<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- name="GENERATOR" content="github.com/mmarkdown/mmark Mmark Markdown Processor - mmark.miek.nl" -->
<rfc version="3" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-tjw-wgchairs-socialmedia-00" submissionType="independent" category="info" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" indexInclude="true">

<front>
<title abbrev="wgchairs-socialmedia">Social Media Suggestions for WGChairs</title><seriesInfo value="draft-tjw-wgchairs-socialmedia-00" stream="independent" status="informational" name="Internet-Draft"></seriesInfo>
<author initials="T." surname="Wicinski. (ed)" fullname="Tim Wicinski"><organization></organization><address><postal><street></street>
<city>Elkins</city>
<code>26241</code>
<country>USA</country>
<region>WV</region>
</postal><email>tjw.ietf@gmail.com</email>
</address></author><date/>
<area>gen</area>
<workgroup></workgroup>

<abstract>
<t>This memo provides some suggestions for working group chairs in utilizing
social media.</t>
</abstract>

</front>

<middle>

<section anchor="introduction"><name>Introduction</name>
<t>Many working groups in the IETF are focused in their length and direction.
There are others which exist for a much longer period of time, especially
operations groups among others.  With these groups the chairs should make
an effort to use other platforms than the datatracker and ietf mailing
lists to make work visible.</t>
</section>

<section anchor="terminology"><name>Terminology</name>
<t>The key words &quot;MUST&quot;, &quot;MUST NOT&quot;, &quot;REQUIRED&quot;, &quot;SHALL&quot;, &quot;SHALL NOT&quot;, &quot;SHOULD&quot;,
&quot;SHOULD NOT&quot;, &quot;RECOMMENDED&quot;, &quot;NOT RECOMMENDED&quot;, &quot;MAY&quot;, and &quot;OPTIONAL&quot; in this
document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"></xref> <xref target="RFC8174"></xref>
when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
DNS terminology is as described in <xref target="RFC8499"></xref>.</t>
</section>

<section anchor="long-running-working-groups"><name>Long running working groups</name>
<t>There are several long running working groups in the IETF, and the work
touches other organizations.  DNSOP, HTTPBIS, TLS are just a few.
With these groups, the chairs should adopt an approach of &quot;oversharing
is a good thing&quot;.</t>
<t>Currently a number of working groups are using github to store materials,
documents being worked on, etc.  But these working groups should always be
looking for new avenues to promote the documents being working on in
the working group.</t>
</section>

<section anchor="using-social-media"><name>Using Social Media</name>
<t>Currently, there is a tool to pull data from the datatracker API to automate
posting into twitter [<eref target="https://github.com/ietf-github-services/datatracker-tweet">https://github.com/ietf-github-services/datatracker-tweet</eref>].
This has proven useful for working groups.  DNSOP has modified this code
to automate posting to Mastodon [<eref target="https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/datatracker-toots">https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/datatracker-toots</eref>].</t>
<t>The Working Group Chairs should take this under consideration for busy,
long running working groups.</t>
</section>

</middle>

<back>
<references><name>Normative References</name>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"/>
</references>
<references><name>Informative References</name>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8499.xml"/>
</references>

<section anchor="acknowledgements" numbered="false"><name>Acknowledgements</name>
<t>Mark Nottingham for the datatracker-tweet code, and for the
quote &quot;Busy working groups should over share&quot;.</t>
</section>

</back>

</rfc>
