<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc version 1.6.39 (Ruby 3.2.2) -->
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-richardson-nasr-terminology-00" category="std" consensus="true" tocInclude="true" sortRefs="true" symRefs="true" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.19.1 -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="nasr-names">Terminology and Use cases for Secured Routing Infrastructure</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-richardson-nasr-terminology-00"/>
    <author initials="M." surname="Richardson" fullname="Michael Richardson">
      <organization>Sandelman Software Works</organization>
      <address>
        <email>mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="C." surname="Liu" fullname="Chunchi (Peter) Liu">
      <organization>Huawei Technologies</organization>
      <address>
        <email>liuchunchi@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2024" month="February" day="26"/>
    <area>Internet</area>
    <workgroup>anima Working Group</workgroup>
    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <?line 44?>

<t>This document collects terminology and use cases for Secured Routing.</t>
    </abstract>
    <note removeInRFC="true">
      <name>About This Document</name>
      <t>
        Status information for this document may be found at <eref target="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-nasr-terminology/"/>.
      </t>
      <t>
        Discussion of this document takes place on the
        nasr Working Group mailing list (<eref target="mailto:nasr@ietf.org"/>),
        which is archived at <eref target="https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nasr/"/>.
        Subscribe at <eref target="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nasr/"/>.
      </t>
      <t>Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
        <eref target="https://github.com/mcr/nasr-terminology"/>.</t>
    </note>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <?line 48?>

<section anchor="introduction">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t>This document collects terminology in use for various secured routing
efforts.</t>
      <t>In addition, it may collect use cases that explain the terminology.</t>
      <t>This documents is not intended to ever be published.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="terminology">
      <name>Terminology</name>
      <t>Although this document is not an IETF Standards Track publication, it
adopts the conventions for normative language to provide clarity of
instructions to the implementer.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED",
"MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they
appear in all capitals, as shown here.
<?line -9?>
      </t>
      <dl>
        <dt>Secure routing:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>A abstract term that applies to all of the various work at both control
plane and forwarding plane.</t>
        </dd>
        <dt>Path Validation:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>an examination of control plane messages (such as BGP) to validate that
the planned route is correct.</t>
        </dd>
        <dt>Proof of Transit:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>an examination of data plane messages to provide evidence that the planned
route was the one used</t>
        </dd>
        <dt>Planned Route:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>unsure</t>
        </dd>
      </dl>
    </section>
    <section anchor="use-cases">
      <name>Use Cases</name>
      <t>TBD</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>Just words, no protocols in this document.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>This document makes no requests to IANA.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="acknowledgements">
      <name>Acknowledgements</name>
      <t>Hello.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="changelog">
      <name>Changelog</name>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references>
      <name>Normative References</name>
      <reference anchor="BCP14">
        <front>
          <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
          <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba"/>
          <date month="May" year="2017"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC2119">
        <front>
          <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
          <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner"/>
          <date month="March" year="1997"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC8174">
        <front>
          <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
          <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba"/>
          <date month="May" year="2017"/>
          <abstract>
            <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings.</t>
          </abstract>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
        <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
      </reference>
    </references>
    <?line 106?>


    <section anchor="contributors" numbered="false" toc="include" removeInRFC="false">
      <name>Contributors</name>
      <contact initials="M." surname="Chen" fullname="Meiling Chen">
        <organization/>
        <address>
      </address>
      </contact>
    </section>
  </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source: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-->

</rfc>
