<?xml version='1.0'?>   
    <!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM 'rfc2629.dtd' [ 
    	<!ENTITY rfc2629 PUBLIC '' 'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2629.xml'> 
		]>
<?rfc strict="yes"?>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="4"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-xiong-pce-nrp-id-00"
     ipr="trust200902">
  <!-- ***** FRONT MATTER ***** -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="PCEP Extension for NRP-ID">PCEP Extension for NRP-ID</title>
	
    <author fullname="Quan Xiong" initials="Q" surname="Xiong">
      <organization>ZTE Corporation</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>No.6 Huashi Park Rd</street>
          
          <city>Wuhan</city>
          
          <region>Hubei</region>
  
          <code>430223</code>

          <country>China</country>
        </postal>

        <phone></phone>

        <email>xiong.quan@zte.com.cn</email>
      </address>
    </author>
	
	
	<author fullname="Shaofu Peng" initials="S" surname="Peng">
      <organization>ZTE Corporation</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>No.50 Software Avenue</street>
          
          <city>Nanjing</city>
          
          <region>Jiangsu</region>
  
          <code>210012</code>

          <country>China</country>
        </postal>

        <phone></phone>

        <email>peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn</email>
      </address>
    </author>
	
	<author fullname="Vishnu Pavan Beeram" initials="V" surname="Beeram">
      <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street></street>
          
          <city></city>
          
          <region></region>
  
          <code></code>

          <country></country>
        </postal>

        <phone></phone>

        <email>vbeeram@juniper.net</email>
      </address>
    </author>

   	<author fullname="Tarek Saad" initials="T" surname="Saad">
      <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>

      <address>
        <postal>
          <street></street>
          
          <city></city>
          
          <region></region>
  
          <code></code>

          <country></country>
        </postal>

        <phone></phone>

        <email>tsaad@juniper.net</email>
      </address>
    </author>
	
	
    
   <date month="November" year="2021"/>	
    <area>Routing</area>
    <workgroup>PCE</workgroup>
    <keyword></keyword>
    <abstract>
     <t>This document proposes a set of extensions for PCEP to support the 
	identifier of Network Resource Partition (NRP-ID) as the constraint 
	of network slicing during path computation.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <!-- ***** MIDDLE MATTER ***** -->

  <middle>
  
   <section title="Introduction">
	
	<t><xref target="RFC5440"></xref> describes the Path Computation Element 
    Protocol (PCEP) which is used between a Path Computation Element (PCE) 
    and a Path Computation Client (PCC) (or other PCE) to enable computation 
    of Multi-protocol Label Switching (MPLS) for Traffic Engineering Label 
    Switched Path (TE LSP). PCEP Extensions for the Stateful PCE Model <xref target="RFC8231"></xref> 
	describes a set of extensions to PCEP to enable active control of MPLS-TE and 
	Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) tunnels. As depicted in <xref target="RFC4655"></xref>, a PCE MUST be able
	to compute the path of a TE LSP by operating on the TED and considering 
	bandwidth and other constraints applicable to the TE LSP service request. 
	The constraint parameters are provided such as metric, bandwidth, delay, 
	affinity, etc. However these parameters can't meet the network slicing 
	requirements.</t> 
	
	<t>According to 5G context, network slicing is the collection of a set of 
	technologies to support network service differentiation and meeting the 
	diversified requirements from vertical industries. IETF Network Slice is
	defined in <xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-definition"></xref>.
	The slices may be viewed as virtual networks and partition the network 
	resources into sub-topologies in transport network. Slice Aggregate is a 
	a collection of packets that match a slice policy selection criteria and 
	are given the same forwarding treatment as defined in <xref target="I-D.bestbar-teas-ns-packet"></xref>.
	And Network Resource Partition is the collection of resources that are used 
	to support a slice aggregate. The identifier of Network Resource Partition (NRP-ID)
    could be used to identify the slice and network resource and viewed as 
	constraints of network slicing when PCE is deployed. PCE MUST take the 
	identifier of slicing into consideration during path computation. </t>
	
	<t>This document proposes a set of extensions for PCEP to support the 
	NRP-ID as the constraint of network slicing during path computation.</t>
  
   </section>

   <section title="Conventions used in this document">	 	
    <section title="Terminology">
	<t>The terminology is defined as <xref target="RFC5440"></xref> and <xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-definition"></xref>.</t>
   </section>
   
   <section title="Requirements Language">
    <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
    "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
    "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
    14 <xref target="RFC2119"></xref> <xref target="RFC8174"></xref> when,
    and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
    </section>
	
   </section>
   
   <section title="PCEP Extensions for Network Resource Partition">
   
   <t>As defined in <xref target="RFC5440"></xref> , the LSPA object is used to specify the
   LSP attributes to be taken into account by the PCE during path
   computation such as constraints. This document proposes 
   new TLV for the LSPA object to carry TE constraints in Network Slicing.</t>
  
   <section title="NRP-ID TLV">
   
  <t>The NRP-ID TLV is optional and is defined to carry the slice specific
   constraint. PCEP message needs to carry NRP-ID to let the scope of
   path calculation to be limited in a specific network resources partition.</t>

   <t>There are many control plane technologies to realize network slice.  Some
   control plane technologies may directly maintain resources per slice
   granularity in the link-state database, only for the case with small
   slice scalability. <xref target="I-D.bestbar-teas-ns-packet"></xref> proposes a more
   scalable slicing scheme.  The resource information in link-state
   database is identified by NRP-ID to distinguish the logical topologies
   corresponding to different slice-aggregate.  Within the controller, a
   slice-aggregate includes one or more slices mapped to it.  If the
   number of slices is small, the resources per slice granularity can be
   maintained directly in the link-state database.  In this case,
   different slice may be mapped to different slice-aggregate.  If the
   number of slices is large, it is not recommended to maintain the
   slice granularity resources in the link-state database, but the
   aggregated granularity.</t>
   
   
   <t>It is required to define a NRP-ID constraint in the TE purpose
   definition of overlay service.  For example, VPN routes may have Color attribute 
   (refer to <xref target="I-D.ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps"></xref>  and
   <xref target="I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy"></xref>).  
   Color represents aspecific TE purpose, which can contain an NRP-ID.</t>
   
   <t>When the controller receives the path computation request with a NRP-
   ID constraint, it can use the resources identified by specific NRP-ID
   in TED to calculate the path. PCE may maintain resources per path within
   the resource pool identified by NRP-ID.</t>
   
   <t>In a PCReq message, a PCC MAY insert one NRP-ID TLV to indicate the
   slice based virtual network that MUST be considered by the PCE.  The
   PCE will perform path computation based on the intra-domain or inter-
   domain sub-topology identified by the specific NRP-ID, that can be used 
   to find the corresponding customized topology or referenced topology, 
   and corresponding resources.</t>
   
   <t>In a PCRep/PCInit/PCUpd message, the NRP-ID TLV MAY be carried so as
   to provide the network slicing information for the computed path.
   The headend may put the NRP-ID, or other information that can be 
   deduced to a NRP-ID, to an encapsulated data packet.</t>

  <t>The format of the NRP-ID TLV is shown as Figure 1:</t>
    
   <figure title="Figure 1: NRP-ID TLV" align="center">
         <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
		
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |         Type=TBD1             |            Length=4           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           NRP-ID                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
	
	   ]]></artwork>
  <postamble></postamble>
 </figure>

   <t>The code point for the TLV type is TBD1. The TLV length is 4 octets.</t>

   <t>NRP-ID (32 bits): indicates the identifier of Network Resource Partition 
   to represent an IETF Network Slice that is defined in <xref target="I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-definition"></xref>.</t>
 
   </section>

   
   </section>

   
    
   <section title="Security Considerations">
    <t>TBA</t>
   </section>

    <section anchor="Acknowledgements" title="Acknowledgements">
      <t>TBA</t>
    </section>
	
	<section anchor="IANA" title="IANA Considerations">
	<t>IANA is requested to make allocations from the registry, as follows: </t>
	
     <texttable anchor="table">
     <ttcol align = 'left'> Type </ttcol>
     <ttcol align = 'left'> TLV </ttcol>
     <ttcol align = 'left'> Reference </ttcol>
     <c> TBD1 </c>
     <c> NRP-ID TLV</c>
     <c>[this document] </c>
	 
     </texttable>
     </section>
	
  </middle>

  <!--  *****BACK MATTER ***** -->

  <back>
  
    <references title="Normative References">
    <?rfc include='reference.RFC.2119'?>
	<?rfc include='reference.RFC.5440'?>
	<?rfc include='reference.RFC.8174'?>
	<?rfc include='reference.RFC.8231'?>
	<?rfc include='reference.RFC.4655'?>
	<?rfc include='reference.I-D.ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps'?>
	<?rfc include='reference.I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy'?>
	<?rfc include='reference.I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-definition'?>
	<?rfc include='reference.I-D.bestbar-teas-ns-packet'?>	
    </references>
        
  </back>
</rfc>
