KVmdQgRhLgivEBRAXe0anGpmwuKKPWNhLF7Tnh/cTCXLDsJiJfZXulY5pHvZ
rp7CT34Hskp4NzPsEQdEd6gKS/+w1vMFfIkAJDVk7nUM9ZF3GwsxsTs34k16
rx7AqORIehYMFvawwftuXVG+5mvE4S+NJhU7A0JxnPXBrNRS1QewRpnuVoDP
HXqmf3QElWCfmGI+5r0cuOcQH1Y0Vcae62kxZg9RNLAGXb5GOWTKorNN7MAA
VGwRUcBRJZ5KiCHwu0clvn79N8D+27dxL0RQtNb9kKsCBJLGZZo3fPPr11Ba
vn078D+ouPgfqBt0cXE/ER8nDw/vPvmkuL27EJ8n4k7WTpwcj5N7khkx6HVq
T2Fi8ZN+r8VdM811KmY1yjIOR5DEfJnF61iFoHRF+2I7pDc82ZD5rJeMSiSp
eMtwZNcA/cK24VDBGuoLKgHtc3VHjioV8map3RoK49gMbyEBWuDcit3op4Po
a9lYBuBU12mTS8LMSpWZLNP1eBuwPXK1cO3TKPLGSLV2oNhAOjOl8NqKUZlP
FeKUUzeVFdEJQSgr8+jCsxO2zUbkQ8Id73DMU8SFXMO59M6sAfuzjXbsz0gf
O2qwf3X3UjgqnSY3c03OpIAg1TjmoQ5hfS/oUBwUwhqwz6ABaKBzgoG8xTKm
mCRomivELeWvnNE/tLeSVnvD6KLKFVua7sMRuVnTltAuJ0GZYtlQAcIJcKwh
SmtW3sGMmdimnxZ9fXx4+DDy53tIU1ur1NLkUCmWNh+EtJ0ulxAZj5pqDqrq
V+dyrerRCR4iCZCuwHPEX4CL1hpwfA5zwF9uEFmNr2HbsRPKaWF8EQgFMRZk
jguqyN++tcH5/yjJ/6OaLHbW5P+4DN8Y10YsxLd9mtjVE397zeKqL6Bx0UQs
xcZh7eYbGF0Za/VU59pxSnEKWQJVv5flsguNiHD5lBmLGyqUyFaPuwVvBnZa
oD1yIaV+lxCBeFB1oTly1z7cnhS8B7ixYu/j5/uHvQP/r7i55etP7378fPXp
3SVd33+YXF+3F0lYcf/h9vP1ZXfVvXlx+/Hju5tL/zLuisGtZO/j5O973ol7
t3cPV7c3k+u97XAnVby2mhAIuE4aSZtESswpgu7rn/84PkWU/w5hfnJ8/BZh
7n9QO4YfwN8QMqbM1+EnjLVOUC2BNAyMMCGgUTvmIABEiqmSzTdm87XYd8np
ab0Ne04lyTUVM5Iq4qghyOGaC5BVFm3g78WltqkBPVmLES8imoyyKDnDHHsp
pkVH3iimM9Pn6LTVZMB8tvcLpa/F9TYHrG8ddsV8u7Gp9a/9fePLoWZbketC
M/r0C2w4qbfXbWejUb8iMZrxoANPqVB3jIGyVtXUbW5q/J4q00YqD3alYtYy
iSEre6ZIcS+/uSmc/uJF5yrv7bgEsdHknNrizdHJ+Pi4IYmtnpfYx+OZR6EK
2MFnI+x2KETY1VgyTNyGBNRlxg5l8PN7tZ0U020l80LsRUzcI5hXVNp7jveo
HBhRnz8CNTm4tPX7MAEgnmm7qhzVLOSako94gJzmagPFBtBYBhRimtYSdkrg
Z9/22BfOaOvxxgZLpBq93UtfeFXsY68SFy/j+yud52ywNkW8jsQhdWRsFB+o
Mb7rPdjZFiCO4XxZaxzEwzZBuNwXatxvvra6LTdQit5dNCUqHUAWAL3RyZgZ
2M0gHkhJOQQElo82jKNGB+DoA36DAMvJiygIme1BBtb6c0IwQgtSjrhd2w6M
k0lJ9apgLjQLNLvTq6WNOQ1hxH5mflUl52dfr1luTI3eUZK5Gbqnjc49KtLL
1E05gtPU1MypyUg0votJY1lDsL4nNAcGRSz7WabMeErtqFNgou+PCXRwSSGf
1sb6pACXUiiOw7ejFJEMdkwm+jvQEB8sTEIOuPOl3j3VFWARTKEhjibYplAn
pir4HZgfpxSV6Jkm8kk/CzBEWWpb9Jb8ANEL8Z7XELbcty62gosuYylpotF9
pD6kuCAOakzPtfTELyQP9BPrahZiP3SfoaVFQKKphJ8B2YPg5/MzQjqGcW/D
3Qd723MEzpmHNbZhcCMSpnIqAtS7YTcKbbJ0mzXo/60x3M1uoPVUwZXhrP9W
NIJk5ztvX4qHnTvs1i95vh6EvekZNz7rEYgAQ1aX8qgFw1rrC0IvU8FOrCJ3
ImBVPnumxFaKkCekpfUdiWIOGxlzn6zfK+9gBBz+T+jx8fiE+mZ/+So26m/R
DkfUIcLpgzguogm+nlMG4cgeExtvKeG7XGQ9l0xU80FotTTc27rlAegHmOtv
NRBjIegAcopHq17VClS+BYANhtIWoxAJK20XvoV6pnf2DU90VMtdkuRzBQvW
wHVd8ThhWCdj+wOkHo6RfBxOJhMEdr3kqSdggLPS922cojERu1cN96hVLkP7
zeMjbxmmhXLXbJCr4bBv0O3ga+RnDdjBu5W6f9tmHk1ePY+hoUUWDPK368lN
CDNKscjUdnGci4WksTOwy0IBxvMfWwnFTRgEs4Cd5O1OgfkTTVDzWs35dLjO
N7pYI/YVgTfWvwxtmydPBEkVkV0n4oIwGOJMLKkFpBFOmD1zAfBNvrAFUw3F
7gz9GE6t4UiPru/hBAblXUOv4SgpTryYWlzdLb8T17p8Gl2bFFQuyEOVnqov
9bD3vkBG9Rmg4hBLir/QSBWdwpc1txCtaLjbnnbQpvUpzWlYWK/eTmkLQ/Mp
AqTQF8Y89xLRCK/PcjwBYa7gB1mXHy7ulqcxiMO76J4oWPN2qhGyjLstP6MJ
c6GAjoykNbLI5etQTAfsKvedb4omp5s7e169B3fVrlogTvcIinJZOVOFqR0T
t5ayLbXcmlDBQjzKMr4YbofgwaCf8JbszMdmpw9tAMheV7FRQ3whpXwQF+H0
Oz49CSOUFX9UodGTgYYAvECtC4b8IBsqgItA1wo31Mb2h3R+CM3lr50SgJIb
7EKJk6mUxkYeG2SGtlDTgJdDh9lwpcIvnLl5DLzTDcoJHgKZ8F9hA7T3NgWx
guMMxzr0AGZaHVn7JmpMfA4dRKv4WQRxKU3iwOdTBdU0E36f9ANzYc8tuxwg
YUVu/OQXItJQHNk+53gncPI0Q5U4a9ilhCZwoMvYd+x6KdO1uCBdsmAr9O2X
YRAbgMjJJ1LDzxoWnMcISV8BZ2vPYcOXW5j6NxgIcen1sy8yUjBMohKoMq3X
FWWVD/mA+RGZQikjoGjYV8+p4JtHWe7iiHygBKUtegPX+JAKSMkNDoHapNdT
w4AzVO8esHfC9sfT4DtLHtI4J9Mn4K43zRQJKBTi2ma14W8RYXxKDwuTBcvw
tKs/7++Ziugx6pVHlW3F7LZmcbROTmzVCt0++5ibMZR8bRrE781go4L838pi
+7pdqhJxR5lyD/gkjNm/NPcvg862+ypBIyXf7rWiOKBb5cJnBiaYwQVWkti6
UJuC+BZgI6yd2V0WqF71Ngje4jF320qIKSyw0hk8wvgCltmJ2JHQqaKtWwLu
8WbIm/uBrIlOPKl8HWZzvhrvF6j907Vj1QVhWCj3nq3USlogAyGKM92HuzjD
pSoExPPVqNe6EL1i9xCdQlxMNsXveptW/oh2ssIuXzShB2R9dRTOsr3I7jqL
XmnPFLhLS0uV5oIiu/iJAhx2GM+FtuDNNr7EH3bgcNWn0j3Bac4NbtvJTcBU
Ow6R4ZQiAFa6MASPsvS1btCkfPZUO7LsHY1m7JC2mThToI1Jtcfu3LM6P+LT
VJK6bbtdnyflN8O5R5hm9c8hGNwtFW8fA4az3fZU+s1ze70H/yXEulI27meb
nD+i1epnz8bi8CVrc15uTRpDw/SMkDTnjp8dyI/00ZU9RF+K1RfXwQU/FTeT
q/A58+z0hDiocul4+GbMd64GV5ObyVYl4AaOeKbMR6RrEKgnYoiaKdX1+Pcx
cbTgP6r4+2jq9//Y/xMbLUsZ/sKG9rSHtPhPL9HU3RgxOaDeaMKxf/fwiRos
/pTg+cMv9Oc3/MkH7VhK48VcZXNf/iHzD5eeanGBz808/AXMFKCaJP8CgIWH
33wnAAA=

-->

</rfc>
