<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc2629 version 1.6.4 (Ruby 2.6.6) -->
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-richardson-emu-eap-onboarding-02" category="std" consensus="true" tocInclude="true" sortRefs="true" symRefs="true" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.13.1 -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="EAP-onboarding">EAP defaults for devices that need to onboard</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-richardson-emu-eap-onboarding-02"/>
    <author initials="A." surname="Dekok" fullname="Alan DeKok">
      <organization>FreeRADIUS</organization>
      <address>
        <email>aland@freeradius.org</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="M." surname="Richardson" fullname="Michael Richardson">
      <organization>Sandelman Software Works</organization>
      <address>
        <email>mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2023" month="February" day="04"/>
    <area>Internet</area>
    <workgroup>anima Working Group</workgroup>
    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <t>This document describes a method by which an unconfigured device can
use EAP to join a network on which further device onboarding, network
attestation or other remediation can be done.
While RFC 5216 supports EAP-TLS without a client certificate, that document defines no method by which unauthenticated EAP-TLS can be used.
This draft addresses that issue.
First, by defining the @eap.arpa domain, and second by showing how it
can be used to provide quarantined network access for onboarding unauthenticated devices.</t>
    </abstract>
    <note removeInRFC="true">
      <name>About This Document</name>
      <t>
        Status information for this document may be found at <eref target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-emu-eap-onboarding/"/>.
      </t>
      <t>
        Discussion of this document takes place on the
        anima Working Group mailing list (<eref target="mailto:anima@ietf.org"/>),
        which is archived at <eref target="https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/"/>.
      </t>
      <t>Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
        <eref target="https://github.com/mcr/eap-onboarding.git"/>.</t>
    </note>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section anchor="introduction">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t>There are a multitude of situations where a network device needs to join a new (wireless) network but where the device does not yet have the right credentials for that network.  As the device does not have credentials, it cannot access networks which typically require authentication.  However, since the device does not have network access, it cannot download a new configuration which contains updated credentials.</t>
      <t>The process by which a device acquires these credentials has become known as onboarding
<xref target="I-D.irtf-t2trg-secure-bootstrapping"/>.
There are many onboarding protocols, including <xref target="RFC8995"/>, <xref target="RFC9140"/>, <xref target="dpp"/>, CSA MATTER, and OPC UA Part 21.
Some of these protocols use WiFi Public frames, or provide for provisioning as part of EAP, such as <xref target="RFC7170"/>.
Other systems require pre-existing IP connectivity in order to configure credentials for a device, which causes a circular dependancy.</t>
      <t>This document defines a method where devices can use unauthenticated EAP in order to obtain network access, albeit in a captive portal <xref target="RFC8952"/>.
Once the device is in a captive portal, it has access to the full suite of Internet Protocol (IP) technologies, and can proceed with onboarding.
We believe that the method defined here is clearer, safer, and easier to implement and deploy than alternatives.
This method also allows for multiple onboarding technologies to co-exist, and for the technologies to evolve without requiring invasive upgrades to layer-2 infrastructure.</t>
      <t>The method detailed in this document uses the unauthenticated client mode of EAP-TLS.
While <xref target="RFC5216"/> defines EAP-TLS without a client certificate, that document defines no method by which unauthenticated EAP-TLS can be used.</t>
      <t>This draft addresses that issue.
First, by defining the @eap.arpa domain, and second by showing how it can be used to provid network access for onboarding unauthenticated devices.</t>
      <t>Note that this specification does not specify the exact method used for onboarding devices!
There are many possibilities, with some methods yet to be defined.
Not all of them are enumerated here.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="terminology">
      <name>Terminology</name>
      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED",
"MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they
appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
      <t>The term <em>supplicant</em> is used to refer to the network device which is attempting to do EAP-TLS.</t>
      <t>The term <em>pledge</em> (from <xref target="RFC8995"/>) is used to refer to the network device which has successfully performed unauthenticated client mode EAP-TLS, and now has access to a network on which is may perform onboarding.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="protocol-details">
      <name>Protocol Details</name>
      <t>The onboarding is divided into the following phases:</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Discovery - the supplicant determines that a network can do onboarding,</li>
        <li>Authentication - the supplicant connects to the network as an unauthenticated device,</li>
        <li>Authorization - the network provides limited connectivity to the device/pledge,</li>
        <li>Onboarding - the device/pledge uses standard IP protocols to perform onboarding,</li>
        <li>Full network access - the device has provisioned credentials, and can proceed with normal network access.</li>
      </ul>
      <section anchor="discovery">
        <name>Discovery</name>
        <t>The network should use 802.11u to signal that it can potentially perform onboarding, by using 802.11u and indicating that it supports the realm "eap.arpa".</t>
        <t>When a supplicant which requires onboarding sees this realm, it knows that the network may be suitable for onboarding.</t>
        <t>Note that not all such networks are suitable for onboarding using the technologies that a supplicant has.
Some networks might have only a captive portal, intended for human use.
This is the "coffee shop" case.</t>
        <t>There may be multiple such networks available, and only one (or none) may be willing to onboard this particular device.
Further, the device does not necessarily trust any such network.</t>
        <t>There are situations where there may be many hundreds of networks which offer onboarding, and a supplicant device may need to try all of them until it finds a network to which it can successfully onboard.
An example of such a situation is in a large (dozens to hundreds of floors) apartment building in a downtown core, where radio signals may leak from adjacent units, reflect off glass windows, come from other floors, and even cross the street from adjacent buildings.
This document does not address this issue, but anticipates future work in 802.11u, perhaps  involving some filtering mechanism using Bloom Filters.</t>
        <t>Supplicants MUST limit their actions in the onboarding network to the action of onboarding.
If this process cannot be completed, the device MUST disconnect from the onboarding network, and try again, usually by selecting a different network.</t>
        <t>As soon as the device has been onboarded, the device MUST disconnect from the onboarding network, and use the provided configuration to authenticate and connect to a fully-capable network.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="authentication">
        <name>Authentication</name>
        <t>The supplicant presents itself as an unauthenticated peer, which is allowed by EAP-TLS <xref target="RFC5216"/> Section 2.1.1.
TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 <xref target="RFC9190"/> may be used, but TLS 1.3 or higher is RECOMMENDED.</t>
        <t>The supplicant uses an identity of onboarding@eap.arpa, and provides no TLS client certificate.  The use of the "eap.arpa" domain signals to the network that the device wishes to use unauthenticated EAP-TLS.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="authorization">
        <name>Authorization</name>
        <t>Upon receipt of a supplicant without any authentication, the AAA server returns instructions to the authenticator to place the new client into the quarantined or captive portal network.
The exact method is network-dependent, but it is usually done with a dedicated VLAN which has limited network access.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="characteristics-of-the-quarantine-network">
        <name>Characteristics of the Quarantine Network</name>
        <t>The quarantine network SHOULD be segregated at layer-two (ethernet), and should not permit ethernet frames to any destination other than a small set of specified routers.</t>
        <t>Specifically, the layer infrastructure should prevent one pledge from attempting to connect to another pledge.</t>
        <t>For some onboarding protocols such as <xref target="RFC8995"/>, only IPv6 Link-Local frames are needed.
Such a network MUST provide a Join Proxy as specified in <xref section="4" sectionFormat="comma" target="RFC8995"/>.</t>
        <t>For other onboarding protocols more capabilities may be needed, in particular there need for a DHCPv4 server may be critical for the device to believe it has connected correctly.
This is particularly the case where a normal "smartphone" or laptop system will onboard via a captive portal.</t>
        <t>Once on the quarantine network, device uses other protocols <xref target="RFC6876"/> to perform the onboarding action.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="captive-portal">
      <name>Captive Portal</name>
      <t>While this document imposes no requirements on the rest of the network, captive portals <xref target="RFC8952"/> have been used for almost two decades.
The administration and operation of captive portals is typically within the authority of administrators who are responsible for network access.
As such, this document defines additional behavior on, and requirements for, captive portals, so long as those changes materially benefit the network access administrator.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="privacy-considerations">
      <name>Privacy Considerations</name>
      <t>Devices should take care to hide all identifying information from the onboarding network.
Any identifying information MUST be sent encrypted via a method such as TLS.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>Devices using an onboarding network MUST assume that the network is untrusted.
All network traffic SHOULD be encrypted in order to prevent attackers from both eavesdropping, and from modifying any provisioning information.</t>
      <t>Similarly onboarding networks MUST assume that devices are untrusted, and could be malicious.
Networks MUST make provisions to prevent Denial of Service (DoS) attacks, such as when many devices attempt to connect at the same time.</t>
      <t>Networks MUST limit network access to onboarding protocols only.</t>
      <t>Networks SHOULD also limit the bandwidth used by any device which is being onboarded.</t>
      <t>The configuration information is likely to be small (megabytes at most), and it is reasonable to require a second or two for this process to take place.</t>
      <t>Any device which cannot be onboarded within approximately 30 seconds SHOULD be disconnected.
Such a delay signals either a malicious device / network, or a misconfigured device / network.
If onboarding cannot be finished within a short timer, the device should choose another network.</t>
      <section anchor="use-of-eaparpa">
        <name>Use of eap.arpa</name>
        <t>Supplicants MUST use the "eap.arpa" domain only for onboarding and related activities.
Supplicant MUST use unauthenticated EAP-TLS.</t>
        <t>Networks which support onboarding via the "eap.arpa" domain MUST require that supplicants use unauthenticated EAP-TLS.
The use of other EAP types MUST result in rejection, and a denial of all network access.</t>
        <t>The "eap.arpa" domain MUST NOT be used in any other context, such as in an NAI <xref target="RFC7542"/>, etc. in any other protocol.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>The special-use domain "eap.arpa" should be registered in the .arpa registry (<eref target="https://www.iana.org/domains/arpa">https://www.iana.org/domains/arpa</eref>).  No A, AAAA, or PTR records are requested.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="acknowledgements">
      <name>Acknowledgements</name>
      <t>TBD.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="changelog">
      <name>Changelog</name>
      <t>01 to 02: minor edits.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references>
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <reference anchor="BCP14" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174">
          <front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol  specifications.  This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the  defined special meanings.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC5216" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5216">
          <front>
            <title>The EAP-TLS Authentication Protocol</title>
            <author fullname="D. Simon" initials="D." surname="Simon">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="B. Aboba" initials="B." surname="Aboba">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="R. Hurst" initials="R." surname="Hurst">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="March" year="2008"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP), defined in RFC 3748, provides support for multiple authentication methods.  Transport Layer Security (TLS) provides for mutual authentication, integrity-protected ciphersuite negotiation, and key exchange between two endpoints.  This document defines EAP-TLS, which includes support for certificate-based mutual authentication and key derivation.</t>
              <t>This document obsoletes RFC 2716.  A summary of the changes between this document and RFC 2716 is available in Appendix A.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5216"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5216"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9190" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9190">
          <front>
            <title>EAP-TLS 1.3: Using the Extensible Authentication Protocol with TLS 1.3</title>
            <author fullname="J. Preuß Mattsson" initials="J." surname="Preuß Mattsson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="M. Sethi" initials="M." surname="Sethi">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="February" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP), defined in RFC 3748, provides a standard mechanism for support of multiple authentication methods. This document specifies the use of EAP-TLS with TLS 1.3 while remaining backwards compatible with existing implementations of EAP-TLS. TLS 1.3 provides significantly improved security and privacy, and reduced latency when compared to earlier versions of TLS. EAP-TLS with TLS 1.3 (EAP-TLS 1.3) further improves security and privacy by always providing forward secrecy, never disclosing the peer identity, and by mandating use of revocation checking when compared to EAP-TLS with earlier versions of TLS. This document also provides guidance on authentication, authorization, and resumption for EAP-TLS in general (regardless of the underlying TLS version used). This document updates RFC 5216.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9190"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9190"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2119" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119">
          <front>
            <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
            <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="March" year="1997"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification.  These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents.  This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8174" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174">
          <front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol  specifications.  This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the  defined special meanings.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
      <references>
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC6876" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6876">
          <front>
            <title>A Posture Transport Protocol over TLS (PT-TLS)</title>
            <author fullname="P. Sangster" initials="P." surname="Sangster">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="N. Cam-Winget" initials="N." surname="Cam-Winget">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Salowey" initials="J." surname="Salowey">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="February" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies PT-TLS, a TLS-based Posture Transport (PT) protocol.  The PT-TLS protocol carries the Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA) message exchange under the protection of a Transport Layer Security (TLS) secured tunnel.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6876"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6876"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7030" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7030">
          <front>
            <title>Enrollment over Secure Transport</title>
            <author fullname="M. Pritikin" initials="M." role="editor" surname="Pritikin">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="P. Yee" initials="P." role="editor" surname="Yee">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="D. Harkins" initials="D." role="editor" surname="Harkins">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="October" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document profiles certificate enrollment for clients using Certificate Management over CMS (CMC) messages over a secure transport.  This profile, called Enrollment over Secure Transport (EST), describes a simple, yet functional, certificate management protocol targeting Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) clients that need to acquire client certificates and associated Certification Authority (CA) certificates.  It also supports client-generated public/private key pairs as well as key pairs generated by the CA.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7030"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7030"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7170" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7170">
          <front>
            <title>Tunnel Extensible Authentication Protocol (TEAP) Version 1</title>
            <author fullname="H. Zhou" initials="H." surname="Zhou">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="N. Cam-Winget" initials="N." surname="Cam-Winget">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Salowey" initials="J." surname="Salowey">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="S. Hanna" initials="S." surname="Hanna">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2014"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines the Tunnel Extensible Authentication Protocol (TEAP) version 1.  TEAP is a tunnel-based EAP method that enables secure communication between a peer and a server by using the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol to establish a mutually authenticated tunnel.  Within the tunnel, TLV objects are used to convey authentication-related data between the EAP peer and the EAP server.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7170"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7170"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7542" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7542">
          <front>
            <title>The Network Access Identifier</title>
            <author fullname="A. DeKok" initials="A." surname="DeKok">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2015"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In order to provide inter-domain authentication services, it is necessary to have a standardized method that domains can use to identify each other's users.  This document defines the syntax for the Network Access Identifier (NAI), the user identifier submitted by the client prior to accessing resources.  This document is a revised version of RFC 4282.  It addresses issues with international character sets and makes a number of other corrections to RFC 4282.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7542"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7542"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8952" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8952">
          <front>
            <title>Captive Portal Architecture</title>
            <author fullname="K. Larose" initials="K." surname="Larose">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="D. Dolson" initials="D." surname="Dolson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="H. Liu" initials="H." surname="Liu">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="November" year="2020"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes a captive portal architecture. Network provisioning protocols such as DHCP or Router Advertisements (RAs), an optional signaling protocol, and an HTTP API are used to provide the solution.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8952"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8952"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8995" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8995">
          <front>
            <title>Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)</title>
            <author fullname="M. Pritikin" initials="M." surname="Pritikin">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="M. Richardson" initials="M." surname="Richardson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="T. Eckert" initials="T." surname="Eckert">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="M. Behringer" initials="M." surname="Behringer">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="K. Watsen" initials="K." surname="Watsen">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies automated bootstrapping of an Autonomic Control Plane.  To do this, a Secure Key Infrastructure is bootstrapped.  This is done using manufacturer-installed X.509 certificates, in combination with a manufacturer's authorizing service, both online and offline.  We call this process the Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI) protocol. Bootstrapping a new device can occur when using a routable address and a cloud service, only link-local connectivity, or limited/disconnected networks. Support for deployment models with less stringent security requirements is included. Bootstrapping is complete when the cryptographic identity of the new key infrastructure is successfully deployed to the device.  The established secure connection can be used to deploy a locally issued certificate to the device as well.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8995"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8995"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9140" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9140">
          <front>
            <title>Nimble Out-of-Band Authentication for EAP (EAP-NOOB)</title>
            <author fullname="T. Aura" initials="T." surname="Aura">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="M. Sethi" initials="M." surname="Sethi">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="A. Peltonen" initials="A." surname="Peltonen">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="December" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) provides support for multiple authentication methods. This document defines the EAP-NOOB authentication method for nimble out-of-band (OOB) authentication and key derivation. The EAP method is intended for bootstrapping all kinds of Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices that have no preconfigured authentication credentials. The method makes use of a user-assisted, one-directional, out-of-band (OOB) message between the peer device and authentication server to authenticate the in-band key exchange. The device must have a nonnetwork input or output interface, such as a display, microphone, speaker, or blinking light, that can send or receive dynamically generated messages of tens of bytes in length.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9140"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9140"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="I-D.irtf-t2trg-secure-bootstrapping">
          <front>
            <title>Terminology and processes for initial security setup of IoT devices</title>
            <author fullname="Mohit Sethi" initials="M." surname="Sethi">
              <organization>Aalto University</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Behcet Sarikaya" initials="B." surname="Sarikaya">
              <organization>Denpel Informatique</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Dan Garcia-Carrillo" initials="D." surname="Garcia-Carrillo">
              <organization>University of Oviedo</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="26" month="November" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>   This document provides an overview of terms that are commonly used
   when discussing the initial security setup of Internet of Things
   (IoT) devices.  This document also presents a brief but illustrative
   survey of protocols and standards available for initial security
   setup of IoT devices.  For each protocol, we identify the terminology
   used, the entities involved, the initial assumptions, the processes
   necessary for completetion, and the knowledge imparted to the IoT
   devices after the setup is complete.

              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-irtf-t2trg-secure-bootstrapping-03"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="dpp" target="https://www.wi-fi.org/downloads-registered-guest/Device_Provisioning_Protocol_Draft_Technical_Specification_Package_v0_0_23_0.zip/31255">
          <front>
            <title>Device Provisioning Protocol Specification</title>
            <author>
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date>n.d.</date>
          </front>
          <format type="pdf" target="https://github.com/kcdtv/wpa3/blob/master/Device_Provisioning_Protocol_Specification_v1.0.pdf"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
    </references>
  </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source:
H4sIABez3mMAA8Va3XLbyLG+x1NMtDdSjkj92N5dq1LJciU7qxxbViz5bOVK
NQSG5KwADBYDkOZu+V3Os5wny9fdM/ghpa2cpCqxLwQSg5n+/frrBieTSdLY
JjcX6s3sVmVmodu88WrhanxY29R41ax0o0pjMtU45cq503WW6Pm8Nmt+ahK+
s+UyyVxa6gK7ZbVeNJPapivc8a6cmKKdGF0NFk9Oz5PEN7rMHnTuSjzU1K1J
bFXzlW/OT09fY42ujb5Q12Vj6tI0yWZ5oXRpC61+dPUj9lF/rl1bJY+bftHk
io5PUt1cKN9kSVLZC4V/X6lUl6r1Rum61lt1aBdK57naGn+koPJK+5Vamdok
CsqmF3QDl97VTW0W/oK36IwEc4T720Ju08dEt83K1RdJMlG2xJezqboyj+4R
C8U2sxxCXJn/5q9cDX3e1sZ8nF1df7rDN6bQNoeOWJV9t8CdWme29VOs7PZ8
P1UfO9t2G7+nr0w+vsUH3GEvkxc4984tmg1Mytbz/XFFWv+XNc3iOx+XTlOd
JKWrC93YtbnA0u8vb89eXqiPby+/PfvmJb7A1avzs68v5PL12etTqG3LxfAh
3Pj622/imm9OX5zGy7NvustXL8/D5bevX/WXr191W7/ktdeTq6mtm8WkOW/q
5cSbtK3NZO5c45taVxXCgZZlVUV/4ESJ7YMrjmV1W7u19daVFDb4AB+7XN1V
JrULi2jBnQN+TjSQPZSqssWFWjVN5S9OTpa2WbXzaeqKk8c0a9Ynm0q/OJnn
bn5SaI/4O5HDHoaHPcTDHkaHPazPpqdTbC/C6nppELEH8ajNZjPd2MnCku9P
Mrcpc6czP6nN0tJJJpssW+Ob3z6Rc+Hh3qSrEsfuSnCr00e9NA/r04fTh/MX
D6fTX2x18uLs/NWrgyRZm7JlLy4px0Li4WMIUfr0HUUNBydWsW04mE7GyT7F
rQThO5koPSdfpfh4v7JeATLawpQN8sqntZ0DcbQqDHIoU/Ot2qwQzIqytkxd
ubBLODwL2ETZnFA2E3YhG39ytsTDAIANghtYFZ5etHWDrI5P9VIdx7WJbhoY
kk1CQOB4fW0Kk1n5koBjbiBtaabJjyubG4pLReGvfFtVgAjPaHj/7k5tYAfX
NpAlzS3plpq6EZubYwHUgdoLW0Lp0u1p3ZaEJVjED2bd9kEWaJ5NgxHJx0pn
WW28j5htvW8h7Ftb++aYduWjKPSxqfoODprqutIQBe4sj2HkTCGjXMki+JXb
0Fr8UZawtDuTTF1RqGVG/dzqWkPAEl9Hu+sUZUNqSG/qPWVCeZlKUBQ2y3KT
JF8Rhtcua1OyOoUIwlwRXiEogLq2aXGqWyiPK/aMh7F4TXd+cDOVLD8Ki406
3Nja5JDuqFs9h59kB7JKeDZz7JEGiN6gKqzlZm2XK/gSAUhq6Fx0DPWRd5sq
NfNPbsSbDB49hlHJkXQvGCzs4YP3m21F+ZpvEYc/t5ZU7A0IxXHWD25j1qY+
hjXK9GkF+NyxZ4ZHR1AJ9okpJjEvcuC7BvHhVVtl7LmBFlP2EEUDa9Dna5RD
pyw628SPDEDFFhEFHDXqsYQYCp8HVOLXX/8BsP/yZToIERSt7TDkqgCBpHGZ
5i1/+euvobR8+XIsH6i4yAfUDbq4vJup97P7+zcfJSk+3F6qTzN1q+tGnZ9N
kzuSGTEoOnWnMLH40b616rad5zZVixplGYcjSGK+LOJ1rEJQuqJ9sR3SG55s
yXxeJKMSSSp+YDjyW4B+4btwqGAN8xmVgPa5viVHlQZ5s7bNFgrj2AxPIQE6
4NyL3ein4+hr3XoG4NTWaZtrwszKlJku0+10H7AFuTq4ljSKvDFSrSdQbCSd
m1N47cWozucGccqpm+qK6IQilNV5dOGrc7bNTuRDwiee4ZiniAu5hnPpmUUL
9udb27A/I33sqcHh9e2Raqh0utwtLTmTAoJU45iHOoT1g6BDcTAIa8A+gwag
gc4JBhKLZUwxSdA0N4hbyl+9oD+0t9HeimFsUeWGLU3fwxG529KW0C4nQZli
+VABwglwrCNK6zbiYMZMbDNMi6E+Eh4SRnK+QJrZW2XWLodKsbRJENJ2tlxD
ZNxqqyWoqqzO9dbUk3PcRBIgXYHniL8AF5014Pgc5oC/mlFktVLD9mMnlNPC
SREIBTEWZI4LqshfvnTB+Z8oyf+mmqyerMn/dBm+cU0XsRDfD2liX0/k6y2L
az6DxkUTsRQ7h4XNf7eL0ZXz3s5tbhtOKU4hT6Aqe3kuu9CICJekzJTE415N
cLfgzcBOC7RHTUgpKAECcW/qwnLkbiXcHg28B7jx6uD9p7v7g2P5q24+8PXH
N3/9dP3xzRVd3/0we/euu0jCirsfPnx6d9Vf9U9efnj//s3NlTyMb9Xoq+Tg
/exvB+LEgw+399cfbmbvDvbDnVQRbS0hEHCdNNI+iZSYUwTd1//979lLRPnv
EObnZ2evEebygdoxfAD+hpBxZb4NH2GsbYJqCaRhYIQJAY22YQ4CQKSYKjvz
3XPm14V6IFKLIgZy90BQFYMMja6gEwXADuOSFMFiYtNFxXUJKzPXJ+rgAKBS
hsZDHS5qV0CRP3V1+ej/dyDBOsomRTvhOcLL1NTA4fnfwo8gkxgMBGSnPDzR
RxDM6m77Eegj7rqiccW45kXXQTaQyy2xAHJnLECOsJrJCo43Hv3z79WV9akD
r9uqCS/qXUGYyeEd8aSXksAgc8PmhraajSjj/n6BM/hdA5MpymfAotvY1faX
4b7x4UB2vMptYdnsQ2YSTpK9TiQKeMsPvakm+0ukKPC8CIuI7/TEi8Bvzym8
51sq8DuIONycnd4RsjG5fabW80hkd1OKgK96x4nv4xKkWJszQqpvT8+nZ2ct
SeztssQ+UhYEzCtAMJ+dPxVlXC9aT/aJ25CAtszYvVxDZK+uIeWuxei8UAex
tBxA1B/hU4TOIA4kwAOzHPJwVB+ONetlIyZSxNd9z26inpQcc8N8Ss9zs1MN
RiWmDGjOdLdrfAgIn3k6KL7PTCQLBqrAo4Gid/sW3LhxK8TI+AQ7BPCWWahg
q7YQ7hq4lRVDHqRusTCG3FkdYAcf+AxXNda8Y1s7aq2BB6TTAJwRbOoQZ5W4
OIrPb2yeB9AMmovlqUOwkY9T2IJByEzj+MmmD8mGmNS1xUE8SlVUdYdCTYet
9V4v3YyUomdXbQkegxKK8rvTp5JR6lGYkpJ6jFosH20YB8kN0G1YzlvEfU6x
hXKf+QGuYW1AX8mREdKHU6fJrCQ2UjDTXYQmqterawpyGrGpw8z9YkqGjaFe
i9y52h8pTebmwjxvbS7QTQ9Tr9xQsUxdzR0TGYmGszGXpTyA0z8qrmk6+0mn
zGdL2wBOUMpywCBZTC1zDSgC8mNX3OI2mB+S0ZPIEjqCNbI1rZ2XMASbNqBH
4xOipLEd6LlsjIlARCWgmIYe8+yDpjeprYDv4IotsXTFdofKAWWOCYtWuvKK
uD66AIYFFthSI0IfC+SkLq0vQp5+D/kL9ZbvEzjedcHgFZMvLg2kj0UXmkrw
MTEalcxBENAdWUi+GsLK9SJkSZhChNEGQhdWRUSgAo3ShM/PCKq5Koklnz5Y
HMCxumQ+3vqW0ZnIuCFncg+P3SgJyN59fs1QrZzjscZOvZkbODQc9q/KRkWl
kRGMUIvxCIeIzKCES0ULezPJ4TyaAA4Zc3vpUc3G3EFK2iCpQVO9IX8itk2+
eIYyVIZAqmeGRHcMNzOxdRp2bXdGPIy4w/+Ebp9Nz2mAIpcv4sTm9SlWB4Ai
piixHBcRhgPykUc4ckDJp3tKyLgDAMFFH+xkFFtdPya27ngNGkNu+vY6yalS
dAA5RYBtUHdDT9dhxQ7j6qpp5LbWr6SXfmaIEgh1cFTHxZLkUwUL1igBtuK5
0rjQxz4YoD6eJ0oczmYzRHa95vE30IDTUhp4ztGYif2jjtl5leswh+E5olim
o7nDMTHW78xzuqi7320qbTcVncggCruKq2k05Lt0pLG8sDOaaGXBSP/zbnYz
6BEiG32KuV2uNL2TAJh5KOWj9/7aya1uwpsCFrLXp9sttIbEf8yyNkuWAC6V
SQjWqEND0I71R6GvF1pIWFURqW9UXBAmh5yhJc0IaMYXXk5weZApkPIFcyjD
bg4NO06t4eAAu7GJh5HEvyzOzlgmSoKMXpPbyJiBdEuVGbVzQ/goRRxZjPPe
wrlcGZ6awo5nm3EEy2zo+nb9tXpny8fJOwdho/5ETogwUP9/JzU9mpuBMk5V
tfoLzfjRgX3eck/bmQLfdqcdd/DykgaHLKzI/6S0haOBKQFjGFREvBGJiDMO
iZlwJqY3Mlm9+uHydv0yJlN4Fu08JU3ejdlCtnP7L0PDMKgMZmZEr5HNTb7t
6Wh/bi6jGGKj/YsQ6VAOEB51U63gzgPKuhxZ56owRmau2bHMtdV7pBgW4tmq
K3dSuC9AQXgG0RAJnfnY7PTmF0A96M92aplUdO6fL8Ppt3x6EmZ640mJLSrn
BYBDr1JwCQoyoiI1MXU7Icda+eH0WFoCLsfd+Ao9jsMulLCZSWmeKbikM7Td
lt48cAgxka9M+IQzd4+hpqF7g0PQFNiN/DwglJrBpqB7cKDjmIcewHBvYxu0
i1gzyaXjHet0A/kssyQWYmBuoKLlTkpAZ2Q27L1nn2MksMqdvJqAqPTWBmiz
5PgngBT+Y0ocNm7/Qns90ilMRuxap1t1STplwWY+Sa7Cm4IAP41+pECWYdiK
8xohKpV5sRUaHn5aAJP/BjOidmD77IOMHAzTMJkp03pbUZZJCoS6E5EqlFgC
jpZ99pwKwnp1+RR55QPB9uGk/Z6ZiljJPRqB3GwwrYABF4DuQWHphR2+P4mo
DZTW6SNwX0wzR0Iqg/j2We34ZVmY79PNwmXBMjyOHb6QGpiKCghqpqDMvmJ+
X7P47oec2KkV5ijsY+4nQUWsaxHHN6ONCvJ/J4sf6nZlSsQdZcwd4JQw5/DK
3R0FnX3/2oxmntKxdqJI8RpWruACr0lsW1DhGksizclOXDfu6TpBBWy4Q/AX
v4npuhw1hw02NoNPGGnAf3she3o8N7R31xoEvjqm9MNYtsRqHk2+DfNjIQSH
BejHfNuw9orgLDAOIU210R7gQODSuP7lcnzPQIUJ4CcFatBWEZVjDxHTo/5m
V/6+7+oUiMCnK+zy2RKAQNYXp+EsPwjuvukZVPvMgK90jNlYrjG6D6EowEkP
91x7C95s59ciJz0+XA9Z/kBwehcD2t3LTdhUNxwl41lLwKx05QghIxEa9U+f
pAuIDcATTXBs3vabBGZFOxMwge9ciKVMUy1Vp37bftfn+4Wb8fQmjAqH5xAS
Pi0Vbx8DhhPeD1T6zXMHbZGYin+zs62Mj7v6NufXvbX5SWhaHCRlXfLrvWFu
yJBnRKU3MvEFGXmTfh7Ah9NvGsznpscNvqtuZtfhxfurl+dETk2TTsdPxrzn
snA9u5ntlQTuMImA6nxCGgeBBiKG2JlToY+/5IrDD3n9J9/XW3X4h+GPwawu
dfgtGO3pT2jxH4/Qdd44NTum5m3GGXB7/5E6QH7pJYTiZ/qhGCMK+sWUBrjM
2ZkHQObvr4SDcaXP3TJJTs8o40/PLxS9TasVuqom/lpnDtBNkr8De4sG1z0q
AAA=

-->

</rfc>
