<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rfc category="info"
     docName="draft-zeng-mcp-network-measurement-00"
     ipr="trust200902"
     submissionType="IETF"
     xml:lang="en"
     version="3">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="MCP NetMeas">
      MCP-based Network Measurement Framework:
      Using Model Context Protocol for Intelligent Network Measurement
    </title>
    <author fullname="Guanming Zeng" initials="G." surname="Zeng">
      <organization>Huawei</organization>
      <address><email>zengguanming@huawei.com</email></address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Jianwei Mao" initials="J." surname="Mao">
      <organization>Huawei</organization>
      <address><email>maojianwei@huawei.com</email></address>
    </author>
    <date year="2025"/>
    <abstract>
      <t>This document proposes a framework for intelligent network measurement
      using the Model Context Protocol (MCP). By treating network devices as
      MCP servers and network controllers as MCP clients, this framework
      enables natural language-driven, AI-assisted network measurement
      operations. The framework leverages MCP's standardized communication
      protocol to provide real-time network performance monitoring,
      intelligent fault diagnosis, topology discovery, and automated
      measurement workflows. This document describes the architecture,
      use cases, and security considerations for implementing MCP-based
      network measurement systems.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section anchor="intro" title="Introduction">
      <t>Traditional network measurement approaches often require specialized
      tools, complex configurations, and expert knowledge. As networks grow
      in complexity and scale, there is an increasing need for more
      intelligent and automated measurement solutions. The Model Context
      Protocol (MCP) provides a standardized framework for enabling
      communication between AI systems and external data sources.</t>
      <t>This document proposes leveraging MCP to create an intelligent
      network measurement framework where:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>Network devices (routers, switches, firewalls) act as MCP servers</li>
          <li>Network controllers or management systems act as MCP clients</li>
          <li>Natural language queries drive measurement operations</li>
          <li>AI systems assist in analysis and decision-making</li>
        </ul>
      
      <t>The key benefits of this approach include:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li><strong>Natural Language Interface</strong>: Network operators can perform measurements using natural language queries</li>
          <li><strong>AI-Assisted Analysis</strong>: Intelligent analysis of measurement results and anomaly detection</li>
          <li><strong>Standardized Communication</strong>: Uniform protocol across different vendor devices</li>
          <li><strong>Automated Workflows</strong>: Reduced manual intervention in measurement processes</li>
        </ul>
      
    </section>

    <section anchor="terminology" title="Terminology">
      <t>The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”,
      “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “NOT RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and
      “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in
      BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only
      when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
      <t><strong>MCP Server</strong>: A network device that exposes measurement
      capabilities and data through the Model Context Protocol.</t>
      <t><strong>MCP Client</strong>: A network controller or management system
      that initiates measurement requests through MCP.</t>
      <t><strong>Measurement Resource</strong>: Data exposed by MCP servers for
      network measurement (e.g., interface statistics, routing tables).</t>
      <t><strong>Measurement Tool</strong>: Functions exposed by MCP servers
      that can be invoked for active measurements (e.g., ping, traceroute).</t>
    </section>

    <section anchor="architecture" title="MCP-Based Network Measurement Architecture">
      <section anchor="arch-components" title="Architectural Components">
        <figure>
          <name>MCP Network Measurement Architecture</name>
          <artwork><![CDATA[
+------------------+          MCP Protocol         +------------------+
|                  |<----------------------------->|                  |
|  MCP Client      |   JSON-RPC 2.0 over           |  MCP Server      |
|  (Controller)    |   TCP/HTTP/WebSocket          |  (Network Device)|
|                  |                               |                  |
+------------------+                               +------------------+
        |                                                  |
        |                                                  |
        v                                                  v
+------------------+                               +------------------+
|                  |                               |                  |
|  AI/LLM System   |                               |  Network         |
|                  |                               |  Hardware        |
+------------------+                               +------------------+
          ]]></artwork>
        </figure>
      </section>

      <section anchor="comm-flow" title="Communication Flow">
        <t>The communication process involves five phases:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li><strong>Discovery Phase</strong>: MCP client discovers available MCP servers and their capabilities</li>
          <li><strong>Capability Negotiation</strong>: Client and server negotiate supported measurement features</li>
          <li><strong>Measurement Execution</strong>: Client requests measurements using natural language or structured queries</li>
          <li><strong>Data Collection</strong>: Server provides measurement data through resources or tool execution</li>
          <li><strong>Analysis and Response</strong>: Client processes results, potentially with AI assistance</li>
        </ul>
      </section>

      <section anchor="server-capabilities" title="MCP Server Capabilities">
        <t>MCP servers (network devices) MUST expose:</t>
        <t>Measurement Resources:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>Interface statistics (bandwidth, utilization, errors)</li>
          <li>Routing information (tables, protocols, neighbors)</li>
          <li>Device performance metrics (CPU, memory)</li>
          <li>Network topology data (LLDP/CDP information)</li>
        </ul>
        <t>Measurement Tools:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>Connectivity tests (ping, traceroute)</li>
          <li>Performance measurements (throughput, latency)</li>
          <li>Protocol-specific diagnostics</li>
          <li>Configuration validation tools</li>
        </ul>
      </section>

      <section anchor="client-capabilities" title="MCP Client Capabilities">
        <t>MCP clients (controllers) MAY provide:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li><strong>Sampling capabilities</strong>: For complex measurement scenarios</li>
          <li><strong>Root context</strong>: Measurement scope and boundaries</li>
          <li><strong>User interaction</strong>: For measurement confirmation and authorization</li>
        </ul>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="use-cases" title="Use Cases">
      <section anchor="performance-monitoring" title="Real-time Network Performance Monitoring">
        <t><strong>Scenario</strong>: Network operator wants to check link utilization across core routers.</t>
        <t><strong>MCP Interaction</strong>:</t>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
Operator: "Show me the current utilization of all core router interfaces"
MCP Client: Discovers core routers and requests interface statistics
MCP Server: Provides Resources containing interface utilization data
MCP Client: Aggregates and presents data with AI-generated insights
        ]]></artwork>
      </section>

      <section anchor="fault-diagnosis" title="Intelligent Fault Diagnosis">
        <t><strong>Scenario</strong>: Troubleshooting connectivity issues between two sites.</t>
        <t><strong>MCP Interaction</strong>:</t>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
Operator: "Diagnose connectivity issues between Site A and Site B"
MCP Client: Identifies relevant devices and requests diagnostic tools
MCP Server: Provides Tools: [traceroute, ping, show interfaces, show route]
MCP Client: Executes diagnostic sequence and analyzes results
        ]]></artwork>
      </section>

      <section anchor="topology-discovery" title="Network Topology Discovery">
        <t><strong>Scenario</strong>: Automated mapping of network topology.</t>
        <t><strong>MCP Interaction</strong>:</t>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
Operator: "Discover and map the current network topology"
MCP Client: Requests topology information from seed devices
MCP Server: Provides Resources: [neighbors table, interface status, VLAN info]
MCP Client: Builds topology graph using AI-assisted correlation
        ]]></artwork>
      </section>

      <section anchor="capacity-planning" title="Capacity Planning and Trend Analysis">
        <t><strong>Scenario</strong>: Predict future capacity needs based on current usage patterns.</t>
        <t><strong>MCP Interaction</strong>:</t>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
Operator: "Analyze capacity trends for all WAN links"
MCP Client: Collects historical utilization data
MCP Server: Provides Resources: [historical statistics, error counters]
MCP Client: AI analysis generates capacity planning recommendations
        ]]></artwork>
      </section>

      <section anchor="security-incident" title="Security Incident Response Measurement">
        <t><strong>Scenario</strong>: Measure and analyze potential security threats.</t>
        <t><strong>MCP Interaction</strong>:</t>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
Operator: "Investigate unusual traffic patterns on border routers"
MCP Client: Requests security-related measurements
MCP Server: Provides Tools: [ACL hit counts, flow analysis, threat detection]
MCP Client: Correlates security events with network measurements
        ]]></artwork>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="protocol-operations" title="Protocol Operations">
      <section anchor="request-format" title="Measurement Request Format">
        <t>Measurement requests MUST follow MCP protocol specifications with the following structure:</t>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "name": "network_measurement_tool",
    "arguments": {
      "target": "device_or_interface",
      "measurement_type": "ping_throughput_latency",
      "parameters": {
        "count": 10,
        "interval": 1,
        "timeout": 5
      }
    }
  },
  "id": "measurement_request_001"
}
        ]]></artwork>
      </section>

      <section anchor="response-format" title="Measurement Response Format">
        <t>Measurement responses MUST include:</t>
        <artwork><![CDATA[
{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "result": {
    "measurement_id": "measurement_request_001",
    "timestamp": "2025-10-18T10:30:00Z",
    "device_id": "router_core_01",
    "results": {
      "avg_latency_ms": 25.3,
      "min_latency_ms": 24.1,
      "max_latency_ms": 28.7,
      "packet_loss_percent": 0.0,
      "throughput_mbps": 987.2
    },
    "metadata": {
      "measurement_duration": 15,
      "path_taken": ["router1", "router2", "router3"]
    }
  },
  "id": "measurement_request_001"
}
        ]]></artwork>
      </section>

      <section anchor="error-handling" title="Error Handling">
        <t>MCP servers MUST implement appropriate error handling for:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>Unsupported measurement types</li>
          <li>Device capability limitations</li>
          <li>Resource exhaustion scenarios</li>
          <li>Security policy violations</li>
        </ul>
        <t>Error responses MUST follow JSON-RPC 2.0 error format with MCP-specific error codes.</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="security" title="Security Considerations">
      <t>The Model Context Protocol enables powerful capabilities through arbitrary
      data access and code execution paths. With this power comes important
      security and trust considerations that all implementers must carefully
      address.</t>

      <section anchor="auth-authz" title="Authentication and Authorization">
        <t>MCP-based network measurement systems MUST implement:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li><strong>Strong Authentication</strong>: All MCP communications MUST be authenticated using industry-standard mechanisms (TLS mutual authentication, OAuth 2.0, etc.)</li>
          <li><strong>Role-Based Access Control</strong>: Different measurement capabilities MUST be restricted based on user roles and privileges</li>
          <li><strong>Device Authorization</strong>: Network devices MUST verify client authorization before exposing sensitive measurement data</li>
        </ul>
      </section>

      <section anchor="data-privacy" title="Data Privacy and Confidentiality">
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li><strong>Encryption in Transit</strong>: All MCP communications MUST use TLS 1.3 or higher</li>
          <li><strong>Data Minimization</strong>: Only necessary measurement data SHOULD be exposed</li>
          <li><strong>Access Logging</strong>: All measurement requests and responses MUST be logged for audit purposes</li>
        </ul>
      </section>

      <section anchor="tool-security" title="Measurement Tool Security">
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li><strong>Tool Validation</strong>: All measurement tools exposed by MCP servers MUST be validated for security vulnerabilities</li>
          <li><strong>Resource Limits</strong>: Measurement tools MUST implement appropriate resource limits to prevent DoS attacks</li>
          <li><strong>Input Sanitization</strong>: All measurement parameters MUST be validated and sanitized</li>
        </ul>
      </section>

      <section anchor="ai-security" title="AI/LLM Security Considerations">
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li><strong>Prompt Injection Protection</strong>: Natural language interfaces MUST implement protection against malicious prompt injection</li>
          <li><strong>Result Sanitization</strong>: Measurement results MUST be sanitized before AI processing</li>
          <li><strong>Model Security</strong>: AI models used for analysis MUST be protected against adversarial inputs</li>
        </ul>
      </section>

      <section anchor="device-security" title="Network Device Security">
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li><strong>Least Privilege</strong>: Network devices MUST expose only necessary measurement capabilities</li>
          <li><strong>Rate Limiting</strong>: Measurement requests MUST be rate-limited to prevent abuse</li>
          <li><strong>Network Segmentation</strong>: MCP traffic SHOULD be isolated in management networks</li>
        </ul>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section anchor="iana" title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>This document has no IANA actions.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>

  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      <reference anchor="RFC2119" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119">
        <front>
          <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
          <author initials="S." surname="Bradner"/>
          <date year="1997"/>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC8174" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174">
        <front>
          <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
          <author initials="B." surname="Leiba"/>
          <date year="2017"/>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC8259" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8259">
        <front>
          <title>The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format</title>
          <author initials="T." surname="Bray"/>
          <date year="2017"/>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="STD" value="90"/>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8259"/>
      </reference>
    </references>

    <references title="Informative References">
      <reference anchor="MCP-SPEC">
        <front>
          <title>Model Context Protocol Specification 2025-06-18</title>
          <author><organization>Anthropic</organization></author>
          <date year="2025"/>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="URL" value="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-06-18/basic"/>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC1157" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1157">
        <front>
          <title>Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)</title>
          <author initials="J." surname="Case"/>
          <author initials="M." surname="Fedor"/>
          <author initials="M." surname="Schoffstall"/>
          <author initials="J." surname="Davin"/>
          <date year="1990"/>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="1157"/>
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC3954" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3954">
        <front>
          <title>Cisco Systems NetFlow Services Export Version 9</title>
          <author initials="B." surname="Claise"/>
          <date year="2004"/>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="3954"/>
      </reference>
    </references>


  </back>
</rfc>