<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="3"?>
<?rfc tocindent="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc comments="yes"?>
<?rfc inline="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-wang-bess-sbfd-discriminator-01"
     ipr="trust200902">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="Abbreviated-Title">Advertising S-BFD Discriminators in
    BGP</title>

    <author fullname="Haibo Wang" initials="H." surname="Wang">
      <organization>Huawei</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>No. 156 Beiqing Road</street>

          <city>Beijing</city>

          <region/>

          <code>100095</code>

          <country>P.R. China</country>
        </postal>

        <phone/>

        <facsimile/>

        <email>rainsword.wang@huawei.com</email>

        <uri/>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Yang Huang" initials="Y." surname="Huang">
      <organization>Huawei</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>No. 156 Beiqing Road</street>

          <city>Beijing</city>

          <region/>

          <code>100095</code>

          <country>P.R. China</country>
        </postal>

        <phone/>

        <facsimile/>

        <email>yang.huang@huawei.com</email>

        <uri/>
      </address>
    </author>

    <author fullname="Jie Dong" initials="J." surname="Dong">
      <organization>Huawei</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>No. 156 Beiqing Road</street>

          <city>Beijing</city>

          <region/>

          <code>100095</code>

          <country>P.R. China</country>
        </postal>

        <phone/>

        <facsimile/>

        <email>jie.dong@huawei.com</email>

        <uri/>
      </address>
    </author>

    <date day="03" month="January" year="2022"/>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document defines the method of transmitting S-BFD discriminators
      through BGP attributes. This method makes it easier for operators to
      create S-BFD for services.</t>
    </abstract>

    <note title="Requirements Language">
      <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
      "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
      document are to be interpreted as described in <xref
      target="RFC2119">RFC 2119</xref>.</t>
    </note>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section title="Introduction">
      <t><xref target="RFC7880"/> defines the Seamless Bidirectional
      Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) mechanism. S-BFD is a simplified mechanism
      for using BFD with a large proportion of negotiation aspects eliminated,
      thus providing benefits such as quick provisioning, as well as improved
      control and flexibility for network nodes initiating path monitoring.
      Currently, S-BFD can be used to simplify the service deployment.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Motivations">
      <t>An important usage for S-BFD is to check the reachability of targets,
      so that service interruption can be swiftly detected when there is a
      failure on the service path and services can be switched to a backup
      path quickly.</t>

      <t><xref target="RFC7880"/> specifies the Seamless Bidirectional
      Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) mechanism. Generally, the operators need to
      manually deploy S-BFD discriminators on the device to generate S-BFD
      sessions.</t>

      <t>For the deployment of S-BFD in IPv4 network, the reflector can use
      the LSR-ID address as the discriminator. This reduces the number of
      discriminators deployed on the transmit end. This mode cannot be used
      for IPv6 because the discriminator has only four bytes.</t>

      <t><xref target="RFC7883"/> <xref target="RFC7884"/> defines IS-IS and
      OSPF to flood BFD discriminators. However, this mode is based on nodes
      and cannot traverse an IGP area. In addition, without the knowledge of
      services to be detected, a large number of redundant S-BFD sessions may
      be generated.</t>

      <t>It is recommended to use BGP to distribute BFD discriminator
      information. BGP can transmit routes across domains, and service routes
      can drive to generate the end-to-end S-BFD sessions on demand.</t>
    </section>

    <section title="Scenarios">
      <t>When the services are across multiple areas or multiple ASes, the BFD
      discriminator of the remote PE node cannot be obtained through the IGP
      based S-BFD extensions, thus a BGP based mechanism is required.</t>

      <t>For SRv6 services, there are two different service types. One is
      service over SRv6 BE, the other is service over SRv6 Policy. For the
      service over SRv6 BE, it will use the VPNSID to resolve the forwarding
      information. Thus we must generate an S-BFD session to detect the
      VPNSID's reachablity. This is an IP-routed S-BFD. We may use the remote
      VPNSID's locator as the destination of the S-BFD session. For the
      service over SRv6 Polcy, it will use &lt;nexthop, color&gt; of the
      service route to resolve an SRv6 Policy. Then we must generate an S-BFD
      session to detect the reachablity of the SR Policy.</t>

      <section title="EVPN Layer 3 Service Over SRv6 BE Use Case">
        <t><figure align="center">
            <artwork><![CDATA[         +-----------------------+ +-------------------+         
         |                       | |                   |         
         | +-----+      +-----+  | | +-----+           |         
         | , PE1 |------|ASBR1|------|ASBR3\           |         
         |/+-----+      +-----+  | | +-----+\          |         
         /                       | |         \         |         
        /|                       | |          \        |         
 +-----/ |                       | |           '-----+ | +-----+ 
 | CE1 | |                       | |           | PE3 |---| CE2 | 
 +------ |                       | |           /-----+ | +-----+ 
        `,                       | |          /        |         
         |.+-----+      +-----+  | | +-----+ /         |         
         | ' PE2 |------|ASBR2|------|ASBR4|-          |         
         | +-----+      +-----+  | | +-----+           |         
         |                       | |                   |         
         |        AS65001        | |      AS65002      |         
         +-----------------------+ +-------------------+         
Figure 1: EVPN Layer 3 Service Over SRv6 BE]]></artwork>
          </figure>Figure 1 shows a SRv6 BE based seamless scenario. CE1 is
        dual-homed to PE1 and PE2, and CE2 is accecssed to PE3. PE1, PE2, and
        PE3 are cross BGP ASes.</t>

        <t>CE1 accesses PE1 and PE2 through Layer 3 and advertises its private
        network routes to PE1. PE1 encapsulates the routes into Type 5 routes
        in the EVPN format and sends them to PE3. After receiving Type 5
        routes advertised by PE1 and PE2, PE3 generates primary and backup
        entries for the routes to speed up service switchover. In this
        scenario, the SRv6 BE service mode is used. PE3 will resolve PE1's VPN
        routes reachbility through the VPNSID. To ensure that PE3 can properly
        route to PE1, PE1 needs to advertise its own locator route. The
        advertisement of the locator route is not in the scope of this
        document.</t>

        <t>To speed up fault detection, we may configure an S-BFD session on
        PE3 to detect PE1 or PE2's reachbility. In traditional mode, a
        discriminator needs to be assigned by PE1 and PE2, and two S-BFD
        sessions need to be configured on PE3 to detect the VPN SID's
        reachability of PE1 and PE2. It needs to generate an S-BFD session
        with the destination set to the VPN SID. To reduce the number of S-BFD
        sessions, these sessions can be merged into an S-BFD session which
        target is remote PE's locator route.</t>

        <t>There are a large number of such PEs that exist on the network.
        Each PE is configured with several S-BFD sessions to detect PE1 and
        PE2, which increases the deployment complexity.</t>
      </section>

      <section title="EVPN Layer 3 Service Over SPv6 Policy Use Case">
        <t><figure align="center">
            <artwork><![CDATA[         +-----------------------+ +-------------------+         
         |                       | |                   |         
         | +-----+      +-----+  | | +-----+           |         
         | , PE1 |------|ASBR1|------|ASBR3\           |         
         |/+-----+      +-----+  | | +-----+\          |         
         /                       | |         \         |         
        /|                       | |          \        |         
 +-----/ |                       | |           '-----+ | +-----+ 
 | CE1 | |                       | |           | PE3 |---| CE2 | 
 +------ |                       | |           /-----+ | +-----+ 
        `,                       | |          /        |         
         |.+-----+      +-----+  | | +-----+ /         |         
         | ' PE2 |------|ASBR2|------|ASBR4|-          |         
         | +-----+      +-----+  | | +-----+           |         
         |                       | |                   |         
         |        AS65001        | |      AS65002      |         
         +-----------------------+ +-------------------+                    
Figure 2: EVPN Layer 3 Service Over SRv6 Policy
]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t>Figure 2 shows a SRv6 Policy scenario. CE1 is dual-homed to PE1 and
        PE2, and CE2 is accessed to PE3. PE1, PE2, and PE3 are cross BGP
        ASes.</t>

        <t>CE1 accesses PE1 and PE2 through Layer 3 and advertises its private
        network routes to PE1. PE1 encapsulates the routes into Type 5 routes
        in the EVPN format and sends them to PE3.</t>

        <t>After receiving Type 5 routes advertised by PE1 and PE2, PE3
        generates primary and backup entries for the routes, speeding up
        service switchover. PE3 parses the tunnel based on the &lt;nexthop,
        color&gt; of the service routes advertised by PE1 and PE2, and matches
        an SRv6 Policy. After receiving the traffic from CE2 to CE1, PE3
        encapsulates and forwards the traffic based on the SRv6 Policy.</t>

        <t>An S-BFD session needs to be established for these SRv6
        Policy-based forwarding paths to swiftly detect the availability of
        the paths. When detecting a fault on the SRv6 Policy path of the
        primary service route, services can be swiftly switched to the backup
        path, providing more reliable protection for services.</t>

        <t>There are a large number of such PEs that exist on the network.
        Each PE is configured with several S-BFD sessions to detect PE1 and
        PE2, which increases the deployment complexity.</t>

        <t>Certainly, this scenario may also be implemented in other methods.
        For example, when delivering an SRv6 policy, specify a tunnel to
        generate an S-BFD session.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Procedure">
      <t/>

      <section title="BGP Encoding">
        <t><xref target="RFC9026"/> specifies the "BFD Discriminators" (38)
        attribute, which is an optional transitive BGP attribute that conveys
        the Discriminators and other optional attributes used to establish BFD
        sessions.</t>

        <t>The attribute defined in <xref target="RFC9026"/> is used to
        transmit P2MP BFD session creation information through the BFD
        Discriminator attribute in MVPN scenarios. For non-multicast services,
        such as L3VPN services, L2VPN services, and native IP services, BFD
        discriminators are also required to create an S-BFD session.</t>

        <t>The S-BFD Discriminator attribute introduced in this document is
        defined as follows:</t>

        <t><figure>
            <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    BFD Mode   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                       BFD Discriminator                       |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~                         Optional TLVs                         ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 3: Format of the BFD Discriminator Attribute]]></artwork>
          </figure>o BFD Mode:</t>

        <t>The BFD Mode field is 1 octet. <xref target="RFC9026"/> defines
        only the P2MP BFD session for MVPN. This document defines two new
        types of SBFD session types based on the preceding scenarios.</t>

        <t>As described in the preceding scenario. There are two types of
        S-BFD sessions for SRv6 services. For service over SRv6 BE, an
        IP-routed S-BFD session needs to be created to detect the locator
        route. For service over SRv6 Policy, an S-BFD session for SRv6 Policy
        path needs to be created to detect the SRv6 Policy path. So two new
        BFD modes should be introduced here.</t>

        <t>SBFD for SRv6 Locator Session Mode, which is dedicated to detecting
        the locator. The temporary type is 176, and is to be allocated by
        IANA.</t>

        <t>SBFD for Common Session Mode, which is for general SBFD session.
        The temporary type is 177, and is to be allocated by IANA. This mode
        is not only for SRv6, but also can be used for other scenarios.</t>

        <t>o BFD Discriminators:</t>

        <t>The field length is 4 octets. Used to specify the discriminator for
        S-BFD session.</t>

        <t>o Optional TLVs:</t>

        <t>Variable-length fields are optional. Indicates the additional
        information required for creating a S-BFD session. The format is as
        follows:</t>

        <t><figure align="center">
            <artwork><![CDATA[ 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|      Type     |     Length    |           Value             ...
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 4: Format of the Optional TLV]]></artwork>
          </figure></t>

        <t>If a transit node changes the next hop or reassigns a VPN SID when
        forwarding a route, the transit node needs to use the locally
        allocated S-BFD discriminator to advertise the S-BFD discriminator
        attribute. If the transit node does not recognize the S-BFD
        Discriminator attribute in the learned route and continues to
        advertise the route to the remote PE, the receiver may use incorrect
        information when creating an S-BFD session. Therefore, the advertised
        S-BFD Discriminator attribute needs to carry the IP address for
        receiver verification.</t>

        <t>In this document, S-BFD for SRv6 Locator Session and S-BFD for
        Common Session must carry IP addresses except discriminators, which
        reuse the Source IP Address TLV defined in <xref
        target="RFC9026"/>.</t>

        <t>If the mode is set to SBFD for SRv6 Locator Session, the SRv6
        Locator address used for the service is carried.</t>

        <t>If the mode is set to SBFD for Common Session, the next-hop address
        used for the service is carried.</t>

        <t>For details about the error handling, see section "Error
        Handling".</t>
      </section>

      <section title="ProceduerProceduer  ">
        <t>In BGP address families, such as L3VPN or EVPN, routes can carry
        the S-BFD Discriminator attribute as required so that S-BFD sessions
        can be established based on the attribute. The following uses S-BFD
        for SRv6 Locator as an example. If mode is set to SBFD for Common
        Session, the processing method is similar.</t>

        <section title="Egress Node Process">
          <t>As shown in figure 1, the S-BFD discriminator is configured on
          PE1. After obtaining the information, BGP encapsulates the attribute
          into the EVPN route and sets the BFD Mode to SBFD for Locator
          Session, when advertising the EVPN route. The Discriminator value is
          local discriminator value. The optional TLV carries the local PE's
          locator address used by the VPN.</t>
        </section>

        <section title="Transit Node Process">
          <t>Here is the end-to-end SRv6 BE scenario. The ASBR does not
          re-allocate the VPN SID. Thus, the ASBR does not require to modify
          the VPN SID, and not to alter the BFD discriminator attribute.</t>
        </section>

        <section title="Ingress Node Process">
          <t>After receiving the EVPN Type 5 routes from PE1 and PE2, PE3
          imports the routes to the VRF of PE3 based on the route targets.
          Routes triggers establish the S-BFD sessions based on &lt;S-BFD
          discriminator, locator ip&gt;.</t>

          <t>Then, routes with the same prefix from PE1 and PE2 form primary
          and backup paths. When the primary path or the egress node is in
          fault, S-BFD detects that fault and forms switch to backup path
          quickly.</t>

          <t>To avoid the waste of redundant resources, assume that the ASBR
          re-assigns the SID in Option B and the ASBR does not recognize the
          attribute. In this case, the SID and locator carried in the route
          received by PE3 do not match the Source IP carried in the Optional
          TLV in the BFD attribute. Therefore, PE3 does not need to establish
          an S-BFD session to remote PE, which can avoid resource waste.</t>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Error handling">
      <t>Error handling complies with <xref target="RFC7606"/>. In this
      document, the BFD discriminator information is used only to establish an
      S-BFD session. Therefore, if the BFD discriminator information is
      invalid, the BFD attirbute will be discard and not transmit to other
      devices.</t>

      <t>For BFD discriminator attribute, the following case will be
      processed:</t>

      <t>o The BFD Discriminator value in receiving BFD Discriminator
      attribute is 0, the attribute is invalid.</t>

      <t>For BFD mode type is S-BFD for SRv6 Locator Session, the following
      case will be processed:</t>

      <t>o The BFD discriminator attribute doesn't contain optional TLV with
      type set to 1, the attribute is invalid.</t>

      <t>o The optional TLV type is 1 but the length is not 16, the attribute
      is invalid.</t>

      <t>o The optional TLV type is 1 but the value is all 0, the attribute is
      invalid.</t>

      <t>o If multiple Source IP Optional TLVs are carried, the first source
      IP address should be used as the destination to establish an S-BFD
      session. For EVPN type 2 MAC-IP routes may use the first and the second
      IP address because it may carry two SRv6 SIDs with different locators.
      Other source IP addresses should be ignored.</t>

      <t>o If a non-Source IP Optional TLV is carried, the Optional TLV will
      be ignored.</t>

      <t>For BFD mode type is S-BFD for Common Session, the following case
      will be processed:</t>

      <t>o The BFD discriminator attribute doesn't contain optional TLV with
      type set to 1, the attribute is invalid.</t>

      <t>o The optional TLV type is 1 but the length is not 4 or 16, the
      attribute is invalid.</t>

      <t>o The optional TLV type is 1 but the value is all 0, the attribute is
      invalid.</t>

      <t>o If multiple Source IP Optional TLVs are carried, only the first
      source IP address should be used as the destination to establish an
      S-BFD session. Other source IP addresses should be ignored.</t>

      <t>o If a non-Source IP Optional TLV is carried, the Optional TLV will
      be ignored.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="IANA" title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>This document defines two new BFD modes in the BFD Discriminator
      attribute. The following values are recommended to be assigned by
      IANA:</t>

      <t><figure>
          <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[Value  Description
----  -------------------------
176   S-BFD for SRv6 Locator Session
177   S-BFD for Common Session]]></artwork>
        </figure></t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="Security" title="Security Considerations">
      <t>The new S-BFD Discriminators sub-TLV does not introduce any new
      security risks for BGP.</t>

      <t>When creating an S-BFD session, the initiator verifies the S-BFD
      session based on routing information. This reduces the number of invalid
      S-BFD sessions and avoid attribute attack.</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="Acknowledgements" title="Acknowledgements">
      <t>The authors would like to thank Greg Mirsky for their review and
      comments.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>
    </references>

    <references title="References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7606"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7880"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7883"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7884"?>

      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.9026"?>
    </references>
  </back>
</rfc>
