<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes" ?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>
<?rfc compact="yes" ?>
<?rfc subcompact="no" ?>

<rfc category="std" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-xiao-mpls-lsp-ping-ioam-conf-state-05" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF">

<front>
  <title abbrev="LSP Ping for IOAM Capabilities"> LSP Ping/Traceroute for Enabled In-situ OAM Capabilities </title>

  <author fullname="Xiao Min" initials="X" surname="Min">
      <organization>ZTE Corp.</organization>
     <address>
       <postal>
         <street></street>

         <!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently -->

         <city>Nanjing</city>

         <region></region>

         <code></code>

         <country>China</country>
       </postal>

       <phone>+86 18061680168</phone>

       <email>xiao.min2@zte.com.cn</email>

       <!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added -->
     </address>
    </author>

  <author fullname="Greg Mirsky" initials="G" surname="Mirsky">
      <organization>Ericsson</organization>
     <address>
       <postal>
         <street></street>

         <!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently -->

         <city></city>

         <region></region>

         <code></code>

         <country>United States of America</country>
       </postal>

       <phone></phone>

       <email>gregimirsky@gmail.com</email>

       <!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added -->
     </address>
    </author>

  <author fullname="Loa Andersson" initials="L" surname="Andersson">
      <organization>Bronze Dragon Consulting</organization>
     <address>
       <postal>
         <street></street>

         <!-- Reorder these if your country does things differently -->

         <city></city>

         <region></region>

         <code></code>

         <country>Sweden</country>
       </postal>

       <phone></phone>

       <email>loa@pi.nu</email>

       <!-- uri and facsimile elements may also be added -->
     </address>
    </author>
	
    <date year="2025"/>
	
    <area>Internet</area>
    <workgroup>MPLS Working Group</workgroup>

    <keyword>Request for Comments</keyword>
    <keyword>RFC</keyword>
    <keyword>Internet Draft</keyword>
    <keyword>I-D</keyword>

    <abstract>
	
  <t> This document describes the application of the mechanism of discovering In-situ OAM (IOAM) capabilities, described in RFC 9359 
  "Echo Request/Reply for Enabled In Situ OAM (IOAM) Capabilities", in MPLS networks. The MPLS Node IOAM Information Query functionality 
  uses the MPLS echo request/reply messages, allowing the IOAM encapsulating node to discover the enabled IOAM capabilities of each IOAM 
  transit and IOAM decapsulating node.</t>
  
    </abstract>
    
</front>
  
<middle>

  <section title="Introduction">
  
  <t> MPLS encapsulation for In-situ OAM (IOAM) data is defined in <xref target="I-D.ietf-mpls-mna-ioam"/>, which utilizes MPLS 
  Network Actions (MNA) techniques (<xref target="I-D.ietf-mpls-mna-fwk"/>) to carry IOAM data fields (<xref target="RFC9197"/>, 
  <xref target="RFC9326"/>) in MPLS packets.</t>

  <t> As specified in <xref target="RFC9359"/>, the echo request/reply can be used by the IOAM encapsulating node to discover the 
  enabled IOAM capabilities at IOAM transit and decapsulating nodes.</t>
  
  <t> <xref target="RFC8029"/> defines a probe message called "MPLS echo request", and a response message called "MPLS echo reply" 
  for returning the result of the probe.</t>
  
  <t> This document describes the MPLS Node IOAM Information Query functionality, which uses the MPLS echo request/reply messages, 
  allowing the IOAM encapsulating node to discover the enabled IOAM capabilities of each IOAM transit and IOAM decapsulating node.</t>
  
  <t> <xref target="RFC8029"/> specifies "ping" and "traceroute" modes. In "ping" mode, the ingress LSR sends a single MPLS echo 
  request with the TTL in the outermost label set to 255. The MPLS echo request is intended to reach the end of the path and only 
  the egress LSR is expected to respond with the MPLS echo reply. In "traceroute" mode, the ingress LSR transmits a sequence of MPLS 
  echo requests with the TTL value being set in successive probe packets to 1, 2, and so on. Using TTL expiration as the exception 
  mechanism, each LSR is expected to respond by transmitting an MPLS echo reply.</t>
  
  <t> In an MPLS network, the ingress LSR may also act as the IOAM encapsulating node. In such a case, a transit LSR acts as the IOAM 
  transit node, and the egress LSR acts as the IOAM decapsulating node. Usually, the trace option of IOAM data is needed, the IOAM 
  encapsulating node requires to query the enabled IOAM capabilities of each IOAM transit and decapsulating node, then the "traceroute" 
  mode can be used. In case that only the edge to edge option of IOAM data is needed, the IOAM encapsulating node requires to query the 
  enabled IOAM Capabilities of only the IOAM decapsulating node, then the "ping" mode can be used.</t>
  
  <t> The mechanism specified in this document applies to both point-to-point (P2P) MPLS LSP and point-to-multipoint (P2MP) MPLS LSP.</t>
       
  </section>
  
   <section title="Conventions Used in This Document">

	<t> The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", 
	"RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as 
	described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they appear 
	in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
	
   </section>

  <section title="IOAM Capabilities Query TLV">

	<t> The IOAM Capabilities Query TLV presented in Figure 1 is carried 
	as a TLV of the MPLS Echo Request message:</t>
	 
     <figure anchor="Figure_1" title="IOAM Capabilities Query TLV">
     <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|  IOAM Capa. Query Type (TBA1) |            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
.                                                               .
.                  List of IOAM Namespace-IDs                   .
.                                                               .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ]]></artwork>
     </figure>

    <t>Type: Indicates the IOAM Capabilities Query TLV. The value is TBA1.</t>

    <t>Length: The length of the TLV's Value field in octets.</t>

    <t>The Value field is a List of IOAM Namespace-IDs, which is also 
	called IOAM Capabilities Query Container Payload in Section 3.1 
	of <xref target="RFC9359"/>.</t>
	
	<section title="Examples of the IOAM Capabilities Query">
        
     <t> The format of an IOAM Capabilities Query can vary from deployment to deployment.</t> 
	 
     <t> In a deployment where only the default Namespace-ID is used, the IOAM Capabilities Query 
	 is depicted as the following:</t> 
	 
     <figure anchor="Figure_2" title="IOAM Capabilities Query of the Default IOAM Namespace">
     <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|  IOAM Capa. Query Type (TBA1) |            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|         Namespace-ID          |          Zero-padded          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ]]></artwork>
     </figure>
	 
     <t> In a deployment where two Namespace-IDs (Namespace-ID1 and Namespace-ID2) are used, the 
	 IOAM Capabilities Query is depicted as the following:</t> 
	 
     <figure anchor="Figure_3" title="IOAM Capabilities Query of the Two IOAM Namespaces">
     <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|  IOAM Capa. Query Type (TBA1) |            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|         Namespace-ID1         |         Namespace-ID2         |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ]]></artwork>
     </figure>
	
    </section> 	 
	 
  </section> 
   
  <section title="IOAM Capabilities Response TLV">

	<t> The IOAM Capabilities Response TLV presented in Figure 4 is carried 
	as a TLV of the MPLS Echo Reply message:</t>
	 
     <figure anchor="Figure_4" title="IOAM Capabilities Response TLV">
     <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|IOAM Capa. Response Type (TBA2)|            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
.                                                               .
.               List of IOAM Capabilities Sub-TLVs              .
.                                                               .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ]]></artwork>
     </figure>

    <t>Type: Indicates the IOAM Capabilities Response TLV. The value is TBA2.</t>

    <t>Length: The length of the TLV's Value field in octets.</t>

    <t>The Value field is a List of IOAM Capabilities Objects, which is 
	also called IOAM Capabilities Response Container Payload in Section 3.2 
	of <xref target="RFC9359"/>. Each IOAM Capabilities Object is encoded in 
	a sub-TLV format.</t>
	 
	<section title="IOAM Capabilities Sub-TLVs">

	<t> All IOAM Capabilities sub-TLVs (aka Objects) are encapsulated in an IOAM Capabilities Response TLV of 
	an MPLS Echo Reply message.</t>
	
	<t> Each IOAM Capabilities sub-TLV has the following format:</t>
	 
     <figure anchor="Figure_5" title="IOAM Capabilities Sub-TLV">
     <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|      IOAM Capa. Sub-type      |            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
.                                                               .
.                IOAM Capabilities Object Payload               .
.                                                               .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ]]></artwork>
     </figure>

    <t>Sub-type: Indicates the IOAM Capabilities sub-TLVs. The values are listed as the following:</t>
		
     <figure>
       <artwork><![CDATA[
   Value         Sub-type Name
   -----         -----------
   TBA3          IOAM Pre-allocated Tracing Capabilities Object
   TBA4          IOAM Proof of Transit Capabilities Object
   TBA5          IOAM Edge-to-Edge Capabilities Object
   TBA6          IOAM DEX Capabilities Object
   TBA7          IOAM End-of-Domain Object   
     ]]></artwork>
     </figure>
		
    <t>Length: The length of the sub-TLV's Value field in octets.</t>

    <t>The Value field is the IOAM Capabilities Object Payload, which is defined in 
	Sections 3.2.1, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.2.5, and 3.2.6 of <xref target="RFC9359"/>.</t>
	
    </section> 
	 
	<section title="Examples of IOAM Capabilities Response TLV">
        
     <t> The format of an IOAM Capabilities Response can vary from deployment to deployment.</t> 
	 
     <t> In a deployment where only the default Namespace-ID is used, the IOAM Pre-allocated Tracing 
	 Capabilities and IOAM Proof of Transit Capabilities are enabled at an IOAM transit node, if that IOAM 
	 transit node received an MPLS echo request containing IOAM Capabilities Query TLV, then the IOAM Capabilities 
	 Response TLV contained in an MPLS echo reply is depicted as the following:</t> 
	 
     <figure anchor="Figure_6" title="Example 1 of IOAM Capabilities Response TLV">
     <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|IOAM Capa. Response Type (TBA2)|            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   IOAM Capa. Sub-type (TBA3)  |            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               IOAM-Trace-Type                 |  Reserved   |W|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|         Namespace-ID          |          Ingress_MTU          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|  Ingress_if_id (short or wide format)         ......          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   IOAM Capa. Sub-type (TBA5)  |            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|         Namespace-ID          | IOAM-POT-Type |SoP| Reserved  |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ]]></artwork>
     </figure>
	 
     <t> In a deployment where two Namespace-IDs (Namespace-ID1 and Namespace-ID2) are used, for both 
	 Namespace-ID1 and Namespace-ID2 the IOAM Pre-allocated Tracing Capabilities and IOAM Proof of Transit 
	 Capabilities are enabled at an IOAM transit node, if that IOAM transit node received an MPLS echo request 
	 containing IOAM Capabilities Query TLV, then the IOAM Capabilities Response TLV contained in an MPLS echo 
	 reply is depicted as the following:</t> 
	 
     <figure anchor="Figure_7" title="Example 2 of IOAM Capabilities Response TLV">
     <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|IOAM Capa. Response Type (TBA2)|            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   IOAM Capa. Sub-type (TBA3)  |            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               IOAM-Trace-Type                 |  Reserved   |W|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|         Namespace-ID1         |          Ingress_MTU          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|  Ingress_if_id (short or wide format)         ......          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   IOAM Capa. Sub-type (TBA5)  |            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|         Namespace-ID1         | IOAM-POT-Type |SoP| Reserved  |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   IOAM Capa. Sub-type (TBA3)  |            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               IOAM-Trace-Type                 |  Reserved   |W|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|         Namespace-ID2         |          Ingress_MTU          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|  Ingress_if_id (short or wide format)         ......          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   IOAM Capa. Sub-type (TBA5)  |            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|         Namespace-ID2         | IOAM-POT-Type |SoP| Reserved  |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ]]></artwork>
     </figure>
	 
     <t> Note that multiple sub-TLVs with the same sub-type may be present in an IOAM Capabilities Response TLV, as 
	 long as the Namespace-IDs in these sub-TLVs are all different.</t> 
	 
     <t> In a deployment where only the default Namespace-ID is used, the IOAM Pre-allocated Tracing Capabilities, 
	 IOAM Proof of Transit Capabilities and IOAM Edge-to-Edge Capabilities are enabled at the IOAM decapsulating 
	 node, if that IOAM decapsulating node received an MPLS echo request containing IOAM Capabilities Query TLV, then 
	 the IOAM Capabilities Response TLV contained in an MPLS echo reply is depicted as the following:</t> 
	 
     <figure anchor="Figure_8" title="Example 3 of IOAM Capabilities Response TLV">
     <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|IOAM Capa. Response Type (TBA2)|            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   IOAM Capa. Sub-type (TBA3)  |            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               IOAM-Trace-Type                 |  Reserved   |W|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|         Namespace-ID          |          Ingress_MTU          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|  Ingress_if_id (short or wide format)         ......          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   IOAM Capa. Sub-type (TBA5)  |            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|         Namespace-ID          | IOAM-POT-Type |SoP| Reserved  |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   IOAM Capa. Sub-type (TBA6)  |            Length             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|         Namespace-ID          |         IOAM-E2E-Type         |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|TSF|         Reserved          |           Reserved            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     ]]></artwork>
     </figure>
	
    </section> 
  </section> 
   
  <section title="Return Code Field Processing">

     <t>The Return Code field in the MPLS echo reply MUST be set to (TBA9) No Matched Namespace-ID if any of the
     following conditions apply:<list style="symbols">
         <t>The IOAM Capabilities Query TLV does not include any Namespace-ID.</t>

         <t>None of the contained list of IOAM Namespace-IDs is recognized.</t>

         <t>None of the contained list of IOAM Namespace-IDs is enabled.</t>
       </list></t>

  </section> 

  <section anchor="IANA" title="IANA Considerations">

   <section title="TLV and Sub-TLV Allocation">
   
   <t>IANA maintains the "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) 
   Ping Parameters" registry, and within that registry a sub-registry for TLVs and sub-TLVs.</t>
   
   <t>IANA is requested to allocate a new IOAM Capabilities Query TLV (Type TBA1) and a new 
   IOAM Capabilities Response TLV (Type TBA2) from the Standards Action range (0-16383), 
   and sub-TLVs as follows from sub-registry presented in <xref target="iana-allocation-table"/>, 
   called "Sub-TLVs for TLV Type TBA2".</t>
   
   <t>Registration procedures for Sub-TLVs from ranges 0-16383 and 32768-49161 are by Standards 
   Action. Ranges 16384-31739 and 49162-64507 are through RFC Required.</t>
   
   <texttable anchor="iana-allocation-table" title="IANA TLV Type Allocation">
    <ttcol align='left'>Type</ttcol>
    <ttcol align='left'>Sub-type</ttcol>
    <ttcol align='left'>Value Field</ttcol>
    <ttcol align='left'>Reference</ttcol>
    <c>TBA1</c><c></c><c>IOAM Capabilities Query</c><c>This document</c>
    <c>TBA2</c><c></c><c>IOAM Capabilities Response</c><c>This document</c>
     <c></c><c>TBA3</c><c>IOAM Pre-allocated Tracing Capabilities Object</c><c>This document</c>
     <c></c><c>TBA4</c><c>IOAM Proof of Transit Capabilities Object</c><c>This document</c>
     <c></c><c>TBA5</c><c>IOAM Edge-to-Edge Capabilities Object</c><c>This document</c>
     <c></c><c>TBA6</c><c>IOAM DEX Capabilities Object</c><c>This document</c>
     <c></c><c>TBA7</c><c>IOAM End-of-Domain Object</c><c>This document</c>
   </texttable>

   </section> 

   <section title="Namespace-ID Error">
  
   <t>IANA maintains the "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) 
   Ping Parameters" registry, and within that registry a sub-registry "Return Codes".</t>
   
   <t>IANA is requested to assign a new Return Code from the Standards Action range (0-191) as follows:</t>
   
   <texttable title="IANA Return Code Allocation">
    <ttcol align='left'>Error Value Code</ttcol>
    <ttcol align='left'>Description</ttcol>
    <ttcol align='left'>Reference</ttcol>
    <c>TBA9</c>
    <c>No Matched Namespace-ID</c>
    <c>This document</c>
   </texttable>
   
   </section>		

  </section>
  
  <section title="Security Considerations">
  
  <t> Security issues discussed in <xref target="RFC8029"/> and <xref target="RFC9359"/> apply to this document.</t>
  
  <t> This document recommends that the network operators establish policies that restrict access to MPLS Node IOAM 
  Information Query functionality. In order to enforce these policies, nodes that support MPLS Node IOAM Information 
  Query functionality SHOULD support the following configuration options:</t>

  <t><list style="symbols">
      <t>Enable/disable MPLS Node IOAM Information Query functionality. By default, MPLS Node IOAM Information Query 
	  functionality is disabled.</t>

      <t>Define enabled Namespace-IDs. By default, all Namespace-IDs except the default one (i.e., Namespace-ID 
	  0x0000) are disabled.</t>
  </list></t>
  
  <t> While applying the MPLS Node IOAM Information Query to P2MP MPLS LSP, since a single MPLS echo request may trigger 
  multiple echo replies, there are scaling concerns and some mitigation measures, e.g., containing the Echo Jitter TLV 
  in the MPLS echo request, as being specified in <xref target="RFC6425"/>, MAY be applied.</t>
  
  </section>
  
  <section title="Acknowledgements">
  
  <t> The authors would like to acknowledge Tarek Saad for his comments on the idea of using LSP Ping for MPLS IOAM 
  Capabilities Discovery.</t>
  
  </section>  
  
</middle>
  
<back>

    <references title="Normative References">
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8174"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8029"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.9359"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6425"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-mpls-mna-ioam"?>
    </references>
	
    <references title="Informative References">
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.9197"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.9326"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-mpls-mna-fwk"?>
    </references>
	
</back>
</rfc>

