<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc version 1.6.17 (Ruby 3.0.2) -->
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-tan-pce-detnet-high-reliability-00" category="std" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF" xml:lang="en" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.15.3 -->
  <front>
    <title>PCEP Extension for DetNet High Reliability</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-tan-pce-detnet-high-reliability-00"/>
    <author initials="R." surname="Tan" fullname="Ren Tan">
      <organization>Huawei</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>tanren@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="T." surname="Zhou" fullname="Tianran Zhou">
      <organization>Huawei</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <country>China</country>
        </postal>
        <email>zhoutianran@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2023" month="January" day="12"/>
    <area>Routing Area</area>
    <workgroup>pce Working Group</workgroup>
    <keyword>PCC</keyword>
    <keyword>PCE</keyword>
    <keyword>PCEP</keyword>
    <keyword>Metric</keyword>
    <keyword>DetNet</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <t>Real-time network performance information, like latency, delay variation, packet loss and in order delivery, is becoming critical in the path computation in some networks.</t>
      <t>This document propose metric extensions to PCEP messages, to better describe the path computation constraints and QoS requirements of Deterministic Networking (DetNet) flows, especially the high reliability requirements on packet loss and in order delivery.</t>
      <t>PCEP Extensions defined in this document could be used not only for DetNet, but also for other PCEP scenarios.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section anchor="introduction">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t><xref target="RFC5440"/> specifies the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) for communications between a PCC and a PCE. <xref target="RFC8231"/> describes a set of extensions to PCEP to enable stateful control of MPLS-TE and GMPLS LSPs via PCEP.</t>
      <t><xref target="RFC8655"/> provides the overall architecture for Deterministic Networking (DetNet), and specifies the primary goals of DetNet QoS, which can be expressed in terms of minimum and maximum end-to-end latency from source to destination, timely delivery, bounded jitter, packet loss ratio of the nodes and links, and an upper bound on out-of-order packet delivery. It is important that the QoS requirements be met when computing path for DetNet flows.</t>
      <t><xref target="I-D.ietf-detnet-controller-plane-framework"/> provides a framework overview for the DetNet controller plane. The DetNet control plane model could be distributed, fully centralized or hybrid. In centralized control plane model, PCEP could be used as a communication protocol between the controller and DetNet nodes.</t>
      <section anchor="requirements-language">
        <name>Requirements Language</name>
        <t>The key words "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL
NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>",
"<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they
appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="terminology">
        <name>Terminology</name>
        <t>The abbreviations used in this document are:</t>
        <t>PCC: Path Computation Client; any client application requesting a path computation to be performed by a Path Computation Element.</t>
        <t>PCE: Path Computation Element; an entity (component, application, or network node) that is capable of computing a network path or route based on a network graph and applying computational constraints.</t>
        <t>PCEP: Path Computation Element Protocol; a protocol for communications between a PCC and a PCE.</t>
        <t>DetNet: Deterministic Networking</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="pcep-extenstions">
      <name>PCEP Extenstions</name>
      <section anchor="extensions-to-metric-object">
        <name>Extensions to METRIC Object</name>
        <t><xref target="RFC5440"/> defines METRIC Object to indicate an optimization or bound constraint on the path cost when computing path for Label Switched Lsps (LSPs). <xref target="RFC8233"/> defines the extension to PCEP METRIC object to carry latency, delay variation, packet loss as constraints for path computation. This document propose three new metric type, and two bit flags.</t>
        <section anchor="end-to-end-loss-metric">
          <name>End-to-End Loss Metric</name>
          <t>All though path loss metric type (T=14) was defined in <xref target="RFC8233"/>, the corresponding matric value of METRIC Object is described as the sum of "Unidirectional Link Loss" along the path, which does not count in the packet loss arises in the nodes along the path.</t>
          <t>This document propose a new metric type, end-to-end loss metric, which counts in both link and node loss along the path. It could describe the end-to-end packet loss metric more precisely. It expresses the maximum Packet Loss Rate (PLR) requirement for the DetNet flow between the Ingress and Egress(es).</t>
          <t>Metric Type T=TBD1: End-to-End Loss metric</t>
          <t>PCCs <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> use this METRIC object in PCReq/PCRpt messages to carry end-to-end packet loss metric constraint for path computation; PCEs <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> use this METRIC object in PCRep/PCInitiate/PCUpd messages to express the computed value of end-to-end packet loss metric of the computed path.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="consecutive-loss-metric">
          <name>Consecutive Loss Metric</name>
          <t>As per <xref target="RFC9016"/>, consecutive packet loss tolerance in a certain period could be considered as constraint when computing path for DetNet flows. This document specifies a new metric type, Consecutive Loss, to describe the consecutive packet loss along the path.</t>
          <t>Metric Type T=TBD2: Consecutive Loss metric</t>
          <t>PCCs <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> use this METRIC object in PCReq/PCRpt messages to carry consecutive packet loss metric constraint for path computation; PCEs <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> use this METRIC object in PCRep/PCInitiate/PCUpd messages to express the computed value of consecutive packet loss metric of the computed path.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="misordering-metric">
          <name>Misordering Metric</name>
          <t>As per <xref target="RFC8655"/>, packet misordering should be considered as constraint when computing path for DetNet flows. This document specifies a new metric type, Misordering tolerance, to describe the misordering packets counts along the path.</t>
          <t>Metric Type T=TBD3: Misordering metric</t>
          <t>PCCs <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> use this METRIC object in PCReq/PCRpt messages to carry packet misordering metric constraint for path computation; PCEs <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> use this METRIC object in PCRep/PCInitiate/PCUpd messages to express the computed value of packet misordering metric of the computed path.</t>
        </section>
        <section anchor="metric-flags">
          <name>Metric Flags</name>
          <t>As per <xref target="RFC5440"/>, a "Flags" field (8 bits) is defined in METRIC Object. The flags filed is comprised of several bit flags, currently B (Bound) and C (Computed) bits have been defined.</t>
          <section anchor="low-bound">
            <name>Low Bound</name>
            <t>As per <xref target="RFC5440"/>, an abstract B bit flag was defined in METRIC Object, and in most case it describes the up bound value of the corresponding metric type.</t>
            <t>As per <xref target="RFC8655"/>, both minimum and maximum end-to-end latency could be used to express the QoS requirements of DetNet flows.</t>
            <t>This document propose a new bit, Low Bound, which is defined in Flags field of METRIC Object, to specify that the metric value is a low bound constraint.</t>
            <t>L bit: Low bound of a metric type</t>
            <t>PCCs <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> use L bit flag of METRIC object in PCReq/PCRpt messages to request a path that the metric value of the path <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be larger or equal to the value specified in related METRIC object.</t>
          </section>
          <section anchor="margin">
            <name>Margin</name>
            <t>In some DetNet scenario, allowance methods could be used to mitigate the negative impact caused by rapid value variations of certain metric of DetNet nodes and links.</t>
            <t>This document propose a new bit, Margin, which is defined in Flags field of METRIC Object, to describe that the metric value is a margin value.</t>
            <t>M bit: Margin of a metric type</t>
            <t>A METRIC object with M bit set <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used along with another METRIC object with the same metric type and B or L bit set. PCCs <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> use M bit flag of METRIC object in PCReq/PCRpt messages to express the requirement that a margin of the metric value specified in the METRIC object with M bit set could be tolerated when computing a path.</t>
          </section>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="IANA">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>TBD.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="Security">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>The security considerations described in <xref target="RFC5440"/> and <xref target="RFC8655"/> apply to the extensions defined in this document as well. This document does not raise new security issues.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references>
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC5440" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5440">
          <front>
            <title>Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)</title>
            <author fullname="JP. Vasseur" initials="JP." role="editor" surname="Vasseur">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="JL. Le Roux" initials="JL." role="editor" surname="Le Roux">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="March" year="2009"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies the Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP) for communications between a Path Computation Client (PCC) and a PCE, or between two PCEs.  Such interactions include path computation requests and path computation replies as well as notifications of specific states related to the use of a PCE in the context of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering.  PCEP is designed to be flexible and extensible so as to easily allow for the addition of further messages and objects, should further requirements be expressed in the future.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5440"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC5440"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8231" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8231">
          <front>
            <title>Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE</title>
            <author fullname="E. Crabbe" initials="E." surname="Crabbe">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="I. Minei" initials="I." surname="Minei">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Medved" initials="J." surname="Medved">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="R. Varga" initials="R." surname="Varga">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="September" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation Client (PCC) requests.</t>
              <t>Although PCEP explicitly makes no assumptions regarding the information available to the PCE, it also makes no provisions for PCE control of timing and sequence of path computations within and across PCEP sessions.  This document describes a set of extensions to PCEP to enable stateful control of MPLS-TE and GMPLS Label Switched Paths (LSPs) via PCEP.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8231"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8231"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8233" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8233">
          <front>
            <title>Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) to Compute Service-Aware Label Switched Paths (LSPs)</title>
            <author fullname="D. Dhody" initials="D." surname="Dhody">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Q. Wu" initials="Q." surname="Wu">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="V. Manral" initials="V." surname="Manral">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Z. Ali" initials="Z." surname="Ali">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="K. Kumaki" initials="K." surname="Kumaki">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="September" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In certain networks, such as, but not limited to, financial information networks (e.g., stock market data providers), network performance criteria (e.g., latency) are becoming as critical to data path selection as other metrics and constraints.  These metrics are associated with the Service Level Agreement (SLA) between customers and service providers.  The link bandwidth utilization (the total bandwidth of a link in actual use for the forwarding) is another important factor to consider during path computation.</t>
              <t>IGP Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions describe mechanisms with which network performance information is distributed via OSPF and IS-IS, respectively.  The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation Client (PCC) requests.  This document describes the extension to PCEP to carry latency, delay variation, packet loss, and link bandwidth utilization as constraints for end-to-end path computation.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8233"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8233"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8655" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8655">
          <front>
            <title>Deterministic Networking Architecture</title>
            <author fullname="N. Finn" initials="N." surname="Finn">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="P. Thubert" initials="P." surname="Thubert">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="B. Varga" initials="B." surname="Varga">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Farkas" initials="J." surname="Farkas">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="October" year="2019"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document provides the overall architecture for Deterministic Networking (DetNet), which provides a capability to carry specified unicast or multicast data flows for real-time applications with extremely low data loss rates and bounded latency within a network domain.  Techniques used include 1) reserving data-plane resources for individual (or aggregated) DetNet flows in some or all of the intermediate nodes along the path of the flow, 2) providing explicit routes for DetNet flows that do not immediately change with the network topology, and 3) distributing data from DetNet flow packets over time and/or space to ensure delivery of each packet's data in spite of the loss of a path.  DetNet operates at the IP layer and delivers service over lower-layer technologies such as MPLS and Time- Sensitive Networking (TSN) as defined by IEEE 802.1.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8655"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8655"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2119" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119">
          <front>
            <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
            <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="March" year="1997"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification.  These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents.  This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8174" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174">
          <front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol  specifications.  This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the  defined special meanings.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
      <references>
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC9016" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9016">
          <front>
            <title>Flow and Service Information Model for Deterministic Networking (DetNet)</title>
            <author fullname="B. Varga" initials="B." surname="Varga">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Farkas" initials="J." surname="Farkas">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="R. Cummings" initials="R." surname="Cummings">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Y. Jiang" initials="Y." surname="Jiang">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="D. Fedyk" initials="D." surname="Fedyk">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="March" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes the flow and service information model for Deterministic Networking (DetNet). These models are defined for IP and MPLS DetNet data planes.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9016"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9016"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-detnet-controller-plane-framework" target="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-detnet-controller-plane-framework-03.txt">
          <front>
            <title>Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Controller Plane Framework</title>
            <author fullname="Andrew G. Malis" initials="A. G." surname="Malis">
              <organization>Independent</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Xuesong Geng" initials="X." surname="Geng">
              <organization>Huawei</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Mach Chen" initials="M." surname="Chen">
              <organization>Huawei</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Fengwei Qin" initials="F." surname="Qin">
              <organization>China Mobile</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Balazs Varga" initials="B." surname="Varga">
              <organization>Ericsson</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="30" month="December" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>   This document provides a framework overview for the Deterministic
   Networking (DetNet) controller plane.  It discusses concepts and
   requirements for DetNet controller plane which could be basis for
   future solution specification.

              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-detnet-controller-plane-framework-03"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
    </references>
    <section numbered="false" anchor="Acknowledgements">
      <name>Acknowledgements</name>
    </section>
  </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source: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-->

</rfc>
